Philippe Pibarot et al. JIMG 2015;8:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MITRAL REGURGITATION. 2D ASSESSMENT LOOK CAREFULLY AT THE MITRAL VALVE APPARATUS.
Advertisements

Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Versus Transthoracic Echocardiography for the Assessment and Quantification of Aortic Regurgitation in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter.
Aortic Regurgitation Mohammed AL Ghamdi.
Date of download: 6/25/2016 Copyright © The American College of Cardiology. All rights reserved. From: 4D Flow CMR in Assessment of Valve-Related Ascending.
Date of download: 9/19/2016 Copyright © The American College of Cardiology. All rights reserved. From: Assessment of aortic regurgitation by transesophageal.
PULMONARY REGURGITATION- SEVERITY ASSESSMENT - fazil bishara
Mackram F. Eleid et al. JIMG 2016;9:
Tareq Ibrahim et al. JIMG 2009;2:
Patrick O’Gara et al. JIMG 2008;1:
Philipp Blanke et al. JIMG 2015;8:
Gaku Nakazawa et al. JIMG 2009;2:
Kenshi Hayashi et al. JACEP 2016;2:
Tom F. Brouwer et al. JACEP 2016;2:89-96
Junjie Zhang et al. JACEP 2017;j.jacep
Junjie Zhang et al. JACEP 2017;3:
Example of Subendocardial Defects With Normal Transmural WT on Apical 3-Chamber View With RTMCE Apical 3-chamber view of RTMCE with power modulation (iE33,
Ryoji Nagoshi et al. JCIN 2016;9:e107-e109
Konstantin Krieger et al. JACEP 2017;j.jacep
Repair of posterior mitral valve prolapse with a novel leaflet plication clip in an animal model  Eric N. Feins, MD, Haruo Yamauchi, MD, PhD, Gerald R.
Megan Coylewright et al. JCIN 2015;8:
Niyada Naksuk et al. JACEP 2016;2:
Nicolaj C. Hansson et al. JACC 2016;68:
Carlos A. Roldan et al. JIMG 2013;6:
Kenshi Hayashi et al. JACEP 2016;2:
Adam B. Greenbaum et al. JACEP 2015;1:
Eran Leshem et al. JACEP 2018;j.jacep
Hidehiko Hara et al. JIMG 2008;1:92-93
Matthew J. Kolek et al. JACEP 2017;j.jacep
K.R. Julian Chun et al. JACEP 2017;3:
Elias Botvinick et al. JIMG 2008;1:
Philippe Taghji et al. JACEP 2017;j.jacep
Daniele Muser et al. JACEP 2017;j.jacep
Jason H. Rogers et al. JCIN 2015;8:
Nina C. Wunderlich et al. JIMG 2015;8:
Sagit Ben Zekry et al. JIMG 2008;1:
Jamil Aboulhosn et al. JCIN 2017;10:53-63
Nina Ajmone Marsan et al. JIMG 2009;2:
James S. Gammie et al. JACC 2018;71:25-36
Nicole M. Bhave et al. JIMG 2018;11:
Nicole M. Bhave et al. JIMG 2018;11:
Nicole M. Bhave et al. JIMG 2018;11:
Nicole M. Bhave et al. JIMG 2018;11:
Thomas H. Marwick et al. JIMG 2009;2:80-84
Hiram G. Bezerra et al. JCIN 2009;2:
Ronan Abgral et al. JIMG 2017;10:
Matthew J. Kolek et al. JACEP 2018;4:
Pál Maurovich-Horvat et al. JIMG 2010;3:
Maria Alejandra Restrepo-Cordoba et al. JCIN 2016;9:e137-e139
John A. Sallach et al. JIMG 2009;2:
Philippe Pibarot et al. JIMG 2015;8:
Philipp Blanke et al. JIMG 2015;8:
Kelley C. Stewart et al. JIMG 2011;4:37-46
Zeenat Safdar et al. JCHF 2014;2:
Kelley C. Stewart et al. JIMG 2011;4:37-46
Philipp Blanke et al. JIMG 2015;8:
Patric Biaggi et al. JIMG 2011;4:94-97
John A. Ormiston et al. JCIN 2008;1:
Philippe Pibarot et al. JIMG 2015;8:
Pál Maurovich-Horvat et al. JIMG 2010;3:
Kazuaki Negishi et al. JIMG 2015;8:
Itzhak Kronzon et al. JIMG 2015;8:
Bushra S. Rana et al. JIMG 2010;3:
Leah M. Wright et al. JIMG 2016;9:
James A. Goldstein et al. JIMG 2008;1:
Federico Migliore et al. JIMG 2013;6:32-41
Stephen H. Little JIMG 2012;5:
Figure 13b.  Assessment of stent jet patency in a patient with a transplanted kidney in the right iliac fossa who presented with deteriorating renal function.
Mackram F. Eleid et al. JIMG 2016;9:
OCT Characterization of Calcified Lesions and the Effects of Lithoplasty and Stenting (A) Optimal coherence tomography (OCT) cross sections acquired before.
Bar graphs of ratios of diffusion characteristics between the two sides of four structures in a patient with mild traumatic brain injury, using the immediate.
Presentation transcript:

Philippe Pibarot et al. JIMG 2015;8:340-360 Online Video 19 Representative images of the different classes of severity according to the 7-class grading scheme (Table 1). The videos #13 to 36 show the PSAX, PLAX, AP5, and AP3 color Doppler TTE views for each patient. Below are presented the PVR severity grade in the 7-class scheme (with the corresponding grading in the 3-class scheme) as well as the main the criteria that were used to determine the severity class of PVR. Patient #5 (see Videos # 13-16): Trace PVR (i.e. trace in 3-class scheme). Criteria: jet width at its origin and jet circumferential extent (<10%). There is one small jet located at 3 o’clock in the PSAX view. Patient #6 (see Videos # 17-20): Mild PVR (i.e. mild in 3-class scheme). Criteria: width of the jets at their origin. There are 2 small jets, one anterior (1-2 o’clock in the PSAX view) and one posterior. The posterior jet is not visualized in the PSAX and PLAX views most likely due to shadowing phenomenon but it is clearly visible in the AP5 view. The circumferential extent of the anterior jet may be overestimated due to the eccentric nature of this jet and to the fact that the imaging plane is not exactly at the level of the vena contracta. Patient #7 (see Videos # 21-24): mild-to-moderate PVR (i.e. mild in 3-class scheme). Criteria: width of the anterior jet at its origin, 2 jets, circumferential extent (20%). There are 2 anterior jets (2 and 11 o’clock in the PSAX view). One of the anterior jet is very eccentric has a larger origin width. There is a small posterior jet visible in the AP3 view. There is also a trace central AR visible in the AP5 and AP3 views. Patient #8 (see Videos # 25-28): moderate PVR (i.e. moderate in 3-class scheme). Criteria: width of the anterior jet at its origin, 2 jets, circumferential extent (27%), jet path visible. There are 2 jets: one anterior (1-3 o’clock in the PSAX view) with moderately large origin width in the PLAX and Ap5 views and one lateral jet only visible in the PSAX view (7-8 o’clock). The path of the anterior jet is visible in the PLAX view. There is also a mild central AR visible in AP5 and AP3 views. Patient #9 (see Videos # 29-32): moderate PVR (i.e. moderate in 3-class scheme). Criteria: width of the anterior jet at its origin, several jets, circumferential extent (23%), jet path visible. There are several contiguous anterior jets (in the 1-4 o’clock section in the PSAX view) with one jet having moderately large origin width in the PLAX and Ap5 views. The jets are not well visualized in the AP3 view. Patient #10 (seeVideos # 33-36): moderate-to-severe PVR (i.e. moderate in 3-class scheme). Criteria: width of the jets at their origin, 2 major jets, jet path visible along the stent, abnormal shape of the stent. There is an important anterior jet that has a large origin in the PSAX, PLAX, AP5, and AP3 views. This is an example where the jet circumferential extent (17%) assessed in the PSAX view would markedly underestimate the severity of PVR. Indeed, the anterior jet does not occupy a large portion of the stent circumference but the width of its vena contract is large. Furthermore, the posterior jet, which also has a large origin width in the AP5 and AP3 views, is not visualized in the PSAX view, which contributes to the underestimation of PVR extent. The anterior jet is located in regard of an important deformation of the THV stent. The path of the jet along the stent is visible in the AP5 view for the posterior jet. Philippe Pibarot et al. JIMG 2015;8:340-360 American College of Cardiology Foundation