45th WGCV Plenary Perth, July 2019

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Future Directions and Initiatives in the Use of Remote Sensing for Water Quality.
Advertisements

Precipitation in IGWCO The objectives of IGWCO require time series of accurate gridded precipitation fields with fine spatial and temporal resolution for.
Space-based Architecture for Climate Mary Kicza NOAA’s Assistant Administrator for Satellite and Information Services May 19, 2011.
World Meteorological Organization Working together in weather, climate and water WMO OMM WMO Barbara J. Ryan Director, WMO Space Programme.
1 1. FY09 GOES-R3 Project Proposal Title Page Title: Trace Gas and Aerosol Emissions from GOES-R ABI Project Type: GOES-R algorithm development project.
Green Vegetation Fraction (GVF) derived from the Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) sensor onboard the SNPP satellite Zhangyan Jiang 1,2,
Brief Overview of CM-SAF & Possible use of the Data for NCMPs.
Princeton University Global Evaluation of a MODIS based Evapotranspiration Product Eric Wood Hongbo Su Matthew McCabe.
VENUS (Vegetation and Environment New µ-Spacecraft) A demonstration space mission dedicated to land surface environment (Vegetation and Environment New.
Brief Overview of CM-SAF & Possible use of the Data for NCMPs.
World Renewable Energy Forum May 15-17, 2012 Dr. James Hall.
Slide: 1 27 th CEOS Plenary |Montréal | November 2013 Agenda item: 29 Adrian Simmons, Chair of the GCOS Steering Committee Update from the Global.
LAND PRODUCT VALIDATION update F. Baret, J. Nightingale, S. Garrigues, J. Nickeson Missoula, 17 June /29.
Getting Ready for the Future Woody Turner Earth Science Division NASA Headquarters May 7, 2014 Biodiversity and Ecological Forecasting Team Meeting Sheraton.
Translation to the New TCO Panel Beverly Law Prof. Global Change Forest Science Science Chair, AmeriFlux Network Oregon State University.
CEOS WGCV Land Product Validation Sub-Group Overview Joanne Nightingale, Jaime Nickeson (Sigma Space Corp / NASA GSFC) With input from LPV Focus Group.
© geoland2 consortium European Commission Fast Track Service Land within the GMES initiative in FP-7 Approach for validation of geoland2 products: phenological.
Clear sky Net Surface Radiative Fluxes over Rugged Terrain from Satellite Measurements Tianxing Wang Guangjian Yan
Modern Era Retrospective-analysis for Research and Applications: Introduction to NASA’s Modern Era Retrospective-analysis for Research and Applications:
Recommendations from the GEO TASK AG Community of Practice Image: NASA, ASTER Science Team Minnesota Kansas Germany Bolivia Thailand Brazil.
Research Progress Discussions of Coordinated Emissions Research Suggestions to Guide this Initiative Focus on research emission inventories Do not interfere.
WGISS and GEO Activities Kathy Fontaine NASA March 13, 2007 eGY Boulder, CO.
Systematic Terrestrial Observations: a Case for Carbon René Gommes with C. He, J. Hielkema, P. Reichert and J. Tschirley FAO/SDRN.
ATT Contribution to GEO Archive Task Team WGISS – 22 Sep 11 – 15, 2006 Annapolis, USA.
R. T. Pinker, H. Wang, R. Hollmann, and H. Gadhavi Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland Use of.
RMIB involvement in the Geostationary Earth Radiation Budget (GERB) and Climate Monitoring SAF projects Nicolas Clerbaux Remote sensing from Space Division.
ISAC Contribution to Ocean Color activity Mediterranean high resolution surface chlorophyll mapping Use available bio-optical data sets to estimate the.
1/13 Development of high level biophysical products from the fusion of medium resolution sensors for regional to global applications: the CYCLOPES project.
SAG UV Last meetings: Melbourne, Australia, Jul 2011 Next meeting: Hannover, May 2015 Susana Diaz (Chair)
Consistent Earth System Data Records for Climate Research: Focus on Shortwave and Longwave Radiative Fluxes Rachel T. Pinker, Yingtao Ma and Eric Nussbaumer.
EUMETSAT, version 1, Date 06/06/2016 Coordination Group for Meteorological Satellites - CGMS Status report and recommendations from SCOPE-CM Chair: Ed.
Research Progress Discussions of Coordinated Emissions Research Suggestions to Guide this Initiative Focus on research emission inventories Do not interfere.
The International Ocean Colour Coordinating Group International Network for Sensor Inter- comparison and Uncertainty assessment for Ocean Color Radiometry.
Solar Intelligence Lessons learnt in Australia Bruce W Forgan Observation & Infrastructure Branch Observations and Infrastructure Division Australian Bureau.
Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service CAMS General Assembly, Athens, June 2016 Marion Schroedter-Homscheidt (DLR) with Armines (L. Wald, M. Lefèvre),
CrossCutting topic: Data Quality and European Network of EO Networks
IMAGE PIXELS OF RFI<0.2 ONLY
A. Lattanzio, R. Roebeling (EUMETSAT)
The GEO Renewable Energy Initiative
Future directions of CEOS WGCV: Incoming chair perspective
CEOS Carbon Strategy – WGClimate Actions
Australian report for Atmosphere theme
Terrestrial-atmosphere (1)
TOPC Report Wolfgang Wagner.
WMO Space Programme Update
Peter May and Beth Ebert CAWCR Bureau of Meteorology Australia
Kansas Minnesota Germany
Validation of Satellite-derived Lake Surface Temperatures
EG2234 Earth Observation Weather Forecasting.
The Joint CEOS/CGMS Working Group on Climate
WGCV Work Plan Actions K. . Thome NASA WGCV Plenary # 43
Status of Carbon Action Items
Application of GI to weather forecasting
Zhang Hailong, Xin Xiaozhou, Liu Qinhuo
Carbon Actions for WGCV
Carbon Actions for WGCV
National REMOTE SENSING Validation Workshop
Overview of the validation of active fire products
Inter-calibration of the SEVIRI solar bands against MODIS Aqua, using Deep Convective Clouds as transfer targets Sébastien Wagner, Tim Hewison In collaboration.
Recent activities of OCR-VC
Closure of WGCV actions (CV-01; CV-09; CV-13; CV-16)
WGCV Work Plan Actions K. Thome NASA WGCV Plenary # 44
Igor Appel Alexander Kokhanovsky
What do we want to accomplish?
SCOPE-CM Statement of Needs John Bates (NOAA, SCOPE-CM Executive Panel Chair) Lothar Schüller (EUMETSAT, SCOPE-CM Secretariat)
WG Calibration and Validation
Satellite-based climate data records of the surface solar radiation Jörg Trentmann, Uwe Pfeifroth, Steffen Kothe, Vivien Priemer.
The WMO Global Basic Observing Network (GBON) Lars Peter Riishojgaard
WGCV Chair’s Report C. Ong CSIRO WGCV Plenary # 45
45th WGCV Plenary Perth, July 2019
Presentation transcript:

45th WGCV Plenary Perth, July 2019 Working Group on Calibration and Validation Land Product Validation Subgroup 45th WGCV Plenary Perth, July 2019 Solar radiation validation protocol I. Grant LPV established as subgroup in 2000.

Why a solar radiation protocol? Working Group on Calibration and Validation Why a solar radiation protocol? Downwelling surface solar radiation (DSSR) is a key environmental variable. It drives weather, climate, evapotranspiration, plant growth, solar energy, DSSR is a GCOS ECV Under: Atmosphere – Surface – Radiation budget GCOS has proposed the GCOS Surface Reference Network (GSRN) with DSSR a core variable as one of the four components of surface radiation budget. DSSR is produced by CEOS agencies WGClimate inventory of satellite ECV datasets: EUMETSAT (CM SAF): CLARA (AVHRR), CLAAS (SEVIRI), SARAH (SEVIRI by Heliosat) NASA (CERES) Others include NOAA: NSRDB (US coverage) NASA: POWER (global coverage, from GEWEX/SRB) EC: CAMS radiation service (Meteosat coverage) ABoM (Australia coverage) JAXA (Himawari coverage) DSSR is the fuel for solar energy generation UN Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 7 "Affordable and Clean Energy" Formed in 2000 as part of NASA’s EOS validation program – validating MODIS land products The mission of the CEOS Land Product Validation (LPV) subgroup is to coordinate the quantitative validation of satellite-derived products. The focus lies on standardized intercomparison and validation across products from different satellite, algorithms, and agency sources.

GCOS ECV Working Group on Calibration and Validation Atmosphere – Surface – Radiation budget Formed in 2000 as part of NASA’s EOS validation program – validating MODIS land products The mission of the CEOS Land Product Validation (LPV) subgroup is to coordinate the quantitative validation of satellite-derived products. The focus lies on standardized intercomparison and validation across products from different satellite, algorithms, and agency sources.

Spatiotemporal characteristics Working Group on Calibration and Validation Spatiotemporal characteristics DSSR has the spatiotemporal variability of clouds Ground observation sampling is at 1 minute or even 1 second E.g. ABoM network is 1-minute statistics of 1-second samples GEO satellite data has hourly or recently 10/15 minute sampling Satellite solar products are typically at 10/15 minutes, hour, day, month, year Significant spatial variation within a satellite IFOV or grid cell Thus Temporal "smoothness" metric of Albedo, FAPAR, etc. is not appropriate Errors of dataset intercomparison depend on spatial and temporal resolution Point ground observations have more temporal variability than spatially averaged satellite observations Formed in 2000 as part of NASA’s EOS validation program – validating MODIS land products The mission of the CEOS Land Product Validation (LPV) subgroup is to coordinate the quantitative validation of satellite-derived products. The focus lies on standardized intercomparison and validation across products from different satellite, algorithms, and agency sources.

IEA/PVPS Task 16 Working Group on Calibration and Validation International Energy Agency (IEA) – Photovoltaic Power Systems (PVPS) – Task16: "Solar resource for high penetration and large scale applications” International group of self-funded technical experts: ~20 nations, ~100 people Focus on improving solar resource assessment and forecasting for solar energy sector Duration 2017–2020 (extension to 2023 under development) Continues IEA/SHC Task 4 (1977–), …, Task 46 (2011–2016) Produced Best Practices Handbook Task 16 broad goals include Lowering uncertainty of satellite retrievals Contribute to or setup international benchmark for data sets Task 16 members are broadly supportive of a CEOS protocol to formalise solar radiation validation Formed in 2000 as part of NASA’s EOS validation program – validating MODIS land products The mission of the CEOS Land Product Validation (LPV) subgroup is to coordinate the quantitative validation of satellite-derived products. The focus lies on standardized intercomparison and validation across products from different satellite, algorithms, and agency sources.

Previous solar validation efforts Working Group on Calibration and Validation Previous solar validation efforts IEA/SHC Task 36 "Report on Benchmarking of Radiation Products" (2009) Point comparisons at ground stations Map-based relative intercomparison of satellite datasets Metrics include MBE, RMSE, measures of difference between probability distributions IEA/SHC Task 46 "Best Practices Handbook" (2015): "There is no standardized method for accuracy assessment [of satellite datasets]" Formed in 2000 as part of NASA’s EOS validation program – validating MODIS land products The mission of the CEOS Land Product Validation (LPV) subgroup is to coordinate the quantitative validation of satellite-derived products. The focus lies on standardized intercomparison and validation across products from different satellite, algorithms, and agency sources.

A Solar validation protocol Working Group on Calibration and Validation A Solar validation protocol Model on Albedo (and LST, FAPAR, …) protocol Adapt to existing solar validation work and necessary future work Metrics adapted from albedo or FAPAR protocols Delete smoothness Add measures of PDF difference, temporal variability?, ramps? Identify future work needed (e.g. How necessary is ground site homogeneity?) Split of DSSR into direct beam & diffuse components Critical for solar energy Direct/diffuse split is also used by e.g. weather models, ecosystem models Expand solar protocol from initial DSSR to include direct component? Formed in 2000 as part of NASA’s EOS validation program – validating MODIS land products The mission of the CEOS Land Product Validation (LPV) subgroup is to coordinate the quantitative validation of satellite-derived products. The focus lies on standardized intercomparison and validation across products from different satellite, algorithms, and agency sources.

Issues / Questions Working Group on Calibration and Validation Is DSSR "land" enough to come under LPV? Protocol to cover direct and diffuse? Some CEOS agency datasets include direct (e.g. NOAA/NSRDB, ABoM, JAXA, EC/CAMS, CM-SAF/MVIRI) Protocol to list areas requiring research, including What is adequate global distribution of sites? What is the need for spatial homogeneity of ground sites? Need for QC of ground data Dealing with gaps in ground or satellite data to be compared as temporal aggregates (e.g. daily totals, monthly averages) Lack of globally coordinated dataset production and distribution What to call it? Downwelling surface solar radiation GCOS: Surface ERB shortwave Solar energy community: Global horizontal irradiance, Direct normal irradiance Formed in 2000 as part of NASA’s EOS validation program – validating MODIS land products The mission of the CEOS Land Product Validation (LPV) subgroup is to coordinate the quantitative validation of satellite-derived products. The focus lies on standardized intercomparison and validation across products from different satellite, algorithms, and agency sources.

Extra slides Working Group on Calibration and Validation Formed in 2000 as part of NASA’s EOS validation program – validating MODIS land products The mission of the CEOS Land Product Validation (LPV) subgroup is to coordinate the quantitative validation of satellite-derived products. The focus lies on standardized intercomparison and validation across products from different satellite, algorithms, and agency sources. Extra slides

IEA/PVPS Task 16 – Broad goals Working Group on Calibration and Validation IEA/PVPS Task 16 – Broad goals Lowering uncertainty of satellite retrievals and Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) models for solar resource assessments and nowcasting. Define best practices for data fusion of ground, satellite and NWP data (re-analysis) to produce improved datasets, e.g. time series or Typical Meteorological Year (TMY). Develop enhanced analysis of long-term inter-annual variability and trends in the solar resource. Develop and compare methods for Estimating the spectral and angular distributions of solar radiation (clear and all-sky conditions) Describing the spatial and temporal variabilities of the solar resource Modelling point to area forecasts Probabilistic and variability forecasting Contribute to or setup international benchmark for data sets and for forecast evaluation. Formed in 2000 as part of NASA’s EOS validation program – validating MODIS land products The mission of the CEOS Land Product Validation (LPV) subgroup is to coordinate the quantitative validation of satellite-derived products. The focus lies on standardized intercomparison and validation across products from different satellite, algorithms, and agency sources.

IEA/PVPS Task 16 Solar resource for high penetration and large scale applications, 2017-2020 Main goal is to lower uncertainty of resources and forecasts and therefore lower the costs of financing costs as well operation and grid integration costs Subtask 1: Evaluation of current and emerging resource assessment methodologies: Ground based methods Numerical weather models (NWP) Satellite-based methods Benchmarking framework Subtask 2: Enhanced data & bankable products: Data quality & format Merging of satellite, NWP & ground data Spatio-temporal high variability Long-term inter-annual variability Products for the end-users Subtask 3: Evaluation of current and emerging solar forecasting techniques: Value of solar power forecasts Regional solar power forecasting Variability forecasting and probabilistic forecasting Subtask 4: Dissemination and Outreach: Develop a Task Brochure Create a 6-month Task Newsletter Conduct periodic (annual) Subtask-level webinars and/or conference presentations Update of the solar resource handbook

LPV Subgroup Objectives Working Group on Calibration and Validation LPV Subgroup Objectives To foster and coordinate quantitative validation of global land products derived from remotely sensed data, in a traceable way, and to relay results to users. To increase the quality and efficiency of global satellite product validation by developing and promoting international standards and protocols for: Field sampling Scaling techniques Accuracy report and use Data and information exchange To improve quality of ground references used for product validation Field campaigns for fiducial references Identification of sites and supersites for validation To provide feedback to international structures for: Requirements on product accuracy and quality assurance Terrestrial ECV measurement standards Formed in 2000 as part of NASA’s EOS validation program – validating MODIS land products The mission of the CEOS Land Product Validation (LPV) subgroup is to coordinate the quantitative validation of satellite-derived products. The focus lies on standardized intercomparison and validation across products from different satellite, algorithms, and agency sources.