MCAS-Alt and the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ACCOMMODATIONS MANUAL
Advertisements

State-wide Assessment Update for What Does TNs Alternate Assessment Program Look Like Now? Alternate Assessment General Assessment Alternate.
Grade-level and Competency Portfolios for 2014 MCAS-Alt
Monitoring Accommodations in Florida Karen Denbroeder Bureau of Exceptional Education and Student Services.
Using Assessment Data to Improve Student Achievement Massachusetts Department of Education Dan Wiener, Coordinator of Assessment for Students with Disabilities.
Implemented: November Credit by Demonstrated Mastery (CDM) is the process where Buncombe County Schools shall, based on a body-of-evidence, award.
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training Guide
ACCOMMODATIONS MANUAL How to Select, Administer, and Evaluate Use of Accommodations for Instruction and Assessment of Students with Disabilities.
IDENTIFICATION 1 PROPOSED REGULATORY CHANGECOMMENTS Implement a four step ELL identification process to ensure holistic and individualized decisions can.
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training Guide
IEP Team Decision-Making Eligibility Tool
Facts About the Florida Alternate Assessment Created from “Facts About the Florida Alternate Assessment Online at:
American Diploma Project Network A coalition of states committed to aligning high school standards, assessments, graduation requirements and accountability.
1. Goal: To prepare all students for success in college, work, and citizenship 2.
ASSESSING THE ENGLISH PROFICIENCY OF ENGLISH LEARNERS WITH DISABILITIES Presentation by: Audrey Lesondak EL – Education Consultant Office of Educational.
ASSESSMENT ACCOMMODATIONS How to Select, Administer, and Evaluate Use of Accommodations for Instruction and Assessment of Students with Disabilities Ohio.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction California High School Exit Examination Program Update Bilingual.
Wisconsin Extended Grade Band Standards
Assessing Students With Disabilities: IDEA and NCLB Working Together.
Dan Wiener Assessment Coordinator for Special Populations Massachusetts Department of Education How Massachusetts Uses Large-Scale Assessment Results to.
A Principled Approach to Accountability Assessments for Students with Disabilities CCSSO National Conference on Student Assessment Detroit, Michigan June.
October 2009 Oregon Department of Education 1 Diploma Options 2009.
PSSA-M January 19, 2012 LEA meeting January 19, 2012 LEA meeting.
Dispelling DAPA Myths Brian M. Touchette November 15, 2007 Center for Disabilities Studies University of Delaware & Delaware Department.
TEAM Coordinating Committee Training (TCC).  Introductions  Mission of the TEAM Program  Design of the TEAM Program  Overview of the Module Process.
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training January 2010.
STAAR Decision Making Process for LPAC for Teachers.
No Child Left Behind Impact on Gwinnett County Public Schools’ Students and Schools.
GEORGIA’S CRITERION-REFERENCED COMPETENCY TESTS (CRCT) Questions and Answers for Parents of Georgia Students February 11, 2009 Presented by: MCES.
Alignment as a Systemic Tool Classroom Instruction.
Universal Design for Learning (UDL) Where does it fit? 2016.
2016 Where does it fit? Universal Design for Learning (UDL)
Serving Students with Disabilities in Indiana
December 4, 2009 State Board of Education adopted:  Oregon Diploma  Modified Diploma  Extended Diploma  Alternative.
Closing the Educational Gap for Students with Disabilities Kristina Makousky.
STAAR Alternate is the state assessment for students with significant cognitive disabilities.
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
Review, Revise and Amend from Procedures for State Board Policy 74
Understanding the Alternate ACCESS for ELLs Individual Student Report
Volusia County Schools
“Grade-level” and “Competency” Portfolios
American Institutes for Research
Administrator of Inclusive Assessment
Title III of the No Child Left Behind Act
The Michigan Merit Curriculum (MMC), Personal Curriculums (PC) and Certificates of Completion (COC): Addressing the Needs of Students with ASD.
Assessment.
What States are Doing That Meet the 1% Cap
KY Alternate Assessment
December 15, 2016.
Build Your Own ESSA Explainer
ELA–Writing: Access Skills and Low Entry Points
STAAR Alternate is the state assessment for students with significant cognitive disabilities.
Federal Policy & Statewide Assessments for Students with Disabilities
MCAS-Alt “Grade-level” and “Competency” Portfolios
2018 OSEP Project Directors’ Conference
MCAS-Alt Update: What’s New for 2019?
ELE PROPOSED REGULATIONS and the LOOK ACT
TELPAS Alternate Student Eligibility
Orientation for District IEP Teams and Other Interested Staff
Accessibility Supports Training
Every Student Succeeds Act
New Mexico’s Alternate Assessments
WA-AIM 1% Participation Cap
Accessibility Supports Training
“Read by Grade Three” Law
Accessibility Supports Training
Standards-based Individualized Education Program (IEP) Module One: Introduction SBIEP Module one: Introduction - The standards-based reform movement has.
Assessing Students With Disabilities: IDEA and NCLB Working Together
Assistive Technology Devices & Assistive Technology Services
MCAS-Alt “Grade-level” and “Competency” Portfolios
Presentation transcript:

MCAS-Alt and the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)

TOPICS Addressed in this Training Session ESSA requirements and alternate assessments Review Commissioner’s memo and updated attachments. Which students should take the MCAS-Alt? Clarify the criteria for participation. Become aware of other available assessment options. Next steps for Districts and IEP teams.

Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA): The “One Percent” Rule for Statewide Alternate Assessment “The total number of students assessed in a subject using an alternate assessment aligned with alternate academic achievement standards…may not exceed 1 percent of the total number of students in the state who are assessed in that subject.” Defines “1%” based on total number of students assessed in a subject. Districts may exceed 1% of all assessed students if justification is provided. Districts must address any disproportional representation of students from all subgroups taking the MCAS-Alt. States may exceed 1%, if a one-year waiver was granted based on assessing 95% of students and other factors.

ESSA Requires Parental Notification of Participation in an Alternate Assessment Parents must be informed as part of the IEP process that: their child’s academic achievement will be measured based on “alternate achievement standards” that reflect lower expectations than for other students; and participation in an alternate assessment may eventually delay or otherwise affect completion of the requirements for a diploma. (A Sample Parent Notification Letter, translated in five languages, may be copied onto school/district stationery and must either be sent or provided at the IEP meeting.)

Goals and Outcomes of the Alternate Assessment To include difficult-to-assess students in assessment and accountability (it’s the law). To ensure that standards-based skills and content are being taught at levels that are meaningful and challenging. To determine the knowledge and skills students have learned. To provide information to schools and parents on the achievement of students with significant disabilities (i.e., what they can do).

Who Should Take the MCAS-Alt? Only a student with a significant cognitive disability who is…. Working on learning standards that have been substantially modified due to the severity of the disability, and is Receiving intensive, individualized instruction in order to acquire, generalize, and demonstrate knowledge and skills, and is Unable to demonstrate knowledge and skills on a standardized, on- demand paper or online test, even with accommodations, . . . should take the MCAS-Alt in that subject. Teams determine annually for each content area.

A student should not take the MCAS-Alt based solely on… previous low achievement on MCAS a particular disability or placement lack of standards-based instruction participation in MCAS-Alt the previous year (since this is an annual decision) English learner (EL) status low income, child in foster care, or interrupted formal education potential impact on a school’s accountability rating

Other assessment options for students with significant disabilities A student with a significant disability should be considered for a grade-level or competency portfolio, if he/she: performs classroom work at or near grade-level; cannot demonstrate knowledge and skills on the MCAS test in that grade and subject, even with accommodations; and is attempting to earn a score that is comparable to a student who takes and passes the MCAS test.

Decision-Making Tool to guide IEP teams in determining the appropriate assessment option

Next Steps for Districts Districts should: Review data on rate of MCAS-Alt participation. Provide assurances that, if disproportionality is found for students taking MCAS-Alt in any subgroup, steps will be taken to address it. District data is available here and in School and District Profiles. Provide written justification, if likely to exceed one percent in the current school year. Retrain teams annually on criteria to be used (and not used) for selecting students for MCAS-Alt. Training presentation (PowerPoint) available here.

Next Steps for IEP Teams Team Chairperson and team members must: Be familiar with guidelines, criteria, and decision-making tool in Commissioner’s memo. Review the IEPs of students currently taking the MCAS-Alt during annual IEP meetings. Review assessment options and determine if student meets criteria for MCAS-Alt in each subject scheduled for assessment.

In Conclusion… These requirements are not intended to “take students off the MCAS-Alt” or encourage large-scale migration away from the alternate assessment. Instead, ESSA provides an opportunity to refine and clarify our understanding of the criteria to be used for team decision-making. The provision is intended to ensure that the MCAS-Alt is the “right” assessment for a student, and that it does not unintentionally lower expectations. Requirements are also intended to make IEP teams aware of all available assessment options.

DESE Contacts Student Assessment Services Dan Wiener, Administrator of Inclusive Assessment dwiener@doe.mass.edu Debra Hand, MCAS-Alt Coordinator dhand@doe.mass.edu Robert Pelychaty, Accommodations and Competency Portfolio Coordinator rpelychaty@doe.mass.edu Rose Ellen Zakrzewski, MCAS Appeals Coordinator rosez@doe.mass.edu

THANK YOU 781.338.3625 mcas@doe.mass.edu www.doe.mass.edu/mcas/alt 75 Pleasant Street, Malden, MA 02148