Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages e3 (January 2018)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Advertisements

Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
Jinwei Zhu, Yuan Shang, Yitian Xia, Rongguang Zhang, Mingjie Zhang 
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
A Naturally Occurring Repeat Protein with High Internal Sequence Identity Defines a New Class of TPR-like Proteins  Jacob D. Marold, Jennifer M. Kavran,
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages (March 2016)
Deubiquitination of Lys63-Linkage by a CYLD UBP
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
Volume 105, Issue 4, Pages (May 2001)
Ping Wang, Katelyn A. Doxtader, Yunsun Nam  Molecular Cell 
Arvin C. Dar, Michael S. Lopez, Kevan M. Shokat  Chemistry & Biology 
Structure of an LDLR-RAP Complex Reveals a General Mode for Ligand Recognition by Lipoprotein Receptors  Carl Fisher, Natalia Beglova, Stephen C. Blacklow 
Volume 24, Issue 7, Pages (July 2016)
Volume 25, Issue 8, Pages e4 (August 2017)
Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages (May 2013)
Jinwei Zhu, Yuan Shang, Yitian Xia, Rongguang Zhang, Mingjie Zhang 
Beyond the “Recognition Code”
Deubiquitination of Lys63-Linkage by a CYLD UBP
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (March 2006)
Volume 24, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 24, Issue 11, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages (November 2010)
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (January 2007)
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages (January 2017)
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Systematic Profiling of Histone Readers in Arabidopsis thaliana
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
Volume 25, Issue 10, Pages e3 (October 2017)
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (October 2013)
Crystal Structure of a Y-Family DNA Polymerase in Action
Structural Insights into the Inhibition of Wnt Signaling by Cancer Antigen 5T4/Wnt- Activated Inhibitory Factor 1  Yuguang Zhao, Tomas Malinauskas, Karl.
Structure and Site-Specific Recognition of Histone H3 by the PHD Finger of Human Autoimmune Regulator  Suvobrata Chakravarty, Lei Zeng, Ming-Ming Zhou 
Binding Dynamics of Isolated Nucleoporin Repeat Regions to Importin-β
Structural Basis for Protein Recognition by B30.2/SPRY Domains
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages (April 2008)
Volume 33, Issue 2, Pages (January 2009)
The Structure of the Tiam1 PDZ Domain/ Phospho-Syndecan1 Complex Reveals a Ligand Conformation that Modulates Protein Dynamics  Xu Liu, Tyson R. Shepherd,
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages (March 2012)
Volume 25, Issue 8, Pages e4 (August 2017)
Structure of the Catalytic Region of DNA Ligase IV in Complex with an Artemis Fragment Sheds Light on Double-Strand Break Repair  Takashi Ochi, Xiaolong.
Structural Basis of EZH2 Recognition by EED
Volume 25, Issue 11, Pages e4 (November 2017)
Structural Basis for the Recognition of Methylated Histone H3K36 by the Eaf3 Subunit of Histone Deacetylase Complex Rpd3S  Chao Xu, Gaofeng Cui, Maria.
Volume 25, Issue 11, Pages e3 (November 2017)
Crystal Structure of the p53 Core Domain Bound to a Full Consensus Site as a Self- Assembled Tetramer  Yongheng Chen, Raja Dey, Lin Chen  Structure  Volume.
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (February 2014)
Volume 14, Issue 11, Pages (November 2006)
Tianjun Zhou, Liguang Sun, John Humphreys, Elizabeth J. Goldsmith 
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (April 2006)
Shiqian Qi, Do Jin Kim, Goran Stjepanovic, James H. Hurley  Structure 
Volume 55, Issue 3, Pages (August 2014)
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages e3 (February 2018)
Volume 24, Issue 7, Pages (July 2016)
Structural Insight into BLM Recognition by TopBP1
Arvin C. Dar, Michael S. Lopez, Kevan M. Shokat  Chemistry & Biology 
Structure of an IκBα/NF-κB Complex
Structural Basis for Kinase-Mediated Macrolide Antibiotic Resistance
Volume 20, Issue 7, Pages (July 2012)
Volume 25, Issue 11, Pages e3 (November 2017)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages (November 2010)
Yogesh K. Gupta, Deepak T. Nair, Robin P. Wharton, Aneel K. Aggarwal 
Alternate Modes of Cognate RNA Recognition by Human PUMILIO Proteins
Structural Switch of the γ Subunit in an Archaeal aIF2αγ Heterodimer
Structural Basis for Apelin Control of the Human Apelin Receptor
Volume 14, Issue 8, Pages (August 2006)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages 85-95.e3 (January 2018) DNA Sequence Recognition of Human CXXC Domains and Their Structural Determinants  Chao Xu, Ke Liu, Ming Lei, Ally Yang, Yanjun Li, Timothy R. Hughes, Jinrong Min  Structure  Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages 85-95.e3 (January 2018) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2017.11.022 Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Domain Organization of 12 Human CXXC Proteins, Including CFP1, MLL1, MLL2, KDM2A, KDM2B, FBXL19, MBD1, DNMT1, CXXC4, CXXC5, TET1, and TET3 CXXC, CXXC-type zinc finger domain; MBD, methyl-CpG-binding domain; AT hook, DNA-binding domain with preference for AT-rich regions; PHD, plant homeodomain; BRD, bromodomain; Tudor, Tudor domain; FYR, FY-rich domain; SET, (Su(var)3–9, enhancer-of-zeste, trithorax) domain; Post-SET, cysteine-rich motif following a subset of SET domains; F box, F box domain; TRD, transcriptional repression domain; LRR, leucine-rich repeat; DMAP binding, DNA methyltransferase-associated protein-binding domain; BAH, bromo-adjacent homology; MTase, SAM-dependent methyltransferase C5-type domain; JmjC, Jumonji C domain; Dioxygenase, methylcytosine dioxygenase. Detailed construct information of CXXC or CXXC-PHD domain is also labeled. See also Figure 2 and Table S3. Structure 2018 26, 85-95.e3DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2017.11.022) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Four Classes of Human CXXC Domains: CpGpG, CpG, CpN, and Weak or No Binding (A) The sequence alignment of 14 human CXXC domains, with the logo representing each class. Conserved residues are highlighted with red columns, while similar residues are colored in red. (B) PBM of the GST-tagged fusion CXXC domains of CFP1, MLL1, KDM2A, KDM2B, FBXL19, TET1, TET3, and CXXC4. The binding motifs are highlighted in red. See also Figure 1, Data S1, and Tables 1 and S1. Structure 2018 26, 85-95.e3DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2017.11.022) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 The MLL2 CXXC Domain Specifically Recognizes CpG dsDNA (A) Left: Overall structure of the MLL2-CCGG complex. Protein and DNA are shown in blue and green cartoon, respectively, with the CpG base pairs (C6-G6′ and G7-C7′) in red cartoon. Middle: The electrostatic surface of MLL2 in complex with dsDNA (green). Right: The detailed interactions between MLL2 and dsDNA, with backbone and side-chain hydrogen bonds indicated by gray and red arrows, respectively. (B) The detailed interactions between the MLL2 CXXC domain with C6-G6′ (left) and G7-C7′ (right) base pairs, respectively. The protein and DNA are shown as blue and green cartoon, respectively. The interaction residues and bases are shown in stick model. See also Figures 2, 4, S1, and S3. Structure 2018 26, 85-95.e3DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2017.11.022) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 The CFP1 CXXC Domain Is the Only Member of the Class I CXXC Domain that Prefers CpGpG (A) Left: the overall structure of the CFP1-CCGG complex, in which the protein and DNA are shown in the same way as in Figure 3A. The CGG are shown in red. Right: The CFP1 CXXC domain specifically recognizes CpGpG, that is, C6-G6′, G7-C7′, and G8-C8′ base pairs. (B–D) Structure comparisons of the class II CXXC domains with the that of CFP1, including (B) MLL2, (C) MBD1_C3, and (D) FBXL19. In all three figures, the CFP1 and the class II CXXC domains are shown in blue and orange ribbon, respectively. The DNAs are shown in gray cartoon, with G8-C8′ shown in red. The protein residues, such as Arg213 and Tyr216 of CFP1, as well as Met382 and Leu385 of MBD1_C3, are shown in stick model. See also Figures 2 and 3, and Table S1. Structure 2018 26, 85-95.e3DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2017.11.022) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Base-Specific Interactions between Class III CXXC Domains and Their Respective dsDNA Ligands (A) TET3-ACGT; (B) TET1-CCGG; (C) CXXC4-ACGT; (D) CXXC5-ACGT. The figures are shown in the same way as Figure 3. See also Figures 2 and S1–S4, and Tables 1 and S1. Structure 2018 26, 85-95.e3DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2017.11.022) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions