Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (October 2013)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages (March 2013)
Advertisements

Conformational Heterogeneity in the Activation Mechanism of Bax
Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages (May 2009)
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Natalie K. Garcia, Miklos Guttman, Jamie L. Ebner, Kelly K. Lee 
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (March 2008)
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (June 2015)
Volume 24, Issue 7, Pages (July 2016)
Sudha Chakrapani, Luis G. Cuello, D. Marien Cortes, Eduardo Perozo 
Accurate design of megadalton-scale two-component icosahedral protein complexes by Jacob B. Bale, Shane Gonen, Yuxi Liu, William Sheffler, Daniel Ellis,
Molecular Basis of Fibrin Clot Elasticity
Sebastian Meyer, Raimund Dutzler  Structure 
Volume 20, Issue 8, Pages (August 2012)
Volume 15, Issue 12, Pages (December 2007)
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages (September 2013)
R. Elliot Murphy, Alexandra B. Samal, Jiri Vlach, Jamil S. Saad 
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages e3 (January 2018)
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages e3 (May 2017)
Volume 19, Issue 9, Pages (September 2011)
Volume 24, Issue 11, Pages (November 2016)
Frank J. Smith, Victor P.T. Pau, Gino Cingolani, Brad S. Rothberg 
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages (May 2014)
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 97, Issue 5, Pages (May 1999)
Volume 11, Issue 11, Pages (November 2003)
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages (June 2006)
Volume 139, Issue 6, Pages (December 2009)
Solution Structures of Engineered Vault Particles
Nadine Keller, Jiří Mareš, Oliver Zerbe, Markus G. Grütter  Structure 
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages (April 2011)
Volume 25, Issue 12, Pages e3 (December 2017)
Volume 25, Issue 11, Pages e5 (November 2017)
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (October 2013)
A Conformational Switch in the CRIB-PDZ Module of Par-6
Regulation of the Protein-Conducting Channel by a Bound Ribosome
Volume 23, Issue 5, Pages (May 2015)
A Gating Mechanism of the Serotonin 5-HT3 Receptor
Daniel Hoersch, Tanja Kortemme  Structure 
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (March 2008)
Volume 21, Issue 8, Pages (August 2013)
How pH Opens a H+ Channel: The Gating Mechanism of Influenza A M2
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
Crystal Structure of Group II Chaperonin in the Open State
Coiled-Coil Domains of SUN Proteins as Intrinsic Dynamic Regulators
Volume 95, Issue 9, Pages (November 2008)
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (June 2015)
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages (July 2005)
Conformational Heterogeneity in the Activation Mechanism of Bax
A Self-Sequestered Calmodulin-like Ca2+ Sensor of Mitochondrial SCaMC Carrier and Its Implication to Ca2+-Dependent ATP-Mg/Pi Transport  Qin Yang, Sven.
Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages (May 2011)
Kalyan S. Chakrabarti, Jess Li, Ranabir Das, R. Andrew Byrd  Structure 
Structure of the Kinesin13-Microtubule Ring Complex
Crystal Structures of Human GlyRα3 Bound to Ivermectin
Crystal Structure of Group II Chaperonin in the Open State
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages (April 2016)
NMR Structures of the Second Transmembrane Domain of the Human Glycine Receptor α1 Subunit: Model of Pore Architecture and Channel Gating  Pei Tang, Pravat.
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages (April 2012)
Volume 13, Issue 10, Pages (October 2005)
NMR Polypeptide Backbone Conformation of the E
Volume 27, Issue 7, Pages e5 (July 2019)
Matthieu Chavent, Elena Seiradake, E. Yvonne Jones, Mark S.P. Sansom 
Fine Details of IGF-1R Activation, Inhibition, and Asymmetry Determined by Associated Hydrogen /Deuterium-Exchange and Peptide Mass Mapping  Damian Houde,
Matthew T. Eddy, Tatiana Didenko, Raymond C. Stevens, Kurt Wüthrich 
Volume 98, Issue 3, Pages (February 2010)
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages (January 2017)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages 1897-1904 (October 2013) Open-Channel Structures of the Human Glycine Receptor α1 Full-Length Transmembrane Domain  David D. Mowrey, Tanxing Cui, Yuanyuan Jia, Dejian Ma, Alexander M. Makhov, Peijun Zhang, Pei Tang, Yan Xu  Structure  Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages 1897-1904 (October 2013) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2013.07.014 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Structure 2013 21, 1897-1904DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2013.07.014) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 EM Analyses of the hGlyR-α1 TMD Oligomeric Complexes (A) A raw electron micrograph of negatively stained hGlyR-α1 TMD oligomers in LPPG. Scale bar, 50 nm. Representative particles are indicated with red circles. (B) Selected 2D class averages of hGlyR-α1 TMD oligomers from 210 particle images. Class averages show doughnut-shaped particles with a central channel and several oligomeric states, including pentamer and tetramer. (C) Representative raw particle images corresponding to the pentameric (0–3) and tetrameric (5–7) configurations. An average of the raw particles from panels 0–3 is shown in panel 4. Panels 8 and 9 show side views of the particles. See also Figure S2. Structure 2013 21, 1897-1904DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2013.07.014) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Channel Functional Measurements (A) Stack plots of 35Cl NMR spectra in Cl− flux measurements across LUV by NMR MIT experiments (see Supplemental Experimental Procedures for experimental details). Left: control vesicles without the protein; Right: vesicles with hGlyR-α1 TMD channels. The Cl− shift reagent Co(Gly)3− separates the extravesicle Cl− signal from the intravesicle signal (indicated by asterisks). The intensity of the intravesicle signal (∗) changes as a function of the inversion-recovery time (t) due to the exchange of intra- and extravesicle Cl−. (B) The rates of Cl− influx (ki) and efflux (ke) are determined by fitting the intensity changes as a function of t with a two-site exchange model (solid line, see fitting details in Supplemental Experimental Procedures). ○, LUV without protein; ●, LUV with protein; ▾, LUV with the same amount of protein and with 1 mM picrotoxin. Error bars show the SEM. Structure 2013 21, 1897-1904DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2013.07.014) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 NMR Structures of the hGlyR-α1 TMD (A) A bundle of 15 lowest target function monomer structures of the hGlyR-α1 TMD (PDB code: 2M6B). The TM1, TM2, TM3, and TM4 helices are indicated in red, light green, green, and blue, respectively. (B) Top view of a bundle of the 15 lowest target function pentameric structures of the hGlyR-α1 TMD (PDB code: 2M6I), calculated using CYANA with restraints generated from NMR and EM data. Pore lining residues are highlighted based on residue type: green, polar; gray, nonpolar; and blue, basic. (C) Side view of the bundle of the15 lowest target function pentameric structures of the hGlyR-α1 TMD. For clarity, only two subunits are shown. Pore lining residues are labeled and colored based on their residue type. (D) The pore profile calculated using the HOLE program (Smart et al., 1996). Dashed lines represent ±1 SD determined from the bundle of 15 lowest target function structures. See also Figures S3–S5. Structure 2013 21, 1897-1904DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2013.07.014) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Conformational Dynamics around TM2-3 Loop (A) A representative 1H-15N heteronuclear single-quantum coherence spectrum of the hGlyR-α1 TMD in LPPG micelles at 40°C. Several residues at the C terminus of TM2 show two sets of peaks, as exemplified in the insert for S268(16′), G269(17′), and S270(18′), indicating that two conformations coexist in this region and undergo slow conformational exchange. (B) The 15 lowest target function structures of the hGlyR-α1 TMD (thin ribbons) are aligned with the crystal structure of GluCl (thick ribbon; PDB code: 3rhw). TM3 of the hGlyR-α1 TMD is highlighted in green. Ivermectin (IVT; orange sticks) observed in GluCl partially overlaps with the kink at A288 (black sticks) in the NMR structures of the hGlyR-α1 TMD. The residue D284 (purple sticks), located four residues upstream of A288, may be responsible for the kink (Langelaan et al., 2010). (C) The segment showing high dynamics is highlighted in yellow between S267 (green) and A288 (black) in the bundle of the 15 lowest target function NMR structures. See also Figure S6. Structure 2013 21, 1897-1904DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2013.07.014) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions