© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

and Statistics, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1-8. doi: /ajams-4-1-1

Advertisements

Perception of discriminatory organizational relationships

Test (Haemodialysis patients) Controls (health care workers)

Research, 2015, Vol. 3, No. 6, doi: /education

Table 5. KAP score by community

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

osteoporosis among the studied working women (n= 365)

Research, 2017, Vol. 5, No. 4, doi: /ajnr-5-4-6

SON Nurse Practitioner Blackboard Community

Table 3. Descriptive Statistics – All Banks

Table 3. Student’s Mathematical Critical Thinking Ability Description

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

% Asian/Pacific Islander

Table 2. Showing mean and SD along with t- critical ratio

Acrylic Type SOV SS df MS F–value p–value

Table 1. The Demographic Characteristics

Table 8. Unit Key Performance Indicators

Table 7. Clinical Practice

Table 3. Shared Governance

Knowledge about elderly care

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Mu Qin et al. JACEP 2017;j.jacep

Table 2. Student's t–test (Tensile Strength)

Table 1. Descriptive statistics

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 3. Direct Effects for the Dyadic Model

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

During hospitalization

Table 1. Mean score of GAP perception of the farmers’ understanding

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Significant (2- tailed)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 2. Showing mean and SD along with t- critical ratio

Number of categories that are mentioned (0% < categories < 5%)

Table 1. Diagnostic methods for systemic fungal infection (n=70)

Table 1. Characteristics (age, height, and weight) of the participants

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Entrapment Efficiency (%) ± S.D.

Table 2. Test of Normality

Table 1. Descriptive Statistics

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Experience of primary school teachers

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 2. Drug use among family members and friends of the students

Socio-demographic data

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

chemistry that are involved in peer group

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

post intervention (n=60)

reported practices score pre/post intervention

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 2. Pre and Post Test Scores for the Plaid Condition(N=16)

erythematous disease pre and post intervention (n=60)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Educational Attainment

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Evaluating questionnaires

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Gender N Mean S.D Df t-cal P

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Presentation transcript:

© The Author(s) 2018. Published by Science and Education Publishing. Table 5. Mean Lupus PRO scores of studied clients pre and post intervention (n= 60) Lupus PRO Score Pre-intervention Post-intervention Paired t test P value Mean ±SD Lupus Symptoms 15 7.3800±1.73664 9.9400±1.57026 -7.568 <0.001** Cognition 10 3.5800±1.56609 6.4000±1.42857 -7.468 Lupus Medication 3.7000±1.56818 7.5400±1.19881 -12.406 Physical Health 3.5000±1.07381 7.3600±.98478 -17.587 Pain-Vitality 25 12.1200±1.28793 19.3400±1.49298 -22.851 Emotional Health 9.6200±1.78303 18.0000±2.16654 -21.173 Procreation 30 11.8000±1.44279 22.6600±1.81389 -33.861 Body Image 10.3400±1.69766 18.8800±1.36487 -25.065 Desires-Goals 20 8.3800±1.12286 14.2200±2.28830 -16.781 Social support 5.0600±1.44857 6.8800±1.09991 -8.387 Coping 6.2600±2.30182 10.9800±1.31692 -11.594 Satisfaction with care 8.4000±2.36471 17.2200±2.44357 -16.899 Total Lupus PRO score 215 90.1400±5.75347 159.4200±6.30546 -62.880 * Statistically significant difference (p≤0.05), **Highly statistically significant difference (p≤0.001). Doaa Mohamed Sobhy Elsayed et al. Effect of Health Education based Intervention on Self-care among Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Clients. American Journal of Nursing Research, 2018, Vol. 6, No. 3, 105-112. doi:10.12691/ajnr-6-3-4 © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Science and Education Publishing.