Inhibition of Msh6 ATPase Activity by Mispaired DNA Induces a Msh2(ATP)-Msh6(ATP) State Capable of Hydrolysis-Independent Movement along DNA  Dan J. Mazur,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Mitochondrial Basis of Aging Nuo Sun, Richard J. Youle, Toren Finkel Molecular Cell Volume 61, Issue 5, Pages (March 2016) DOI: /j.molcel
Advertisements

Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (April 2007)
The Mcm2-7 Complex Has In Vitro Helicase Activity
Volume 41, Issue 6, Pages (March 2011)
Phage Mu Transposition Immunity: Protein Pattern Formation along DNA by a Diffusion- Ratchet Mechanism  Yong-Woon Han, Kiyoshi Mizuuchi  Molecular Cell 
Volume 42, Issue 2, Pages (April 2011)
Andrey V. Zavialov, Vasili V. Hauryliuk, Måns Ehrenberg  Molecular Cell 
Asymmetric Activation of the Hsp90 Dimer by Its Cochaperone Aha1
Laura Lancaster, Harry F. Noller  Molecular Cell 
Volume 33, Issue 2, Pages (January 2009)
hsp90: Twist and Fold Cell
Volume 45, Issue 4, Pages (February 2012)
Volume 1, Issue 5, Pages (June 2002)
A New Window onto Translational Repression by Bacterial sRNAs
Stop Codon Recognition by Release Factors Induces Structural Rearrangement of the Ribosomal Decoding Center that Is Productive for Peptide Release  Elaine.
Volume 45, Issue 3, Pages (February 2012)
Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages (November 2007)
ATP-Dependent Positive Supercoiling of DNA by 13S Condensin: A Biochemical Implication for Chromosome Condensation  Keiji Kimura, Tatsuya Hirano  Cell 
Volume 54, Issue 5, Pages (June 2014)
John D. Leonard, Geeta J. Narlikar  Molecular Cell 
Gracjan Michlewski, Sonia Guil, Colin A. Semple, Javier F. Cáceres 
Volume 35, Issue 1, Pages (July 2009)
Modulation of the Hsp90 Chaperone Cycle by a Stringent Client Protein
Yi Qin Gao, Wei Yang, Martin Karplus  Cell 
Mechanochemistry of Transcription Termination Factor Rho
Volume 69, Issue 5, Pages e5 (March 2018)
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (December 2005)
Volume 36, Issue 4, Pages (November 2009)
Mechanism of Force Generation of a Viral DNA Packaging Motor
Yasunori Aizawa, Qing Xiang, Alan M. Lambowitz, Anna Marie Pyle 
Molecular Basis for Kir6.2 Channel Inhibition by Adenine Nucleotides
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages (March 2007)
Scott Gradia, Samir Acharya, Richard Fishel  Cell 
ACF Takes the Driver’s Seat
Asymmetric Activation of the Hsp90 Dimer by Its Cochaperone Aha1
Jesse Easter, James W Gober  Molecular Cell 
Volume 35, Issue 1, Pages (July 2009)
Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages (December 1997)
Jesse Easter, James W Gober  Molecular Cell 
How Integration of Positive and Negative Regulatory Signals by a STAND Signaling Protein Depends on ATP Hydrolysis  Emélie Marquenet, Evelyne Richet 
Volume 59, Issue 6, Pages (September 2015)
ATPase Site Architecture and Helicase Mechanism of an Archaeal MCM
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (July 2017)
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (April 2007)
MCM Loading—An Open-and-Shut Case?
A Drug-Drug Interaction Crystallizes a New Entry Point into the UPR
The Coordinated Functions of the E
Troponin-Tropomyosin: An Allosteric Switch or a Steric Blocker?
DEAD-Box Proteins Unwind Duplexes by Local Strand Separation
Chaperoning of a Replicative Polymerase onto a Newly Assembled DNA-Bound Sliding Clamp by the Clamp Loader  Christopher D. Downey, Charles S. McHenry 
DNA-Induced Switch from Independent to Sequential dTTP Hydrolysis in the Bacteriophage T7 DNA Helicase  Donald J. Crampton, Sourav Mukherjee, Charles.
Mechanism of Substrate Unfolding and Translocation by the Regulatory Particle of the Proteasome from Methanocaldococcus jannaschii  Fan Zhang, Zhuoru.
Allosteric Regulation of Hsp70 Chaperones by a Proline Switch
Diverse Pore Loops of the AAA+ ClpX Machine Mediate Unassisted and Adaptor- Dependent Recognition of ssrA-Tagged Substrates  Andreas Martin, Tania A. Baker,
Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Mechanistic Basis of 5′-3′ Translocation in SF1B Helicases
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (April 2007)
Amanda Solem, Nora Zingler, Anna Marie Pyle  Molecular Cell 
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages (October 2006)
Ligand-Driven Vectorial Folding of Ribosome-Bound Human CFTR NBD1
Robert E. Johnson, Roland Klassen, Louise Prakash, Satya Prakash 
Visualizing the ATPase Cycle in a Protein Disaggregating Machine: Structural Basis for Substrate Binding by ClpB  Sukyeong Lee, Jae-Mun Choi, Francis.
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages (August 2004)
Benjamin Misselwitz, Oliver Staeck, Tom A Rapoport  Molecular Cell 
Volume 35, Issue 1, Pages (July 2009)
The Conformational Dynamics of the Mitochondrial Hsp70 Chaperone
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages (August 2006)
A New Window onto Translational Repression by Bacterial sRNAs
CRISPR Immunological Memory Requires a Host Factor for Specificity
Species-Dependent Ensembles of Conserved Conformational States Define the Hsp90 Chaperone ATPase Cycle  Daniel R. Southworth, David A. Agard  Molecular.
Presentation transcript:

Inhibition of Msh6 ATPase Activity by Mispaired DNA Induces a Msh2(ATP)-Msh6(ATP) State Capable of Hydrolysis-Independent Movement along DNA  Dan J. Mazur, Marc L. Mendillo, Richard D. Kolodner  Molecular Cell  Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages 39-49 (April 2006) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2006.02.010 Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 The Msh2 and Msh6 Subunits Both Bind ATP, but with Different Affinities Standard crosslinking reactions (20 μl) contained 0.4 pmol (A–C) or 4 pmol (D and E) of wild-type Msh2-Msh6 and labeled ATP (A and D), ATPγS (B and E), or AMP-PNP (C) at the indicated concentrations. Dissociation constants (Kd) are presented in Table 1. Molecular Cell 2006 22, 39-49DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2006.02.010) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Analysis of the Effect of ATP Binding Mutants and DNA on ATP Binding by Msh2 and Msh6 Standard crosslinking reactions contained the ATP binding mutants Msh2(K694M)-Msh6 (A and B), Msh2-Msh6(K988M) (C and D), or wild-type Msh2-Msh6 containing no DNA, paired DNA, or mispair-containing DNA (E). The apparent Kd of nucleotide binding determined for wild-type and mutant Msh2 and Msh6 is displayed in Table I. Pulse-chase experiments (F) contained Msh2-Msh6 and [γ-32P]ATP at indicated concentrations. Molecular Cell 2006 22, 39-49DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2006.02.010) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Nucleotide Binding Characteristics of Msh2-Msh6 Standard crosslinking reactions containing different concentrations of [α-32P]ATP with Mg2+ as indicated (A and B), [α-32P]ADP (C), 5 μM [α-32P]ADP and unlabeled ATPγS (D), different concentrations of [α-32P]ADP in the presence of 5 μM ATPγS (E), preincubation of 5 μM ADP followed by the addition of [35S]ATPγS at concentrations indicated (F), and 5 μM [α-32P]ADP with unlabeled AMP-PNP at concentrations indicated (G). The asterisk indicates nucleotide containing the label [32P]ATP or [35S]ATPγS. The apparent Kd measurements determined for all reactions are displayed in Table I. Molecular Cell 2006 22, 39-49DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2006.02.010) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Mispaired DNA Inhibits ATP Hydrolysis by Msh6, which Causes Reduced Binding of ADP by Msh2 (A) Standard crosslinking reactions containing Msh2-Msh6 (4 pmol) and ATP (10 μM) were prepared. The presence of α- or γ-labeled ATP, Mg2+, and mispaired or paired DNA is indicated. (B) Crosslinking reactions with Msh2-Msh6 (4 pmol) and [α-32P]ADP (5 μM) were prepared. The presence of ATP (0, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0 μM) and mispaired or fully paired DNA (20 pmol) is indicated. ADP binding was set at 100% for the level seen in the absence of ATP. Molecular Cell 2006 22, 39-49DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2006.02.010) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Sliding of Msh2-Msh6 Requires Nucleotide Binding to Both Subunits but Does Not Require Hydrolysis End-dependent dissociation of the Msh2-Msh6 complex from an unblocked, mispaired DNA substrate was determined by Biosensor analysis. Dissociation data generated with a LacI blocked substrate were subtracted from data generated with an unblocked substrate. Dissociation of Msh2-Msh6 from a DNA substrate after addition of ATP (A) or ATPγS (B) at the concentrations indicated. A plot of Koff versus ATP (C) or ATPγS (D) concentration was performed, yielding an apparent Kd for sliding of 17.9 + 1.4 μM and 81.5 ± 10.2 μM, respectively. Molecular Cell 2006 22, 39-49DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2006.02.010) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Model of ATP Binding and Hydrolysis, which Increases Mispair-Specific Binding of Msh2-Msh6 (A) Mispaired DNA causes a shift to the doubly occupied state that is required for downstream MMR events. Msh2-Msh6, in the empty or Msh2(ADP) states, binds with high affinity to mispaired DNA, which then stabilizes ATP bound by Msh6. This stably bound ATP allows release of ADP by Msh2, which then binds ATP to form the dual ATP occupied state (∗) that allows end-dependent dissociation (sliding) and possibly other downstream MMR events. (B) The absence of mispaired DNA shifts Msh2-Msh6 to an empty or Msh2(ADP) state. The nucleotide binding model for non-DNA bound Msh2-Msh6 is identical to the paired DNA model. Unbound Msh2-Msh6 is shifted to the empty or Msh2(ADP) states, which are shown binding DNA and entering the cycles in (A) and (B). Although end-dependent dissociation (sliding) has not been detected on paired DNA, it could occur at a low level. This greatly reduced level of sliding in the absence of mispaired DNA is partially caused by rapid hydrolysis of ATP bound by Msh6, which in turn causes a decrease in the dual ATP occupancy state required for sliding. End-independent dissociation from paired DNA likely occurs for all Msh2-Msh6 states (for a discussion, see Mendillo et al. [2005]), also resulting in a decrease in the dual ATP occupancy state on paired DNA. Bound ATP and ADP are indicated by “T” and “D,” respectively. Molecular Cell 2006 22, 39-49DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2006.02.010) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions