© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
and Statistics, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1-8. doi: /ajams-4-1-1
Advertisements

before and after rehabilitation
Dose and range (mg/kg body weight)
Table 4. Medications (drugs) used for self medication
Perception of discriminatory organizational relationships
Baseline characteristics and effectiveness results
Test (Haemodialysis patients) Controls (health care workers)
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Do not desire to have child
Research, 2015, Vol. 3, No. 6, doi: /education
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Total Number of persons Tested
Figure 1. Serum creatinine trend in the patient
Table 3. Number of MS patients/ Year of diagnosis / Current Residence
osteoporosis among the studied working women (n= 365)
Research, 2017, Vol. 5, No. 4, doi: /ajnr-5-4-6
PREDICTORS OF ADHERENCE TO ORAL ANTIHYPERTENSIVES AMONG PATIENTS ATTENDING TWO DISTRICT HOSPITALS IN NORTHERN VOLTA, GHANA BY PHARM.EMMANUEL SARKODIE CO-AUTHOR:
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 1. Distribution of the various organisms according to prevalence
WHI Observational Study: Cardiovascular death in women with hypertension but no history of CVD on monotherapy CVD death Diuretic, HR (95% CI) ACE inhibitor,
Mean BP from initial visit to four years
Table 3. Student’s Mathematical Critical Thinking Ability Description
Drug Rate ratio 95% CI Thiazide diuretics 1.0 Reference ACE inhibitors
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
% Asian/Pacific Islander
Table 1. The Demographic Characteristics
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 1. Student’s attitude towards technology (%)
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Patient-reported adherence towards different IMID treatments in RA (A), PsA (B) or AS (C). Patient-reported adherence towards different IMID treatments.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Rating of Water Quality
Number of patients who would have benefitted from addition of ACE inhibitor (ACEi), beta blockers (BB) or optimal therapy (one or both of ACEi and BB)
Table 2. Showing mean and SD along with t- critical ratio
Table 1. Diagnostic methods for systemic fungal infection (n=70)
Table 2. Modal parameters estimated by Pulse Reflex®
Patient flowchart of recruitment and treatment failure and success with glyburide vs. metformin. Patient flowchart of recruitment and treatment failure.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Entrapment Efficiency (%) ± S.D.
Table 5. Comparison of Outcome of 138 patients
ORs of receiving metformin for outcome measures, including age, number of comorbidities, provider age, A1C level, history of CHF, and use of medications,
Table 2. Demographic characteristics of the study subjects
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Experience of primary school teachers
Behavioral strategies
Prevalence of prescribing of different anti-diabetic medications as add-on therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes on metformin. *Other=Sum of prevalence.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Cumulative Percentage
Cumulative Percentage
Socio-demographic data
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 1. Laboratory values
chemistry that are involved in peer group
institution N Mean S.D SEM df t P
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
reported practices score pre/post intervention
Cashew juice stored for 30 days
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 2. Pre and Post Test Scores for the Plaid Condition(N=16)
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Twice daily regimen N=45 MDI regimen N=28 P Value
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Average Execution Time in seconds
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Presentation transcript:

© The Author(s) 2015. Published by Science and Education Publishing. Table 3. Medication related variables among T2DM patients at WSU teaching hospital Medication related variables Frequency (%) Antihypertensive Drugs No of medications taken per day (mean± SD) 3.33±1.38 ACEIs 127 (57.5) Below (<5) 195 (80.25) Calcium channel blockers 61 (27.6) Above(>5) (polypharmacy) 48 (19.75) Diuretics 23(10.4) Beta blockers 10(4.5) Other Concurrently used medications (N=66) Frequency/number of doses per day (mean±SD) 2.34 ± 0.47 Acid lowering drugs 32 (48.5) <Twice 160 (65.8) Antibiotics 14 (21.2) Three times and above 83 (34.2) NSAIDs 11 (16.7) Others* 9 (13.6) Statins Anti-diabetic medications Yes 60 (24.7) Metformin 13 (5.3) No 183(75.3) Glibenclamide 62 (25.5) Antiplatelet Insulin 44(18.1) Metformin and Glibenclamide 116 (47.7) 199(81.9) Metformin and insulin 26 (10.7) MMAS** Insulin and Glibenclamide 12 (4.9) < 3 116(47.7) Metformin + Glibenclamide + insulin 1 (0.4) > 3 127(52.3 * ARV drugs, anti-asthmatics, anti-epileptics, steroids ** Morisky medication adherence score. Hailu Chare Koyra et al. Epidemiology and Predictors of Drug Therapy Problems among Type 2 Diabetic Patients at Wolaita Soddo University Teaching Hospital, Southern Ethiopia. American Journal of Pharmacological Sciences, 2017, Vol. 5, No. 2, 40-48. doi:10.12691/ajps-5-2-4 © The Author(s) 2015. Published by Science and Education Publishing.