Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages (November 2007)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Biochemical Specialization within Arabidopsis RNA Silencing Pathways
Advertisements

Xuan Li, Carrie M. Stith, Peter M. Burgers, Wolf-Dietrich Heyer 
Volume 67, Issue 1, Pages e3 (July 2017)
How an RNA Ligase Discriminates RNA versus DNA Damage
Sebastian D Fugmann, David G Schatz  Molecular Cell 
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
Haley D.M. Wyatt, Shriparna Sarbajna, Joao Matos, Stephen C. West 
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages (August 2005)
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 1999)
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (December 2005)
Erik D. Larson, W. Jason Cummings, David W. Bednarski, Nancy Maizels 
Saving the Ends for Last: The Role of Pol μ in DNA End Joining
DNase H Activity of Neisseria meningitidis Cas9
Replication-Independent Histone Deposition by the HIR Complex and Asf1
RAG1/2-Mediated Resolution of Transposition Intermediates
Volume 31, Issue 4, Pages (August 2008)
Volume 40, Issue 4, Pages (November 2010)
Volume 64, Issue 3, Pages (November 2016)
Commitment to Splice Site Pairing Coincides with A Complex Formation
Ben B. Hopkins, Tanya T. Paull  Cell 
Gracjan Michlewski, Sonia Guil, Colin A. Semple, Javier F. Cáceres 
Tn10 Transposition via a DNA Hairpin Intermediate
Single-Stranded DNA Cleavage by Divergent CRISPR-Cas9 Enzymes
Tanya T. Paull, Martin Gellert  Molecular Cell 
Volume 35, Issue 1, Pages (July 2009)
Stephen Schuck, Arne Stenlund  Molecular Cell 
Hairpin Coding End Opening Is Mediated by RAG1 and RAG2 Proteins
Polynucleotide Ligase Activity of Eukaryotic Topoisomerase I
RNA Polymerase Pausing Regulates Translation Initiation by Providing Additional Time for TRAP-RNA Interaction  Alexander V. Yakhnin, Helen Yakhnin, Paul.
Crystal Structure of Human Mre11: Understanding Tumorigenic Mutations
Programmable RNA Cleavage and Recognition by a Natural CRISPR-Cas9 System from Neisseria meningitidis  Beth A. Rousseau, Zhonggang Hou, Max J. Gramelspacher,
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (November 2000)
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages (March 2007)
HMGN Proteins Act in Opposition to ATP-Dependent Chromatin Remodeling Factors to Restrict Nucleosome Mobility  Barbara P. Rattner, Timur Yusufzai, James.
Base Excision Repair of Oxidative DNA Damage Activated by XPG Protein
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (November 2001)
Regulation of Telomere Elongation by the Cyclin-Dependent Kinase CDK1
Molecular Architecture of the Human Pre-mRNA 3′ Processing Complex
Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages (December 1997)
Volume 41, Issue 5, Pages (March 2011)
Volume 32, Issue 1, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (October 2017)
Claudia Schneider, James T. Anderson, David Tollervey  Molecular Cell 
Pierre-Henri L Gaillard, Eishi Noguchi, Paul Shanahan, Paul Russell 
Chromatin Constrains the Initiation and Elongation of DNA Replication
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (November 2001)
Brh2 Promotes a Template-Switching Reaction Enabling Recombinational Bypass of Lesions during DNA Synthesis  Nayef Mazloum, William K. Holloman  Molecular.
Mu Transpositional Recombination: Donor DNA Cleavage and Strand Transfer in trans by the Mu Transposase  Harri Savilahti, Kiyoshi Mizuuchi  Cell  Volume.
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (November 2001)
Nbs1 Converts the Human Mre11/Rad50 Nuclease Complex into an Endo/Exonuclease Machine Specific for Protein-DNA Adducts  Rajashree A. Deshpande, Ji-Hoon.
Replication-Independent Histone Deposition by the HIR Complex and Asf1
Hairpin Opening and Overhang Processing by an Artemis/DNA-Dependent Protein Kinase Complex in Nonhomologous End Joining and V(D)J Recombination  Yunmei.
Volume 54, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
Detecting Folding Intermediates of a Protein as It Passes through the Bacterial Translocation Channel  Hiroshi Kadokura, Jon Beckwith  Cell  Volume 138,
Uncoupling Promoter Opening from Start-Site Scanning
Beyond Homing: Competition between Intron Endonucleases Confers a Selective Advantage on Flanking Genetic Markers  Heidi Goodrich-Blair, David A Shub 
Excision of the Drosophila Mariner Transposon Mos1
Regulation of Yeast mRNA 3′ End Processing by Phosphorylation
Structural and Mechanistic Analysis of the Slx1-Slx4 Endonuclease
Transcriptional Regulation by p53 through Intrinsic DNA/Chromatin Binding and Site- Directed Cofactor Recruitment  Joaquin M Espinosa, Beverly M Emerson 
Scott J Diede, Daniel E Gottschling  Current Biology 
Generating Crossovers by Resolution of Nicked Holliday Junctions
Michael J. McIlwraith, Stephen C. West  Molecular Cell 
The V(D)J Recombinase Efficiently Cleaves and Transposes Signal Joints
An SOS Inhibitor that Binds to Free RecA Protein: The PsiB Protein
H3K4me3 Stimulates the V(D)J RAG Complex for Both Nicking and Hairpinning in trans in Addition to Tethering in cis: Implications for Translocations  Noriko.
Assembly of a Double Hexameric Helicase
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 1999)
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages (January 2001)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages 638-651 (November 2007) Sae2 Is an Endonuclease that Processes Hairpin DNA Cooperatively with the Mre11/Rad50/Xrs2 Complex  Bettina M. Lengsfeld, Alison J. Rattray, Venugopal Bhaskara, Rodolfo Ghirlando, Tanya T. Paull  Molecular Cell  Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages 638-651 (November 2007) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.11.001 Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Expression and DNA-Binding Activity of Recombinant Sae2 (A) Schematic representation of full-length wild-type Sae2 and mutants G270D, 5D (residues indicated changed to aspartate), 5A (residues indicated changed to alanine), ΔN (Δ aa 21–173), and ΔC (Δ aa 251–345). (B) SDS-PAGE of purified Sae2 wild-type and mutant proteins, ∼750 ng total protein each. (C) Wild-type (WT) and mutant Sae2 proteins were incubated with a 249 bp double-stranded DNA substrate and analyzed in a 8% native polyacrylamide gel in the presence of WT or R20M (RM) MRX complex. Protein-DNA complex 1 and complex 2 are indicated (described in text). Molecular Cell 2007 28, 638-651DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2007.11.001) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Nuclease Activities of MR and MRX Complexes (A) MRX was incubated with a 5′ 32P-labeled 46 bp DNA substrate containing a 4 nt recessed 3′ end in 1 mM MnCl2 or 5 mM MgCl2 with wild-type Sae2 protein as indicated. (B) The Rad50S MR(R20M)X complex was assayed in comparison to the wild-type complex as in (A) in 1 mM MnCl2. (C) The nuclease-deficient complexes M(D16A)R and M(Mre11-3)R were assayed in comparison to the wild-type MR complex as in (A) in 1 mM MnCl2. Molecular Cell 2007 28, 638-651DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2007.11.001) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Sae2 Cleaves Hairpin DNA (A) Wild-type MR and Sae2 were incubated with a 3′ 32P-labeled hairpin DNA substrate with 1 mM MnCl2 and 0.5 mM ATP as indicated and separated in a denaturing polyacrylamide gel. Substrate was also incubated with Mung Bean nuclease as a control to show the location of hairpin cut at the tip (MB). Numbers in the “M” lane indicate the positions of DNA standards run in the same gel. (B) Reactions were performed as in (A) with Sae2 only, 5 mM MgCl2, and internally labeled hairpin substrates as shown. (C) Reactions were performed with substrates identical to those in (B) except lacking the hairpin loops. Molecular Cell 2007 28, 638-651DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2007.11.001) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Sae2 and MRX Cooperatively Cleave Hairpin Structures (A) Wild-type MRX and Sae2 were incubated in 5 mM MgCl2 with an internally 32P-labeled hairpin DNA substrate as in Figure 3B. The primary cleavage products (arrow) are not cut at the tip of the hairpin but in the single-stranded overhang as shown in the diagram. MB control as in Figure 3. (B) Reactions were performed as in (A) but with substrates lacking the hairpin loop. (C) Wild-type MRX and Sae2 were incubated in 5 mM MgCl2 with an internally 32P-labeled hairpin DNA substrate with the opposite polarity compared to the substrate shown in (A). (D) Wild-type MRX and wild-type and mutant Sae2 proteins were incubated in 5 mM MgCl2 with an internally 32P-labeled hairpin DNA substrate as in (B). (E) Wild-type Sae2 and wild-type MRX and Rad50S MR(R20M)X complexes were assayed as in (A). Molecular Cell 2007 28, 638-651DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2007.11.001) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Mre11 Exonuclease Activity Facilitates Sae2 Hairpin Removal (A) An internally 32P-labeled double-hairpin DNA substrate was incubated first with wild-type MRX in 1 mM MnCl2 for 20 min; Sae2 was then added with 5 mM MgCl2, and the reactions were continued for an additional 30 min before separation on a denaturing polyacrylamide gel. MB control as in Figure 3. (B) Reactions were performed as in (A) but with wild-type MR and Mre11 nuclease-deficient complexes M(D16A)R and M(Mre11-3)R as indicated. (C) Hairpin cleavage assays as in (A) except that the substrate has a nick instead of a gap. (D) Model of MRX/Sae2 hairpin processing. Dotted arrow represents predicted MRX/Sae2-independent cleavage of the cruciform; circle-like object represents MRX 3′ to 5′ exonuclease activity; bold arrow represents Sae2 cleavage. The location of the cruciform cleavage site is assumed to be at the base of the cruciform as shown, but this has not been demonstrated in vivo. Molecular Cell 2007 28, 638-651DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2007.11.001) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Sae2 Cleaves Single-Stranded DNA in Branched DNA Structures (A) Diagram of DNA substrates 1–4 with locations of 32P labels (asterisks) and summary of predominant cleavage sites (arrows) as shown. (B) Wild-type and mutant Sae2 proteins were incubated with Substrate 1 in 5 mM MgCl2 as indicated. (C) Reactions with wild-type Sae2 on Substrates 1, 2, and 3 as in (B). (D) Wild-type Sae2 protein was incubated as in (B) with Substrate 4. (E) Wild-type Sae2 protein incubated as in (B) with substrates 1, 5, and 6. Molecular Cell 2007 28, 638-651DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2007.11.001) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions