electron/positron background flux models

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

ELENA VANNUCCINI ON BEHALF OF PAMELA COLLABORATION Measurement of the Hydrogen and Helium absolute fluxes with the PAMELA experiment.

Advertisements

GLAST The GLAST Balloon Flight experiment was performed with the collaboration of NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Stanford Linear Accelerator Center,

CRflux_protonAlpha_ ppt 1 Proton/alpha background flux models October 14, 2003 Tsunefumi Mizuno Background flux model.

Cosmic-Ray Antiproton Spatial Distributions Simulated in Magnetosphere Michio Fuki Faculty of Education, Kochi University 2-5-1, Akebono-cho, Kochi ,

PAMELA Payload for Antimatter Matter Exploration and Light Nuclei Astrophysics.

GLAST Rate Calculations Toby Burnett 12 Jan Jan 2000T. Burnett GLAST rate calculations2 Components used to measure rates Source model –Geomagnetic.

PositronBG_ ppt 1 Positron BG on GLAST/EGRET GLAST Calibration/Analysis VRVS meeting April 17, 2006 Tsunefumi Mizuno Hiroshima University.

May 26, 2002Thomas K. Gaisser Atmospheric neutrino fluxes Status of the calculations based on work with M. Honda.

The 511 keV Annihilation Emission From The Galactic Center Department of Physics National Tsing Hua University G.T. Chen 2007/1/2.

Solar Energetic Particles -acceleration and observations- (Two approaches at the highest energy) Takashi SAKO Solar-Terrestrial Environment Laboratory,

Analysis meeting 11July05 - T. Burnett 1 Status of the Background Review DC2 prep meeting: Switch to CRflux package by Mizuno for charged particles, Earth.

Paul Evenson January Low Energy Electron Observations (LEE, AESOP and the Historical Context) Paul Evenson and John Clem University of Delaware.

PLANETOCOSMICS L. Desorgher, M. Gurtner, E.O. Flückiger, and P. Nieminen Physikalisches Institut, University of Bern ESA/ESTEC.

Radiation conditions during the GAMMA-400 observations:

CTA and Cosmic-ray Physics Toru Shibata Aoyama-Gakuin University (26/Sep/2012) (1)

Antiprotons of interstellar origin at balloon altitudes: Flux simulations U. B. Jayanthi, K. C. Talavera Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE),

HEAD 2010 – Mar.3, 2010 :: IVM/Stanford-KIPAC 1IVM/Stanford-KIPAC 1 PAMELA Workshop, Rome/May 12, 2009 Igor V. Moskalenko (stanford/kipac) Leptons in Cosmic.

Evaluation of the flux of CR nuclei inside the magnetosphere P. Bobik, G. Boella, M.J. Boschini, M. Gervasi, D. Grandi, K. Kudela, S. Pensotti, P.G. Rancoita.

Measurements of Cosmic-Ray Positrons & Electrons An Experimentalist’s Point of View Michael Schubnell University of Michigan February 4 th, 2009 XLIVth.

1 Observations of Charge Sign Dependence in Solar Modulation Kiruna 2011 LEE Low Energy Electrons P.I.C. June 30, 2010 John Clem and Paul Evenson.

P. Bobik, G. Boella, M. J. Boschini, M. Gervasi, D. Grandi, K. Kudela, S. Pensotti, P.G. Rancoita 2D Stochastic Monte Carlo to evaluate the modulation.

1 PEBS Prototype PERDaix was launched in October 2010 from Kiruna, Sweden.

Vladimir Mikhailov (NRNU MEPHI, Moscow) On behavior PAMELA collaboration SUB CUTOFF SPECTRA OF ELECTRONS AND POSITRONS measured in the PAMELA experiment.

Aa GLAST Particle Astrophysics Collaboration Instrument Managed and Integrated at SLAC/Stanford University The Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope (GLAST)

Measurement of the cosmic ray positron spectrum with the Fermi LAT using the Earth’s magnetic field Justin Vandenbroucke (KIPAC, Stanford / SLAC) for the.

Trapped positrons and electrons observed by PAMELA Vladimir Mikhailov NRNU MEPHI, Moscow, Russia For PAMELA collaboration ICPPA 2015, PAMELA workshop,

Cosmic rays at sea level. There is in nearby interstellar space a flux of particles—mostly protons and atomic nuclei— travelling at almost the speed of.

PAMELA Space Mission Antimatter and Dark Matter Research Piergiorgio Picozza INFN & University of Rome “ Tor Vergata”, Italy TeV Particle Astrophysics.

KIAA-WAP, Peking U 2015/9/28 Implications on CRs and DM from the AMS-02 results Xiao-Jun Bi ( 毕效军 ) Center for Particle and Astrophysics IHEP, Beijing.

Cosmic Ray Study The PAMELA Experiment Piergiorgio Picozza INFN and University of Rome Tor Vergata 23 rd European Cosmic Ray Symposium Moscow, Russia July.

Cosmic Rays2 The Origin of Cosmic Rays and Geomagnetic Effects.

RCCN International Workshop sub-dominant oscillation effects in atmospheric neutrino experiments 9-11 December 2004, Kashiwa Japan Input data to the neutrino.

GLAST Hiroshima University, ISAS Cosmic-Ray Source Generator Y.Fukazawa (Hiroshima U) M.Ozaki(ISAS) T.Mizuno(Hiroshima U) S.Hirano(Hiroshima U) T.Kamae(Hiroshima.

_CygCocoon_Suzaku_JPS.ppt T. Mizuno et al. X-ray Investigation of  -ray Excess in Cygnus Region “Cygnus Cocoon” by Suzaku ( 「すざく」による白鳥座に発見されたガンマ線超過の.

GLAST The GLAST Balloon Flight experiment was performed with the collaboration of NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Stanford Linear Accelerator Center,

PAMELA measurements of proton and helium nuclei and cosmic ray acceleration in the galaxy M. Casolino RIKEN – ASI INFN & University of Rome Tor Vergata.

Primary Cosmic Ray Spectra in the Planet Atmospheres Marusja Buchvarova 1, Peter Velinov 2 (1) Space Research Institute – Bulgarian Academy of Sciences,

Propagation of CR electrons and the interpretation of diffuse  rays Andy Strong MPE, Garching GLAST Workshop, Rome, 17 Sept 2003 with Igor Moskalenko.

Progress report of the GLAST ACD Beam Test at CERN (Backsplash study) simulation and analysis Tsunefumi Mizuno, Hirofumi Mizushima (Hiroshima Univ.) and.

A Simple Analytic Treatment of the Intergalactic Absorption Effect in Blazar  -ray Spectra Introduction Stecker, Malkan, & Scully (2006) have made a detailed.

Theoretical Modeling of the Inner Zone Using GEANT4 Simulations as Inputs R. S. Selesnick and M. D. Looper The Aerospace Corp., Los Angeles, CA USA R.

Comparison between BFEM data and G4 simulation October 18, 2001 Balloon Analysis VRVS meeting T. Mizuno, H. Mizushima, Y. Fukazawa, and T. Kamae

GLAST_BGmodel_ ppt Tsunefumi Mizuno 1 Status of the GLAST BG model February 6, 2008 CA-SO Workshop Tsunefumi Mizuno (Hiroshima Univ.)

In high energy astrophysics observations, it is crucial to reduce the background effectively to achieve a high sensitivity, for the source intensity is.

Direct measurements of cosmic rays in space ROBERTA SPARVOLI ROME “TOR VERGATA” UNIVERSITY AND INFN, ITALY Vulcano Workshop 2014 Vulcano Island (Italy),

A complete simulation of cosmic rays access to a Space Station Davide Grandi INFN Milano, ITALY.

After integration and test at SLAC and GSFC, BFEM was shipped to the National Scientific Balloon Facility (NSBF) at Palestine, Texas. The experiment was.

On the Galactic Center being the main source of Galactic Cosmic Rays as evidenced by recent cosmic ray and gamma ray observations Yiqing Guo, Zhaoyang.

Response of the KM3NeT detector to neutrinos from Fermi bubbles.

HIGH ENERGY POSITRON DETECTION VIA SYNCHROTRON RADIATION IN MAGENTOSPHERE “SONYA” project А.М. Гальпер 1, О.Ф. Прилуцкий 2, С.В. Колдашов 1, В.В. Михайлов.

Topicality of this work is caused by the fact that modern detectors aren't effective in searching electrons and positrons with energies higher than 1 TeV.

FLUKA Muon Calculations For Electronic Applications

Atmospheric radiation modeling of galactic cosmic rays using LRO/CRaTER and the EMMREM model with comparisons to balloon and airline based measurements.

Solar gamma-ray and neutron registration capabilities of the GRIS instrument onboard the International Space Station Yu. A. Trofimov, Yu. D. Kotov, V.

Search for Cosmic Ray Anisotropy with the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer on the International Space Station G. LA VACCA University of Milano-Bicocca.

Primary Cosmic Rays the multi TeV challenge

INFN e Università di Roma Tor Vergata

Electron Observations from ATIC and HESS

Determining the Spectrum of Cosmic Rays

Vladimir Mikhailov (MEPhI) on behalf PAMELA collaboration

John Kelley for the IceCube Collaboration

Cosmic Ray Electron Spectrum in 2009

Are Diffuse High Energy Neutrinos from Starburst Galaxies Observable?

SN 1006 Extract spectra for each region..

Cosmic-Ray Source Generator

Simulation of 14C production rates for the troposphere and stratosphere in weak geomagnetic intensity at 26,000 yr BP 1 Graduate School of Science and.

On the relative role of drift and convection-diffusion effects in the long-term CR variations on the basis of NM and satellite data Lev Dorman (1, 2) Israel.

on behalf of the Fermi-LAT Collaboration

Update of G4 simulation -- Development of Cosmic-Ray generator --

Analysis of GLAST Balloon Experiment Data

Presentation transcript:

electron/positron background flux models October 14, 2003 Tsunefumi Mizuno mizuno@SLAC.Stanford.EDU Background flux model functions for e-/e+ in CRflux package are given here. The model is under construction and the function shown in this report could be modified in future. CRflux_electronPositron_2003-10-14.ppt

Plan overview The background flux depends on satellite position (due to geomagnetic cutoff) and year (due to solar activity). To take these effects into account for primary component, we utilize the formula similar to those of proton and alpha. There, solar modulation potential and cutoff rigidity are included in the function explicitly. We refer to the AMS data (Alcaraz et al. 2000, Phys. Let. B 484, 10) and model the flux spectra with analytic functions. CRflux_electronPositron_2003-10-14.ppt

electron model functions Reference: Data compilation in Komori et al. 1999, proceeding of large balloon symposium at ISAS, p33. (The same data points are also given in Kobayashi et al. 1999, proceeding of 26th ICRC 3, p61). Spectrum for all electrons(e- + e+) is given here. Golden et al. 1996, ApJL 457, 103; assume that positron fraction is 0.078 Solar modulation theory (L. J. Gleeson and W. I. Axford 1968, ApJ 154, 1011) Etc. Model functions: Primary: Power-law with solar modulation effect (Gleeson and Axford 1968) and geomagnetic cutoff (introduced by T. Kamae and M. Ozaki to reproduce low geomag. lat. proton data of AMS). Secondary: Simple analytic functions such as power-law. Model functions are determined to reproduce the AMS data. Below 100 MeV, we do not have AMS data and we just extrapolate the spectrum down to 10 MeV with E^-1. To keep the model simple, we use the same function to express the reentrant (downward) and splash (upward) spectra. [c/s/m^2/sr/MeV] CRflux_electronPositron_2003-10-14.ppt

positron model functions Reference: Model functions for electron primary. Golden et al. 1996, ApJL 457, 103 Etc. Model functions: Primary: We adopted the results of Golden et al. (1996) and assume that a fraction fraction is 0.078 (energy indepent). Secondary: Like for electrons, we utilize Simple analytic functions such as power-law. [c/s/m^2/sr/MeV] CRflux_electronPositron_2003-10-14.ppt

Note for primary spectra We have utilized the data compilation in high energy region (100 GeV-10 TeV) and modeled the interstellar electron spectra as 0.667*E^-3.33. This function givse a slightly higher flux in relatively low energy region (around 10 GeV), as shown in figure below. We can also see that the interstellar spectrum of primary electron could not be a single power-law, but suffers a small cutoff in low energy region (below 2-3 GeV). Interstellar spectrum of primary electron. Three observations shown here were in similar solar activity, and we demodulated their data according to equation in page 3 with phi=650 MV. Unmod=0.667*E^-3.33 references; J. Alcaraz et al. 2000, Phys. Let. B 484, 10 Boezio et al. 200, ApJ 532, 653 Golden et al. 1994, ApJ 436, 769 CRflux_electronPositron_2003-10-14.ppt

e-/e+ models (1) 2ndary electron 2ndary positron phi=650 MV Rc=12.7 GV Vertically downward going e-/e+ flux data by AMS (geomagnetic latitude theta_M<0.3; geomagnetic equator) and model functions. phi=650 MV Rc=12.7 GV 2ndary electron 2ndary positron (E<100 MeV) (E<100 MeV) (E=0.1-2 GeV) (E=2-20 GeV) (E=0.1-20 GeV) CRflux_electronPositron_2003-10-14.ppt

e-/e+ models (2) 2ndary electron 2ndary positron phi=650 MV Rc=8.7 GV Vertically downward going e-/e+ flux data by AMS (0.3<theta_M<0.6) and model functions. phi=650 MV Rc=8.7 GV 2ndary electron 2ndary positron (E<100 MeV) (E<100 MeV) (E=0.1-20 GeV) (E=0.1-20 GeV) CRflux_electronPositron_2003-10-14.ppt

e-/e+ models (3) 2ndary e-/e+ phi=650 MV Rc=4.5 GV (E<100 MeV) Vertically downward going e-/e+ flux data by AMS (0.6<theta_M<0.8) and model functions. phi=650 MV Rc=4.5 GV 2ndary e-/e+ (E<100 MeV) (E=0.1-20 GeV) CRflux_electronPositron_2003-10-14.ppt

e-/e+ models (4) 2ndary e-/e+ phi=650 MV Rc=2.5 GV (E<100 MeV) Vertically downward going e-/e+ flux data by AMS (0.8<theta_M<0.9) and model functions. phi=650 MV Rc=2.5 GV 2ndary e-/e+ (E<100 MeV) (E=0.1-20 GeV) CRflux_electronPositron_2003-10-14.ppt

e-/e+ models (5) 2ndary e-/e+ phi=650 MV Rc=1.5 GV (E<100 MeV) Vertically downward going e-/e+ flux data by AMS (0.9<theta_M<1.0) and model functions. phi=650 MV Rc=1.5 GV 2ndary e-/e+ (E<100 MeV) (E=100-300 MeV) (E=0.3-20 GeV) CRflux_electronPositron_2003-10-14.ppt

e-/e+ models (6) 2ndary e-/e+ phi=650 MV Rc=0.8 GV (E<100 MeV) Vertically downward going e-/e+ flux data by AMS (1.0<theta_M<1.1) and model functions. phi=650 MV Rc=0.8 GV 2ndary e-/e+ (E<100 MeV) (E=0.1-20 GeV) CRflux_electronPositron_2003-10-14.ppt