Table 7. The Result of T Test After Treatment

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

and Statistics, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1-8. doi: /ajams-4-1-1

Advertisements

Intermediate-level learner

Table 2. Result of Actual Technical Writing Needs

Hospital live Deliveries

Research, 2015, Vol. 3, No. 6, doi: /education

Table 4. Filter Sand Sieve Analysis

Figure 3. Comparison of class performance

Table 3. Quran memorization students survey responses about App

UNICEF funded Projects

Table 1. Sample Size No Category Sample Size (F) Percentage (%) 1

SON Nurse Practitioner Blackboard Community

Total Energy Consumed (%)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Source Sum of Squares (SS) df Mean Square (MS) F p-value

Table 3. Student’s Mathematical Critical Thinking Ability Description

Teachers Response (N= 11)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 8. Drawing result before game

Table 2. Showing mean and SD along with t- critical ratio

student achievement scores

Table 11. Chi-Square Analysis Based on Grade Shift for Study Group

No. 8, doi: /education Table 9. t-Test Analysis Based on Average Quiz Scores from Last Six Quizzes t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Unequal.

in the last evaluation of the software

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Year range Rainfall (mm) ∆s in rainfall Temp (°C) ∆s in temp RH (mm)

Test Mean Std. Dev. Mathematics English Language

Table 1. Student’s attitude towards technology (%)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Significant (2- tailed)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Contrast equality of group means

Table 2. Showing mean and SD along with t- critical ratio

Number of categories that are mentioned (0% < categories < 5%)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Overall Average Female Overall Average Male/Female

Entrapment Efficiency (%) ± S.D.

Table 2. Test of Normality

Table 1. Population by University

Table 1. LLC Academics Outcome Report ( )

Number of questionnaires sent out

Table 1. Descriptive Statistics

Training Programs in Management and Leadership

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Behavioral strategies

Table 4. Summary of Multi ways ANOVA results

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

95% Confidence Interval for Mean

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

chemistry that are involved in peer group

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 3. (d) Summary of two way ANOVA for overall adjustment

Category Quantity Secondary school 3 Student participant

Table 1. Illiteracy distribution by Gender and Place (No. in million)

Geometry and Mensuration

Table 3. The Result of Post-test Data Normality Test

Table 2. Pre and Post Test Scores for the Plaid Condition(N=16)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Average Execution Time in seconds

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 4. Independent Samples Test Application of ICT by Gender

Table 6. Range Comparisons amongst Subgroups and grade levels

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Presentation transcript:

Table 7. The Result of T Test After Treatment No. Result Science-program class XI 2 (Learning by using smartphones) Science-program class XI 3 (Learning without using smartphones) 1. Average score (X) 82.20 75.40 2. Variance 35.16 27.50 4. tcalculation 4.30 5. ttabulation 2.01 Sources: Research Findings (2014) Vandalita M.M. Rambitan et al. The Effect of Smartphone on Students’ Critical Thinking Skill in Relation to the Concept of Biodiversity. American Journal of Educational Research, 2015, Vol. 3, No. 2, 243-249. doi:10.12691/education-3-2-18 © The Author(s) 2015. Published by Science and Education Publishing.