Claim construction and associated problems in France

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CIER-lezing Ex parte maatregelen
Advertisements

Innovation - Lab National Institute for Standardization And Industrial Property Patenting procedure Overview.
The German Experience: Patent litigation and nullification cases
How to read a patent? Karen Curé.
Industrial Property the Patent system
THE PROTECTION OF INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY AND TREATIES ADMINISTERED BY WIPO TK.
The Second Company Law Directive and the protection of corporate creditors Diederik BRULOOT ECLE meeting Cologne - 27 September 2012.
Invention Spotting – Identifying Patentable Inventions Martin Vinsome June 2012.
China on the way to a high-technology country: The legal policy perspective Stefan Luginbuehl Lawyer, International Legal Affairs.
Patent Protection of Technical Equivalents in Germany Prof. Dr. Christian Osterrieth Copenhagen August 2008.
The Case in Favour of Prosecution History Estoppel EPLAW Annual Meeting & Congress, Brussels, 2 December 2011 Jean-Christophe Troussel Bird & Bird Brussels.
New Constitutional Review in France: How Does the French Constitution Finally Speak to its People – or Does It? Dr Marie-Luce Paris, University College.
1 Impatriates: French tax regime CABINET SEVESTRE, 71 avenue Marceau – PARIS Tél : 33 (0) – Fax : 33 (0)
Patents 101 April 1, 2002 And now, for something new, useful and not obvious.
A comparative analysis with a harmonizing perspective A RT. 123(2) EPC AND US W RITTEN D ESCRIPTION 1 © AIPLA 2015 Enrica Bruno - Steinfl & Bruno LLP.
AIPPI seminarParis, 7 November 2013 Karsten Koeniger, Harmsen Utescher 1 Patents: Infringement under the doctrine of equivalence - Germany - Karsten Koeniger,
J.A.Kemp & Co. London Munich Oxford. FICPI ABC MEETING 2007 EPC 2000 Alan M. Senior 30 May 2007.
Dr. Michael Berger, European Patent Attorney © Michael Berger Intellectual Property (IP): Patents for Inventions.
THE PROTECTION OF PATENTS, TRADEMARKS, INDUSTRIAL DESIGNS AND GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS AND THEIR ROLE IN TRADE AND COMMERCE TK.
IPR-INSIGHTS CONSULTING AND RESEARCH 1116 BUDAPEST, KONDORFA U. 10. TEL.: (+36-1) FAX: (+36-1)
European Patent Applicants Filing in China Common Mistakes Zheng Li Zhongzi Law Office September, 2014.
The Means and Experiences of Patent Protection of Traditional Medicine in China Zheng Yongfeng The Patent Office of State Intellectual Property Office.
Professor Peng  Patent Act (2008) ◦ Promulgated in 1984 ◦ Amended in 1992, 2000, and 2008.
Patents Physical Property Deed Intellectual Property Deed InventionHouse.
ENFORCEMENT OF IP RIGHTS – INFRINGEMENT SEIZURE IN FRANCE Didier Intès French & European Patent attorney AIPPI – November 7, 2013.
Heli PihlajamaaLondon, Director Patent Law (5.2.1) Clarity - Article 84 EPC.
© 2008 International Intellectual Property June 22, 2009 Class 6 Patents: Multilateral Agreements (Paris Convention); Economics of International Patent.
ENFORCEMENT OF PATENT RIGHTS IN EUROPE The Hungarian way Zsolt SZENTPÉTERI S.B.G.&K. Patent and Law Offices, Budapest International Seminar Intellectual.
Drafting of Claims - The Tailor’s Scissors Edoardo Pastore European Patent Office Torino, October 2011.
6.1 Chapter 6 Patents © 2003 by West Legal Studies in Business/A Division of Thomson Learning.
6.1 Chapter 6 Patents © 2003 by West Legal Studies in Business/A Division of Thomson Learning.
WIPO Global Forum Of Intellectual Property Authorities Geneva, September 17-18, 2009 Panel 5B: Industrial Design Registration Key Design.
1 Patent Claim Interpretation under Art. 69 EPC – Should prosecution history be used to interpret the patent? presented at Fordham 19th Annual Conference.
Conference on Intellectual Property Rights for SMEs organized by TAIEX in co-operation with WIPO and the Turkish Patent Institute Istanbul, 10.
Claims and Determining Scope of Protection -Introduction Nov. 9, 2014 APAA Patents Committee Penang Malaysia Kay Konishi Co-chair of APAA Patents Committee.
15-16 May 2007Geertrui Van OverwalleEUPACO One size fits all? How unitary is the present European patent system? Geertrui Van Overwalle Centre for Intellectual.
1 Claim Interpretation and the Doctrine of Equivalence – German Approach Dr. Klaus Grabinski Judge at the Federal Court of Justice, Germany Chengdu, 10.
Harmonised use of accreditation for assessing the competence of various Conformity Assessment Bodies Dr Andreas Steinhorst, EA ERA workshop 13 April 2016,
A CP patent in European policy Dr Ali Al-fatlawi.
UK claim interpretation: “purposive construction” Peter Hale.
16/20/11/09 – EU Civil Patent Enforcement HG Patent Rights in the EU – The Civil Enforcement Perspective Heinz Goddar Boehmert & Boehmert.
Overview of presentation
Patent Quality Improvement: Proposed WIPO Discussion Topics
International Conference on Judicial Protection of IPR
Quantitive Impact Studies
Recent IP Case in Japan Construction of Functional Claim
ENFORCEMENT OF PATENT RIGHTS IN EUROPE The Hungarian way
PATENTS IT.CAN Annual Meeting
China Patent Practice Nongfan Zhu, Ph.D. Yanqin Song
The Role of Patent Attorneys
Patentability of AI related inventions
Lord Neuberger in Actavis v Eli Lilly [2017] RPC 21, para. 57.
Unitary Patent Court: Strategising in advance to maximise IP asset protection London IP Summit – October 2015.
Doctrine of Equivalents
Business benefits and advantages of protecting intellectual property
Upcoming changes in the European Patent Office practice on allowing claim amendments in pending patent applications (Article 123(2) EPC) Christof Keussen.
Understanding patent claims (b) Heating element for a washing machine
WTO Law Class 12: TRIPS Agreement
NON-PROFIT COMPANY FOR QUALITY CONTROL AND INNOVATION IN BULDING
(Outmoded) “Point of Novelty” Test
Claim drafting strategies when filing a European patent application or entering the European phase of a PCT-application Christof Keussen
Review on new matters under 20.5 & 20.5bis
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS
FUNDAMENTAL SOCIAL RIGHTS IN EU
Dr. Achim Seiler, EU-Project” Support of Yemen’s Accession to the WTO”
Patent Claims: Scope of Protection, Equivalence
Trilateral Seminar of the French, German and Polish Groups of AIPPI
The current referrals to the CJEU
Thursday April 4th, Welcome coffee and Registration of the participants Introductory speeches   AIPPI Secretary General Olga Sirakova.
Influence of AI creations on the IP rules
Presentation transcript:

Claim construction and associated problems in France 4/2019

CLAIM CONSTRUCTION 1 First analysis by the French Judge Extent of protection A69 EPC – L613-2 CPI Amendments before grant Literal infringement Essential means of a claim

FIRST ANALYSIS Technical field General background Aim of the invention 2 FIRST ANALYSIS Not harmonized Technical field General background Aim of the invention Solution Invention as claimed Discussion of the submissions Rule 43 EPC Tailor-made

EXTENT OF PROTECTION Interpreting the claims a compulsory step 3 EXTENT OF PROTECTION Interpreting the claims a compulsory step Revealing the essence of the invention Scope not beyond what is claimed Basis for the doctrine of equivalents A 69 as a compromise

AMENDENTS BEFORE GRANT 4 AMENDENTS BEFORE GRANT In the past: NOT TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT 2019 Clearly: YES Feature added during Exam/Oppo & not reproduced no infringement

LITERAL INFRINGEMENT Direct reproduction All features 5 LITERAL INFRINGEMENT Direct reproduction All features Not established if a claimed feature not read on the Defendant product

ESSENTIAL MEANS Not all features reproduced What about a missing one ? 6 ESSENTIAL MEANS Not all features reproduced What about a missing one ? What about a supplementary one ? Ancillary features can be neglected

EXAMPLE: Paris 28-11-2017 Trolley 100 Base 120 Two sidewalls 130 Panels 130 with sheet 150 Two horizontal straps 160 having at 1st end means to attach to 1st sidewall and at 2nd end means to attach releasably to 2nd sidewall FR 2 848 188

EXAMPLE: Paris 28-11-2017 Defendant’s product Trolley with a base, two sidewalls, panels with sheet At 1st end of panel, means to attach to 1st sidewall at 2nd end of panel, means to attach releasably to 2nd sidewall No strap across the panel no literal infringement Straps added during procedure no infringement by 2nd differences Same function, same result, novel function equivalence

EQUIVALENTS IN FRANCE Means – structure - not reproduced 9 EQUIVALENTS IN FRANCE Means – structure - not reproduced Function reproduced Same result Function to be new The scope extends from the claimed technology to any variant combining in the same way different means performing the same function, the function of a means is the 1st technical effect caused by executing this means that allows to attain the result. The result shall be of the same nature.

Merci ! Dziękuję ! Danke! Michael KRAHN Cabinet NETTER European & French Patent and Trademark Attorneys 36 avenue Hoche  - 75008 Paris FRANCE   Tel:  +33 (0)1 58 36 44 22 Fax:  +33 (0)1 42 25 00 45 Merci ! Dziękuję ! Danke!