ENG 251 American Literature II: 1865-Present – 3 credits

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
An Overview of Service Learning: Building Bridges, Making Connections
Advertisements

ESEA: Developing the Paraprofessional Portfolio Prepared by Carolyn Ellis Logan, Consultant Professional Development/Human Rights Department Michigan Education.
Common Core State Standards Initiative An Initiative of the Council of Chief State School Officers and the National Governors Association Center for Best.
NACEP Accreditation: Advancing Quality College Courses in High School and Improving Credit Transfer Kent Scheffel, President-Elect National Alliance of.
Where Have We Been? Where Are We Going? Using Student Surveys to Assess and Improve Literature Courses Kelly Douglass, PhD Asst. Professor, English Riverside.
Grade 12 Subject Specific Ministry Training Sessions
Reading Literature to Write Analysis: Fiction in the Composition Classroom Karen McLeer, Ph.D. Associate Professor of English UW-Richland Thank you to.
 8 years teaching English at SMSU  7 ½ years mentoring high school CEP teachers  Professional awareness of disconnect in high school and college standards.
Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Institutional Effectiveness Southern Association of Colleges and Schools February 2008 Stephen F. Austin State University.
Assessment & Evaluation Committee A New Road Ahead Presentation Dr. Keith M. McCoy, Vice President Professor Jennifer Jakob, English Associate Director.
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Inspire, Educate, and Protect the Students of California Commission on Teacher Credentialing 1 Accreditation Overview.
Engaging the Arts and Sciences at the University of Kentucky Working Together to Prepare Quality Educators.
Creating a Teaching Dossier Shea Wang, Ph.D Interim Faculty Evaluation Coordinator Oct. 21, 2013.
Presented by Debbie Godsen DePalma.  What is the plan for NYS and the CCS?  What are the CCS?  FAQ  What are the benefits?  What are the models of.
Preceptor Orientation
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
Evidence of Student Learning Fall Faculty Seminar Office of Institutional Research and Assessment August 15, 2012.
EDU 385 CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT Week 1 Introduction and Syllabus.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
NSE Assessment Overview: Your Role in Outcomes-Based Assessment What Will We Learn About Our Students?
Academic Practicum Winter Academic Practicum Seminar2 Agenda 4 Welcome 4 Burning ??’s 4 Routines & Organizational Systems 4 Overview of Academic.
Program Standards for Bilingual Authorization Jo A. Birdsell, Ed.D. Commission on Teacher Credentialing Technical Assistance Meetings November 21 & 25,
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
October 10-12, 2004 Boise, Idaho Welcome Transforming Learning Opportunities through Enrollment Partnerships.
Preparing for North Central Association / Higher Learning Commission (HLC) Accreditation Reviewing Areas of Specialization and Assessing Learning Outcomes.
MRS. LIMA AP Literature & Composition. What are AP Courses? Provide the opportunity for academically prepared and motivated students to complete.
Program Portfolio Orientation Dr. Cara M. Mulcahy and Dr. Lynda M. Valerie Department of Reading and Language Arts Thursday, October 8, :00 - 5:00pm.
Developing Program Learning Outcomes To help in the quality of services.
Instructional Leadership and Application of the Standards Aligned System Act 45 Program Requirements and ITQ Content Review October 14, 2010.
Concurrent Enrollment Policy An Update on Recent Changes.
4/16/07 Assessment of the Core – Humanities with Writing Charlyne L. Walker Director of Educational Research and Evaluation, Arts and Sciences.
The University of Maine at Fort Kent RURAL U Dual Enrollment Faculty Orientation ENG 101 English Composition II – 3 credits.
The University of Maine at Fort Kent RURAL U Dual Enrollment Faculty Orientation HTY 103 U.S. History II – 3 credits.
The University of Maine at Fort Kent RURAL U Dual Enrollment Faculty Orientation ANT 100 Introduction to Anthropology – 3 credits.
The University of Maine at Fort Kent RURAL U Dual Enrollment Faculty Orientation GOV 200 American Government – 3 credits.
The University of Maine at Fort Kent RURAL U Dual Enrollment Faculty Orientation ART 101 History of Art: Renaissance to 21 st Century – 3 credits.
The University of Maine at Fort Kent RURAL U Dual Enrollment Faculty Orientation CHY 101 Chemistry II – 4 credits w/ Lab.
Learning Assessment Techniques
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Training for Faculty
Dutchess Community College Middle States Self-Study 2015
Assessment Planning and Learning Outcome Design Dr
Research and Development Partnerships
Faculty Evaluations: Tenured, Tenure-Track, and Associate
Information Literacy Requirement Charter Oak State College
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
The NEW Distance Education Guidelines
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
Curriculum and Accreditation
GRADUATE PROGRAM COORDINATOR GRADUATE CURRICULUM SERIES
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Training for Faculty
Building Partnerships:  How the Office of Assessment and Accreditation Can Help You and Your Program Be Successful.
and preparation for, higher education.
Introduction to the NSU Write from the Start QEP
UF Quest: Faculty Senate Presentation 3
NACEP Standards and Assessment February 15, 2016
Student Learning Outcomes Assessment
Program Assessment Processes for Developing and Strengthening
Accreditation 2016 A student’s guide.
College in the High School FALL KICKOFF, 2018
Quality assurance and curriculum development
ACCJC Standards Adopted june 2014.
Implementing Race to the Top
Unit 7: Instructional Communication and Technology
The Heart of Student Success
Welcome to Your New Position As An Instructor
SLOs, Curriculum, and Other Things that Shape Your Classroom
Opportunities to Enhance Quality at EKU
Curriculum Coordinator: Pamela Quinn Date of Presentation: 1/19/18
Quality Matters Overview
Presentation transcript:

ENG 251 American Literature II: 1865-Present – 3 credits The University of Maine at Fort Kent RURAL U Dual Enrollment Faculty Orientation ENG 251 American Literature II: 1865-Present – 3 credits

Introduction Welcome to the University of Maine at Fort Kent’s Rural U program! This PowerPoint is meant to be a tool to familiarize Rural U dual enrollment faculty with the expectations of teaching a college-level course. The New England Association of Schools and Colleges (NEASC) Commission on Higher Education mandates that equivalent learning is taking place in all sections of the University's courses. To ensure this is being met, the master syllabus, learning objectives, and grading scale that is outlined in this PowerPoint have been adopted and must be followed by all faculty. We thank you for your willingness to abide by these guidelines and for providing your students with a meaningful college level experience.

Orientation Agenda Course Curriculum UMFK Course Description Pedagogy/Philosophy Required Texts Course Objectives/Outcomes/Competencies Student Evaluation Grade Scale Administrative Responsibilities Accreditation New Course Orientation Annual Discipline Specific Meeting Site Visits Grade Submission Course Evaluations Course Evidence Complete Evaluation

Dual Enrollment Faculty Expectations Faculty across all sections will be expected to follow the established: Syllabus learning outcomes Instructional objectives Common/similar course assessments All other essential elements

IMPORTANT! When you teach a Rural U dual enrollment course, you are not just preparing students for college – you are teaching a UMFK college course. You may do more than what is in the syllabus but you may not do less!

ENG 251 Course Description Prerequisites: ENG 100 or instructor’s permission. The dominant themes and forms of literature from Walt Whitman through the contemporary era. Readings will likely include canonical authors as well as new and emerging voices in American literature to better understand how literature is a product of time and age.

Required Text(s) The Bedford Anthology of American Literature Vol. 2: 1865 to the Present, Belasco and Johnson, Bedford/ST. Martin’s, 2008. ISBN 978-0-312-46371-7 * Other texts and supplemental information are permitted as long as course competencies can be met.

Course Objectives General goals and transferable skills include: reading with critical perspective, exploring author purpose and audience awareness; presenting original ideas orally and in writing; calling upon a broad knowledge base in American literature. Students will study many voices that constitutive what we call American Literature, addressing questions such as: How do the gender, race, and class of writers and readers affect the creation and reception of a literary text? What constitute literary canon? What does “American” mean? What roles has literature played in the cultural and historical story of what came to be the United States? Some of our primary goals will be: To take an exploratory learning journey through American Literature To trace the development of American Literature To undertake a close reading of major works from the period To take part in engaging academic dialogue To demonstrate critical analytical and research skills To present findings in a clear and effective manner

Course Outcomes In order to successfully complete this course students must be able to: Present awareness of the development of American literature (review and reflection). Demonstrate critical thinking and reading in participation . Produce and deliver/present well-crafted works. Properly document any sources using a standard documentation system (MLA, APA, etc.).

Student Evaluation Methods of assessment: Assessment methods will include analysis of quality/quantity of classroom discussion, and student compositions and presentations. Final grades in ENG 251 will be based upon: Paper (Literary Analysis/Research) 20% 1 Self-Reflective Essay Exam 10% Presentation Active Classroom Participation (attendance, reflective course discussion/response) 50% Total 100%

Grade Scale A 95-100 C 73-75 A- 90-94 C- 70-72 B+ 86-89 D+ 65-69 B Final Student grades for ENG 250 will be determined using the following scale: A 95-100 C 73-75 A- 90-94 C- 70-72 B+ 86-89 D+ 65-69 B 83-85 D 60-64 B- 80-82 F 0-59 C+ 76-79 *If the school you are teaching at follows a different grading scale as the one outlined above, you must convert grades to this scale when submitting grades to UMFK for this course.

Administrative Responsibilities Accreditation New Course Orientation Annual Discipline Specific Meeting Site Visits Grade Submission Course Evidence

Accreditation The University of Maine at Fort Kent is accredited by the Commission on Institutions of Higher Education (CIHE) of the New England Association of Schools and Colleges (NEASC), having been re- accredited in March 2006.

National alliance of concurrent enrollment partnerships The University of Maine at Fort Kent’s Rural U program is working toward accreditation by the National Alliance of Concurrent Enrollment Partnerships (NACEP). NACEP works to ensure that college courses taught by high school teachers are as rigorous as courses offered on the sponsoring college campus. As the sole accrediting body for concurrent enrollment partnerships, NACEP helps these programs adhere to the highest standards so students experience a seamless transition to college and teachers benefit from meaningful, ongoing professional development.

New course orientation Newly certified Rural U dual enrollment faculty are required to participate in the Rural U program orientation, which includes the course specific orientation, prior to teaching a new Rural U course. The purpose of this course orientation is to allow the faculty member to become familiar with the course prior to teaching. Rural U dual enrollment faculty will also have the opportunity to discuss the course with college faculty prior to teaching the course.

Site Visits A faculty liaison from UMFK will conduct a site visit every 3 years. During this visit, the faculty liaison may ask to see examples of exams, lab activities, and any other artifacts that will aid in determining if the course outcomes are being achieved. An observation form will be shared with the Rural U dual enrollment faculty upon completion of the visit and may outline recommendations for improvements. It is important to note, site visits are not an evaluation of you as a teacher. Site visits are conducted to determine if the course being taught is equivalent to the on-campus course.

Annual Discipline-Specific Meeting Per NACEP standards – UMFK will host annual, discipline- specific professional development activities on campus and/or via distance technology. These events are critical and required as they allow for open conversation between UMFK and Rural U dual enrollment faculty. If UMFK identifies a pattern of absence over a two-year period, a Rural U administrator will discuss with the faculty member his or her continued participation in the program.

Grade Submission Rural U dual enrollment faculty must submit their final grades, in letter format, to Rural U program staff by February 1 (for fall classes) and June 30 (for spring classes). Classes that are a year-long must have grades submitted with the spring deadline. *In the event you are teaching a 4-credit course with lab, please note you will need to enter two separate grades – one for the lecture part of the class and one for the lab part of the class.

Course Evaluations Rural U dual enrollment faculty must conduct end-of-term student university evaluations. These evaluations are comprised of questions focusing on the content of the course and are not an evaluation of your teaching methods. Results of the evaluation are available at your request, but these results do not have to be used in your personnel file. All evaluations will be provided to you by UMFK prior to the end of your class with instructions for completion.

Course Evidence At the end of each course, dual enrollment faculty must submit to Rural U program staff course evidence. Evidence samples should include, but are not limited to, tests/quizzes, papers/essays, worksheets and assignments, projects, etc. When submitting please include a full range of ability – a sample of “A” grade, a sample of a “C” grade, and a sample of an “F” grade. If you do not have a “C” or an “F” grade please include the closest grade possible.

References Rural U Homepage English Program Recommended References for ENG 251

Umfk faculty liaison contact information Should you have any questions, please contact: Geraldine Becker, Associate Professor of English & Creative Writing 207-834-7695 geraldine.becker@maine.edu

New Course Orientation Survey To complete your New Course Orientation you will need to complete the brief survey found here https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/G9CJKGS If you have been approved for more than one course, please review the other New Course Orientation presentations available before completing the survey. Should you have any questions or concerns please contact Rural U program staff.