Volume 23, Issue 10, Pages (June 2018)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages (February 2012)
Advertisements

Volume 16, Issue 8, Pages (August 2016)
TIA-1 Self-Multimerization, Phase Separation, and Recruitment into Stress Granules Are Dynamically Regulated by Zn2+  Joseph B. Rayman, Kevin A. Karl,
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages (August 2004)
Volume 57, Issue 3, Pages (February 2015)
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (April 2008)
Volume 24, Issue 8, Pages e5 (August 2017)
T-Cell Response to Gluten in Patients With HLA-DQ2
Volume 14, Issue 7, Pages (July 2007)
Volume 23, Issue 10, Pages (October 2015)
Volume 24, Issue 7, Pages (July 2016)
Volume 136, Issue 5, Pages (May 2009)
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages (October 2015)
Volume 38, Issue 4, Pages (May 2010)
Small-Molecule Targeting of E3 Ligase Adaptor SPOP in Kidney Cancer
Volume 39, Issue 6, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 115, Issue 2, Pages (October 2003)
ADP-Specific Sensors Enable Universal Assay of Protein Kinase Activity
Alice C.L. Len, Shimona Starling, Maitreyi Shivkumar, Clare Jolly 
Anne L. Sapiro, Patricia Deng, Rui Zhang, Jin Billy Li  Cell Reports 
Sherilyn Grill, Valerie M. Tesmer, Jayakrishnan Nandakumar 
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages (July 2012)
Optimizing Glycosyltransferase Specificity via “Hot Spot” Saturation Mutagenesis Presents a Catalyst for Novobiocin Glycorandomization  Gavin J. Williams,
Volume 13, Issue 8, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages (February 2012)
Crystal Structure of Tetrameric Arabidopsis MYC2 Reveals the Mechanism of Enhanced Interaction with DNA  Teng-fei Lian, Yong-ping Xu, Lan-fen Li, Xiao-Dong.
Volume 38, Issue 4, Pages (May 2010)
Volume 16, Issue 8, Pages (August 2016)
B Cell Receptor Activation and Chemical Induction Trigger Caspase-Mediated Cleavage of PIAS1 to Facilitate Epstein-Barr Virus Reactivation  Kun Zhang,
Myosin VI Undergoes Cargo-Mediated Dimerization
Structure-Guided Design of Fluorescent S-Adenosylmethionine Analogs for a High- Throughput Screen to Target SAM-I Riboswitch RNAs  Scott F. Hickey, Ming C.
Diabetes Mutations Delineate an Atypical POU Domain in HNF-1α
Volume 27, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (September 2014)
Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 67, Issue 6, Pages e6 (September 2017)
Identification of Small Molecule Inhibitors that Distinguish between Non-Transferrin Bound Iron Uptake and Transferrin-Mediated Iron Transport  Jing Xu.
Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs Are Caspase Inhibitors
Inactivation of the SMN Complex by Oxidative Stress
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages (April 2018)
Volume 24, Issue 12, Pages e5 (December 2017)
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages (March 2014)
Volume 26, Issue 8, Pages e6 (February 2019)
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (June 2009)
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages (March 2017)
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (February 2015)
MicroRNA Destabilization Enables Dynamic Regulation of the miR-16 Family in Response to Cell-Cycle Changes  Olivia S. Rissland, Sue-Jean Hong, David P.
Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages (August 2012)
Volume 15, Issue 10, Pages (June 2016)
Meigang Gu, Kanagalaghatta R. Rajashankar, Christopher D. Lima 
Cristina Esteva-Font, Puay-Wah Phuan, Marc O. Anderson, A.S. Verkman 
Synthetic Oligonucleotides Inhibit CRISPR-Cpf1-Mediated Genome Editing
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (August 2008)
Dan Yu, Rongdiao Liu, Geng Yang, Qiang Zhou  Cell Reports 
Volume 22, Issue 11, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages (December 2015)
TIA-1 Self-Multimerization, Phase Separation, and Recruitment into Stress Granules Are Dynamically Regulated by Zn2+  Joseph B. Rayman, Kevin A. Karl,
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Non-acylated Wnts Can Promote Signaling
Volume 20, Issue 9, Pages (August 2017)
Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages (February 2015)
Structural and Mechanistic Analysis of the Slx1-Slx4 Endonuclease
Volume 68, Issue 3, Pages e5 (November 2017)
Volume 25, Issue 9, Pages e3 (September 2017)
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages (November 2014)
Volume 17, Issue 8, Pages (August 2010)
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (February 2014)
Volume 1, Issue 2, Pages (February 2012)
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 23, Issue 10, Pages 3091-3101 (June 2018) Small-Molecule Inhibitors Disrupt let-7 Oligouridylation and Release the Selective Blockade of let-7 Processing by LIN28  Longfei Wang, R. Grant Rowe, Adriana Jaimes, Chunxiao Yu, Yunsun Nam, Daniel S. Pearson, Jin Zhang, Xiangyu Xie, William Marion, Gregory J. Heffron, George Q. Daley, Piotr Sliz  Cell Reports  Volume 23, Issue 10, Pages 3091-3101 (June 2018) DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.04.116 Copyright © 2018 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Cell Reports 2018 23, 3091-3101DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2018.04.116) Copyright © 2018 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Design of a Fluorescence Polarization Assay to Identify LIN28 Inhibitors (A) Schematic view of the human LIN28 and preE-let-7f-1 used in our fluorescence polarization assay. CSD and ZKD are colored as cyan and red, respectively. In preE-let-7f-1, residues that bind to the CSD and ZKD are also colored (PDB: 5UDZ). (B) Fluorescence polarization assay of LIN28 binding to preE-let-7f-1 (n = 3 replicates). Error bars denote mean ± SEM. (C) Competition fluorescence polarization assay using unlabeled preE-let-7f-1 (D) Competition fluorescence polarization assay using an unlabeled CSD riboprobe. CSD RNA is sufficient to inhibit LIN28/let-7 interaction. (E and F) Competition fluorescence polarization assay using unlabeled ZKD riboprobe. ZKD RNA (UAGGAGA) is a weak competitor to preE-let-7f-1. LIN28ΔF73A (F) shows more increased sensitivity than LIN28Δ (E) for detecting ZKD inhibitions by UAGGAGA RNA. The green star in (B)–(F) represents 3’ FAM label. The black arrow in (B) and (F) indicates the F73A mutation site. Cell Reports 2018 23, 3091-3101DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2018.04.116) Copyright © 2018 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 High-Throughput Screening Assay Identifies a Panel of Candidate Compounds Inhibiting the LIN28:let-7 Interaction (A) High-throughput screening assay strategy (left and middle panel). Correlations between duplicate screening results (right panel). Each spot represents a compound screened. The x axis and y axis are the duplicate fluorescence polarization (FP) readings of the same molecule. All compounds lie near the diagonal line, indicating that the screening assay is robust. (B) Left: dose-response FP assays overlays. Right: distributions of the IC50s for 350 cherry-picked inhibitors. (C) A selection of oligouridylation assays to identify LIN28 inhibitors that can block LIN28-mediated oligouridylation. ∗pre-let-7g; ∗∗oligouridylated pre-let-7g. The gray-shaded triangle is an illustration of the selectivity of the described screening pipeline, including the numbers of compounds at each step. Cell Reports 2018 23, 3091-3101DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2018.04.116) Copyright © 2018 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Structure of Identified LIN28 Inhibitors that Can Abolish LIN28-Mediated Oligouridylation Cell Reports 2018 23, 3091-3101DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2018.04.116) Copyright © 2018 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 TPEN Is a Potent Inhibitor of the LIN28 ZKD (A) H-15N HSQC spectrum of mouse LIN28:preE-let-7d complex with residue assignments. (B) Model representation of residues affected by TPEN that are evident through intensity changes. Modeling was done based on the crystal structure of mouse LIN28:preE-let-7d complex (PDB: 3TRZ). (C) Blowup spectrums showing that TPEN selectively affects ZKD but not CSD. Cell Reports 2018 23, 3091-3101DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2018.04.116) Copyright © 2018 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 LI71 Inhibits LIN28 by Competing for the RNA Binding Site in the CSD (A) LI71 inhibits the interactions between LIN28 and preE-let-7a, preE-let-7d, preE-let-7f, and preE-let-7g. The IC50 of LI71 in our primary fluorescence polarization assay is ∼7 μM. The IC50 of LI71 in oligouridylation assay is ∼27 μM. (B) Surface presentation of CSD and saturation transfer difference (STD) spectrum of LI71 in the presence of LIN28, preE-let-7, and LIN28 variants. When LI71 is in close contact with an irradiated bio-molecule, saturation transfer difference peaks can be observed. (C) Dose-response oligouridylation assay for LI71. ∗pre-let-7g; ∗∗oligouridylated pre-let-7g. The bottom band intensity is measured and plotted. LI71 shows an IC50 of 27 μM. (D) LI71 variants and their IC50s determined from dose-response fluorescence polarization assay. Cell Reports 2018 23, 3091-3101DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2018.04.116) Copyright © 2018 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 LI71 Inhibits LIN28 in Embryonic and Cancer Cell Lines (A) Schematic of the let-7-sensitive dual luciferase reporter assay. (B) HeLa clones expressing the dual luciferase let-7 sensor were incubated with either vehicle (DMSO) or 100 μM LI71 for 48 hr, at which time luciferase activity was measured (n = 5 biologic replicates; ∗p < 0.0001). (C) HeLa cells expressing LIN28A (A1) were treated with vehicle (DMSO) or the indicated concentrations of LI-71 for 48 hr, at which time luciferase activity was assayed (n = 3 biologic replicates; ∗p < 0.05, by Student’s t test compared to vehicle). (A–C) Error bars denote mean ± SEM. (D) K562 leukemia cells were incubated with 100 μM LI-71 or vehicle for 48 hr, at which time let-7 species were measured by qPCR (n = 6 replicates over two independent experiments; ∗p < 0.05). (E) DKO+A mESCs were incubated with 100 μM LI-71 or vehicle for 48 hr, at which time let-7 species were measured by qPCR (n = 6 replicates over two independent experiments; ∗p < 0.0001). Cell Reports 2018 23, 3091-3101DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2018.04.116) Copyright © 2018 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 5-(Methylamino)nicotinic Acid Presents a Minimal Scaffold to Inhibit LIN28 (A) Dose-response fluorescence polarization assay of 5-(methylamino)nicotinic acid (MNA) (LI101) shows an IC50 of 76 μM (n = 3 replicates). Error bars denote mean ± SEM. (B) Oligouridylation assay with positive control (RNA), negative control (DMSO), and 5-(methylamino)nicotinic acid. ∗Oliouridylated pre-let-7g. (C) HeLa clones expressing the dual luciferase let-7 sensor were incubated with either vehicle (DMSO) or 5-(methylamino)nicotinic acid at various concentrations (50 μM, 100 μM, 150 μM, 250 μM, and 500 μM) for 48 hr, at which time luciferase activity was measured (n = 5 replicates; ∗p < 0.0001). Error bars denote mean ± SEM. Cell Reports 2018 23, 3091-3101DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2018.04.116) Copyright © 2018 The Authors Terms and Conditions