Building a Respectful Workplace Public Service Employee Surveys Labour Management Consultation Committee (LMCC) October 3, 2017.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ADM (HR-Civ) - Assistant Deputy Minister (Human Resources - Civilian) SMA (RH-Civ) - Sous-ministre adjointe (Ressources humaines - Civiles) Public.
Advertisements

2013 CollaboRATE Survey Results
2015 SpEd Assessment Updates TETN Event # Presented June 5, 2013 TEA’s Student Assessment Division.
Biology Staff Survey Why we ran a staff survey  To see how things have changed since the last survey (2011)  To find out what’s working well and.
2010 MUSC Excellence Faculty/Staff Survey Leadership Development Institute July 23, 2010.
University Council Shared Leadership for Integrated Planning and Consultative Decision-Making.
Report to Council Staff Opinion Survey HR Director 6 March 2009.
The National Mental Health and Disability Employment Strategy – Aims and instruments Debbie Mitchell Branch Manager Participation Policy Branch 7 December.
Performance Evaluation Process June 19th and June 26 th.
PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS ENHANCING COMMUNICATIONS & WORKING RELATIONSHIPS Texas A&M University, Human Resources DIVISION OF FINANCE.
Employee Engagement Survey Education Session #3
Department of Administration Employee Relations Committee 2012 Survey.
SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT CANADA 1 The Government of Canada and the Non-Profit and Voluntary Sector: Moving Forward Together Presentation to Civil Society Excellence:
Leah Boetger Interim Director Employee & Organizational Development University of New Mexico.
Staff Survey Executive Team Presentation (Annex B) Prepared by: GfK NOP September, Agenda item: 17 Paper no: CM/03/12/14B.
The Collective Agreement for Supervisory Managers TEAM-IFPTE Local 161 September 19, 2012.
Emory University Climate Survey Results Presented to HR Leadership Group April 21, 2005 Del King Senior Director, Human Resources.
Developing a Competitive Edge: Guarding Against Employee Turnover Employee Turnover is a huge Drain on Company Resources. – –Safety Performance – –Training.
Research on the experience of disabled staff within the NHS workforce Peter Ryan & Mike Edwards Findings from the NHS 2014 staff survey and the 2014 Electronic.
Employee Recognition and Wellness Benchmarking Project Healthy Workplace Champions June 29, 2009.
Employee Survey 2009 Analysis of results and trends Comparison with the 2007 & 2005 survey July 2009.
12-14 Pindari Rd Peakhurst NSW 2210 p: e: Employee Survey Links2Success.
Electronic Records Management: A New Understanding of Policy, Compliance, and Discovery Robert J. Sobie, Ph.D. Director Information Systems Department.
Faculty Satisfaction Survey Results October 2009.
MCCC/DHE Contract Negotiations. The Negotiations Process BHE and MCCC appoint their bargaining teams, comprised of representatives from the 15 Community.
Employee Satisfaction Survey Results 2015 v Employee Satisfaction Survey Results 2015 v Work Areas 2015 Response Count 2014 Response Count.
2009 Annual Employee Survey U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development December 29,2009 (updated January 8, 2010)
Sexual Orientation and the Federal Workplace Policy and Perception New Perspectives Conference Susan Tsui Grundmann Chairman U.S. Merit Systems Protection.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration February 23, 2016 Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey (FEVS) From Results to Action Presented by: Kim Haney-Brown.
Northwest ISD Board Presentation Staff Survey
Durham County Non-Profit Funding Program Board of County Commissioners’ Worksession August 6, 2012.
State of the District Vision 2020 Began with the Team of 8 in January 2014 Developed Beliefs, Vision and Strategic Objectives.
0 Faculty Senate October 17, 2006 Working at IOWA.
Human Resource Management
PILOT SCHOOL PRINCIPAL EVALUATION
Sexual Violence Policy Development
2016/17 Staff Performance Appraisals
AAMC Faculty Forward Engagement Survey Results
Psychological Health and Safety in the Workplace
Budget and Legislative Updates
Community Health Centre Socio-demographic Data
Elaine Wyllie Executive Director of Joint Commissioning
Performance Evaluation Process
Staff Morale Survey Results
Employee Engagement Survey Education Session #3
Survey of Organizational Excellence
Administrative Review Process
2017 UC Staff Engagement Survey
EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT SURVEY RESULTS
Parent & Staff Survey Results
UA Workplace Experience Survey - Chime in!
2017 UC Staff Engagement Survey
Senate Ad hoc Committee for the Assessment of the Higher Education Research Institute (HERI) Faculty Survey Report on Findings Felicia Lassk, Associate.
Summary of the 2018 Winter Meetings
Employee satisfaction survey 2018
Police Services Analysis – Community Meeting 2
Great Colleges To Work For Survey
August 2018 Cross sector consulting
GREAT COLLEGES TO WORK FOR: 2016 SURVEY PROGRESS
Butler University Great Colleges To Work For
2018 UNC System employee engagement survey
2018 Great Colleges Survey for Champlain College
Select Findings from the Fall 2018 Enrolled Student Survey
Supporting Mental Health in the Federal Public Service: Taking Action Presentation to the Union of Taxation Employees National Health and Safety Conference.
Campus Climate Survey.
Employee Engagement Survey 2015 Town of Chapel Hill
Public Service Employee Survey (PSES) 2018 Results
Fall 2016/Spring 2017 Administrative Review Process Update
Agency Action Plan on Diversity and Inclusion Presentation to the Labour Management Consultation Committee (LMCC) October 3, 2017.
Office of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Annual Update
Presentation transcript:

Building a Respectful Workplace Public Service Employee Surveys Labour Management Consultation Committee (LMCC) October 3, 2017

Outline Purpose Employee surveys PSEAS 2017 PSES 2017 Student Exit Survey (SES) 2017 Next Steps 2

Purpose Provide an update on: Public Service Employee Annual Survey (PSEAS) 2017; Public Service Employee Survey (PSES) 2017; and Student Exit Survey. 3

2017 Public Service Employee Annual Survey Results of the PSEAS 2017 were released in June 2017. The Agency-wide results were in-line with or better than the results across the Public Service (see Annex). President has asked the Joint Committee on Mental Health to provide feedback and advice on how we can address areas for improvement. The Human Resources Committee (HRC) has accepted the recommendations of the Joint Committee on Mental Health and has asked the Human Resources Division for input on how best to operationalize the recommendations. We accept all the recommendation of the JCMH committee. 4

2017 Public Service Employee Survey IT Ticket Stats 12,500 11,495 1,525 Questions 18 New 119 Data Release March/ April 2018 Survey Administration Aug 21 - Sept 29 Organizations 86 262,000 Employees Other Themes: Employee Engagement, Performance Management, Duty to Accommodate, Staffing, Work-Life Balance, Labour Relations, Compensation, etc. SURVEY SCOPE Mental Health Official Languages Leadership Respect & Diversity Harassment/ Discrimination Demographics 10 questions 16 questions 25 questions 15 questions 6 questions 7 questions 5

2017 Public Service Employee Survey (continued) The 2017 PSES is being administered electronically by Statistics Canada until September 29, 2017. The participation rate of the Agency after Week 5 is 61.4%. Results will be released in March/April 2018. Better than the PS in most category Doesn’t mean we will stop the gaz and we will continue to work hard to areas we need to improve, for example harassment. 6

Student Exit Survey On June 22, 2017, the Office of the Chief Human Resources Office (OCHRO) announced that a standard exit survey has been developed for student employees across the federal public service, beginning with the summer 2017 cohort of student employees. The Student Exit Survey (SES) examines student perceptions of their recruitment and orientation, their student job and their experiences within their department or agency. The SES has been sent to students (including communications with their managers) by Human Resources of the Agency. It was open until mid-September 2017. 7

Student Exit Survey (continued) The results of the first iteration of the survey will be available later in the Fall. Departments and agencies will receive an aggregate dataset of their students’ results, with appropriate suppression rules applied for small respondent counts. Additionally, OCHRO will provide the public service-wide results and prepare and disseminate a report on the findings. 8

Annex Results of the PSEAS According to the 2017 PSEAS results, 85% of employees in CEAA believed that their organization implements activities and practices that support a diverse workplace (Q1), unchanged from the 2014 PSES (85%), and higher than the 2017 PSEAS result for the overall public service (81%). In CEAA, 90% of employees felt that their organization treats them with respect (Q2), unchanged from the 2014 PSES (90%), a slight increase from the 2011 PSES (88%), and much higher than the 2017 PSEAS result for the overall public service (75%). The 2017 PSEAS results show that 80% of employees in CEAA agreed that they are satisfied with their organization (Q6), an increase from the 2014 (76%) and the 2011 PSES (76%), and much higher than the 2017 PSEAS result for the overall public service (65%). 9

Annex In CEAA, 83% of employees agreed that they like their job (Q7), a large increase from the 2014 PSES (75%), unchanged from the 2011 PSES (83%), and higher than the 2017 PSEAS result for the overall public service (78%). According to the 2017 PSEAS results, 84% of employees in CEAA felt that their immediate supervisor creates an environment where they feel free to discuss matters that affect their wellbeing at work (Q8), higher than the result for the overall public service (79%). Additionally, 89% of CEAA's employees indicated that their immediate supervisor seems to care about them as a person (Q9), much higher than the result for the overall public service (79%). 10

Annex In CEAA, 41% of employees indicated that, overall, their level of work- related stress is “Very high” or “High” (Q12), much higher than the result for the overall public service (34%). Further, 32% of employees in CEAA indicated that they “Always/Almost always” or “Often” feel emotionally drained after their workday (Q13), similar to the result for the overall public service (33%). The 2017 PSEAS results show that 13% of employees in CEAA indicated that they have been the victim of harassment on the job in the past two years (Q14), a large decrease from the 2014 PSES (19%), and much lower than the 2017 PSEAS result for the overall public service (22%). The 2017 PSEAS results show that 5% of employees in CEAA indicated that they have been the victim of discrimination on the job in the past two years (Q16), similar to the 2014 PSES (6%), and much lower than the 2017 PSEAS result for the overall public service (12%). 11