K-Ras Populates Conformational States Differently from Its Isoform H-Ras and Oncogenic Mutant K-RasG12D  Jillian A. Parker, Alicia Y. Volmar, Spiro Pavlopoulos,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Structure of the Rho Family GTP-Binding Protein Cdc42 in Complex with the Multifunctional Regulator RhoGDI  Gregory R. Hoffman, Nicolas Nassar, Richard.
Advertisements

Bhalchandra Jadhav, Klemens Wild, Martin R. Pool, Irmgard Sinning 
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages (April 2008)
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages (July 2005)
Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages (May 2013)
Transformation Efficiency of RasQ61 Mutants Linked to Structural Features of the Switch Regions in the Presence of Raf  Greg Buhrman, Glenna Wink, Carla.
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages (September 2013)
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages (September 2013)
Structure of a Transient Intermediate for GTP Hydrolysis by Ras
Volume 24, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 16, Issue 11, Pages (November 2008)
Allosteric Effects of the Oncogenic RasQ61L Mutant on Raf-RBD
Volume 23, Issue 12, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 23, Issue 8, Pages (August 2015)
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2007)
Crystal Structure of the Rab9A-RUTBC2 RBD Complex Reveals the Molecular Basis for the Binding Specificity of Rab9A with RUTBC2  Zhe Zhang, Shanshan Wang,
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages (April 2016)
Structural Basis of DNA Loop Recognition by Endonuclease V
Crystal Structures of Ral-GppNHp and Ral-GDP Reveal Two Binding Sites that Are Also Present in Ras and Rap  Nathan I. Nicely, Justin Kosak, Vesna de Serrano,
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages e3 (May 2017)
Solution and Crystal Structures of a Sugar Binding Site Mutant of Cyanovirin-N: No Evidence of Domain Swapping  Elena Matei, William Furey, Angela M.
Volume 23, Issue 8, Pages (August 2015)
Elif Eren, Megan Murphy, Jon Goguen, Bert van den Berg  Structure 
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Sebastiano Pasqualato, Jacqueline Cherfils  Structure 
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Leonardus M.I. Koharudin, Angela M. Gronenborn  Structure 
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 20, Issue 9, Pages (September 2012)
Volume 23, Issue 5, Pages (May 2015)
Volume 4, Issue 11, Pages (November 1996)
Volume 23, Issue 12, Pages (December 2015)
Structural Roles of Monovalent Cations in the HDV Ribozyme
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages (April 2002)
Volume 17, Issue 10, Pages (October 2009)
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages (February 1999)
Functional Plasticity in the Substrate Binding Site of β-Secretase
Crystal Structure of the p53 Core Domain Bound to a Full Consensus Site as a Self- Assembled Tetramer  Yongheng Chen, Raja Dey, Lin Chen  Structure  Volume.
Antonina Roll-Mecak, Chune Cao, Thomas E. Dever, Stephen K. Burley 
Insights into Oncogenic Mutations of Plexin-B1 Based on the Solution Structure of the Rho GTPase Binding Domain  Yufeng Tong, Prasanta K. Hota, Mehdi.
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ski7 Is a GTP-Binding Protein Adopting the Characteristic Conformation of Active Translational GTPases  Eva Kowalinski, Anthony.
Volume 25, Issue 9, Pages e3 (September 2017)
Transformation of MutL by ATP Binding and Hydrolysis
Volume 17, Issue 10, Pages (October 2009)
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (June 2015)
Tianjun Zhou, Liguang Sun, John Humphreys, Elizabeth J. Goldsmith 
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (April 2006)
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages (March 2007)
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (March 2008)
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Volume 13, Issue 10, Pages (October 2005)
DNA Synthesis across an Abasic Lesion by Human DNA Polymerase ι
Structural Insight into AMPK Regulation: ADP Comes into Play
Volume 17, Issue 7, Pages (July 2009)
Crystal Structures of the Thi-Box Riboswitch Bound to Thiamine Pyrophosphate Analogs Reveal Adaptive RNA-Small Molecule Recognition  Thomas E. Edwards,
Crystal Structures of Human GlyRα3 Bound to Ivermectin
GTP-Dependent K-Ras Dimerization
NMR Polypeptide Backbone Conformation of the E
Structural Basis of RIP1 Inhibition by Necrostatins
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
Structural Basis for Activation of ARF GTPase
Structural Switch of the γ Subunit in an Archaeal aIF2αγ Heterodimer
Presentation transcript:

K-Ras Populates Conformational States Differently from Its Isoform H-Ras and Oncogenic Mutant K-RasG12D  Jillian A. Parker, Alicia Y. Volmar, Spiro Pavlopoulos, Carla Mattos  Structure  Volume 26, Issue 6, Pages 810-820.e4 (June 2018) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2018.03.018 Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Conserved Motifs in Ras GTPase The P loop (10GAGGVGKS17) is shown in yellow, 57DTAG60, as well as catalytic residue Q61, are in dark green, the 116NKCD119 motif is in blue, and the 143ETSAK147 motif is in magenta. Switch I residues mentioned in the text are in red and so are the oxygen atoms of water molecules. The Mg2+ ion is in light green. The figure is a composite of two H-Ras structures. The protein, nucleotide, Mg2+ and water molecules heavy atoms are as in the coordinates with PDB: 3K8Y, with deuterium atoms added at locations on GppNHp and Mg2+ coordinating water molecules as observed in the neutron crystal structure with PDB: 4RSG. The deuterium atoms are shown in light gray and labeled with D. Structure 2018 26, 810-820.e4DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2018.03.018) Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 WT K-Ras-GppCH2p Is Conformationally Distinct from the WT H-Ras-GppNHp Isoform (A) WT K-Ras-GppCH2p (green) aligned with WT H-Ras-GppNHp (gray, PDB: 3K8Y) highlights differences in the switch I and switch II regions. (B) WT K-Ras-GppCH2p exhibits a state 1 conformation with T35 away from the active site, where a third water molecule replaces the hydroxyl side chain to coordinate the Mg2+ (light green). Waters are shown as red spheres. The electron density for the 2Fo−Fc electron density map is shown in blue and contoured to 1σ. Structure 2018 26, 810-820.e4DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2018.03.018) Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 1H NMR Spectra of WT K-Ras and its Mutants Bound to GDP, GppNHp, and WT K-Ras-GppNHp in Complex with Raf-RBD at 275 K Peaks labeled D and T denote a difference in chemical shift seen for the downfield resonance near 13 ppm in K-Ras-GDP versus K-Ras proteins bound to GppNHp, respectively. Important resonances in the 10.0–11.0 ppm range are labeled as A, B, X, and Z. See Figure S1 for 31P NMR spectrum of K-Ras-GppNHp. For assignments of peaks T and X see Figures S2–S4. For an educated guess on the proton associated with peak Z see Figure S5. For the spectra of K-Ras bound to GppCH2p and GTPγ-S see Figure S6. Structure 2018 26, 810-820.e4DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2018.03.018) Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 1H NMR Spectra of WT H-Ras and its Mutants Bound to GppNHp at 275 K Peaks labeled D and T denote a difference in chemical shift seen for the downfield resonance near 13 ppm in H-Ras-GDP versus H-Ras proteins bound to a GppNHp, respectively. Important resonances in the 10.0–11.0 ppm range are labeled as A, B, X, and Z. See Figure S1 for 31P NMR spectrum of H-Ras-GppNHp. Structure 2018 26, 810-820.e4DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2018.03.018) Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Comparison of WT K-Ras and Oncogenic K-RasG12D (A) Inactive K-RasG12D-GDP (cyan, PDB: 4EPR) exhibits a unique conformation of Q61 in switch II that is not observed in WT K-Ras-GDP, where Q61 is disordered (wheat, molecule A from PDB: 5UK9). (B) In the K-RasG12D-GppNHp structure (purple, PDB: 4DSN) where switch 1 is “closed” over the active site, the Y32 and D12 side chains are coordinating the catalytically relevant bridging water molecule, while Q61 accepts an H bond from D12. The nucleophilic water molecule is also present in this structure. Both active site water molecules are absent in state 1 WT K-Ras-GppCH2p (green, molecule B from PDB: 5UK9). The state 2 switch I conformation of K-RasG12D-GppNHp is nearly identical to that in WT H-Ras-GppNHp (gray, PDB: 3K8Y). Structure 2018 26, 810-820.e4DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2018.03.018) Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Temperature Dependence of 1H Chemical Shifts in the H-Ras Proteins (A–C) 1H spectra were collected for (A) WT H-Ras-GppNHp, (B) H-RasT35S-GppNHp, and (C) H-RasY32A-GppNHp at 275, 280, 285, 288, and 295 K. Structure 2018 26, 810-820.e4DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2018.03.018) Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Temperature Dependence of 1H Chemical Shifts in the K-Ras Proteins (A–D) 1H spectra were collected for (A) WT K-Ras-GppNHp, (B) K-RasT35S-GppNHp, (C) K-Ras-GppNHp in complex with Raf-RBD, and (D) K-RasG12D-GppNHp at 275, 280, 285, 288, and 295 K. Structure 2018 26, 810-820.e4DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2018.03.018) Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions