Volume 108, Issue 7, Pages (April 2015)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cell Traction Forces Direct Fibronectin Matrix Assembly Christopher A. Lemmon, Christopher S. Chen, Lewis H. Romer Biophysical Journal Volume 96, Issue.
Advertisements

Agarose-Dextran Gels as Synthetic Analogs of Glomerular Basement Membrane: Water Permeability Jeffrey A. White, William M. Deen Biophysical Journal Volume.
Volume 111, Issue 7, Pages (October 2016)
Mapping Three-Dimensional Stress and Strain Fields within a Soft Hydrogel Using a Fluorescence Microscope  Matthew S. Hall, Rong Long, Chung-Yuen Hui,
Goran Žagar, Patrick R. Onck, Erik van der Giessen  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 109, Issue 8, Pages (October 2015)
Volume 98, Issue 12, Pages (June 2010)
Jeffrey G. Jacot, Andrew D. McCulloch, Jeffrey H. Omens 
Shijie He, Chenglin Liu, Xiaojun Li, Shaopeng Ma, Bo Huo, Baohua Ji 
Volume 107, Issue 11, Pages (December 2014)
Philipp J. Albert, Ulrich S. Schwarz  Biophysical Journal 
Local Viscoelastic Properties of Live Cells Investigated Using Dynamic and Quasi-Static Atomic Force Microscopy Methods  Alexander Cartagena, Arvind Raman 
Form and Function in Cell Motility: From Fibroblasts to Keratocytes
Maxim E. Dokukin, Nataliia V. Guz, Igor Sokolov  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 103, Issue 6, Pages (September 2012)
Volume 107, Issue 5, Pages (September 2014)
Volume 101, Issue 3, Pages (August 2011)
Nanopore Sequencing: Forcing Improved Resolution
Joshua S. McLane, Lee A. Ligon  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 111, Issue 10, Pages (November 2016)
Quantifying Cell Adhesion through Impingement of a Controlled Microjet
Volume 108, Issue 3, Pages (February 2015)
Viscoplasticity Enables Mechanical Remodeling of Matrix by Cells
Worms under Pressure: Bulk Mechanical Properties of C
Anil K. Dasanna, Christine Lansche, Michael Lanzer, Ulrich S. Schwarz 
Volume 114, Issue 1, Pages (January 2018)
Volume 109, Issue 5, Pages (September 2015)
Volume 107, Issue 8, Pages (October 2014)
Stiffness Tomography by Atomic Force Microscopy
Volume 110, Issue 8, Pages (April 2016)
Nanonet Force Microscopy for Measuring Cell Forces
Erin L. Baker, Roger T. Bonnecaze, Muhammad H. Zaman 
Taeyoon Kim, Margaret L. Gardel, Ed Munro  Biophysical Journal 
Probing Red Blood Cell Morphology Using High-Frequency Photoacoustics
Cell Movement Is Guided by the Rigidity of the Substrate
Stationary Gating of GluN1/GluN2B Receptors in Intact Membrane Patches
A Dynamic Biochemomechanical Model of Geometry-Confined Cell Spreading
Viscoelasticity as a Biomarker for High-Throughput Flow Cytometry
Drift and Behavior of E. coli Cells
Guidance of Cell Migration by Substrate Dimension
Volume 107, Issue 11, Pages (December 2014)
Teuta Pilizota, Joshua W. Shaevitz  Biophysical Journal 
Hongqiang Ma, Jianquan Xu, Jingyi Jin, Yi Huang, Yang Liu 
Focal Adhesion Kinase Stabilizes the Cytoskeleton
Volume 99, Issue 8, Pages (October 2010)
Volume 105, Issue 10, Pages (November 2013)
Volume 97, Issue 5, Pages (September 2009)
Volume 114, Issue 2, Pages (January 2018)
Venkat Maruthamuthu, Margaret L. Gardel  Biophysical Journal 
Integrin Molecular Tension within Motile Focal Adhesions
Volume 112, Issue 4, Pages (February 2017)
Dana N. Moses, Michael G. Pontin, J. Herbert Waite, Frank W. Zok 
Volume 108, Issue 10, Pages (May 2015)
Interaction of Oxazole Yellow Dyes with DNA Studied with Hybrid Optical Tweezers and Fluorescence Microscopy  C.U. Murade, V. Subramaniam, C. Otto, Martin.
Mohd Almie Alias, Pascal R. Buenzli  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 105, Issue 10, Pages (November 2013)
Prisca Schär-Zammaretti, Job Ubbink  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 97, Issue 1, Pages (July 2009)
Systems Biophysics: Multiscale Biophysical Modeling of Organ Systems
Volume 97, Issue 5, Pages (September 2009)
A New Angle on Microscopic Suspension Feeders near Boundaries
Anil K. Dasanna, Christine Lansche, Michael Lanzer, Ulrich S. Schwarz 
Volume 114, Issue 6, Pages (March 2018)
Jeffrey G. Jacot, Andrew D. McCulloch, Jeffrey H. Omens 
Ai Kia Yip, Pei Huang, Keng-Hwee Chiam  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 96, Issue 12, Pages (June 2009)
The Layered Structure of Coronary Adventitia under Mechanical Load
Volume 101, Issue 9, Pages (November 2011)
Quantitative Modeling and Optimization of Magnetic Tweezers
Viscoplasticity Enables Mechanical Remodeling of Matrix by Cells
Presentation transcript:

Volume 108, Issue 7, Pages 1604-1612 (April 2015) The Effect of Substrate Stiffness, Thickness, and Cross-Linking Density on Osteogenic Cell Behavior  Conleth A. Mullen, Ted J. Vaughan, Kristen L. Billiar, Laoise M. McNamara  Biophysical Journal  Volume 108, Issue 7, Pages 1604-1612 (April 2015) DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2015.02.022 Copyright © 2015 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 (A) Schematic showing wedge-shaped gel formation. Gels ranged from a height of 0 to 150 μm across a horizontal distance of 50 mm. (B) Gel height was confirmed by recording the change in the vertical position of the microscope relative to the stage required to focus on the top surface of the gel. Biophysical Journal 2015 108, 1604-1612DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2015.02.022) Copyright © 2015 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 (A) Schematic of an MC3T3-E1 cell applying force to a fibrous substrate. The force applied by the cell is transferred through the focal adhesion complexes and resisted by the gel. (B) Boundary conditions placed on micromechanics model. A shear load of 1 N was applied to the nodes to simulate the forces exerted by the cell at the cell-substrate interface. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2015 108, 1604-1612DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2015.02.022) Copyright © 2015 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Representative images of MC3T3-E1 cells on polyacrylamide gels of (A) 600 Pa, (B) 9.6 kPa, and (C) 38.4 kPa and collagen gels cross-linked with (D) 0 mM EDAC, (E) 50 mM EDAC, and (F) 150 mM EDAC. White arrows on (A) indicate multiple cells grouped together; and (G) cell spread area of MC3T3-E1 cells cultured on polyacrylamide gels of ∼70 μm. (a) Indicates statistically higher than 0.6 kPa to 4.8 kPa gels. (b) Indicates statistically higher than 0.6 kPa to 9.6 kPa gels. (c) Indicates statistically higher than 0.6 kPa to 19.2 kPa gels. p < 0.05. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2015 108, 1604-1612DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2015.02.022) Copyright © 2015 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Cell spread area of MC3T3-E1 cells cultured on wedge-shaped soft (1.2 kPa) polyacrylamide gels of various thicknesses. (a) Indicates statistically difference to cells cultured on 1 μm thick gel. (b) Indicates statistical difference to cells cultured on 3 μm thick gel. p < 0.05. Biophysical Journal 2015 108, 1604-1612DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2015.02.022) Copyright © 2015 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Cell area (μm2) of MC3T3-E1 cells cultured on wedge-shaped crosslinked collagen substrates. The average cell area at relevant thickness for each gel is presented. The average cell area on flat gels (∼70 μm thick) is represented by the respective markers for each concentration of crosslinking agent. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2015 108, 1604-1612DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2015.02.022) Copyright © 2015 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 ALP activity normalized to DNA content measured in cells cultured on (A) collagen gels and (B) polyacrylamide gels, for 7 days. (a) Indicates significantly higher activity than cells cultured on PA gels of 4.8 kPa and below. (b) Indicates significantly higher activity than cells cultured on PA gels of 9.6 kPa and below. p < 0.05. Biophysical Journal 2015 108, 1604-1612DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2015.02.022) Copyright © 2015 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Equivalent shear stiffness of nonfibrous polyacrylamide and fibrous cross-linked collagen gels of different thicknesses as calculated using ABAQUS software. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2015 108, 1604-1612DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2015.02.022) Copyright © 2015 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 8 Force is transferred mainly through the fibers, which span the entire gel depth in a noncross-linked fibrous gel (A), whereas force is transferred through multiple adjoined fibers in a fully cross-linked gel (B). To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2015 108, 1604-1612DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2015.02.022) Copyright © 2015 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions