Onboard sensors enable state feedback and closed-loop control of robotic skins. Onboard sensors enable state feedback and closed-loop control of robotic.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Demonstrations I, II, and III.
Advertisements

Soft robotic device applied to the RV in a pressure overload model of RHF. Soft robotic device applied to the RV in a pressure overload model of RHF. (A.
Degradation of MSP samples in 37°C DPBS solution.
Basic design concept of human mimetic humanoid.
Comparing previous simulation work with current study.
TPAD controller schematic and testing for WPC.
TPAD controller performance for three force components.
Cable-driven system diagram for structure matrix.
Three different types of transfer functions with a codomain of [0,1].
TPAD training protocol.
Fabrication of bilayer actuator composed of a hygroscopically active layer with aligned nanofibers and an inactive layer. Fabrication of bilayer actuator.
Self-sensing of actuator position.
Workspace comparison of Delta robots.
T2-weighted cross-sectional MR imaging of MSP swarms inside SD rats.
Spontaneous locomotion of hygrobots under spatial gradient of humidity
Distribution of the number of collisions and the average closest-neighbor distance as a function of communication range and delay. Distribution of the.
Visual explanation of the interaction terms.
Gripper that grasps autonomously.
Visual explanation of the interaction terms.
Crawler locomotion. Crawler locomotion. (A) Initial and final position of the crawlers after six inflation cycles with V ∈ [0,24] ml. (B) Displacement.
Autonomous soft robot with earthwork-like locomotion using an air source of constant pressure. Autonomous soft robot with earthwork-like locomotion using.
Allometric scaling of select biohybrid and organic devices.
Prosthesis grasping and control.
Tukey boxplots overlaid on data points from objective and subjective measures, displaying results from study 1. Tukey boxplots overlaid on data points.
Tactile features for prosthesis perception.
Online verification using reachable occupancies.
Cell viability tests. Cell viability tests. SEM images of (A) MC3T3-E1 cells and (B) MSCs on days 1, 3, and 5 of culture. (C) Survival rates of MC3T3-E1.
T2-weighted cross-sectional MR imaging of MSP swarms inside SD rats.
Prosthesis system diagram.
Translation of a spherical object.
Microrobots with different cell-carrying capacities under different grid lengths (lg) and burr lengths (lb). Microrobots with different cell-carrying capacities.
Self-sensing of actuator position.
Brain-computer interfaces.
Schematic of experimental setup and screen captures from swimming.
Details of an implementation of a mechanism within the control chambers for selective lengthening of the sides of the soft robot. Details of an implementation.
Untethered kirigami-skinned soft crawlers.
Degradation of MSP samples in 37°C DPBS solution.
Soft robotic device applied to the RV in a pressure overload model of RHF. Soft robotic device applied to the RV in a pressure overload model of RHF. (A.
Underwater observatory.
Fluorescence response of actuator.
Fig. 1 Bioinspired design of AAD for promoting wound contraction.
Damage resilience of ACES architecture compared with a conventional row-column multiplexed array. Damage resilience of ACES architecture compared with.
The two modalities for the multitask condition.
Potential applications of the light-induced actuator.
Simulation results of magnetic driving ability in hepatic artery, portal vein, and hepatic vein. Simulation results of magnetic driving ability in hepatic.
Fig. 5 Wearable closed-loop HMI.
In vitro cell-release experiments on a glass substrate.
RAD sampler design. RAD sampler design. (A) One arm of the RAD sampler with revolute joints shown as dotted lines. A fold is initiated by rotating the.
Fig. 2 2D QWs of different propagation lengths.
Object manipulations performed by our biohybrid robots.
Overhead snapshots. Overhead snapshots. (A to E) Mark I3, robot experiments (movie S1). (F) Mark I3, simulation (movie S2, side by side with a run on the.
Universal soft robotic activation based on reversible assembly.
Results of a representative participant with multiple training sessions. Results of a representative participant with multiple training sessions. Average.
Galloping-like gait with the design of a two-legged robot.
AEGIS autonomous targeting process.
Fig. 2 Results of the learning and testing phases.
Details of seal design. Details of seal design. (A) RAD sampler (left), with close-up view (right) indicating the soft edges that form the light seal.
Response of the actuator to different stimulations.
Discrimination accuracy across conditions.
Proprioception. Proprioception. (A) Computer-aided design (CAD) model of each component of the cylinder and the completed device with three different stiffness.
State-of-the-art midwater sampling tools.
Kinematic and mechanical advantage trade-off study.
Characterization and optimization of the device.
The biomimetic pressure sensing ability.
Breakdown of incorrect participant responses.
Skin-like soft driving system for wirelessly activated fully soft robots. Skin-like soft driving system for wirelessly activated fully soft robots. (A)
Recorded spatial distribution of swift parrots.
Evaluating the performance of the robotic system through comparison with human trackers. Evaluating the performance of the robotic system through comparison.
Comparison of children’s behavior between the three conditions.
Setup used in the study. Setup used in the study. A child interacts with the robot tutor with a large touchscreen sitting between them, displaying the.
Presentation transcript:

Onboard sensors enable state feedback and closed-loop control of robotic skins. Onboard sensors enable state feedback and closed-loop control of robotic skins. (A and B) Sensor feedback during open-loop locomotion for both pneumatic and SMA skins positioned on soft cylinders. Actuation sequencing is shown in the cross-section schematics. (C and D) The state feedback from the sensors may be used for closed-loop control of cylinder deflection. Solid lines indicate the set point, dashed lines indicate the mean position, and clouds indicate the 95% confidence interval, over multiple trials. Five trials are shown for the pneumatic skin and 10 trials are shown for the SMA skin. Joran W. Booth et al. Sci. Robotics 2018;3:eaat1853 Copyright © 2018 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works