Setup of the microrobot-assisted high-precision wet transfer.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Soft robotic device applied to the RV in a pressure overload model of RHF. Soft robotic device applied to the RV in a pressure overload model of RHF. (A.

Advertisements

Degradation of MSP samples in 37°C DPBS solution.

Demonstrations integrated system tests.

Basic design concept of human mimetic humanoid.

TPAD controller schematic and testing for WPC.

TPAD controller performance for three force components.

Cable-driven system diagram for structure matrix.

Three different types of transfer functions with a codomain of [0,1].

TPAD training protocol.

Self-sensing of actuator position.

Workspace comparison of Delta robots.

T2-weighted cross-sectional MR imaging of MSP swarms inside SD rats.

Ex vivo testing of the soft robotic devices.

Soft robotic device applied to the left side in a coronary ligation HF model. Soft robotic device applied to the left side in a coronary ligation HF model.

Distribution of the number of collisions and the average closest-neighbor distance as a function of communication range and delay. Distribution of the.

Visual explanation of the interaction terms.

Soft robotic VAD implementations, control schemes, and HF models.

Visual explanation of the interaction terms.

The foldable robotic arm with seven modules assembled in series.

AEGIS intelligent targeting compared with blind targeting.

Prosthesis grasping and control.

A novice user executing various subtasks from study 1.

A shared-control method for effective bimanual robot manipulation.

Tukey boxplots overlaid on data points from objective and subjective measures, displaying results from study 1. Tukey boxplots overlaid on data points.

Soft robotic VAD implementations, control schemes, and HF models.

Tactile features for prosthesis perception.

Online verification using reachable occupancies.

Illustration of the addressable wireless folding concept.

Cell viability tests. Cell viability tests. SEM images of (A) MC3T3-E1 cells and (B) MSCs on days 1, 3, and 5 of culture. (C) Survival rates of MC3T3-E1.

Fig. 2 Global production, use, and fate of polymer resins, synthetic fibers, and additives (1950 to 2015; in million metric tons). Global production, use,

T2-weighted cross-sectional MR imaging of MSP swarms inside SD rats.

Prosthesis system diagram.

Effect of slenderness on optimal shapes.

SoFi system overview. SoFi system overview. (Top, left to right) Soft robotic fish and diver interface module. (Bottom, left to right) Subcomponents of.

Soft robotic device applied to the left side in a coronary ligation HF model. Soft robotic device applied to the left side in a coronary ligation HF model.

Microrobots with different cell-carrying capacities under different grid lengths (lg) and burr lengths (lb). Microrobots with different cell-carrying capacities.

Self-sensing of actuator position.

2D motility characterization and external magnetic steering of RBC microswimmers. 2D motility characterization and external magnetic steering of RBC microswimmers.

Brain-computer interfaces.

Experimental setup for workspace, bandwidth, and force characterization of the milliDelta. Experimental setup for workspace, bandwidth, and force characterization.

Active deformation of an RBC cargo propelled and pushed by a single bacterium through a 2-μm gap. Active deformation of an RBC cargo propelled and pushed.

Untethered kirigami-skinned soft crawlers.

Fig. 6 Comparison of properties of water models.

Degradation of MSP samples in 37°C DPBS solution.

Soft robotic device applied to the RV in a pressure overload model of RHF. Soft robotic device applied to the RV in a pressure overload model of RHF. (A.

Underwater observatory.

Schematic signal pathway.

Collision resilience and foldability of the origami drone.

Simulation results of magnetic driving ability in hepatic artery, portal vein, and hepatic vein. Simulation results of magnetic driving ability in hepatic.

In vitro cell-release experiments on a glass substrate.

Results of a representative participant with multiple training sessions. Results of a representative participant with multiple training sessions. Average.

Galloping-like gait with the design of a two-legged robot.

AEGIS autonomous targeting process.

Overview of the experimental setup and visual stimulus.

Control of a cell-cultured microrobot in vitro and in vivo.

Fig. 6 Experimental setup and properties of the IP screen.

Laboratory tests. Laboratory tests. (A) Time lapse of the landing process, refilling process, and subsequent launch. (B) Comparison of position and velocity.

Jetting phase analysis.

Kinematic and mechanical advantage trade-off study.

Characterization and optimization of the device.

The biomimetic pressure sensing ability.

Iron line orientation inside the PDMS matrix.

Floating microrobots with different preferred magnetization directions: Fabrication and control principles. Floating microrobots with different preferred.

Example applications of microrobot-assisted wet transfer for fiber functionalization. Example applications of microrobot-assisted wet transfer for fiber.

Breakdown of incorrect participant responses.

Fiber patterning using microrobot-assisted wet transfer.

Fig. 4 Single-particle contact angle measurements.

Fig. 2 Supraballs and films from binary SPs.

Comparison of children’s behavior between the three conditions.

Setup used in the study. Setup used in the study. A child interacts with the robot tutor with a large touchscreen sitting between them, displaying the.

Presentation transcript:

Setup of the microrobot-assisted high-precision wet transfer. Setup of the microrobot-assisted high-precision wet transfer. (A) Magnetically controlled microrobots via an external magnet to align a floating 2D device on a target substrate (e.g., optical fiber and 3D microdevice). (B) View of the microrobot structure in which iron lines trapped in an elastomer matrix are used to store a preferred magnetization direction. (C) Final assembled devices featuring the functional pattern aligned with a 5-μm and 0.4° precision. Antoine Barbot et al. Sci. Robotics 2019;4:eaax8336 Copyright © 2019 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works