Preamble Autodetection for 11be

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Submission doc.: IEEE /0081r1 Date: Considerations on 11ax Auto-detection Methods January 2015 Jaeyoung Song, KAISTSlide 1 Authors:
Advertisements

Submission doc.: IEEE /0823r1 July 2015 Sungho Moon, NewracomSlide 1 Preamble Design and Auto-Detection for 11ax Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0823r3 September 2015 Sungho Moon, NewracomSlide 1 Preamble Design and Auto-Detection for 11ax Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0853r3 September 2015 Leonardo Lanante, Kyushu Inst. of Tech.Slide 1 Extensible Preamble Format Design Date:
Submission September 2015 doc.: IEEE /1091r0 September 2015 Considerations on Range Extension with SIG-A Repetition Date: Authors:
WUR Link Budget Analysis Follow-up: Data Rates and SIG Bits Protection
WUR Legacy Preamble Design
Signalling Support for Full Bandwidth MU-MIMO Compressed SIG-B Mode
WUR Legacy Preamble Design
WUR SYNC Preamble Design
Follow-up on Signaling Method for Data Rates
Signaling Method for Multiple Data Rate
WUR SYNC Preamble Design
Clarification on TXSS Sector List Feedback
WUR SYNC Preamble Design
WUR Wake Up Frame Format
OOK Waveform Generation Follow-up
WUR Dual SYNC Design Follow-up: SYNC bit Duration
WUR Wake Up Frame Format
Discussion on Group ID Structure
WUR Action Frame Format
WUR Mode Operation Procedures
WUR Mode Operation Procedures
Communicating Wake-up Operating Parameters
TGac Preamble Auto-detection Comparisons
TGac Preamble Auto-detection Comparisons
WUR Wake Up Frame Format
WUR Mode Operation Procedures
Preamble for 120MHz Date: Authors: Nov, 2010 Month Year
WUR Wake Up Frame Format
19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea
PHY designs for NGV Date: Authors:
WUR Synchronization Date: Authors: November 2017 Name
PHY designs for NGV Date: Authors:
WUR FDMA Padding Content
19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea
Communicating Wake-up Operating Parameters
Clarification on TXSS Sector List Feedback
Discussion on Group ID Structure
Duration in L-SIG Date: Authors: May 2010 Month Year
WUR Action Frame Format
19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea
TGac Preamble Auto-detection Comparisons
Numerology for 11ax Date: Authors: March 2015 Month Year
19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea
Enabling Persistent Allocation for EHT
19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea
Preamble Design Harmonization
19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea
Preamble Design Harmonization
F3-6A, Huawei Base, Bantian, Shenzhen
Discussion on the preamble for 11be
Preamble design and auto-detection for 11bd
PHY designs for NGV Date: Authors:
20 MHz transmission in NGV
Enabling Persistent Allocation for EHT
19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea
Enabling Uplink Persistent Allocation for EHT
20 MHz transmission in NGV
NGV PPDU Format Date: Authors: doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0
Further discussion for 11be preamble
F3-6A, Huawei Base, Bantian, Shenzhen
Power Consideration for Multi-link Transmissions
Consideration on HARQ feedback
Forward Compatibility for WiFi Preamble Design
19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea
11be Preamble Structure Date: 09/15/19 Authors: Sep Name
Preamble design and auto-detection for 11bd
Further discussion for 11be preamble
PHY Signaling for Adaptive Repetition of 11p PPDU
Presentation transcript:

Preamble Autodetection for 11be May 2015 doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/0496r1 Preamble Autodetection for 11be Date: 2019-09-14 Authors: Name Company Address Phone Email Lei Huang Panasonic Corporation   lei.huang@sg.panasonic.com Yanyi Ding Urabe Yoshio Rojan Chitrakar Lei Huang (Panasonic) Edward Au (Marvell Semiconductor)

Background Many contributions have discussed preamble structure and auto-detection scheme for 11be [1]-[4]. It has been proposed that a two-stage autodetection scheme is used for post-HE PPDUs (i.e. EHT PPDUs or beyond) in order to minimize efforts for developing future standards beyond 11be [1][2]. Stage 1: to identify whether a received PPDU is a post-HE PPDU Stage 2: to determine the version of a post-HE PPDU. We agree the proposed two-stage autodetection scheme is a right direction and this contribution addresses a bit detailed design of the two-stage autodetection scheme. Lei Huang (Panasonic)

Two-Stage Autodetection The two-stage autodetection can be implemented in the following two options: Option 1: stages 1 and 2 are performed using two symbols (i.e. SYM1 and SYM2) following the legacy preamble, respectively. SYM1 shall be BPSK modulated. SYM1 may be a different version of RL-SIG (e.g. inverted L-SIG or sequence masked L-SIG) [3][4] or a signature symbol [5] SYM2 contains a few signaling bits to indicate PHY/PPDU version [2] Option 2: stages 1 and 2 are performed using a single symbol (i.e. SYM) following the legacy preamble. SYM shall be BPSK modulated. In our view, Option 2 seems preferable than Option 1 since it enables earlier detection of PHY/PPDU version/format and is addressed in the following. Lei Huang (Panasonic)

Autodetection Using a Single Symbol (1/3) We propose data tones of the SYM are divided into two groups: Group 1 consists of N (e.g. N= 24) data tones carrying information for assisting in the identification of a post-HE PPDU Group 2 consists of (48-N) data tones carrying a few signaling bits to indicate the version of the identified post-HE PPDU and may also indicate other information, e.g. whether or not HARQ operation is enabled. If HARQ operation is disabled for an EHT SU/MU PPDU, the HARQ-SIG field [7] is not present. For proper reception of EHT-STF, it is preferable to have earlier HARQ operation indication. In addition, similar to an HE PPDU, the LENGTH field of the L-SIG field in a post-HE PPDU is set to a value which is not divisible by 3, which can be used for differentiation of post-HE PPDU formats. Lei Huang (Panasonic)

Auto-detection Using a Single Symbol (2/3) 24 Group 1 data tones are selected such that they are uniformly distributed over frequency domain for better frequency diversity The value of a Group 1 data tone is inverted from the value of the corresponding data tone in L-SIG. Example of Group 1 and Group 2 data tones in SYM: Group 1 data tone index (24 tones): {±26, ±24, ±22, ±19, ±17, ±15, ±13, ±11, ±9, ±6, ±4, ±2} Group 2 data tone index (24 tones): {±25, ±23, ±20, ±18, ±16, ±14, ±12, ±10, ±8, ±5, ±3, ±1} Lei Huang (Panasonic)

Auto-detection Using a Single Symbol (3/3) Group 2 data tones carry a 12-bit signaling field. For example, PHY/PPDU Version (3 bits): indicate the version of a post-HE PPDU e.g. 0 for EHT PPDU, 1 to 7 are reserved. HARQ Flag (1 bit): indicate whether or not HARQ operation is enabled. CRC (2 bits) Tail (6 bits) Transmitter processing of the 12-bit signaling field is similar to L-SIG Encode the 12 signaling bits with rate ½ BCC and generate 24 encoded bits. Interleave the 24 encoded bits. Modulate the 24 interleaved bits with BPSK. Mapped the 24 BPSK symbols to the 24 Group 2 data tones. Lei Huang (Panasonic)

Example of Detection Procedure at Rx Step-1: Repetition check on Group 1 data tones of L-SIG and inverted Group 1 data tones of SYM. Step-2: MRC on Group 1 data tones of L-SIG and inverted Group 1 data tones of SYM and demodulate/decode L-SIG. Step-3: Content check. For example, L-SIG: Rate = 6Mbps, Reserved bit, Parity bit, and L-LENGTH!=3x. When both steps 1 and 3 pass, 11be or beyond is detected. Otherwise jump back to 11a/n/ac/ax state machine. This procedure is similar to 11ax and thus has similar detection complexity to 11ax Lei Huang (Panasonic)

False Detection Analysis We simulated the distributions of Hamming distance (HD) [6] between Group 1 data tones of 11a L-SIG/11ac L-SIG and inverted Group 1 data tones of 11a first data symbol/11ac VHT-SIG-A1 (3-million cases). 11a: Minimal HD = 4 11ac: Minimal HD = 3 If step 1 repetition check has a threshold of 4, the false detection probability at very high SNR is only 4×10-5 for 11a and 6×10-4 for 11ac, even without step 3 content check. Lei Huang (Panasonic)

Simulation Setting fc = 5 GHz 20 MHz bandwidth 1/2/4 Tx antennas and 1 Rx antenna UMi-NLOS and D-NLOS channels (unnormalized) CSD values per antenna [0, -50, -100, -150]ns as in 11ax/11ac Actual 40ppm CFO and phase/CFO tracking Actual timing Frequency domain repetition check based on the HD of coded bits with a threshold of 8 for 11ax and 4 for the proposed scheme Lei Huang (Panasonic)

Simulation Results (1×1, UMi-NLOS) L-SIG error rate gap: 0.4 dB Pmiss gap: 0.5 dB (Pfalse = 0) Lei Huang (Panasonic)

Simulation Results (2×1, UMi-NLOS) L-SIG error rate gap: 0.4 dB Pmiss gap: 0.7 dB (Pfalse = 0) Lei Huang (Panasonic)

Simulation Results (4×1, UMi-NLOS) L-SIG error rate gap: 0.5 dB Pmiss gap: 0.6 dB (Pfalse = 0) Lei Huang (Panasonic)

Simulation Results (1×1, D-NLOS) L-SIG error rate gap: 0.5 dB Pmiss gap: 0.5 dB (Pfalse = 0) Lei Huang (Panasonic)

Simulation Results (2×1, D-NLOS) L-SIG error rate gap: 0.5 dB Pmiss gap: 0.6 dB (Pfalse = 0) Lei Huang (Panasonic)

Simulation Results (4×1, D-NLOS) L-SIG error rate gap: 0.7 dB Pmiss gap: 0.6 dB (Pfalse = 0) Lei Huang (Panasonic)

Summary The proposed scheme is backward compatible and has similar complexity to 11ax. The proposed scheme enables earlier detection of PHY/PPDU version and HARQ-SIG presence. The performance gap between 11ax and the proposed scheme is not significant in both indoor and outdoor channels. The proposed scheme enjoys 1.5x repetition gain and frequency diversity gain. Lei Huang (Panasonic)

Reference 11-19-1021-01-00be-preamble-design-harmonization 11-19-1085-00-00be-high-level-eht-preamble-structure 11-19-1099-00-00be-preamble-structure-in-11be 11-19-1142-00-00be-discussion-on-the-preamble-for-11be 11-15-0643-00-00ax-autodetection-with-signature-symbol 11-15-0579-04-00ax-preamble-design-and-autodetection 11-19-0873-01-00be-harq-framing Lei Huang (Panasonic)