Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages (April 2009)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Figure S1. Production of recombinant NS1 protein
Advertisements

Volume 35, Issue 4, Pages (August 2009)
Federico Dajas-Bailador, Emma V. Jones, Alan J. Whitmarsh 
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Interactions between Aiolos and Ikaros proteins are detected within the cell nucleus. Interactions between Aiolos and Ikaros proteins are detected within.
Volume 5, Issue 5, Pages (May 2004)
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages (February 2017)
Megan van Overbeek, Titia de Lange  Current Biology 
Volume 134, Issue 2, Pages (July 2008)
Volume 138, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Weiguo Zhang, Serafin U. Colmenares, Gary H. Karpen  Molecular Cell 
Yu-Hsin Chiu, Jennifer Y. Lee, Lewis C. Cantley  Molecular Cell 
Volume 20, Issue 10, Pages (May 2010)
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
Volume 17, Issue 18, Pages (September 2007)
Dimers Probe the Assembly Status of Multimeric Membrane Proteins 
Volume 16, Issue 12, Pages (June 2006)
Elif Nur Firat-Karalar, Navin Rauniyar, John R. Yates, Tim Stearns 
Volume 23, Issue 12, Pages (June 2018)
The Intracellular Domain of the Frazzled/DCC Receptor Is a Transcription Factor Required for Commissural Axon Guidance  Alexandra Neuhaus-Follini, Greg J.
Robert L.S Perry, Maura H Parker, Michael A Rudnicki  Molecular Cell 
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages (May 2005)
Slicing-Independent RISC Activation Requires the Argonaute PAZ Domain
MAGE-RING Protein Complexes Comprise a Family of E3 Ubiquitin Ligases
Volume 123, Issue 2, Pages (October 2005)
Yuming Wang, Jennifer A. Fairley, Stefan G.E. Roberts  Current Biology 
Jungmook Lyu, Vicky Yamamoto, Wange Lu  Developmental Cell 
A JNK-Dependent Pathway Is Required for TNFα-Induced Apoptosis
Volume 134, Issue 5, Pages (September 2008)
Volume 22, Issue 20, Pages (October 2012)
HDAC5, a Key Component in Temporal Regulation of p53-Mediated Transactivation in Response to Genotoxic Stress  Nirmalya Sen, Rajni Kumari, Manika Indrajit.
Heather B. Megosh, Daniel N. Cox, Chris Campbell, Haifan Lin 
Volume 20, Issue 14, Pages (July 2010)
Nucleocapsid Phosphorylation and RNA Helicase DDX1 Recruitment Enables Coronavirus Transition from Discontinuous to Continuous Transcription  Chia-Hsin.
Volume 44, Issue 3, Pages (November 2011)
Melissa L. Ehlers, Barbara Celona, Brian L. Black  Cell Reports 
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
c-Src Activates Endonuclease-Mediated mRNA Decay
A Critical Role for Noncoding 5S rRNA in Regulating Mdmx Stability
Volume 67, Issue 3, Pages e5 (August 2017)
Proteomic Analysis of Mammalian Primary Cilia
Volume 49, Issue 4, Pages (February 2013)
A Dynamic Molecular Link between the Telomere Length Regulator TRF1 and the Chromosome End Protector TRF2  Benjamin R. Houghtaling, Leanora Cuttonaro,
Volume 19, Issue 14, Pages (July 2009)
SUMO-1 Modification Represses Sp3 Transcriptional Activation and Modulates Its Subnuclear Localization  Sarah Ross, Jennifer L Best, Leonard I Zon, Grace.
Mitochondrial p32 Is a Critical Mediator of ARF-Induced Apoptosis
ASPP2 Regulates Epithelial Cell Polarity through the PAR Complex
Volume 17, Issue 20, Pages (October 2007)
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Eaf3 Chromodomain Interaction with Methylated H3-K36 Links Histone Deacetylation to Pol II Elongation  Amita A. Joshi, Kevin Struhl  Molecular Cell  Volume.
Volume 24, Issue 21, Pages (November 2014)
Volume 17, Issue 18, Pages (September 2007)
Lin28 Mediates the Terminal Uridylation of let-7 Precursor MicroRNA
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
SUMOylation Promotes Nuclear Import and Stabilization of Polo-like Kinase 1 to Support Its Mitotic Function  Donghua Wen, Jianguo Wu, Lei Wang, Zheng.
Volume 12, Issue 5, Pages (November 2003)
Volume 119, Issue 2, Pages (October 2004)
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (January 2002)
Volume 36, Issue 6, Pages (December 2009)
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (May 2009)
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages (August 2005)
Association of CNK1 with Rho Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factors Controls Signaling Specificity Downstream of Rho  Aron B. Jaffe, Alan Hall, Anja Schmidt 
A Smad Transcriptional Corepressor
Volume 15, Issue 19, Pages (October 2005)
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages (February 2011)
Jörg Hartkamp, Brian Carpenter, Stefan G.E. Roberts  Molecular Cell 
Cdk1 Negatively Regulates Midzone Localization of the Mitotic Kinesin Mklp2 and the Chromosomal Passenger Complex  Stefan Hümmer, Thomas U. Mayer  Current.
Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages (March 2007)
Volume 123, Issue 2, Pages (October 2005)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages 640-644 (April 2009) Mili Interacts with Tudor Domain-Containing Protein 1 in Regulating Spermatogenesis  Jianquan Wang, Jonathan P. Saxe, Takashi Tanaka, Shinichiro Chuma, Haifan Lin  Current Biology  Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages 640-644 (April 2009) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2009.02.061 Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Mili Specifically Interacts with Tdrd1 in an RNA-Independent Manner (A) Silver-stained SDS-PAGE gels revealing the products of Mili antibody immunoprecipitation of testicular extract. The immunoprecipitation in the presence of blocking peptide was used as negative control. Two specific bands (∼100 and ∼140 kDa) were identified as Mili and Tdrd1 by mass spectrometry. (B) Western blot showing that Tdrd1 was coimmunoprecipitated by Mili antibody. The Mili-Tdrd1 interaction is RNA independent. Peptide-blocked Mili antibody was used as a negative control. IgG band was used as loading control. (C) Western blot showing that Mili was coimmunoprecipitated by Tdrd1 antibody. Extract plus beads and antibody plus beads were used as negative control for IP. The Mili-Tdrd1 interaction is RNA independent. IgG band was used as loading control. Current Biology 2009 19, 640-644DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2009.02.061) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 The Specificity and Domains of Mili-Tdrd1 Interaction (A) Mili preferentially interacts with Tdrd1. The 293T cells were transfected with indicated FLAG plasmids and myc-tagged Tdrd1, followed by immunoprecipitation with FLAG beads, and the cells were then subjected to western blotting. The numbers under the blots represent the myc or FLAG signal in the IP FLAG blots. (B) Tdrd1 preferentially interacts with Mili. The 293T cells were transfected with FLAG-tagged Mili and constructs encoding the indicated myc-tagged Tdrd protein, followed by immunoprecipitation with myc antibodies, and the cells were then subjected to western blotting. (C) The N-terminal portion of Mili mediates its interaction with Tdrd1. Indicated FLAG-tagged Mili deletion constructs and myc-tagged Tdrd1 were transfected into 293T cells and analyzed as described in (A). (D) Multiple domains of Tdrd1 are required for interaction with Mili. Indicated myc-tagged Tdrd1 deletion constructs were transfected into 293T cells with FLAG-tagged Mili and analyzed as described in (B). Asterisks indicate either N-terminal or C-terminal myc tag. m = zinc finger MynD domain. Current Biology 2009 19, 640-644DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2009.02.061) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Mili Colocalizes with Tdrd1 in Cytoplasm and in the Nuage and Chromatoid Body (A) Western blots showing that Tdrd1 and Mili are primarily expressed in cytoplasm. Purity of the fractionations was confirmed by western blotting for GAPDH as a cytoplasmic marker and RNA Pol II as a nuclear marker. (B) Tdrd1 (green) was localized in the cytoplasm and enriched in the dense granule and the nuage in spermatogonia and spermatocytes and chromatoid body of spermatids. Mili (red) colocalized with Tdrd1 in the cytoplasm, especially in these granules. DNA was stained with DAPI (as shown in blue). (C) Western blotting of Tdrd1 in 13 dpp mili mutant showing that cytoplasmic Tdrd1 is drastically reduced in the mili mutant. (D) In 13 dpp mili+/+ testes, Tdrd1 is primarily localized to the cytoplasm of spermatogonia and spermatocytes, whereas, in 13 dpp mili−/− testes, there is a drastic loss of cytoplasmic Tdrd1 in spermatogonia and spermatocytes. Scale bars represent 25 μm. Current Biology 2009 19, 640-644DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2009.02.061) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 The Interaction between Mili and Tdrd1 Is Not Related to Translation and piRNA Biogenesis (A) Tdrd1 and Mili fraction profile of 2-month-old wild-type testes in a 15%–50% (W/W) sucrose gradient. (B and C) Fractionation profiles of wild-type testes following treatment with EDTA and micrococcal nuclease, respectively. (D) Mili distribution on polysome fractions in tdrd−/− testes. (E) A polyacrylamide gel showing that piRNAs are present in similar abundance in Tdrd1+/+, Tdrd1+/−, and Tdrd1−/− testes. (F) A working model on the interaction of Mili, Tdrd1, and other proteins in the nuage and chromatoid body, which is distinct from the Mili-eIF3a interactions in the translational machinery in the cytosol. Current Biology 2009 19, 640-644DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2009.02.061) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions