Seth Rakoff-Nahoum, Michael J. Coyne, Laurie E. Comstock 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Love Thy Neighbor: Sharing and Cooperativity in the Gut Microbiota
Advertisements

Interaction between the Bacterial Iron Response Regulator and Ferrochelatase Mediates Genetic Control of Heme Biosynthesis  Zhenhao Qi, Mark R O'Brian 
Takashi Tanaka, Michelle A. Soriano, Michael J. Grusby  Immunity 
Volume 6, Issue 2, Pages (January 2014)
Purusharth Rajyaguru, Meipei She, Roy Parker  Molecular Cell 
Volume 24, Issue 20, Pages (October 2014)
The Smc5/6 Complex Is an ATP-Dependent Intermolecular DNA Linker
Volume 11, Issue 17, Pages (September 2001)
Enteroinvasive bacteria alter barrier and transport properties of human intestinal epithelium: Role of iNOS and COX-2  Silvia Resta–Lenert, Kim E. Barrett 
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (December 2010)
Modularity of the Bacterial Cell Cycle Enables Independent Spatial and Temporal Control of DNA Replication  Kristina Jonas, Y. Erin Chen, Michael T. Laub 
Hugo Tapia, Douglas E. Koshland  Current Biology 
Transcriptional activation of transforming growth factor-β1 in mesangial cell culture by high glucose concentration  Brenda B. Hoffman, Kumar Sharma,
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages (February 2012)
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages (March 2004)
Volume 8, Issue 24, Pages S (December 1998)
Volume 21, Issue 8, Pages (August 2014)
Volume 141, Issue 7, Pages (June 2010)
The Putative RNA Helicase Dbp4p Is Required for Release of the U14 snoRNA from Preribosomes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae  Martin Koš, David Tollervey 
Volume 22, Issue 13, Pages (July 2012)
Seth Rakoff-Nahoum, Michael J. Coyne, Laurie E. Comstock 
Profiling Motility Signal-Specific Genes in Primary Human Keratinocytes  Chieh-Fang Cheng, Jianhua Fan, Balaji Bandyopahdhay, Dennis Mock, Shengxi Guan,
Lucy S. Drury, John F.X. Diffley  Current Biology 
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages (June 2015)
Legionella Reveal Dendritic Cell Functions that Facilitate Selection of Antigens for MHC Class II Presentation  Annie L Neild, Craig R Roy  Immunity 
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages e6 (February 2018)
NanoRNAs Prime Transcription Initiation In Vivo
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (February 1998)
Kinetochore Attachments Require an Interaction between Unstructured Tails on Microtubules and Ndc80Hec1  Stephanie A. Miller, Michael L. Johnson, P. Todd.
Genjiro Suzuki, Jonathan S. Weissman, Motomasa Tanaka  Molecular Cell 
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
Volume 21, Issue 24, Pages (December 2011)
Mode of Regulation and the Insulation of Bacterial Gene Expression
Terunao Takahara, Tatsuya Maeda  Molecular Cell 
The Requirement for the Dam1 Complex Is Dependent upon the Number of Kinetochore Proteins and Microtubules  Laura S. Burrack, Shelly E. Applen, Judith.
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages (February 2006)
Volume 16, Issue 12, Pages (June 2006)
Junbiao Dai, Weiwu Xie, Troy L. Brady, Jiquan Gao, Daniel F. Voytas 
A Major Role for Capsule-Independent Phagocytosis-Inhibitory Mechanisms in Mammalian Infection by Cryptococcus neoformans  Cheryl D. Chun, Jessica C.S.
The Est3 protein is a subunit of yeast telomerase
TOR signaling regulates microtubule structure and function
Amphiregulin Exosomes Increase Cancer Cell Invasion
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
B. subtilis GS67 Protects C
Stress-Induced Phosphorylation of S
Genetic and Epigenetic Strategies Potentiate Gal4 Activation to Enhance Fitness in Recently Diverged Yeast Species  Varun Sood, Jason H. Brickner  Current.
Tradeoffs and Optimality in the Evolution of Gene Regulation
Love Thy Neighbor: Sharing and Cooperativity in the Gut Microbiota
Volume 17, Issue 8, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (March 2006)
Physcomitrella patens Auxin-Resistant Mutants Affect Conserved Elements of an Auxin- Signaling Pathway  Michael J. Prigge, Meirav Lavy, Neil W. Ashton,
Volume 17, Issue 13, Pages (July 2007)
Volume 112, Issue 5, Pages (March 2003)
Volume 32, Issue 5, Pages (December 2008)
Paul B. Mason, Kevin Struhl  Molecular Cell 
RNase III-Mediated Silencing of a Glucose-Dependent Repressor in Yeast
Volume 30, Issue 2, Pages (April 2008)
Volume 141, Issue 7, Pages (June 2010)
Nitobe London, Steven Ceto, Jeffrey A. Ranish, Sue Biggins 
Solutions to the Public Goods Dilemma in Bacterial Biofilms
Volume 16, Issue 16, Pages (August 2006)
Benjamin A. Pinsky, Christian R. Nelson, Sue Biggins  Current Biology 
A Yeast Catabolic Enzyme Controls Transcriptional Memory
Regulating Alternative Lifestyles in Entomopathogenic Bacteria
Volume 13, Issue 8, Pages (November 2015)
Condensin and Hmo1 Mediate a Starvation-Induced Transcriptional Position Effect within the Ribosomal DNA Array  Danni Wang, Andres Mansisidor, Gayathri.
KNL1/Spc105 Recruits PP1 to Silence the Spindle Assembly Checkpoint
Interaction between the Bacterial Iron Response Regulator and Ferrochelatase Mediates Genetic Control of Heme Biosynthesis  Zhenhao Qi, Mark R O'Brian 
Nitrogen Regulates AMPK to Control TORC1 Signaling
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages (January 2007)
Presentation transcript:

An Ecological Network of Polysaccharide Utilization among Human Intestinal Symbionts  Seth Rakoff-Nahoum, Michael J. Coyne, Laurie E. Comstock  Current Biology  Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages 40-49 (January 2014) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.10.077 Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Variation among Bacteroidales Members in Ability to Utilize Polysaccharides and to Publicly Liberate PBPs (A) Growth curves of bacteria in defined media with indicated polysaccharide as carbohydrate source. (B) Thin-layer chromatography (TLC) analyses of polysaccharide breakdown products in the CM of primary utilizers through the growth phases (1, early; 2, mid; 3, late log; 4, stationary) in defined media with indicated polysaccharide as carbohydrate source. The intact polysaccharides do not migrate from the bottom of the TLC plate. PBPs are continually generated as they are consumed during bacterial growth due to continued breakdown of polysaccharide. Fru, fructose; FOS, fructose oligosaccharides (derived from inulin); Glu, glucose; Malt, maltose; MD, maltodextrin. Data are representative of at least three independent experiments; one representative experiment is shown. See also Figure S1. Current Biology 2014 24, 40-49DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2013.10.077) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Specific Non-Polysaccharide-Utilizing Bacteroidales Members Can Utilize Liberated PBP Public Goods (A) Growth curves of non-primary-utilizing bacteria in media conditioned by PBP-liberating utilizers. (B) TLC analysis of culture supernatants of recipient bacteria grown in the CM of primary utilizers. As P. distasonis did not grow in Bo-inulin CM, its time points correspond to the growth points of B. vulgatus in the same CM through the growth phases (1, mid; 2, late log; 3, stationary). (C) Growth curves of B. vulgatus in inulin media conditioned by different species of inulin-utilizing Bacteroidales. (D) TLC analysis of culture supernatants of B. vulgatus grown in B. caccae and B. uniformis inulin CM through the growth phases (1, mid; 2, late log; 3, stationary). Data are representative of at least three independent experiments; one representative experiment is shown. See also Figure S2. Current Biology 2014 24, 40-49DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2013.10.077) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Growth and PBP Liberation by Recipients Containing Producer-Derived GH/PL Genes (A) Growth curves of recipient bacteria with genes encoding the B. ovatus inulin PLs (BACOVA_04502 and BACOVA_04503), the B. thetaiotaomicron levan GH (BT_1760), the B. thetaiotaomicron amylopectin GH (susG, BT_3698), or vector alone (pFD340) in defined polysaccharide media. The initial decrease in OD600 in amylopectin and levan media correspond to rapid degradation of these optically dense polysaccharides. (B) TLC analyses of PBPs released from recipient strains containing GH/PL genes in trans or vector alone (pFD340) through the growth phases (Inulin and amylopectin: 1, early; 2, mid; 3, late log; 4, stationary. Levan: 1, lag; 2, early; 3, mid; 4, late log; 5, stationary). As recipient with vector alone did not grow in polysaccharide media, its time points correspond to the growth points of recipient strains containing GH/PL genes in trans. Data are representative of at least independent experiments; one representative experiment is shown. Current Biology 2014 24, 40-49DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2013.10.077) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 GH/PLs Serve as Public Goods through Secretion in Outer Membrane Vesicles (A) Left: growth of utilizers on defined amylopectin agarose plates demonstrating amylopectin degraded zones surrounding Bf, Bo, and Bt, demonstrating extracellular release of GH. Middle: growth capabilities of recipient (Bv) and late recipient (Bc) plated at various distances (a, b, c, and d) from the producer B. ovatus on a defined amylopectin plate. B. vulgatus is only able to grow in the zone of amylopectin degradation, whereas late recipient, B. caccae does not (left). Right: growth of recipient B. vulgatus (spotted on all 36 spots except 3C) is dictated by its spatial proximity to the producer B. ovatus (spotted on 3C) on a defined inulin plate. (B) TLC analyses of GH/PL activity in culture supernatants of PBP-liberating utilizer strains grown in indicated defined medium with extra polysaccharide added and incubated over time. The polysaccharide at the origin of the TLC is degraded with accumulation of PBPs. (C) TLC analysis of extracellular GH/PL activity from recipient strains with GH/PL genes in trans or vector alone. Bacteria were cultured in defined glucose medium without polysaccharide as the GH/PL genes are expressed from a constitutive plasmid-borne promoter. Supernatants were harvested, filter sterilized, and diluted 1:1 with medium containing the indicated polysaccharide and incubated at 37°C over time prior to TLC analysis. The glucose at the top of the TLC is from the initial growth medium. Glu, glucose. (D) Growth of B. vulgatus but not P. distasonis in defined inulin medium with purified BACOVA_04502 and BACOVA_04503 added to the medium. B. vulgatus does not grow with material purified from the vector only control. (E) TLC analysis of the resulting media from the samples shown in (D), through the growth phases (1, lag; 2, lag; 3, late log; 4, stationary), demonstrating PBP consumption by B. vulgatus. “C” indicates B. vulgatus grown with material prepared from vector-only control. As this B. vulgatus with vector control material and P. distasonis did not grow in Bo-inulin CM, its time points correspond to the growth points of B. vulgatus with inulinases through the growth phases. (F) Western immunoblot analysis of cell lysates (CL), supernatant (sup), or outer-membrane vesicles (OMVs) from wild-type transconjugants synthesizing His-tagged GH/PLs. BT_1760 was not tracked in this assay. (G) Growth of B. vulgatus in defined inulin medium with added OMVs isolated from B. ovatus inulin CM. The OMVs were harvested from supernatant of B. ovatus grown to log phase so that the bacteria were actively growing at the time of harvest. (H) TLC analysis of the resulting media from the samples shown in (G), through the growth phases (1, early; 2, mid; 3, late log), demonstrating PBP consumption by B. vulgatus during growth in OMV + inulin media. The first lane is B. vulgatus cultured inulin medium without OMV at the same time point as B. vulgatus with OMV at time point 3. Data are representative of at least two independent experiments; one representative experiment is shown. See also Figure S3. Current Biology 2014 24, 40-49DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2013.10.077) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Ecological Classes and Network of Polysaccharide Utilization (A) Schematic diagram designating Bacteroidales type strains to one of five ecological classes: utilizer/public good producer, utilizer/public good nonproducer, PBP public good recipient (inducible), PBP public good recipient (noninducible), and nonrecipient. (B) A network of interactions based on PS utilization for Bacteroidales type strains. See also Figure S4. Current Biology 2014 24, 40-49DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2013.10.077) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Fitness Assays of Polysaccharide-Utilizing and -Nonutilizing Strains in Coculture Growth of type strains in coculture or monoculture in defined inulin medium (A) or defined amylopectin medium (B). The B ovatus strain is an arginine auxotrophic mutant, allowing for analyses under both growth limiting (low arginine, 1 μg/ml) and nonlimiting (high arginine, 16 μg/ml) conditions. Solid lines represent bacterial counts from monoculture experiments, whereas dotted lines represent bacterial counts from coculture experiments. Monoculture experiments for recipients were performed under low-arginine conditions only, as their growth is not affected by arginine; therefore, this growth curve is used for both producer-limited and not limited experiments. The limit of detection (indicated with ∗ for strains that were below detection) for a given experiment is set at 2 logs below the total density of the culture. Data are representative of at least three independent experiments; one representative experiment is shown. Comparison of growth rates was as follows. Inulin producer nonlimited: Bv in monoculture (−0.08 ± 1.17) versus Bv in coculture (4.62 ± 0.05), p = 0.027. Bo in monoculture (5.58 ± 0.24) versus Bo in coculture with Bv (7.24 ± 2.4), p = 0.30, not significant (ns). Relative frequency producer: recipient (93.9% ± 2.4%:6.1% ± 2.4%). Inulin producer limited: Bv in monoculture (−0.08 ± 1.17) versus Bv in coculture (3.9 ± 1.2), p = 0.005. Relative frequency producer: recipient (5.3% ± 2.1%:94.7% ± 2.1%). Bo in monoculture (3.14 ± 0.37) versus Bo in coculture with Bv (3.08 ± 1.1), p = 0.48, ns. Amylopectin producer nonlimited: Bv in monoculture (−2.67 ± 0.73) versus Bv in coculture (4.69 ± 2.54), p = 0.02. Bo in monoculture (6.06 ± 1.13) versus Bo in coculture with Bv (9.34 ± 0.89), p = 0.02. Relative frequency producer: recipient (96% ± 1%:4% ± 1%). Pd in monoculture (−1.95 ± 1.07) versus Pd in coculture (1.42 ± 1.56), p = 0.05. Bo in monoculture (6.07 ± 1.13) versus Bo in coculture with Pd (9.88 ± 0.52), p = 0.045. Relative frequency producer: recipient (92% ± 2.7%:8% ± 2.7%). Amylopectin producer limited: Bv in monoculture (−2.7 ± 1.15) versus Bv in coculture (11.2 ± 4.1), p = 0.02. Bo in monoculture (6.4 ± 1.77) versus Bo in coculture with Bv (6.22 ± 1.08), p = 0.42, ns. Relative frequency producer: recipient (4.6% ± 2.7%:95.4% ± 2.7%). Pd in monoculture (−1.82 ± 1.23) versus Pd in coculture (5.84 ± 3.35), p = 0.87, ns. Bo in monoculture (6.37 ± 1.78) versus Bo in coculture with Pd (4.9 ± 0.23), p = 0.21. Relative frequency producer: recipient (15.7% ± 7.5%:84.4% ± 7.5%). Limits of detection precluded determination of growth rate of Pd in inulin coculture and Bc in amylopectin coculture. See also Figure S5. Current Biology 2014 24, 40-49DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2013.10.077) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Polysaccharide-Based Ecological Relationships of Naturally Coresident Bacteroidales (A) Growth curves of naturally coresident Bacteroidales strains from human subject CL03 in the four defined polysaccharide media. (B) TLC analysis of PBP release during growth of CL03 strains in defined polysaccharide media. (C and D) Growth (C) and TLC (D) analysis of PBP consumption by CL03-nonutilizing strains grown in the CM of primary utilizers, through the growth phases (1, early; 2, mid; 3, late log). Producer-derived CM was diluted with fresh polysaccharide containing defined media for recipient growth to assess inducible polysaccharide utilization. Therefore, lane 0 (undiluted producer CM) has less polysaccharide than the subsequent lanes. Data are representative of at least two independent experiments; one representative experiment is shown. Current Biology 2014 24, 40-49DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2013.10.077) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions