Table 4. Comparison of time-window by emergency gastroscopy

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

and Statistics, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1-8. doi: /ajams-4-1-1

Advertisements

before and after rehabilitation

Figure 2. Effect of Siberian and Panax ginseng respectively on postprandial glucose level before and after three months of intake in patients with type.

Ringe stage of malaria parasite under microscope

Intermediate-level learner

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Test (Haemodialysis patients) Controls (health care workers)

Hospital live Deliveries

Research, 2015, Vol. 3, No. 6, doi: /education

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Figure 3. Comparison of class performance

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 3. Quran memorization students survey responses about App

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 3. Number of MS patients/ Year of diagnosis / Current Residence

SON Nurse Practitioner Blackboard Community

Table 3. Comparison of NS1 Antigen Assay and Platelet Counts

Total Energy Consumed (%)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 2. Showing mean and SD along with t- critical ratio

Table 11. Chi-Square Analysis Based on Grade Shift for Study Group

Table 8. Unit Key Performance Indicators

No. 8, doi: /education Table 9. t-Test Analysis Based on Average Quiz Scores from Last Six Quizzes t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Unequal.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Figure 1. Changes of Clinical Symptoms Severity in patients on multi-strain probioticFlorasan-D or Placebo Ivashkin V. et al. The Effect of a Multi-strain.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Rating of Water Quality

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 2. Showing mean and SD along with t- critical ratio

Table 1. Rice yield in MT (Source-USDA, Foreign Agricultural Service)

Number of categories that are mentioned (0% < categories < 5%)

Table 1. Diagnostic methods for systemic fungal infection (n=70)

Table 2. Modal parameters estimated by Pulse Reflex®

Table 7. Status of CF in Nepal as of 2009

Table 5. Pvalues of ttests for direction a

Transformer Annual MVA Loadings (%) Average MVA Loading (%)

Entrapment Efficiency (%) ± S.D.

Table 5. Comparison of Outcome of 138 patients

Table 1. LLC Academics Outcome Report ( )

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Simulation Frequency(Hz)

Number of questionnaires sent out

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 6. Pvalues of ttests for direction b

Table 1. Descriptive Statistics

Table 2. Demographic characteristics of the study subjects

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 2. SUMMARIZED OBSERVATIONS FROM MODEL ANALYSIS

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Days without gluten challenge

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 3. (d) Summary of two way ANOVA for overall adjustment

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Category Quantity Secondary school 3 Student participant

Cashew juice stored for 30 days

S. No. Product Name yield content

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 7. The Result of T Test After Treatment

Compressive Strength difference at 1 week (MPa)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Average Execution Time in seconds

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 6. Range Comparisons amongst Subgroups and grade levels

Presentation transcript:

Table 4. Comparison of time-window by emergency gastroscopy Group bleeding detection rate(%) success rate of hemostasis(%) early recurrent bleeding rate(%) mortality rate within a year(%) average days in hospitalization(d) Group A(12h) 100 80 20 6.67 6.8±0.28 Group B(12-24h) 97.8 91.3 13.1 6.1±0.27 Group C(24-48h) 85.7 87.8 12.2 2.0 7.3±0.32 Group D - 75 35.7 7.14 10.9±0.92 Li-xin Hou et al. Clinical Study on the Timing of Emergency Gastroscopy in Liver Cirrhotic Patients with Esophageal Variceal Bleeding. American Journal of Biomedical Research, 2018, Vol. 6, No. 1, 11-19. doi:10.12691/ajbr-6-1-2 © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Science and Education Publishing.