Top tasks for the European Commission

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Programme: 145 sessions & social events
Advertisements

UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION.
Knowledge Management LXV International Council Meeting Qawra, Malta 16 th - 23 rd of March 2014.
Knowledge Management and Transition ICM Cluj-Napoca, 24th April 2015.
Area Definition III KAM,Bratislava. The European Law Students’ Association Albania ˙ Austria ˙ Azerbaijan ˙ Belgium ˙ Bosnia and Herzegovina ˙ Bulgaria.
ELSA Law Schools ICM Cluj-Napoca, 21st April 2015.
INTERNATIONALA CONFERENCE Security and Defence R&D Management: Policy, Concepts and Models R&D HUMAN CAPITAL POLICY ASSISTANT PROFESSOR KONSTANTIN POUDIN.
European Business Register Congress of the Notaries of Europe, Brussels, 28 June 2011.
THE EUROPEAN UNION. HISTORY 28 European states after the second world war in 1951 head office: Brussels 24 different languages Austria joined 1995.
Capitalist. Main Points In a capitalist or free-market country, people can own their own businesses and property. People can also buy services for private.
Make it Smart&Creative ICM Cluj-Napoca, 21st April 2015.
THE EUROPEAN UNION. EU  1993 European Union  Main Aims  All states in the EU = a single market  One currency throughout the EU = the Euro  To have.
KAM Prague 3 rd -7 th September AA Workshop Studies Abroad Projects Embrace cultural diversity!
Institutional Visit LXV International Council Meeting Qawra, Malta 16 th - 23 rd of March 2014.
Natural gas, and oil sectors in Europe Vaidotas Levickis Fort Worth, Texas 2015.
Map - Region 3 Europe.
Why is there a need for a European Association for Language Testing and Assessment? Charles Alderson, Lancaster University, Coordinator of ENLTA.
Computer Class – Summer 20092/21/2016 3:45 AM European Countries Albania Andorra Austria Belarus Belgium Bosnia and Herzegovina Bulgaria Croatia Czech.
Geography Review On Map 1, please identify: -Spain -France -England -Russia -Ottoman empire -Persia -China -Mughal India -Songhai Empire.
Country EPS-12 Total (with ICPS) Hungary7979 Germany5559 Romania3841 Ukraine2527 United Kingdom1930 Finland1842 France1616 Italy1616 Poland1313 Switzerland1314.
The European Law Students’ Association Albania ˙ Austria ˙ Azerbaijan ˙ Belgium ˙ Bosnia and Herzegovina ˙ Bulgaria ˙ Croatia ˙ Cyprus ˙ Czech Republic.
The Mission of CERN  Push back  Push back the frontiers of knowledge E.g. the secrets of the Big Bang …what was the matter like within the first moments.
European Innovation Scoreboard European Commission Enterprise and Industry DG EPG DGs meeting, May 2008.
CONFIDENTIAL 1 EPC, European Union and unitary patent/UPC EPC: yes EEA: no EU: no (*) (*) Also means no unitary patent Albania, Macedonia, Monaco, San.
AllianceSymbol Alliance 1:  Strong military  Weak economy  Unlimited government (dictator) Alliance 2:  Strong military  Strong economy  Limited.
NSO data collections of subjective well-being
PISA 2015 results in England
What does the EU do? Who is in the EU?
Global overview partner work permits* Sept ‘16
EUROPEAN UNION – MAKING OFF European Economic Community
Certification CS-100/ CSE-200 /CSC-1
Table 1. Reported confirmed hepatitis A cases: number and rate per population, EU/EEA, 2010–2014 Source: Country reports. Legend: Y = yes, N =
DISTRIBUTION AUTOMATIC - GENERATION
Current Trends in Civil Service in Performance Appraisal and Benefits
The 1680 Family’s Reach.
Figure 1. Number of reported hantavirus infection cases, EU/EEA, 2014
Sourcing. Costs. HARDWARE + SERVICE
Table 1. Number and rate of reported confirmed syphilis cases per 100 000 population by country and year, EU/EEA, 2010–2014 Country
Table 1. Reported confirmed brucellosis cases: number and rate per population, EU/EEA, 2010–2014 Source: Country reports. Legend: Y = yes, N =
The European Parliament – voice of the people
The European Parliament – voice of the people
Top user tasks for Funding, Tenders: detailed results 2015 poll
Електричните возила во РепубликаМакедонија
Намалување на загадувањето на воздухот со електромобилност
European survey respondents by region.
Gonorrhoea cases of gonorrhoea were reported by 27 EU/EEA Member States for The overall notification rate was 18.8 cases per 100 000 population.
Open public consultation on the FEAD
EU: First- & Second-Generation Immigrants
Table 1. Table 1. Reported confirmed salmonellosis cases: number and rate per population, EU/EEA, 2010–2014 Source: Country reports. Legend: Y.
Table 1. Reported confirmed cholera cases, EU/EEA, 2010–2014
Adriatic Persian Gulf Map Test #1 Answers.
Regional Accounts
European Union Membership
Adoption, adaptation and applicability of the Global Curriculum in Medical Oncology. Adoption, adaptation and applicability of the Global Curriculum in.
“Integrating Microbial Knowledge into Human Life”
Adriatic Persian Gulf Map Test #1 Answers.
European representation of respiratory critical care HERMES participants. European representation of respiratory critical care HERMES participants. Countries.
COST - Promoting and Spreading Excellence
Regional Accounts ESA 95 Data Collection
Why a KETs Observatory ? Commission Communication on Key Enabling Technologies (2012) : "There is no validated market data on development and take-up of.
Infographics on Electromobility. APRIL 2019.
Trends for ECDC measles and rubella monitoring,
Task Force 4 Cultural Practices and Social Aspects of Culture
Where in the world is the European Union?
Photonics topics H2020 Info day on ICT WP 2019
LAMAS Working Group June 2018
International Technical Meeting on Measuring Remittances
European Agency Statistics on Inclusive Education (EASIE) www
Update on Derogation Reporting
Prodcom Statistics in Focus
Presentation transcript:

Top tasks for the European Commission July 11th, 2014

What we will cover Internal poll: what Commission staff think the top tasks are External poll: what the top tasks are Detailed results Key findings Next steps

Internal poll: what do the staff think

Internal poll – facts & figures From May 26, 2014 to June 12, 2014 Valid responses: 668 Question 1: Tasks “Select the 5 reasons (from the list below) that YOU THINK are most important TO PEOPLE when engaging with the Commission (we are talking about people's overall interaction with the Commission, not just with one particular DG)” Question 2: Satisfaction “Participants in the external survey were asked to select 3 factors to describe THEIR EXPERIENCE with Commission websites. Which 3 from the list below do you think they chose?” Gerry to ask: who took the poll?

Internal poll - what do the staff think? 5 Top Tasks according to staff Funding, grants, subsidies Working in an EU country (rights, permits, benefits) Complaints to the European Commission About the EU (role, structure, how it works, origin) Tiny Top Small Medium

Internal poll – stability of results

Bottom 20 tasks according to staff

Satisfaction – what do the staff think? Out-of-date information Inaccurate information Incomplete information Full of jargon, corporate speak Hard to contact a person Hard to participate, give feedback Misleading, not transparent Has no ratings, reviews, recommendations Poor search results Confusing menus and links Cluttered layout Looks unattractive Slow to do things Up-to-date information Accurate information Complete information Plain language Easy to contact a person Easy to participate, give feedback Gives me the facts / transparent Has ratings, reviews, recommendations Helpful search results Clear menus and links Simple layout / easy to read Looks attractive / appealing Fast to do things Satisfaction index: 16%

External poll: what the top tasks are

External poll – facts & figures From May 12, 2014 to June 02, 2014 Valid responses: 106,792 Volunteers for future testing: >40,000

85% participants from EU28 – 211 countries Italy 12% 10878 Germany 11% 9777 Spain 9% 8294 France 7% 6559 United Kingdom 7% 5928 Belgium 6% 5129 Netherlands 3% 3064 Portugal 3% 2731 Greece 3% 2437 Romania 2% 2066 Austria 2% 2040 Sweden 2% 1907 United States of America 2% 1792 Poland 2% 1763 Bulgaria 2% 1674 Finland 2% 1555 Ireland 2% 1399 Denmark 1% 1223 Croatia 1% 1212 Czech Republic 1% 1084 Switzerland 1% 1021 Hungary 1% 947 Slovenia 1% 895 Norway 1% 703 Turkey 1% 613 Slovakia 1% 604 Luxembourg 1% 510 Brazil 1% 496 Serbia 1% 489 Lithuania 1% 457 Mexico 1% 445 Australia 0% 403 Canada 0% 398 Latvia 0% 383 Cyprus 0% 355 India 0% 328 Colombia 0% 323 Estonia 0% 312 Ukraine 0% 306 Malta 0% 305 China 0% 298 Argentina 0% 284 Japan 0% 277 Russia 0% 196 75488 from EU28 French Southern Territories

User segmentation by: Employment Employed 61% Self-employed 13% Student 12% Unemployed 7% Retired 3% Other

User segmentation by: Workplace National government 19% Local, regional authority 10% EU institutions 3% Other international organisations (non-EU) 2% Non-profit and NGO 11% Private sector: start-up 4% Private sector: small companies (<50 employees) 16% Private sector: medium-sized companies (50-249) 7% Private sector: large companies (>250 employees) Other 13%

User segmentation by: Occupation Journalist, media professional 3% Lawyer, legal professional 8% Policy maker 6% Lobbyist, interest representative 4% Teacher, professor, researcher (academia) 21% Economist Other (open question) 50%

User segmentation by: Age < 18 1% 18 - 24 9% 25 - 34 23% 35 - 44 25% 45 - 54 24% 55 - 64 14% 65 + 4%

User segmentation by: Private/professional Private individual 35% Professional 65%

User segmentation by: Site visit frequency Daily 11% Weekly 27% Monthly 21% Infrequently 24% First time 17%

The main task question Select the 5 reasons that are MOST IMPORTANT to you when interacting with the European Commission

External poll - key results 6 Top Tasks 6. Environmental protection Tiny Top Small Medium

The Long Neck

External poll - stability of results

Another view - stability of results

External poll - top 20 tasks 106,792 participants cast 1,601,880 votes

External poll - bottom 20 tasks

Top tasks - assumptions versus facts

External poll - satisfaction Select the 3 factors that BEST DESCRIBE YOUR EXPERIENCE when trying to complete tasks on a European Commission website.

Satisfaction – our audiences Out-of-date information Inaccurate information Incomplete information Full of jargon, corporate speak Hard to contact a person Hard to participate, give feedback Misleading, not transparent Has no ratings, reviews, recommendations Poor search results Confusing menus and links Cluttered layout Looks unattractive Slow to do things Up-to-date information Accurate information Complete information Plain language Easy to contact a person Easy to participate, give feedback Gives me the facts / transparent Has ratings, reviews, recommendations Helpful search results Clear menus and links Simple layout / easy to read Looks attractive / appealing Fast to do things

Satisfaction – our assumptions Out-of-date information Inaccurate information Incomplete information Full of jargon, corporate speak Hard to contact a person Hard to participate, give feedback Misleading, not transparent Has no ratings, reviews, recommendations Poor search results Confusing menus and links Cluttered layout Looks unattractive Slow to do things Up-to-date information Accurate information Complete information Plain language Easy to contact a person Easy to participate, give feedback Gives me the facts / transparent Has ratings, reviews, recommendations Helpful search results Clear menus and links Simple layout / easy to read Looks attractive / appealing Fast to do things

We are 89th out of 181 organisations 60% Staff: 16% 180th out of 181 staff surveys

Satisfaction – Where are the pain points?

Detailed analysis by category/ demographic

Consistency across ‘employment status’

Consistency across ‘workplace’

Consistency across ‘private/professionals’

Detailed analysis: ‘private/professionals’ Commission websites are mainly for professionals Website visit frequency

Consistency across ‘occupation’ (excl. ‘other’ 50%)

Detailed analysis: “other” occupations 6 occupations address 50% of our audiences Who are the other 50%?

The “other” occupations

Consistency across ‘age’

Consistency across ‘site visit frequency’

Consistency across ‘country of residence’

Consistency across ‘area of interest’

Key findings

Key findings There ARE top tasks, and the data is incredibly solid Commission websites are mainly for professionals Customers are much more positive than staff Remarkable consistency across all audience profiles, interest areas, countries Well-rated content, some jargon, lots of confusing menus and links, poor search Strong case for a common information architecture as the logical next step

Every single one is shared Tasks by DG 77 tasks… Every single one is shared Average of 12 DGs per task Alternative: ‘each task has mutliple owners’

We will build a common architecture for ALL 77 tasks. We will focus first on what matters most to most people: the TOP tasks.

The future is collaborative! All 77 tasks, starting with the TOP tasks, will be made more accessible. The future is collaborative!

We build the common architecture TOGETHER, based on FACTS We will collectively work on: Test questions Tester profiles Test results We will also hold new task identification workshops for top tasks Invitations will follow in the next coming weeks

Thanks!