Evaluation: Inspections, Analytics, and Models

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 15: Analytical evaluation
Advertisements

Asking Users and Experts
CS305: HCI in SW Development Continuing Evaluation: Asking Experts Inspections and walkthroughs.
Evaluation (cont.): Heuristic Evaluation Cognitive Walkthrough CS352.
Asking users & experts.
Usability presented by the OSU Libraries’ u-team.
Chapter 15: Analytical evaluation. 2 FJK User-Centered Design and Development Instructor: Franz J. Kurfess Computer Science Dept. Cal Poly San.
Asking users & experts. The aims Discuss the role of interviews & questionnaires in evaluation. Teach basic questionnaire design. Describe how do interviews,
1 User-Centered Design and Development Instructor: Franz J. Kurfess Computer Science Dept. Cal Poly San Luis Obispo FJK 2009.
Heuristics  Basis  Evaluators –Qualifications –Training  Preparation –Scenario  Results –List of problems –Severity –Group synthesis.
Heuristic Evaluation IS 485, Professor Matt Thatcher.
Heuristic Evaluation Evaluating with experts. Discount Evaluation Techniques  Basis: Observing users can be time- consuming and expensive Try to predict.
Evaluation Through Expert Analysis U U U
Evaluating with experts
Heuristic Evaluation.
Usability 2004 J T Burns1 Usability & Usability Engineering.
Evaluation: Inspections, Analytics & Models
Review an existing website Usability in Design. to begin with.. Meeting Organization’s objectives and your Usability goals Meeting User’s Needs Complying.
Design in the World of Business
©2011 1www.id-book.com Analytical evaluation Chapter 15.
Usability testing and field studies
1 Asking users & experts and Testing & modeling users Ref: Ch
1 Usability evaluation and testing User interfaces Jaana Holvikivi Metropolia.
Predictive Evaluation
Discount Evaluation Evaluating with experts. Discount Evaluation Techniques Basis: – Observing users can be time-consuming and expensive – Try to predict.
Part 1-Intro; Part 2- Req; Part 3- Design  Chapter 20 Why evaluate the usability of user interface designs?  Chapter 21 Deciding on what you need to.
Chapter 26 Inspections of the UI. Heuristic inspection Recommended before but in lieu of user observations Sort of like an expert evaluation Heuristics.
Computer Science Department California Polytechnic State University San Luis Obispo, CA, U.S.A. Franz J. Kurfess CPE/CSC 484: User-Centered Design and.
©2011 1www.id-book.com Introducing Evaluation Chapter 12 adapted by Wan C. Yoon
Usability Expert Review Anna Diubina. What is usability? The effectiveness, efficiency and satisfaction with which specified users achieve specified goals.
Usability Evaluation June 8, Why do we need to do usability evaluation?
Heuristic Evaluation and Discount Usability Engineering Taken from the writings of Jakob Nielsen – inventor of both.
©2011 Elsevier, Inc. Heuristic Evaluation of MealpayPlus website Ruidi Tan Rachel Vilceus Anant Patil Junior Anthony Xi Li Kinberley Seals Niko Maresco.
SEG3120 User Interfaces Design and Implementation
Testing & modeling users. The aims Describe how to do user testing. Discuss the differences between user testing, usability testing and research experiments.
Y ASER G HANAM Heuristic Evaluation. Roadmap Introduction How it works Advantages Shortcomings Conclusion Exercise.
Chapter 15: Analytical evaluation. Inspections Heuristic evaluation Walkthroughs.
Chapter 15: Analytical evaluation Q1, 2. Inspections Heuristic evaluation Walkthroughs Start Q3 Reviewers tend to use guidelines, heuristics and checklists.
Analytical evaluation Prepared by Dr. Nor Azman Ismail Department of Computer Graphics and Multimedia Faculty of Computer Science & Information System.
Evaluating a UI Design Expert inspection methods Cognitive Walkthrough
Usability 1 Usability evaluation Without users - analytical techniques With users - survey and observational techniques.
Asking users & experts. The aims Discuss the role of interviews & questionnaires in evaluation. Teach basic questionnaire design. Describe how do interviews,
Cognitive Walkthrough More evaluating with experts.
Chapter 15: Analytical evaluation. Aims: Describe inspection methods. Show how heuristic evaluation can be adapted to evaluate different products. Explain.
Administrivia  Feedback from the mid-term evaluation  Insights from project proposal.
1 Usability evaluation and testing User interfaces Jaana Holvikivi Metropolia.
Introduction to Evaluation “Informal” approaches.
Fall 2002CS/PSY Predictive Evaluation (Evaluation Without Users) Gathering data about usability of a design by a specified group of users for a particular.
Ten Usability Heuristics with Example.. Page 2 Heuristic Evaluation Heuristic evaluation is the most popular of the usability inspection methods. Heuristic.
COGNITIVE WALKTHROUGH Vigneshwar Poojar. The cognitive walkthrough is a formalized way of imagining people’s thoughts and actions when they use an interface.
Discount Evaluation User Interface Design. Startup Weekend Wellington CALLING ALL DESIGNERS, DEVELOPERS AND IDEAS FOLK: Startup Weekend returns to Wellington.
Asking Users and Experts Li Zhang (Jacey) Yuewei Zhou (Joanna)
Heuristic Evaluation May 4, 2016
SIE 515 Design Evaluation Lecture 7.
Human Computer Interaction Lecture 15 Usability Evaluation
Imran Hussain University of Management and Technology (UMT)
CS3205: HCI in SW Development Evaluation (Return to…)
Heuristic Evaluation August 5, 2016
Evaluation Techniques 1
Introducing Evaluation
Software Engineering D7025E
Usability Techniques Lecture 13.
PostPC Computing Heuristic Evaluation Prof. Scott Kirkpatrick, HUJI
Chapter 26 Inspections of the user interface
Evaluation.
Testing & modeling users
Miguel Tavares Coimbra
Cognitive Walkthrough
Miguel Tavares Coimbra
Evaluation: Inspections, Analytics & Models
Presentation transcript:

Evaluation: Inspections, Analytics, and Models Chapter 16 Evaluation: Inspections, Analytics, and Models

Goals Describe the key concepts associated with inspection methods Explain how to do heuristic evaluation and walkthroughs Explain the role of analytics in evaluation Describe how A/B testing is used in evaluation Describe how to use Fitts’ Law – a predictive model www.id-book.com 2

Inspections Several kinds Experts use their knowledge of users and technology to review software usability Expert critiques can be formal or informal Heuristic evaluation is a review guided by a set of heuristics Walkthroughs involve stepping through a pre-planned scenario noting potential problems www.id-book.com 3

Heuristic evaluation Developed by Jacob Nielsen in the early 1990s Based on heuristics distilled from an empirical analysis of 249 usability problems These heuristics have been revised for current technology by Nielsen and others for: Mobile devices Wearables Virtual worlds Social media … Design guidelines form a basis for developing heuristics www.id-book.com 4

Revised version (2014) of Nielsen’s original heuristics (continued) Recognition rather than recall Flexibility and efficiency of use Aesthetic and minimalist design Help users recognize, diagnose, recover from errors Help and documentation www.id-book.com 5

Revised version (2014) of Nielsen’s original heuristics Visibility of system status Match between system and real world User control and freedom Consistency and standards Error prevention www.id-book.com 6

Number of evaluators and problems Curve showing the proportion of usability problems in an interface found by heuristic evaluation using different numbers of evaluators Source: Nielsen and Mack, 1994. Courtesy of Wiley. www.id-book.com 7

Number of evaluators Nielsen suggests that on average five evaluators identify 75-80 percent of usability problems Cockton and Woolrych (2001) point out that the number of users needed to find 75-80 percent of usability problems depends on the context and nature of the task problems www.id-book.com 8

Heuristics for websites focus on key criteria Clarity Minimize unnecessary complexity and cognitive load Provide users with context Promote positive and pleasurable user experience Source: Budd, 2007 www.id-book.com

Doing heuristic evaluation Briefing session to tell experts what to do Evaluation period of 1-2 hours in which: Each expert works separately Take one pass to get a feel for the product Take a second pass to focus on specific features Debriefing session in which experts work together to prioritize problems www.id-book.com 10

Advantages and problems Few ethical and practical issues to consider because users not involved Can be difficult and expensive to find experts Best experts have knowledge of application domain and users Biggest problems: Important problems may get missed Many trivial problems are often identified, such as false alarms Experts have biases www.id-book.com 11

Turning design guidelines and golden rules into heuristics Ask questions like the following: “Does the application include a visible title page, section or site? Does the user always know where they are located? Does the user always know what the system or application is doing? Are the links clearly defined? Can all actions be visualized directly (i.e., no other actions are required)?” Granollers, 2018, p. 62 www.id-book.com 12

Evaluating for accessibility using Guidelines Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) (see Lazar et al., 2015) Guidelines can be used as heuristics for evaluating websites Governments and large corporations have to make their websites accessible by law Four key concepts: Perceivable Operable Understandable Robust Source: WCAG 2.1 at a Glance. www.id-book.com 13

Cognitive walkthroughs Focus on ease of learning Designer presents an aspect of the design and usage scenarios Expert is told the assumptions about user population, context of use, task details One or more experts walk through the design prototype with the scenario Experts are guided by three questions www.id-book.com 14

The three questions Will the correct action be sufficiently evident to the user? Will the user notice that the correct action is available? Will the user associate and interpret the response from the action correctly? As the experts work through the scenario, they note problems www.id-book.com 15

Pluralistic walkthrough Variation on the cognitive walkthrough theme Performed by a carefully managed team The panel of experts begins by working separately This is followed by a managed discussion that leads to agreed decisions The approach lends itself well to participatory design Also other adaptations of basic cognitive walkthroughs www.id-book.com 16

Web Analytics A form of interaction logging that analyzes users’ activities on website Designers use the analysis to improve their designs When designs don’t meet users’ needs, they will not return to the site They become one-time users www.id-book.com 17

Web Analytics (continued) Web analytics enable designers to track the activities of users on their site They can see how many people come to the site, how long they stay, and where they go Web analytics offer designers the “big picture” about how their site performs based on user activity One of the most well-known analytics www.id-book.com 18

Segment of Google Analytics for Interaction Design 5e website, December 2018 www.id-book.com

Segment of Google Analytics for Interaction Design 5e website, December 2018 (continued) www.id-book.com

Segment of early VisiStat Analytics from 2010 Source: VisiStat Analytics, 2010 www.id-book.com

Segment of early VisiStat Analytics from 2010 (continued) Where visitors to Mountain Wineries in California come from Source: VisiStat Analytics, 2010 www.id-book.com

A/B Testing A large-scale experiment Offers another way to evaluate a website, application of app running on a mobile device Often used for evaluating changes in design on social media applications Compares how two groups of users perform on two versions of a design www.id-book.com 23

A/B Testing (continued) Can involve thousands of users May create ethical dilemmas if users don’t know they are part of the test Care is needed to ensure that other issues are not affecting users’ behavior www.id-book.com 24

Predictive models Provide a way of evaluating products or designs without directly involving users Less expensive than user testing Usefulness limited to systems with predictable tasks, for example, voicemail systems, smartphones, and dedicated mobile devices Based on expert error-free behavior www.id-book.com 25

Fitts’ Law (1954) Fitts’ Law predicts that the time to point at an object using a device is a function of the distance from the target object and the object’s size The further away and the smaller the object, the longer the time to locate it and point to it It is particularly useful for determining where on a screen to position an object Fitts’ Law is useful for evaluating systems for which the time to locate an object is important, for example, smartphones, handhelds, and mobile devices www.id-book.com 26

Summary Inspections can be used to evaluate requirements, mockups, functional prototypes, or systems User testing and heuristic evaluation may reveal different usability problems Design guidelines can be used to develop heuristics Walkthroughs are a fine-grained focused method for evaluating small parts of a product www.id-book.com 27

Summary (continued) Analytics involves collecting data about users activity on a website or product to see which parts are used A/B testing is a form of large-scale experiment Fitts’ Law can be used to predict expert, error-free performance for clearly defined tasks with limited key presses, for example, to evaluate keypress sequences for handheld devices and the position of objects on a screen www.id-book.com 28