CLIC luminosity monitoring/re-tuning using beamstrahlung ?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Fast and Precise Beam Energy Measurement at the International Linear Collider Michele Viti.
Advertisements

EXTRACTION BEAM LOSS AT 1 TEV CM WITH TDR PARAMETERS Y. Nosochkov, G. White August 25, 2014.
Considerations about luminosity measurement and IR layout Mogens Dam, Alain Blondel and many others. Nicola Bacchetta, Helmut Burkhardt and Manuela Boscolo.
ATF2 Interaction Point Beam Size Monitor (Shintake Monitor) Status T. Yamanaka, M. Oroku, Y. Yamaguchi, S. Komamiya ( Univ. of Tokyo ), T. Suehara, Y.
GUINEA-PIG: A tool for beam-beam effect study C. Rimbault, LAL Orsay Daresbury, April 2006.
Zero Degree Extraction using an Electrostatic Separator Take another look at using an electrostatic separator and a weak dipole to allow a zero degree.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project  IR background issues and plans for Snowmass Jeff Gronberg/LLNL Linear Collider Workshop October 25, 2000.
27 June 2006Ken Moffeit1 Comparison of 2mrad and 14/20 mrad extraction lines Ken Moffeit ILC BDS 27 June 06.
January 15, 2005D. Rubin - Cornell1 CESR-c Status -Operations/Luminosity December/January vs September/October -Machine studies and instrumentation -Simulation.
The Detector and Interaction Region for a Photon Collider at TESLA
M. Woods (SLAC) Beam Diagnostics for test facilities of i)  ii) polarized e+ source January 9 –11, 2002.
Photon Collider at CLIC Valery Telnov Budker INP, Novosibirsk LCWS 2001, Granada, Spain, September 25-30,2011.
August 2005Snowmass Workshop IP Instrumentation Wolfgang Lohmann, DESY Measurement of: Luminosity (precise and fast) Energy Polarisation.
Karsten Büßer Beam Induced Backgrounds at TESLA for Different Mask Geometries with and w/o a 2*10 mrad Crossing Angle HH-Zeuthen-LC-Meeting Zeuthen September.
Beijing, Feb 3 rd, 2007 LEPOL 1 Low Energy Positron Polarimetry for the ILC Sabine Riemann (DESY) On behalf of the LEPOL Collaboration.
Status of the Beamline Simulation A.Somov Jefferson Lab Collaboration Meeting, May 11, 2010.
SHMS Optics and Background Studies Tanja Horn Hall C Summer Meeting 5 August 2008.
CLIC main detector solenoid and anti-solenoid impact B. Dalena, A. Bartalesi, R. Appleby, H. Gerwig, D. Swoboda, M. Modena, D. Schulte, R. Tomás.
AWAKE Electron Spectrometer Simon Jolly, Lawrence Deacon, Matthew Wing 28 th January 2015.
Polarimetry at the LC Source Which type of polarimetry, at which energies for LC ? Sabine Riemann (DESY), LEPOL Group International Workshop on Linear.
Karsten Büßer Beam Induced Backgrounds at TESLA for Different Mask Geometries with and w/o a 2*10 mrad Crossing Angle LCWS 2004 Paris April 19 th 2004.
Analysis of Beamstrahlung Pairs ECFA Workshop Vienna, November 14-17, 2005 Christian Grah.
October 4-5, Electron Lens Beam Physics Overview Yun Luo for RHIC e-lens team October 4-5, 2010 Electron Lens.
ILC Meeting Vancouver July What Does Beam-strahlung Tell Us? William Morse - BNL.
Page 1 Overview and Issues of the MEIC Interaction Region M. Sullivan MEIC Accelerator Design Review September 15-16, 2010.
LCWS2004 Paris 1 Beam background study for GLC Tsukasa Aso, Toyama College of Maritime Technology and GLC Vertex Group H.Aihara, K.Tanabe, Tokyo Univ.
19 July 2006Ken Moffeit1 Comparison of 2mrad and 14/20 mrad extraction lines Ken Moffeit (via Eric Torrence) VLCW06 19 July 06.
Karsten Büßer Instrumentation of the Forward Region of the TESLA Detector International Europhysics Conference on High Energy Physics Aachen, July 19th.
BES-III Workshop Oct.2001,Beijing The BESIII Luminosity Monitor High Energy Physics Group Dept. of Modern Physics,USTC P.O.Box 4 Hefei,
TESLA R&D: Forward Region Achim Stahl DESY Zeuthen Cracow Tel Aviv Minsk Prague Colorado Protvino UC London Dubna.
CLIC Post-Collision Line and Dump Edda Gschwendtner, CERN for the Post-Collision Working Group Rob Appleby (CERN & Cockcroft Institute), Armen Apyan (CERN),
1 Experience at CERN with luminosity monitoring and calibration, ISR, SPS proton antiproton collider, LEP, and comments for LHC… Werner Herr and Rüdiger.
First Collision of BEPCII C.H. Yu May 10, Methods of collision tuning Procedures and data analysis Luminosity and background Summary.
ILC EXTRACTION LINE TRACKING Y. Nosochkov, E. Marin September 10, 2013.
An electron/positron energy monitor based on synchrotron radiation. I.Meshkov, T. Mamedov, E. Syresin, An electron/positron energy monitor based on synchrotron.
16 February 2009CLIC Physics & Detectors Konrad Elsener 1... some issues regarding the forward region... (“picking up” from Lucie Linssen, 29 Sept 2008)
Beam Physics Issue in BEPCII Commisionning Xu Gang Accelerator physics group.
Assessment of Physics, Applications and Construction Issues for the Proposed Magurele Short-Pulse Facility Silviu Olariu National Institute of Physics.
Electron Spectrometer: Status July 14 Simon Jolly, Lawrence Deacon 1 st July 2014.
September 2007SLAC IR WS Very Forward Instrumentation of the ILC Detector Wolfgang Lohmann, DESY Talks by M. Morse, W. Wierba, myself.
G.R.White: F.O.N. T. From Ground Motion studies by A.Seryi et al. (SLAC) ‘Fast’ motion (> few Hz) dominated by cultural noise Concern for structures.
1 O. Napoly ECFA-DESY Amsterdam, April 2003 Machine – Detector Interface : what is new since the TDR ? O. Napoly CEA/Saclay.
1 RTML Emittance Measurement Station Yuri Kubyshin (1), Robert Apsimon (2), Hector García (1,2) (1) Technical University of Catalonia (UPC) (2) CERN CLIC.
Very Forward Instrumentation: BeamCal Ch. Grah FCAL Collaboration ILD Workshop, Zeuthen Tuesday 15/01/2008.
MAIN DUMP LINE: BEAM LOSS SIMULATIONS WITH THE TDR PARAMETERS Y. Nosochkov E. Marin, G. White (SLAC) LCWS14 Workshop, Belgrade, October 7, 2014.
ODR Diagnostics for Hadron Colliders Tanaji Sen APC.
Initial proposal for the design of the luminosity calorimeter at a 3TeV CLIC Iftach Sadeh Tel Aviv University March 6th 2009
1 April 1 st, 2003 O. Napoly, ECFA-DESY Amsterdam Design of a new Final Focus System with l* = 4,5 m J. Payet, O. Napoly CEA/Saclay.
Emittance measurements for LI2FE electron beams
BeamCal Simulation for CLIC
Test of Hybrid Target at KEKB LINAC
E-beam scanner experience at FNAL
M. Sullivan for the SLAC SuperB Workshop Jan , 2009
Layout of Detectors for CLIC
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Dr. D. Z. LI & Prof. J. GAO Accelerator Center, IHEP
Final Focus Synchrotron Radiation
OTR based measurements for ELI-NP Gamma Beam Source
CLIC BDS tuning and luminosity signal
Other beam-induced background at the IP
FCC ee Instrumentation
AD & I : BDS Lattice Design Changes
Tony Hill Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Hongbo Zhu (IHEP, Beijing) On behalf of the CEPC Study Group
Profile measurements at CTF
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
Study of e+ e- background due to beamstrahlung for different ILC parameter sets Stephan Gronenborn.
Luminometer Integration at IR2
Specifications for the XFEL Beam Switchyard Kickers
The Effects of Beam Dynamics on CLIC Physics Potential
Presentation transcript:

CLIC luminosity monitoring/re-tuning using beamstrahlung ? Instrumentation Working Group T. Lefevre CLIC luminosity monitoring/re-tuning using beamstrahlung ? 1. Beamstrahlung etc. – from D. Schulte 2. Conceptual design of a CLIC post-collision beam-line (“spent beam”) – from A. Ferrari 3. How could one measure beamstrahlung photons - ideas from E. Bravin 4. Possible layout, background, open questions Courtesy of Konrad Elsener

Instrumentation Working Group CLIC 07 Instrumentation Working Group T. Lefevre 1. Beamstrahlung etc. – from D. Schulte

Instrumentation Working Group CLIC 07 Instrumentation Working Group T. Lefevre luminosity tuning: performed in BDS, using laser wires etc. ... a tedious, long procedure ... luminosity monitoring and re-tuning: ILC uses incoherent pairs – CLIC has problem: many coherent pairs

Instrumentation Working Group CLIC 07 Instrumentation Working Group T. Lefevre -> keep track of luminosity … "fast" signal needed (there will be changes of beam position, angle, waist …) … and correct for these changes -> possible signal: beamstrahlung

Instrumentation Working Group CLIC 07 Instrumentation Working Group T. Lefevre beamstrahlung photons: energies: from <1 GeV to <1.5 TeV (max. at > 1 TeV) rate: 2.4 photons per electron (positron) in beam, i.e. 1E+10 photons per bunch x 311 bunches  3E+12 photons per 207 ns pulse (repetition rate 50 Hz)                                      angular distribution: ± 50 mrad (full width) (2005 parameters) NB. all numbers for nominal collision parameters !

Instrumentation Working Group CLIC 07 Instrumentation Working Group T. Lefevre 3.

Instrumentation Working Group CLIC 07 Instrumentation Working Group T. Lefevre 20 mrad crossing angle – horizontal plane beam separation in the horizontal plane [m] distance from IP [m] H

Instrumentation Working Group CLIC 07 Instrumentation Working Group T. Lefevre distance from IP [m] 4 extraction magnets (- 3.2 mrad) 4 “C” magnets (+ 3.2 mrad) vertical displacement for 1.5 TeV beam [m] beam dump 16 quadrupoles (huge aperture !) V

Instrumentation Working Group CLIC 07 Instrumentation Working Group T. Lefevre distance from IP [m] somewhere around here... ? 4 extraction magnets (- 3.2 mrad) vertical displacement for 1.5 TeV beam [m] 4 “C” magnets (+ 3.2 mrad) wrong sign particle diagnositcs / dump E > 200 GeV V

Instrumentation Working Group CLIC 07 Instrumentation Working Group T. Lefevre > 130 m A. Ferrari, CLIC note 704

Instrumentation Working Group CLIC 07 Instrumentation Working Group T. Lefevre 3. How could one measure beamstrahlung photons - ideas from E. Bravin (18 July 2007 meeting) 3E+12 photons in 207 ns, E up to 1.5 TeV  better use a “thin” detector – “fast” (get information on the number of photons, can not get information on their energy) basic principle: converter + OTR monitor g -> e+e- (optical transition radiation) question: layout, backgrounds, etc. etc.

Instrumentation Working Group CLIC 07 Instrumentation Working Group T. Lefevre typical OTR monitor arrangements: e.g. “intensity” and profile e.g. “intensity” only CCD optics PM polished tube works at >10E+11 part. good pos. resolution (+ size of beam) “rad. hard” cameras exist... very slow almost “single counting”; very fast (< 1 ns) “radiation hard” sensitive to “direct hits” ATTENTION: No absolute calibration for the intensity !!

Instrumentation Working Group CLIC 07 Instrumentation Working Group T. Lefevre Pair Production (nuclear field) in 1 mm graphite (0.005 Xo ) 4.4 E+9 part. B.G. Signal pair production probability 1.8 E+9 part. photon energy [MeV]

Instrumentation Working Group CLIC 07 Instrumentation Working Group T. Lefevre A. Ferrari, CLIC note 704

Instrumentation Working Group CLIC 07 Instrumentation Working Group T. Lefevre top view < 1.5 TeV . > 200 GeV view through last C-magnet in beam direction (dimension in cm, from CLIC Note 704)

Instrumentation Working Group CLIC 07 Instrumentation Working Group T. Lefevre side view last C-magnet

Instrumentation Working Group CLIC 07 Instrumentation Working Group T. Lefevre background No. 1: synchrotron radiation photons pair production -> < 50 MeV particles solution (?): 10-3 Tm magnetic field (-> 15 mrad at 20 MeV) (if possible, sweep l.e. particles in H-plane, observe OTR light in V-plane) use “small” OTR screen at 5 m from converter (e.g. diameter 30 mm OTR screen) background No. 2: scattered electrons/positrons of all kinds -> to be studied background No. 3: neutrons (stay far away from IP and from dumps) -> to be studied

Instrumentation Working Group CLIC 07 Instrumentation Working Group T. Lefevre field 10-3 Tm side view last C-magnet z=95 m z=100 m

Instrumentation Working Group CLIC 07 Instrumentation Working Group T. Lefevre open questions: -> strength of C-magnets (separation beamstrahlung from particles > 100 mm (?)) -> investigate beamstrahlung distribution for various non-perfect conditions (e.g. Fig. 20 in CLIC note 704) -> introduce “realistic” monitor into simulations (?) and test the “tuning knobs” + everything overlooked or forgotten !

Instrumentation Working Group CLIC 07 Instrumentation Working Group T. Lefevre 5. Summary The option of using beamstrahlung photons for “fast” feedback and luminosity tuning at CLIC appears still valid. The technique using a converter plus OTR has several interesting features (e.g. change converter thickness for lower intensity running, different options for OTR detection, etc. etc.). Assuming that CLIC-Note 704 is the reference design for the post-collision beamlines, the location at about 100 m from the interaction point could be reasonable. “... affaire à suivre ...”

Instrumentation Working Group CLIC 07 Instrumentation Working Group T. Lefevre extraction magnet (“window-frame”) C - magnet A. Ferrari, CLIC note 704