Orientation of the Myosin Light Chain Region by Single Molecule Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence Polarization Microscopy  Margot E. Quinlan, Joseph.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Masahiro Ueda, Tatsuo Shibata  Biophysical Journal 
Advertisements

Structural Changes of Cross-Bridges on Transition from Isometric to Shortening State in Frog Skeletal Muscle  Naoto Yagi, Hiroyuki Iwamoto, Katsuaki Inoue 
Madoka Suzuki, Hideaki Fujita, Shin’ichi Ishiwata  Biophysical Journal 
Measurement of Single Macromolecule Orientation by Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence Polarization Microscopy  Joseph N. Forkey, Margot E. Quinlan,
Volume 102, Issue 6, Pages (March 2012)
Volume 90, Issue 10, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 91, Issue 8, Pages (October 2006)
Volume 113, Issue 12, Pages (December 2017)
Volume 95, Issue 6, Pages (September 2008)
Orientational Changes of Crossbridges During Single Turnover of ATP
Calcium Regulation of Myosin-I Tension Sensing
Volume 93, Issue 1, Pages (July 2007)
Volume 88, Issue 4, Pages (April 2005)
Joseph M. Johnson, William J. Betz  Biophysical Journal 
Aleš Benda, Yuanqing Ma, Katharina Gaus  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 88, Issue 4, Pages (April 2005)
Self-Organization of Myosin II in Reconstituted Actomyosin Bundles
Volume 95, Issue 9, Pages (November 2008)
Volume 106, Issue 8, Pages (April 2014)
Volume 111, Issue 2, Pages (July 2016)
Serapion Pyrpassopoulos, Henry Shuman, E. Michael Ostap 
Jennifer L. Ross, Henry Shuman, Erika L.F. Holzbaur, Yale E. Goldman 
DNA Translocation Governed by Interactions with Solid-State Nanopores
The “Roll and Lock” Mechanism of Force Generation in Muscle
The “Roll and Lock” Mechanism of Force Generation in Muscle
Volume 96, Issue 2, Pages (January 2009)
Mechanical Distortion of Single Actin Filaments Induced by External Force: Detection by Fluorescence Imaging  Togo Shimozawa, Shin'ichi Ishiwata  Biophysical.
Regulation of Contraction by the Thick Filaments in Skeletal Muscle
Shiori Toba, Hiroyuki Iwamoto, Shinji Kamimura, Kazuhiro Oiwa 
Macromolecular Crowding Modulates Actomyosin Kinetics
Volume 103, Issue 4, Pages (August 2012)
Francesca Pennacchietti, Travis J. Gould, Samuel T. Hess 
Volume 79, Issue 2, Pages (August 2000)
Single-Molecule Analysis Reveals Differential Effect of ssDNA-Binding Proteins on DNA Translocation by XPD Helicase  Masayoshi Honda, Jeehae Park, Robert.
Abir M. Kabbani, Christopher V. Kelly  Biophysical Journal 
Naoto Yagi, Hiroyuki Iwamoto, Jun’ichi Wakayama, Katsuaki Inoue 
Volume 89, Issue 3, Pages (September 2005)
Using Atomic Force Microscopy to Study Nucleosome Remodeling on Individual Nucleosomal Arrays in Situ  H. Wang, R. Bash, J.G. Yodh, G. Hager, S.M. Lindsay,
Kinesin Moving through the Spotlight: Single-Motor Fluorescence Microscopy with Submillisecond Time Resolution  Sander Verbrugge, Lukas C. Kapitein, Erwin.
Volume 111, Issue 7, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 95, Issue 12, Pages (December 2008)
Direct Visualization of Lipid Domains in Human Skin Stratum Corneum's Lipid Membranes: Effect of pH and Temperature  I. Plasencia, L. Norlén, L.A. Bagatolli 
Volume 111, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
Samuel T. Hess, Watt W. Webb  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 88, Issue 5, Pages L30-L32 (May 2005)
Rapid Assembly of a Multimeric Membrane Protein Pore
Volume 113, Issue 1, Pages (July 2017)
Saswata Sankar Sarkar, Jayant B. Udgaonkar, Guruswamy Krishnamoorthy 
Dynamics of Active Semiflexible Polymers
Extracting Dwell Time Sequences from Processive Molecular Motor Data
Saswata Sankar Sarkar, Jayant B. Udgaonkar, Guruswamy Krishnamoorthy 
Blocking of Single α-Hemolysin Pore by Rhodamine Derivatives
Volume 85, Issue 5, Pages (November 2003)
Volume 76, Issue 4, Pages (April 1999)
Single-Molecule Three-Color FRET
Christina Karatzaferi, Marc K. Chinn, Roger Cooke  Biophysical Journal 
Felix Ruhnow, Linda Kloβ, Stefan Diez  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 113, Issue 10, Pages (November 2017)
Mechanical Coupling between Myosin Molecules Causes Differences between Ensemble and Single-Molecule Measurements  Sam Walcott, David M. Warshaw, Edward P.
Inherent Force-Dependent Properties of β-Cardiac Myosin Contribute to the Force- Velocity Relationship of Cardiac Muscle  Michael J. Greenberg, Henry Shuman,
Volume 88, Issue 6, Pages (June 2005)
Yongli Zhang, Junyi Jiao, Aleksander A. Rebane  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 115, Issue 12, Pages (December 2018)
Yufang Wang, Ling Guo, Ido Golding, Edward C. Cox, N.P. Ong 
Kevin McHale, Andrew J. Berglund, Hideo Mabuchi  Biophysical Journal 
Madoka Suzuki, Hideaki Fujita, Shin’ichi Ishiwata  Biophysical Journal 
Naoto Yagi, Hiroyuki Iwamoto, Jun’ichi Wakayama, Katsuaki Inoue 
Volume 95, Issue 9, Pages (November 2008)
Volume 108, Issue 8, Pages (April 2015)
Jennifer L. Ross, Henry Shuman, Erika L.F. Holzbaur, Yale E. Goldman 
Presentation transcript:

Orientation of the Myosin Light Chain Region by Single Molecule Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence Polarization Microscopy  Margot E. Quinlan, Joseph N. Forkey, Yale E. Goldman  Biophysical Journal  Volume 89, Issue 2, Pages 1132-1142 (August 2005) DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.104.053496 Copyright © 2005 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Colocalization of actin filaments with sparsely labeled myosin. Actin filaments labeled with AEDANS (blue) at Cys374 are decorated with HMM or S1. Labeled and unlabeled myosin fragments are mixed ∼1:1000 so individual rhodamine (red) molecules can be distinguished along the length of the actin filaments. When the decorated filaments are added in the presence of excess free HMM or S1, respectively, to a poly-L-lysine coated flow chamber, the filaments are aligned well, as pictured here, due to a balance between flow forces and attachment frequency. Biophysical Journal 2005 89, 1132-1142DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.104.053496) Copyright © 2005 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Typical single molecule polarized fluorescence data. Measurements were made from a single HMM(104-BR-115) molecule bound to an actin filament in the presence of apyrase as described in Materials and Methods. Alternation of excitation pathways (1 and 2) and excitation polarization (s and p) with simultaneous collection with two detector polarizations (x and y) produces eight measurements every 40ms. The numbers of photons detected by the APDs in each 10ms interval are plotted as eight polarized fluorescence intensities. The weighted sum (ITot(24)) of these intensities is plotted in black. The eight intensities are then fit to determine the orientation, β (red), α (green), slow wobble, δ (blue), and IFit (blue), a value proportional to the total intensity (minus background). The average angles for the molecule shown here are β=82°, α=35°, and δ=20°. The average χr2=2.2. The intensity levels and angles are constant as expected for actomyosin in the absence of ATP. A high β value is common for the highly polarized probe (104-BR-115). Biophysical Journal 2005 89, 1132-1142DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.104.053496) Copyright © 2005 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Large transitions apparent in the polarized fluorescence intensities of a rigor HMM(100-BR-108) molecule. Intervals discussed in the text are indicated by arrows at the top of the plots. The total intensity (ITot) remains constant, indicating that the transitions are not a result of photobleaching or an additional fluorophore passing through the detection region. The intensity transitions indicate an apparent orientation change (Δβ=24°) and a decrease in slow wobble (Δδ=18°) but no change in IFit. Biophysical Journal 2005 89, 1132-1142DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.104.053496) Copyright © 2005 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Kinetic analysis of transitions. (a) The interval durations (demonstrated by the arrows in Fig. 3) were plotted as histograms and fit with a single exponential. Here the fit to the histogram of S1(104-BR-115) is shown. The fitted curve indicates a rate constant (kdwell) of 1.14s−1 with r2=0.98. (B) The durations of the traces before photobleaching (the sum of intervals A and B in Fig. 3) were analyzed as in A. Here data for S1(104-BR-115) are shown that have kbleach=0.35s−1, r2=0.93. (C) ktrans is the difference between kdwell and kbleach as described in the text. kbleach and ktrans are highly correlated for many samples, including HMM, S1, RLC alone, and labeled actin. A linear relationship (solid line) is obtained with slope=1.97±0.35, and y-intercept=−0.01±0.22, r2=0.87. The linear fit was made excluding the apparent outlier, HMM(100-BR-108), in the lower right-hand corner. (□), samples without myosin; (Δ), HMM;, and (∇), S1. The solid circle is HMM(100-BR-108) in the presence of 1μM ATP. Dotted lines indicate the 95% confidence intervals. (♦), myosin V labeled with BR-calmodulin light chain. The diamonds correspond to 0, 1, and 5μM ATP in ascending order. Biophysical Journal 2005 89, 1132-1142DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.104.053496) Copyright © 2005 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Single molecule orientation distributions. The orientation of each molecule is found by fitting the average values of the eight polarized intensities to find the dipole orientation in the laboratory frame and then transforming those values into the actin frame to give β, α, and δ. Histograms are plotted with 3.4° bins and normalized to the same total area for comparison. Higher average β-values for (104-BR-115) relative to (100-BR-108) are apparent. α is approximately uniformly distributed. The average δ is 35–45° in all cases. The β-distributions were fit with one and two Gaussian components by minimizing −ln(L), as described in the text. Black lines are the best fits of single Gaussian components to the data; green lines are the best fit of two summed components. For both HMM cases, two components are clearly distinguished (see Table 1). For S1, the one and two distribution fits are similar, as reflected in the statistics shown in Table 1. HMM(100-BR-108) n=147; S1(100-BR-108) n=132; HMM(104-BR-115) n=111; and S1(104-BR-115) n=130. Biophysical Journal 2005 89, 1132-1142DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.104.053496) Copyright © 2005 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Three-dimensional orientation of myosin LCD. The polar angles βL and γL, measured for HMM (●) and S1 (■), are plotted. For comparison, polar angles measured in muscle fibers (○) with the same fluorescent probes by Hopkins et al. (13) are shown. Dashed lines connect pairs of heads from HMM or muscle fibers. Orientations of HMM and muscle fibers are in good agreement. Polar angles determined for S1 docked into cryoelectron micrographs (□) by Rayment et al. (4) are also shown. The orientation of S1 measured with the same technique is intermediate to the two-headed structures and S1 from cryoelectron microscopy is in the same angular vicinity. Biophysical Journal 2005 89, 1132-1142DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.104.053496) Copyright © 2005 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions