Transparency consideration – using MEAT criteria Anna Gorczynska, PhD Centre for Public Procurement and PPP Chair of European Economic Law Faculty of Law and Administration University of Lodz, Poland

Centre for Public Procurement and PPP Faculty of Law, University of Łódź (Lodz)

Centre for Public Procurement and PPP Faculty of Law, University of Łódź (Lodz) The main aim of the Centre is to conduct scientific research and to develop education devoted to various aspects of public procurement law and public-private partnership (PPP). Our main aims: research / scientific publications / opinions on legal acts / development of good practices / branch reports for industry / legal opinions and expertises / conferences, debates, seminars / lectures and trainings

Public procurement law Public procurement law has a dual character due to the regulation on the level of: EU law and national legislation + Government Procurement Agreement (GPA) - WTO

Contracts covered by EU law The rules of the EU law apply to the contracts above the thresholds estimated in the directives (and than amended by regulations) Under the thresholds the domestic law acts are applied.

Rules of public procurement Non-discrimination Competitiveness Transparency Internal market rules: free movement of goods, freedom to provide services, freedom of entreprenourship, free movement of persons

Aims of the 2014 directives Simplification of the procurement procedure Reduce of the administrative burdens Life cycle costs philosphy E-procurement Sustainable and social procurement Green procurement Support for SME’s

Award criteria in 2004 directives I. Most economically advantageus offer objective criteria, referring to the subject of the contract (Concordia Bus, C-513/99), subjective discretion, precision and measurability of criteria, in turn of their importance of their meaning for the contracting authority = use of weighting/scoring systems, according to the non-discriminatory,equality and transparency rules

Award criteria in 2004 directives II. Lowest price – price as only one decision making factor The practice shows that it is dangerous – leading to the fraudental agreements betweeen bidders, price wars, low quality of public works, services and supplies or abuse of labour code rules

Legal background – art. 67 Directive 2014/24/EU Article 67 Contract award criteria 1. Without prejudice to national laws, regulations or administrative provisions concerning the price of certain supplies or the remuneration of certain services, contracting authorities shall base the award of public contracts on the most economically advantageous tender.

Article 67 2. The most economically advantageous tender from the point of view of the contracting authority shall be identified on the basis of the price or cost, using a cost-effectiveness approach, such as life-cycle costing in accordance with Article 68, and may include the best price-quality ratio,

Article 67 which shall be assessed on the basis of criteria, including qualitative, environmental and/or social aspects, linked to the subject-matter of the public contract in question. Such criteria may comprise, for instance:

Article 67 quality, including technical merit, aesthetic and functional characteristics, accessibility, design for all users, social, environmental and innovative characteristics and trading and its conditions;

Article 67 organisation, qualification and experience of staff assigned to performing the contract, where the quality of the staff assigned can have a significant impact on the level of performance of the contract; or

Article 67 after-sales service and technical assistance, delivery conditions such as delivery date, delivery process and delivery period or period of completion.

Article 67 The cost element may also take the form of a fixed price or cost on the basis of which economic operators will compete on quality criteria only. Member States may provide that contracting authorities may not use price only or cost only as the sole award criterion or restrict their use to certain categories of contracting authorities or certain types of contracts.

Article 67 3. Award criteria shall be considered to be linked to the subject-matter of the public contract where they relate to the works, supplies or services to be provided under that contract in any respect and at any stage of their life cycle, including factors involved in:

Article 67 (a) the specific process of production, provision or trading of those works, supplies or services; or (b) a specific process for another stage of their life cycle, even where such factors do not form part of their material substance.

Article 67 4. Award criteria shall not have the effect of conferring an unrestricted freedom of choice on the contracting authority. They shall ensure the possibility of effective competition and shall be accompanied by specifications that allow the information provided by the tenderers to be effectively verified in order to assess how well the tenders meet the award criteria.

Article 67 5. The contracting authority shall specify, in the procurement documents, the relative weighting which it gives to each of the criteria chosen to determine the most economically advantageous tender, except where this is identified on the basis of price alone.

Article 67 Those weightings may be expressed by providing for a range with an appropriate maximum spread. Where weighting is not possible for objective reasons, the contracting authority shall indicate the criteria in decreasing order of importance.

Award criteria - comment Most economically advantageus offer Open catalogue eg: price, delivery date or period of completion, quality, running costs, cost effectiveness, aesthetic and functional characteristic, technical merit, after-sale service and technical assisance, impact on environment, preferences for disabled workers.

Article 68 Life cycle costing 1. Life-cycle costing shall to the extent relevant cover parts or all of the following costs over the life cycle of a product, service or works:

Article 68 (a) costs, borne by the contracting authority or other users, such as: (i) costs relating to acquisition, (ii) costs of use, such as consumption of energy and other resources, (iii) maintenance costs, (iv) end of life costs, such as collection and recycling costs.

Article 68 (b) costs imputed to environmental externalities linked to the product, service or works during its life cycle, provided their monetary value can be determined and verified; such costs may include the cost of emissions of greenhouse gases and of other pollutant emissions and other climate change mitigation costs.

Article 68 2. Where contracting authorities assess the costs using a life- cycle costing approach, they shall indicate in the procurement documents the data to be provided by the tenderers and the method which the contracting authority will use to determine the life-cycle costs on the basis of those data.

(a) it is based on objectively verifiable and non-discriminatory criteria. In particular, where it has not been established for repeated or continuous application, it shall not unduly favour or disadvantage certain economic operators; (

Article 68 3. Whenever a common method for the calculation of life- cycle costs has been made mandatory by a legislative act of the Union, that common method shall be applied for the assessment of life-cycle costs.

Life-cycle costs - comment Life-cycle cost covers all stages of the existence of the object of procedure (direct monetary expenses or external environmental costs). Problem: the absence of one common methodology for life-cycle cost calculation

Life-cycle costs According to Polish researches (see: M.Sieradzka) Life cycle costing for avarange product: 5% aquisition costs 10% maintance costs 85% energy costs

Life-cycle costs Directive 2009/33/EU on green and energy efficient road transport vehicles (O.J. 2009, No. 120) – methodology adopted on the Eu level

Costs efficiency Varied definitions based on eg: Costs efficiency Quality-costs ratio Substantial aspects Objective aspects

Life-cycle costs Selection of the method of costs calculation List of life cycle costs Decision which costs should be taken under consideration Time reference for LLC Inflation rate

Life-cycle costs Example of evaluation of LCC: LCC=cost of aquisition + (time of exploitation/utilization in years X energy costs per year)

Life-cycle costs Aqusition of printing machine: Cost of aquisition – 1000 PLN Time of exploitation – 5 years Energy 50 kWh/year Energy costs – 0,5 PLN/kWh LCC = 1000 zł + [ 5 x (50 x 0,5 PLN)] in Total: 1125 PLN

Quality problems in definition always should refere to the subject matter of the contract Can refere to the experience of the bidders Reference to eg. energy efficiency, service costs, environmental friendly aspects

Environmental aspects in public procurement Green public proceuremnt could be defined as integration of environmental aspects on the all stages of public procurement procedure. It also means that green aspects could be an important factor in the award criteria.

Environmental aspects in public procurement Examples: Energy efficiency Pollussion Waste Recycling