Progressive DNA Bending Is Made Possible by Gradual Changes in the Torsion Angle of the Glycosyl Bond  Leonardo Pardo, Nina Pastor, Harel Weinstein  Biophysical.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 84, Issue 4, Pages (April 2003)
Advertisements

Po-chia Chen, Jochen S. Hub  Biophysical Journal 
Matan Goldshtein, David B. Lukatsky  Biophysical Journal 
Membrane-Induced Structural Rearrangement and Identification of a Novel Membrane Anchor in Talin F2F3  Mark J. Arcario, Emad Tajkhorshid  Biophysical.
Induced Fit and the Entropy of Structural Adaptation in the Complexation of CAP and λ- Repressor with Cognate DNA Sequences  Surjit B. Dixit, David Q.
Volume 108, Issue 5, Pages (March 2015)
The Stretched Intermediate Model of B-Z DNA Transition
Structural Basis of DNA Recognition by p53 Tetramers
Peter J. Mulligan, Yi-Ju Chen, Rob Phillips, Andrew J. Spakowitz 
Olivier Fisette, Stéphane Gagné, Patrick Lagüe  Biophysical Journal 
Structure and Dynamics of Calmodulin in Solution
Christopher Wostenberg, W.G. Noid, Scott A. Showalter 
Solution structure of a pyrimidine·purine·pyrimidine DNA triplex containing T·AT, C+ ·GC and G·TA triples  Ishwar Radhakrishnan, Dinshaw J Patel  Structure 
Volume 92, Issue 11, Pages (June 2007)
Molecular Basis of Box C/D RNA-Protein Interactions
Insight into the stabilization of A-DNA by specific ion association: spontaneous B-DNA to A-DNA transitions observed in molecular dynamics simulations.
Near-Atomic Resolution for One State of F-Actin
Volume 86, Issue 6, Pages (June 2004)
Austin Huang, Collin M. Stultz  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 89, Issue 2, Pages (August 2005)
Po-Chao Wen, Emad Tajkhorshid  Biophysical Journal 
The Mechanism of the Translocation Step in DNA Replication by DNA Polymerase I: A Computer Simulation Analysis  Andrei A. Golosov, Joshua J. Warren, Lorena.
Hydration and DNA Recognition by Homeodomains
Shozeb Haider, Gary N. Parkinson, Stephen Neidle  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 85, Issue 2, Pages (August 2003)
Large-Scale Conformational Dynamics of the HIV-1 Integrase Core Domain and Its Catalytic Loop Mutants  Matthew C. Lee, Jinxia Deng, James M. Briggs, Yong.
Emel Ficici, Daun Jeong, Ioan Andricioaei  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (January 2007)
Volume 96, Issue 2, Pages (January 2009)
Volume 107, Issue 3, Pages (August 2014)
Rainer A. Böckmann, Helmut Grubmüller  Biophysical Journal 
G. Fiorin, A. Pastore, P. Carloni, M. Parrinello  Biophysical Journal 
A Molecular Dynamics Study of Ca2+-Calmodulin: Evidence of Interdomain Coupling and Structural Collapse on the Nanosecond Timescale  Craig M. Shepherd,
Volume 87, Issue 6, Pages (December 2004)
Filip Lankaš, Richard Lavery, John H. Maddocks  Structure 
Dynamic Motions of the HIV-1 Frameshift Site RNA
Adam W. Van Wynsberghe, Qiang Cui  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 96, Issue 7, Pages (April 2009)
Volume 108, Issue 7, Pages (April 2015)
Ligand Binding to the Voltage-Gated Kv1
Volume 89, Issue 4, Pages (October 2005)
Azobenzene Photoisomerization-Induced Destabilization of B-DNA
Till Siebenmorgen, Martin Zacharias  Biophysical Journal 
An Atomic Model of the Interferon-β Enhanceosome
Functional Plasticity in the Substrate Binding Site of β-Secretase
Hisashi Ishida, Hidetoshi Kono  Biophysical Journal 
Karunesh Arora, Tamar Schlick  Biophysical Journal 
Intrinsic Bending and Structural Rearrangement of Tubulin Dimer: Molecular Dynamics Simulations and Coarse-Grained Analysis  Yeshitila Gebremichael, Jhih-Wei.
Volume 108, Issue 10, Pages (May 2015)
Dissecting DNA-Histone Interactions in the Nucleosome by Molecular Dynamics Simulations of DNA Unwrapping  Ramona Ettig, Nick Kepper, Rene Stehr, Gero.
Zara A. Sands, Alessandro Grottesi, Mark S.P. Sansom 
The structure of an RNA dodecamer shows how tandem U–U base pairs increase the range of stable RNA structures and the diversity of recognition sites 
Irina V. Dobrovolskaia, Gaurav Arya  Biophysical Journal 
Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Wild-Type and Mutant Forms of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis MscL Channel  Donald E. Elmore, Dennis A. Dougherty  Biophysical.
Grischa R. Meyer, Justin Gullingsrud, Klaus Schulten, Boris Martinac 
Replica Exchange Molecular Dynamics Simulations Provide Insight into Substrate Recognition by Small Heat Shock Proteins  Sunita Patel, Elizabeth Vierling,
Crystal Structure of an IHF-DNA Complex: A Protein-Induced DNA U-Turn
Chi H. Mak, Tyler Matossian, Wen-Yeuan Chung  Biophysical Journal 
Dominico Vigil, Stephen C. Gallagher, Jill Trewhella, Angel E. García 
Amedeo Caflisch, Martin Karplus  Structure 
Conformational Transitions in Protein-Protein Association: Binding of Fasciculin-2 to Acetylcholinesterase  Jennifer M. Bui, Zoran Radic, Palmer Taylor,
Structure of BamHI Bound to Nonspecific DNA
Toward a Consensus View of Duplex RNA Flexibility
OmpT: Molecular Dynamics Simulations of an Outer Membrane Enzyme
Thérèse E. Malliavin, Jocelyne Gau, Karim Snoussi, Jean-Louis Leroy 
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Po-chia Chen, Jochen S. Hub  Biophysical Journal 
Analyzing the Flexibility of RNA Structures by Constraint Counting
Volume 98, Issue 4, Pages (February 2010)
Volume 86, Issue 6, Pages (June 2004)
Presentation transcript:

Progressive DNA Bending Is Made Possible by Gradual Changes in the Torsion Angle of the Glycosyl Bond  Leonardo Pardo, Nina Pastor, Harel Weinstein  Biophysical Journal  Volume 74, Issue 5, Pages 2191-2198 (May 1998) DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77928-7 Copyright © 1998 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 (A)Values of the glycosyl-bond torsional angle (χ) for each of the eight nucleotides (color coded individually in the figure) of the TATATAAA sequence in the TATA box, shown as a function of time. The χ angles of the other nucleotides in the dodecamer are not shown. During the 0–50-ps period of the simulation, the values of χ were restrained close to those in canonical A-DNA (blue broken line). Subsequently (during the 50–200-ps period), χ values were slowly changed to those found in the TA-DNA structure, and were maintained close to those in the TA-DNA structure during the 200–250-ps period (see Methods for details). The χ angles of the TA-DNA structure in the TBP complex (Kim et al., 1993a) are in the range of 231°-277°, with the exception of the angle corresponding to the first nucleotide of the TATA box (T), which remains close to the A-DNA value (199°, see black line). (B) RMSD comparison of the computer-simulated structures, canonical A-DNA (blue) and B-DNA (green), and the crystal structure of TA-DNA (red). Values are calculated for the heavy atoms of the 8-bp TATA box. The expected minimum RMSD between the computer-simulated structures and the crystal structure of TA-DNA, derived from C, is shown as a broken black line. (C) RMSD comparison of the coding strand A (solid line) and noncoding strand B (broken line) of the sugar-phosphate backbone, in the computer-simulated structures, compared to canonical A-DNA (blue), and to the crystal structure of TA-DNA (red). Each strand was matched separately. Biophysical Journal 1998 74, 2191-2198DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77928-7) Copyright © 1998 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Stereo view of the RMS best fit of the average structure computed from the trajectory between 200 and 250ps (yellow) and the DNA molecule of the TBP/TATA box crystal structure (Kim et al., 1993a) (red). Only the heavy atoms of the 8-bp TATA box are shown. Biophysical Journal 1998 74, 2191-2198DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77928-7) Copyright © 1998 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Comparison of base pair and base pair step geometrical parameters for the TATA box base pairs of A-DNA (●), a crystal structure of TA-DNA (Kim et al., 1993a) (■), and the average structure from the 200–250-ps interval of the simulation (♦). (A) Inclination; (B) twist; (C) slide; (D) roll. The structural parameters were calculated with CURVES as global parameters (Lavery and Sklenar, 1989), over the 8 bp of the TATA box. The slide, roll, and twist parameters were calculated with CURVES 4.1 (Lavery and Sklenar, 1989), whereas inclination was calculated with the CURVES version incorporated in the Dials and Windows package (Ravishanker et al., 1989). Biophysical Journal 1998 74, 2191-2198DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77928-7) Copyright © 1998 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Structures of the central base pair T7:A18 of the TATA box at 50ps (red), 100ps (purple), 150ps (green), and the average structure computed from the trajectory between 200 and 250ps (yellow). The atoms of the backbones of A6, T7, and A8 were superimposed. This comparison emphasizes that the transition from A-DNA to TA-DNA, driven by the glycosyl-bond torsion angle, involves a continuous motion of the sugar moieties toward the 3′ end and a gradual change in the orientation of the base pair. The other base pairs of the TATA box behave in an identical manner. Biophysical Journal 1998 74, 2191-2198DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77928-7) Copyright © 1998 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Structures from the A-DNA to TA-DNA conformational transition at 50ps (red) and 150ps (orange), and the average structure computed from the trajectory between 200 and 250ps (yellow and blue). These TATA box structures have been extended at the 5′ and 3′ ends (see the second part of Methods, Progressive DNA Binding) by DNA segments in the A-DNA conformation (red, orange, and yellow) and B-DNA conformation (blue). The computed structures of the TATA box during the conformational transition are shown as flat ribbons, whereas the extensions are shown as tube ribbons. The structures were superimposed at the 5′ end extensions (in green). Biophysical Journal 1998 74, 2191-2198DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77928-7) Copyright © 1998 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions