Is endometrial receptivity transcriptomics affected in women with endometriosis? A pilot study  Juan A. Garcia-Velasco, Amelie Fassbender, Maria Ruiz-Alonso, David Blesa, Thomas D‘Hooghe, Carlos Simon  Reproductive BioMedicine Online  Volume 31, Issue 5, Pages 647-654 (November 2015) DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2015.07.014 Copyright © 2015 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Hierarchical clustering and principal cluster analysis (PCA). Samples were identified by an alphanumeric code (see also Table 2). PCA graphics A and B are equivalent except for the colour code, which in case A identifies the endometriosis stage of the samples (I to IV) and control group (0), and in case B identifies the day in which each biopsy was taken (18 or 19–20). Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2015 31, 647-654DOI: (10.1016/j.rbmo.2015.07.014) Copyright © 2015 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Heatmap of the 13 differentially expressed genes out of 238 receptivity gene signature including adjusted P-values. N = samples taken on day 19–20; O = samples taken on day 18. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2015 31, 647-654DOI: (10.1016/j.rbmo.2015.07.014) Copyright © 2015 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Terms and Conditions