Table 3. The Result of Post-test Data Normality Test

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

and Statistics, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1-8. doi: /ajams-4-1-1

Advertisements

Intermediate-level learner

Table 1. Empirical MSE to estimate the CP distribution parameter λ

Hypothesis Testing with z Tests

Research, 2015, Vol. 3, No. 6, doi: /education

Figure 3. Comparison of class performance

Table 3. Quran memorization students survey responses about App

Table 1. Sample Size No Category Sample Size (F) Percentage (%) 1

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Source Sum of Squares (SS) df Mean Square (MS) F p-value

Table 3. Student’s Mathematical Critical Thinking Ability Description

Teachers Response (N= 11)

Management Philosophy

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 2. Showing mean and SD along with t- critical ratio

student achievement scores

Table 11. Chi-Square Analysis Based on Grade Shift for Study Group

No. 8, doi: /education Table 9. t-Test Analysis Based on Average Quiz Scores from Last Six Quizzes t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Unequal.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

in the last evaluation of the software

Table 6. Control sample industry distribution

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Test Mean Std. Dev. Mathematics English Language

Table 1. Student’s attitude towards technology (%)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Significant (2- tailed)

Table 2. Regression statistics for independent and dependent variables

FSV Interpretation (qualitative)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Contrast equality of group means

Table 2. Showing mean and SD along with t- critical ratio

Number of categories that are mentioned (0% < categories < 5%)

Table 1. Diagnostic methods for systemic fungal infection (n=70)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 2. Test of Normality

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 1. LLC Academics Outcome Report ( )

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Financial Development

Number of questionnaires sent out

Table 1. Descriptive Statistics

Training Programs in Management and Leadership

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Behavioral strategies

and Applications, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 2, doi: /jcsa-4-2-2

Table 4. Summary of Multi ways ANOVA results

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

95% Confidence Interval for Mean

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 3. Correlation of PC, MC, RC & IC at the Supervisory level

chemistry that are involved in peer group

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 3. (d) Summary of two way ANOVA for overall adjustment

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Category Quantity Secondary school 3 Student participant

Table 1. Illiteracy distribution by Gender and Place (No. in million)

Geometry and Mensuration

Table 5. Daily Standard Deviation of Items

Table 7. The Result of T Test After Treatment

Table 2. Pre and Post Test Scores for the Plaid Condition(N=16)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 4. Correlation of PC, MC, RC & IC at the Managers level

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 4. Independent Samples Test Application of ICT by Gender

Table 6. Range Comparisons amongst Subgroups and grade levels

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Presentation transcript:

Table 3. The Result of Post-test Data Normality Test One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test Score Group N 50 Normal Parametersa,b Mean 78.80 1.50 Std. Deviation 6.518 .505 Most Extreme Differences Absolute .100 .339 Positive Negative -.073 -.339 Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z .707 2.396 Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .699 .000 Sources: Research Finding (2014) a. Test distribution is normal. b. Calculated from data. Vandalita M.M. Rambitan et al. The Effect of Smartphone on Students’ Critical Thinking Skill in Relation to the Concept of Biodiversity. American Journal of Educational Research, 2015, Vol. 3, No. 2, 243-249. doi:10.12691/education-3-2-18 © The Author(s) 2015. Published by Science and Education Publishing.