Interaction between the Bacterial Iron Response Regulator and Ferrochelatase Mediates Genetic Control of Heme Biosynthesis  Zhenhao Qi, Mark R O'Brian 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Interaction between the Bacterial Iron Response Regulator and Ferrochelatase Mediates Genetic Control of Heme Biosynthesis  Zhenhao Qi, Mark R O'Brian 
Advertisements

Volume 32, Issue 3, Pages (February 2015)
Cotranscriptional Recruitment of the mRNA Export Factor Yra1 by Direct Interaction with the 3′ End Processing Factor Pcf11  Sara Ann Johnson, Gabrielle.
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages (April 2003)
Purusharth Rajyaguru, Meipei She, Roy Parker  Molecular Cell 
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages (October 2004)
Phosphorylation of Cdc20 by Bub1 Provides a Catalytic Mechanism for APC/C Inhibition by the Spindle Checkpoint  Zhanyun Tang, Hongjun Shu, Dilhan Oncel,
Activating and Silencing the Mitotic Checkpoint through CENP-E-Dependent Activation/Inactivation of BubR1  Yinghui Mao, Ariane Abrieu, Don W. Cleveland 
Volume 87, Issue 7, Pages (December 1996)
Volume 8, Issue 16, Pages (July 1998)
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages (October 2004)
A Mechanism for Inhibiting the SUMO Pathway
Arginine Methylation of STAT1 Modulates IFNα/β-Induced Transcription
Monica C. Rodrigo-Brenni, Erik Gutierrez, Ramanujan S. Hegde 
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages (January 2003)
ASK1 Is Essential for JNK/SAPK Activation by TRAF2
Biofilm Inhibitors that Target Amyloid Proteins
Yongli Bai, Chun Yang, Kathrin Hu, Chris Elly, Yun-Cai Liu 
Communication with the Exon-Junction Complex and Activation of Nonsense-Mediated Decay by Human Upf Proteins Occur in the Cytoplasm  Guramrit Singh, Steffen.
Selective Degradation of Ubiquitinated Sic1 by Purified 26S Proteasome Yields Active S Phase Cyclin-Cdk  Rati Verma, Hayes McDonald, John R Yates, Raymond.
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
Robert L.S Perry, Maura H Parker, Michael A Rudnicki  Molecular Cell 
Stefanie S. Schalm, Diane C. Fingar, David M. Sabatini, John Blenis 
Volume 32, Issue 3, Pages (February 2015)
Volume 91, Issue 4, Pages (November 1997)
Regulation of Transcription by Ubiquitination without Proteolysis
Volume 29, Issue 3, Pages (February 2008)
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages (January 2002)
Class C Vps Protein Complex Regulates Vacuolar SNARE Pairing and Is Required for Vesicle Docking/Fusion  Trey K. Sato, Peter Rehling, Michael R. Peterson,
Transcription Factor MIZ-1 Is Regulated via Microtubule Association
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages (December 2003)
Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages (February 2009)
Yang Shen, Monica Naujokas, Morag Park, Keith Ireton  Cell 
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (December 2000)
Volume 2, Issue 6, Pages (December 1998)
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
Volume 118, Issue 1, Pages (July 2004)
Ligand-Independent Recruitment of SRC-1 to Estrogen Receptor β through Phosphorylation of Activation Function AF-1  André Tremblay, Gilles B Tremblay,
A Role for Ran-GTP and Crm1 in Blocking Re-Replication
Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages (April 2001)
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (May 2012)
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages (July 2002)
Volume 9, Issue 9, Pages (September 2016)
Activated Cdc42 Sequesters c-Cbl and Prevents EGF Receptor Degradation
c-Src Activates Endonuclease-Mediated mRNA Decay
Volume 3, Issue 2, Pages (August 2002)
FAK-Mediated Src Phosphorylation of Endophilin A2 Inhibits Endocytosis of MT1-MMP and Promotes ECM Degradation  Xiaoyang Wu, Boyi Gan, Youngdong Yoo,
Jinki Yeom, Kyle J. Wayne, Eduardo A. Groisman  Molecular Cell 
Volume 96, Issue 3, Pages (February 1999)
E. Josué Ruiz, Marçal Vilar, Angel R. Nebreda  Current Biology 
Volume 19, Issue 6, Pages (September 2005)
Cotranscriptional Recruitment of the mRNA Export Factor Yra1 by Direct Interaction with the 3′ End Processing Factor Pcf11  Sara Ann Johnson, Gabrielle.
Volume 96, Issue 6, Pages (March 1999)
Volume 28, Issue 5, Pages (December 2007)
Silva H Hanissian, Raif S Geha  Immunity 
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Cytoskeletal Activation of a Checkpoint Kinase
Volume 91, Issue 2, Pages (October 1997)
Regulation of Yeast mRNA 3′ End Processing by Phosphorylation
Volume 95, Issue 5, Pages (November 1998)
Proteasome-Mediated Degradation of p21 via N-Terminal Ubiquitinylation
Vidhya Ramachandran, Khyati H. Shah, Paul K. Herman  Molecular Cell 
RhoA GTPase Regulates B Cell Receptor Signaling
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages (June 2001)
Meiotic Inactivation of Xenopus Myt1 by CDK/XRINGO, but Not CDK/Cyclin, via Site- Specific Phosphorylation  E. Josué Ruiz, Tim Hunt, Angel R. Nebreda 
Yuki Okuda-Shimizu, Linda M. Hendershot  Molecular Cell 
Volume 129, Issue 5, Pages (June 2007)
c-IAP1 Cooperates with Myc by Acting as a Ubiquitin Ligase for Mad1
Presentation transcript:

Interaction between the Bacterial Iron Response Regulator and Ferrochelatase Mediates Genetic Control of Heme Biosynthesis  Zhenhao Qi, Mark R O'Brian  Molecular Cell  Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages 155-162 (January 2002) DOI: 10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00431-2

Figure 1 Interaction of Irr with Ferrochelatase (A) Ferrochelatase coimmunoprecipitates with Irr in B. japonicum cell extract. Cells of strain I110(pBJH) grown under low iron were lysed and immunoprecipitated using anti-Irr (α-Irr), anti-ferrochelatase (α-FC) antibodies, or preimmune serum (Pre). Immunoprecipitates were resolved by SDS-PAGE and analyzed by immunoblotting using either anti-Irr or anti-ferrochelatase antibodies. (B) Pull-down of Irr or Fur by a GST-Ferrochelatase fusion protein. The GST-FC fusion protein was used to precipitate Irr in B. japonicum extracts (top), pure Irr in solution (middle), or pure His-tagged Fur in solution (bottom). GST was used as a negative control. Ten micrograms each of GST, GST-FC, purified Irr, or Fur protein was used for the corresponding individual experiment. The proteins were visualized with antibodies directed against Irr or the His tag of Fur. Molecular Cell 2002 9, 155-162DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00431-2)

Figure 2 Effect of Expression of an Inactive Ferrochelatase on Irr Degradation in Wild-Type B. japonicum Cells (A) A GST-ferrochelatase (GST-FC) or GST-ferrochelatase-H215L (GST-H215L) fusion protein was used to precipitate Irr in B. japonicum cell extracts. GST was used as a negative control. The experiment shows that the H215L mutant retains the ability to interact with Irr. (B) The hemH(H215L) gene encoding an inactive ferrochelatase or the wild-type hemH gene was ligated into the vector pVK102 (pH215L and pHemH, respectively) and introduced into B. japonicum strain I110. The pVK102 vector without an insert was used as a control. The transconjugants contained a wild-type ferrochelatase gene (hemH) in the chromosome. Cells were grown under low iron media, then treated with 6 μM FeCl3 (+Fe) or an equivalent volume of buffer (−Fe) at time zero. Aliquots were taken at various times, and Irr was detected by immunobloting using anti-Irr antibodies. Fifty micrograms of protein was loaded per lane. Molecular Cell 2002 9, 155-162DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00431-2)

Figure 3 Effects of hemA or hemH Deletion or hemA hemH Double Deletion on Irr Activity (A) Abbreviated heme pathway showing ALA synthase (ALAS) encoded by the hemA gene and ferrochelatase (FC) encoded by hemH. The substrates of ALA synthase are glycine and succinyl coenzyme A. “Proto” designates protoporphyrin IX. (B) Cells of strains WT (I110), hemA (MLG1), hemH (I110ek4), and hemA hemH (ΔhemAH) were grown in modified GSY medium containing either low (L) or high (H) iron. Irr and ALAD were analyzed in cells by immunoblots using anti-Irr or anti-ALAD antibodies, respectively. Fifty micrograms of protein was loaded per lane. Molecular Cell 2002 9, 155-162DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00431-2)

Figure 4 Effects of ALA on Irr Activity in Cells of the Wild-Type and hemA Mutant Cells were grown in modified GSY media under low iron conditions supplemented with either 0 (−) or 50 μg/ml ALA (+). Irr and ALAD in cells were analyzed by immunoblots using anti-Irr or anti-ALAD antibodies, respectively. Fifty micrograms of protein was loaded per lane. Molecular Cell 2002 9, 155-162DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00431-2)

Figure 5 A His-215 to Leu Substitution of Ferrochelatase Retains Its Inhibitory Effect on Irr Activity (A) Ferrochelatase (FC) activity, protoporphyrin levels (Proto), and fluorescent colony phenotype due to protoporphyrin accumulation (Colony Fluor.) were measured in cells of strain I110 (Wt), I110ek4 (ΔhemH), and HemH(H215L) (H215L). Ferrochelatase activity is expressed as nmol mesoheme formed hr−1 mg protein−1. Protoporphyrin extracted from cells is expressed as nmol protoporphyrin mg protein−1. Colony fluorescence was assessed by visual inspection of cells on plates under UV light. (B) Cells of strain I110 (Wt), I110ek4 (ΔhemH), and HemH(H215L) (H215L) were grown in modified media containing low iron (L; no added iron) or high iron (H; 6 μM FeCl3). Ferrochelatase (FC), Irr, or ALA dehydratase (ALAD) in cells was analyzed by immunoblots using anti-ferrochelatase, anti-Irr, or anti-ALAD antibodies, respectively. Fifty micrograms of protein was loaded in each lane. Molecular Cell 2002 9, 155-162DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00431-2)

Figure 6 The Effects of Porphyrin Substrates on Ferrochelatase-Irr Interaction The GST-FC fusion protein (10 μg protein) was used to precipitate Irr from B. japonicum extract in the presence of mesobilirubin (MB), deutoroporphyrin IX (Deu), mesoporphyrin IX (Meso), heme, or none of these(−). The top panel shows Irr pulled down by GST-FC under various conditions. The bottom panel shows Irr in extracts and demonstrates that porphyrins do not interfere with the antigenicity of Irr. The precipitates (top panel) or the crude extracts (bottom panel) were resolved by 12% SDS-PAGE and analyzed by immunoblotting using anti-Irr antibodies. GST was used as a negative control. Molecular Cell 2002 9, 155-162DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00431-2)

Figure 7 Binding of Heme to Purified Recombinant Irr and Mutant Protein IrrC29A Binding to Irr was quantified using a fluorimetric assay by measuring the quenching of intrinsic fluorescence of Irr upon binding to heme. Recombinant Irr (closed circles) or IrrC29A (open circles; 0.5 μM) was incubated with various concentrations of heme for 3 min before measuring fluorescence emission at 338 nm using an excitation wavelength of 263 nm. Panels (A) and (B) show the data from 0 to 0.4 μM and 0 to 0.1 μM heme, respectively. The binding curve was fitted by nonlinear regression analysis using the Prism2.01 program. The best fit for wild-type Irr was for two-site binding with Kd values of 1 nM and 80 nM. For IrrC29A, the data best fit one binding site with a Kd value of 124 nM. Molecular Cell 2002 9, 155-162DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00431-2)

Figure 8 Model for Regulation of Irr Expression and Activity at the Site of Ferrochelatase FC denotes ferrochelatase. The light porphyrin is protoporphyrin. The dark porphyrin with the inserted iron molecule is heme (protoheme). (A) Ferrochelatase activity proceeds when iron is sufficient, resulting in heme formation. Irr is inactivated, then subsequently degraded. (B) Under iron limitation, ferrochelatase is bound by only one of its substrates, protoporphyrin. This causes Irr and ferrochelatase to dissociate, thereby relieving inhibition of Irr activity for repression of the hemB gene. (C) The hemA strain cannot synthesize heme, therefore Irr does not degrade. However, the mutant does not synthesize protoporphyrin, thus the inhibition of Irr by ferrochelatase cannot be relieved. (D). Irr is constitutively present and active in a hemH mutant because there is no heme to degrade it and no ferrochelatase to inhibit activity. The status of protoporphyrin is not relevant in a ferrochelatase (hemH) mutant; therefore, a hemA strain and a hemA hemH double mutant have the same phenotype with respect to Irr function. Molecular Cell 2002 9, 155-162DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00431-2)