Table 2. Pre and Post Test Scores for the Plaid Condition(N=16)

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

and Statistics, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1-8. doi: /ajams-4-1-1

Advertisements

Test (Haemodialysis patients) Controls (health care workers)

Research, 2015, Vol. 3, No. 6, doi: /education

Table 2. Result of intention to use

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 1. Sample Size No Category Sample Size (F) Percentage (%) 1

SON Nurse Practitioner Blackboard Community

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 3. Student’s Mathematical Critical Thinking Ability Description

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 2. Showing mean and SD along with t- critical ratio

student achievement scores

Table 1. Descriptive data of movement form scores

in the last evaluation of the software

Table 2. Student's t–test (Tensile Strength)

Table 4. Percentage of post-harvest waste reported by the farmers

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Test Mean Std. Dev. Mathematics English Language

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 1. Student’s attitude towards technology (%)

Table 3. Direct Effects for the Dyadic Model

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 1. Mean score of GAP perception of the farmers’ understanding

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Significant (2- tailed)

Rating of Water Quality

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 2. Showing mean and SD along with t- critical ratio

Table 1. Rice yield in MT (Source-USDA, Foreign Agricultural Service)

Number of categories that are mentioned (0% < categories < 5%)

Table 1. Diagnostic methods for systemic fungal infection (n=70)

Table 1. Characteristics (age, height, and weight) of the participants

Table 2. Modal parameters estimated by Pulse Reflex®

Table 7. Status of CF in Nepal as of 2009

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Entrapment Efficiency (%) ± S.D.

Simulation Frequency(Hz)

Number of questionnaires sent out

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 1. Descriptive Statistics

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 2. SUMMARIZED OBSERVATIONS FROM MODEL ANALYSIS

Table 4. Surface roughness (outer faces)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

chemistry that are involved in peer group

institution N Mean S.D SEM df t P

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 3. (d) Summary of two way ANOVA for overall adjustment

post intervention (n=60)

reported practices score pre/post intervention

Category Quantity Secondary school 3 Student participant

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 3. Surface roughness (inner faces)

Table 3. The Result of Post-test Data Normality Test

Table 7. The Result of T Test After Treatment

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

erythematous disease pre and post intervention (n=60)

Compressive Strength difference at 1 week (MPa)

Twice daily regimen N=45 MDI regimen N=28 P Value

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Average Execution Time in seconds

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Gender N Mean S.D Df t-cal P

Presentation transcript:

Table 2. Pre and Post Test Scores for the Plaid Condition(N=16) Pretest Post-Test Subtest M SD t-value p-value State Anx 39.69 9.68 32.44 8.98 3.612 0.003* POMS-Dep 3.00 3.79 1.50 3.22 2.449 0.027* POMS-Ten 5.63 4.83 2.56 3.95 3.298 0.005* Crystal R. Drake et al. The Influence of Art-Making on Negative Mood States in University Students. American Journal of Applied Psychology, 2014, Vol. 2, No. 3, 69-72. doi:10.12691/ajap-2-3-3 © The Author(s) 2014. Published by Science and Education Publishing.