Genome-Edited Triple-Recessive Mutation Alters Seed Dormancy in Wheat

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WT#3#5#7#9#11#14#15#20#25#30 35S::JAZ13 Root length ratio * * * * * * * * * * Figure S2. Overexpression of native (untagged)
Advertisements

Targeted Disruption of V600E-Mutant BRAF Gene by CRISPR-Cpf1
Supplemental Figure 1 A) B) C)
Volume 88, Issue 5, Pages (March 1997)
Molecular recordings by directed CRISPR spacer acquisition
Yuming Lu, Jian-Kang Zhu  Molecular Plant 
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages (October 2000)
Volume 26, Issue 6, Pages (March 2016)
Mark M Metzstein, H.Robert Horvitz  Molecular Cell 
Volume 8, Issue 12, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages (May 2015)
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages (January 2018)
Volume 156, Issue 4, Pages (February 2014)
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages (October 2017)
Volume 154, Issue 6, Pages (September 2013)
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages (January 2018)
Volume 65, Issue 1, Pages (January 2017)
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages (April 2014)
Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids
Volume 27, Issue 11, Pages e3 (June 2017)
Genome Engineering with CRISPR-Cas9 in the Mosquito Aedes aegypti
Volume 88, Issue 5, Pages (March 1997)
Size Polymorphisms in the Human Ultrahigh Sulfur Hair Keratin-Associated Protein 4, KAP4, Gene Family  Naoyuki Kariya, Yutaka Shimomura, Masaaki Ito 
Volume 171, Issue 2, Pages e8 (October 2017)
USH2A Gene Editing Using the CRISPR System
Supplemental Figure 3 A B C T-DNA 1 2 RGLG1 2329bp 3 T-DNA 1 2 RGLG2
Objective: Convert a hulled (covered) barley into a hull-less (Naked
Volume 48, Issue 5, Pages (December 2012)
RNA-Guided Genome Editing in Plants Using a CRISPR–Cas System
Andrew R. Bassett, Charlotte Tibbit, Chris P. Ponting, Ji-Long Liu 
Volume 10, Issue 7, Pages (July 2017)
Volume 10, Issue 7, Pages (July 2017)
Volume 153, Issue 4, Pages (May 2013)
Volume 4, Issue 3, Pages (May 2011)
Expression of a microRNA-Resistant Target Transgene Misrepresents the Functional Significance of the Endogenous microRNA: Target Gene Relationship  Junyan.
Volume 26, Issue 6, Pages (March 2016)
Volume 17, Issue 10, Pages (December 2016)
RAD51 is essential for L. donovani.
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages (April 2018)
Gang Wang, Na Zhao, Ben Berkhout, Atze T Das  Molecular Therapy 
TALEN Gene Knockouts Reveal No Requirement for the Conserved Human Shelterin Protein Rap1 in Telomere Protection and Length Regulation  Shaheen Kabir,
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages (January 2018)
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages (May 2015)
Autosomal-Dominant Woolly Hair Resulting from Disruption of Keratin 74 (KRT74), a Potential Determinant of Human Hair Texture  Yutaka Shimomura, Muhammad.
WRKY20 dual sgRNA approach.
insomniac and Cullin-3 Regulate Sleep and Wakefulness in Drosophila
Volume 153, Issue 4, Pages (May 2013)
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages (May 2008)
Expanding the Range of CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing in Rice
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages (April 2016)
Volume 37, Issue 3, Pages (May 2016)
DNA Looping Facilitates Targeting of a Chromatin Remodeling Enzyme
Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages (July 2013)
Volume 26, Issue 6, Pages (June 2018)
The sh339 and qmc554 alleles of gfi1b.
Fig. 4 Gene disruption via chip.
Fig. 6. F1 trβ mutants accomplish natural metamorphosis.
Volume 171, Issue 2, Pages e8 (October 2017)
Multiplexed Mutagenesis Using the Csy4 System in Tomato Protoplasts.
Volume 16, Issue 11, Pages (September 2016)
Volume 26, Issue 11, Pages (November 2018)
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages (April 2016)
Fig. 1 Exon 44–deleted DMD patient iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes express dystrophin after CRISPR-Cas9–mediated genome editing. Exon 44–deleted DMD patient.
Wang Long , Mai Yan-Xia , Zhang Yan-Chun , Luo Qian , Yang Hong-Quan  
CRISPR Immunological Memory Requires a Host Factor for Specificity
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages e3 (October 2018)
Lack of Transcription Triggers H3K27me3 Accumulation in the Gene Body
Potent and sequence-specific removal through genome targeting with CRISPR-Cas systems. Potent and sequence-specific removal through genome targeting with.
Fig. 3 Genome editing of the MSTN gene.
Presentation transcript:

Genome-Edited Triple-Recessive Mutation Alters Seed Dormancy in Wheat Fumitaka Abe, Emdadul Haque, Hiroshi Hisano, Tsuyoshi Tanaka, Yoko Kamiya, Masafumi Mikami, Kanako Kawaura, Masaki Endo, Kazumitsu Onishi, Takeshi Hayashi, Kazuhiro Sato  Cell Reports  Volume 28, Issue 5, Pages 1362-1369.e4 (July 2019) DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.06.090 Copyright © 2019 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Cell Reports 2019 28, 1362-1369.e4DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2019.06.090) Copyright © 2019 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Targeted Knockout of TaQsd1 Using CRISPR/Cas9 via Agrobacterium-Mediated Transformation (A) Exons of wheat Qsd1 (TaQsd1) homeolog are shown as blue squares, and introns are shown as black lines. A conserved region of exon 14 of the wheat Qsd1 (TaQsd1) homeolog (shown as red line) targeted by the CRISPR/Cas9 system. CRISPR/Cas9-targeted sequence 1 in TaQsd1 (TaQsd1_t1) is shown in blue letters, and the PstI restriction site is underlined. The protospacer-adjacent motif sequence (PAM) is shown in orange, and the SNPs of TaQsd1 homeoalleles are highlighted in yellow. The mutation position in the barley dormancy orthologous gene (Sato et al., 2016) is highlighted in gray (see also Figures S1A and S1B). (B) PCR-RFLP analysis of the mutation site at TaQsd1 using A, B, and D sub-genome-specific or non-specific primers. PCR was conducted with A, B, and D sub-genome-specific (TaQsd1-A, TaQsd1-B, and TaQsd1-D, respectively) or non-specific (TaQsd1-ABD) primer sets (see also Table S1) using the DNA samples derived from eight T0 transgenic plants as template. T0 plant including mutations are indicated in red. Fragment sizes of amplicons are 549, 503, 523, and 186 bp with the primer sets of TaQsd1-A, TaQsd1-B, TaQsd1-D, and TaQsd1-ABD, respectively. Amplicons were digested with restriction enzyme PstI in the Cas9 cleavage site to detect wild-type (digested, black arrowheads) and mutant (undigested, red arrowhead) plants. M indicates 100-bp size marker in TaQsd1-A, TaQsd1-B, and TaQsd1-D and 50-bp size marker in TaQsd1-ABD. (C) Nucleotide sequences showing genome editing in the TaQsd1 site induced by TaQsd1_t1. Target sequence, PstI restriction site, and PAM are shown as in Figure 1A. Nucleotides inserted are shown in red letters. (D) Deduced amino acid sequences around the target sites. One base insertion causes a frameshift. The resulting amino acid sequences are shown below in red (see also Figures S1C–S1E). Cell Reports 2019 28, 1362-1369.e4DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2019.06.090) Copyright © 2019 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Acceleration of Generation Advancement for Homozygous Edited Lines of TaQsd1_t1 (A) Developmental scheme of eight homozygous lines from the cross between T0 #1 (aaBbdd for three homeoalleles) with cv. Fielder (AABBDD). (B) Acceleration of generation advancement and genotypic selection (see also Figure S2) with the aid of embryo culture. Cell Reports 2019 28, 1362-1369.e4DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2019.06.090) Copyright © 2019 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Triple-Recessive Homozygous Mutant Showed Clearly Longer Seed Dormancy (A) Morphological observation of eight homozygous lines harboring recessive alleles of the homeologs. Plants were grown in a growth chamber and are shown at 21 days after flowering. Scale bar, 10 cm. (B) Spike samples of triple-dominant (AABBDD) and -recessive (aabbdd) genotypes allowed to germinate in a dew chamber for 6 days in the dark followed by 7 days in the light at 20°C. Scale bar, 1 cm. (C) Germination tests of triple-dominant and -recessive genotypes. Seeds were soaked in Petri dishes and allowed to germinate in a growth chamber in the dark at 20°C. Scale bar, 1 cm. (See also Figure S3A.) (D) Germination behaviors of eight homozygous lines. Four pots (six plants/pot) were used for each genotype as replications (n = 4). Two spikes from each plant, and thus a total of 48 spikes from 24 plants, were subjected to germination tests. The germination percentages of two Petri dishes including 20 seeds (10 seeds from each spike) from each plant were averaged. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. (See also Figure S3B.) Cell Reports 2019 28, 1362-1369.e4DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2019.06.090) Copyright © 2019 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Detection of Vector Sequence in the Null-Segregant, Transgene-Positive T1, and Wild-Type Plants by PCR (A) Schematic structure of the plasmid vector, pZH_OsU6gRNA_PubiMMCas9-TaQsd1_t1, and primer sets 01–14 used for transgene detection (see also Table S1). (B) Gel images of PCR assays to detect transgene using primer sets 01–14. Wild-type (WT: cv. Fielder), null-segregant (null), and six representative transgene-positive T1 plants were tested (see also Figure S4). Product size is indicated in parentheses. Marker indicates 100-bp size marker. Cell Reports 2019 28, 1362-1369.e4DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2019.06.090) Copyright © 2019 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Detection of T-DNA Sequence in Plasmid Vector in the Null-Segregant, Transgene-Positive T1, and Wild-Type Plants by Whole-Genome Shotgun Sequencing Analyses (A–C) The 36× (612 Gbp) shotgun reads from (A) null-segregant (null), (B) cv. Fielder (WT), and (C) transgene-positive T1 plants (#1–8) are mapped on the T-DNA sequence of the plasmid vector (12,481 bp) used in this study. The horizontal axis shows the sequence position on the vector. Schematic structure of the T-DNA region used in this study is shown in the bottom. The vertical axis shows read counts. (See also Figure S5.) (D and E) Differences in read counts on the T-DNA sequence are shown between (D) WT and the null, and (E) WT and #1–8. The horizontal axis shows sequence position on the T-DNA. The vertical axis shows the value of the G-test. The 1% level of significance in the G-test is denoted by the red line (6.634). I–VI indicate positions showing peaks on read counts in the null and WT. Annotations of these peaks are shown in Table S4. Cell Reports 2019 28, 1362-1369.e4DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2019.06.090) Copyright © 2019 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions