draft-filsfils-spring-segment-routing-policy-05

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Seamless MPLS draft-leymann-mpls-seamless-mpls-01.txt
Advertisements

Identifying MPLS Applications
© 2009 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Cisco Public Presentation_ID 1 BGP-Prefix Segment in large-scale data centers draft-filsfils-spring-segment-routing-msdc-00.
© 2010 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. 1 Segment Routing Clarence Filsfils – Distinguished Engineer Christian Martin –
Draft-beckhaus-ldp-dod-00IETF 81: 25 July LDP DoD draft-beckhaus-ldp-dod-00.txt Thomas Beckhaus (Deutche Telekom AG) Bruno Decraene (France Telecom)
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. MPLS v2.2—1-1 MPLS Concepts Introducing Basic MPLS Concepts.
Seamless MPLS draft-leymann-mpls-seamless-mpls-03.txt Nicolai Leymann, Thomas Beckhaus (DT) Wim Henderickx (Alcatel-Lucent) Clarence Filsfils (Cisco) Dirk.
Virtual Topologies for Service Chaining in BGP IP/MPLS VPNs draft-rfernando-bess-service-chaining-00 (previously draft-rfernando-l3vpn-service-chaining-04)
Draft-li-mpls-network-virtualization-framework-00IETF 88 SPRING WG1 Framework of Network Virtualization Based on MPLS Global Label draft-li-mpls-network-virtualization-framework-00.
Draft-francois-segment-routing-ti-lfa-00 Pierre Francois, IMDEA Networks Institute Clarence Filsfils, Ahmed Bashandy, Cisco Systems Bruno Decraene, Stephane.
BGP Link-State extensions for Segment Routing
Extension to the Link Management Protocol (LMP/DWDM - rfc4209) for Dense Wavelength Division Multiplexing (DWDM) Optical Line Systems draft-dharinigert-ccamp-g lmp-07.txt.
Connecting SPRING Islands over IP Networks draft-xu-spring-islands-connection-over-ip-00 Xiaohu Xu (Huawei) Siva Sivabalan (Cisco) IETF89,
Draft-li-idr-cc-bgp-arch-00IETF 88 IDR1 An Architecture of Central Controlled Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) draft-li-idr-cc-bgp-arch-00 Zhenbin Li, Mach.
Segment Routing: An Architecture build with SDN in mind and addressing the evolving network requirements Brian Meaney Cisco SP Consulting Team.
Atrium Router Project Proposal Subhas Mondal, Manoj Nair, Subhash Singh.
Draft-fm-bess-service-chaining-01 Prague, July 2015 Rex Fernando Stuart Mackie Dhananjaya Rao Bruno Rijsman Maria Napierala.
Connecting MPLS-SPRING Islands over IP Networks
draft-patel-raszuk-bgp-vector-routing-01
BGP-Based SPF RTGWG - Jan 2017
Daniel King, Old Dog Consulting Adrian Farrel, Old Dog Consulting
Multicast Information Model draft-zhang-mboned-multicast-info-model-00 Sandy. Zhang Linda Wang (Presenting) Mboned WG IETF 97#Seoul.
draft-francois-segment-routing-ti-lfa-00
draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-04
S. Gundavelli, J. Korhonen, M. Liebsch, P. Seite, H. Yokota,
OSPF Extensions for ASON Routing draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-ason-routing-ospf-03.txt IETF67 - Prague - Mar’07 Dimitri.
MPLS Traffic Engineering
Multi-Vendor Interoperability Testing Results Update to MPLS WG
Authors Mach Chen (Huawei) Xuesong Geng (Huawei) Zhenqiang Li (CMCC)
N. Kumar, C. Pignataro, F. Iqbal, Z. Ali (Presenter) - Cisco Systems
Zhenbin Li, Shunwan Zhuang Huawei Technologies
A Unified Approach to IP Segment Routing
ISIS extensions for SRv6 draft-bashandy-isis-srv6-extensions-02
Xiaohu Xu & Stewart Bryant (Huawei) Hamid Assarpour (Broadcom)
draft-ali-spring-bfd-sr-policy-00
Xiaohu Xu (Huawei) Stewart Bryant (Huawei) Hamid Assarpour (Broadcom)
Framework for DWDM interface Management and Control
Authors : Francois Clad, Cisco (presenter) Xiaoahu Xu, Alibaba
Update on draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-expl-track A. Dolganow J. Kotalwar E
Separating Routing Planes using Segment Routing draft-gulkohegde-spring-separating-routing-planes-using-sr-00 IETF 98 – Chicago, USA Shraddha Hegde
ISIS extensions for SRv6 draft-bashandy-isis-srv6-extensions-00
OSPF WG Status IETF 98, Chicago
Framework for DWDM interface Management and Control
SPRING IETF-98 Tuesday, March 28.
DetNet Information Model Consideration
Update on draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-mpls-12
draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-topo-08
BGP-Based SPF IETF 98, Chicago
SRv6 BGP based overlay services draft-dawra-bess-srv6-services-00
draft-guichard-sfc-nsh-sr-02
Synonymous Flow Labels
LSR WG Status IETF 103, Bangkok
FlexE Design Team Presenter: Mach
draft-ali-spring-srv6-oam-02.txt SRv6 OAM
IETF 103 – Bangkok November 2018
BGP-LCU draft-szarecki-idr-bgp-lcu-traffic-steering-00
draft-filsfils-spring-segment-routing-policy-00
IP RSVP-TE: Extensions to RSVP for P2P IP-TE LSP Tunnels Tarek Saad, Juniper Networks Vishnu Pavan Beeram, Juniper.
ISIS extensions for SRv6 draft-bashandy-isis-srv6-extensions-03
draft-bashandy-isis-srv6-extensions-04
Scope and Approach of ONF OIMT Internet Protocol Work Items
BGP VPN service for SRv6 Plus IETF 105, Montreal
Royi Zigler(Broadcom)
Supporting Flexible Algorithm Prefix SIDs in LSP Ping/Traceroute
DetNet Data Plane Solutions draft-ietf-detnet-dp-sol-ip-02  draft-ietf-detnet-dp-sol-mpls-02  Bala’zs Varga, Jouni Korhonen, Janos Farkas, Lou Berger,
Unified Source Routing Instructions using MPLS Label Stack draft-xu-mpls-unified-source-routing-instruction-04 Xiaohu Xu (Huawei) Ahmed Bashandy (Cisco)
draft-gandhi-spring-sr-mpls-pm-03
draft-ali-spring-srv6-oam-01.txt SRv6 OAM
Large-Scale Deterministic Network Update
Inter-AS OAM for SR Networks IETF 105, Montreal
Presentation transcript:

draft-filsfils-spring-segment-routing-policy-05 IETF 101 – London Mar 2018 SPRING Working Group draft-filsfils-spring-segment-routing-policy-05 C. Filsfils, S. Sivabalan, et al (Cisco Systems) S. Hegde (Juniper Networks, Inc) D. Voyer (Bell Canada) S. Lin, A. Bogdanov, P. Krol (Google, Inc) M. Horneffer (Deutsche Telekom) D. Steinberg (Steinberg Consulting) B. Decraene, S. Litkowski (Orange Business Services) P. Mattes (Microsoft) IETF 101, London, March 17 -23, 2018

Scope of the Document SR Architecture document specifies various Segment Types. This document is a companion of the SR Architecture that introduces the notion of SR Policy as a stack of segments encoded in the packet This document architecturally defines the SR Policies construct that applies to the following: MPLS and SRv6 data-planes Traffic Engineering Network Function Virtualization Layer 2 networks Optical networks Multicast (TreeSID) It defines the various flavors of Steering into SR Policies It specifies traffic accounting for SR Polices IETF 101, London, March 17 -23, 2018

Key Attributes of SR Policies Applicable to both SR-MPLS and SRv6 data planes. State is only at the head-end not all over the fabric. Leverages ECMP; not “hop-by-hop” or “circuit-oriented”. Includes topological and service segments (TE+NFC). Supports automated instantiation of policies (locally and via controllers). Enables steering mechanism for the overlay service integrated with the underlay SLA guarantees Integrates IP/MPLS, Layer 2 and Optical. IETF 101, London, March 17 -23, 2018

Binding SID (BSID) Provides scaling, network opacity and service independence BSID-keyed entry in the forwarding plane for SR Policy is vital for the steering use-cases. IETF 101, London, March 17 -23, 2018

Steering into SR Policies Incoming packets have an active SID matching a local BSID at the head-end. Per-destination steering: incoming packets match a BGP/Service route which recurses on an SR policy Automated Steering for BGP services On-demand SR Policies and steering for BGP services Per-flow Steering: incoming packets match or recurse on a forwarding array where some of the entries are SR Policies. Policy-based Steering: incoming packets match a routing policy which directs them on an SR policy. These mechanisms are defined since 00 version; later versions addresses comments received and provides more details IETF 101, London, March 17 -23, 2018

Status Version 00 was presented a year ago @ IETF 98 Since then document has matured with contributions from multiple vendors and operators Document has been updated to address comments, provide clarifications and details. The document have multiple existing implementations The document have ongoing deployments/trials IETF 101, London, March 17 -23, 2018

Next Steps … Solicit WG review and comments/inputs/feedback. The authors would like to request the WG adoption for this draft. IETF 101, London, March 17 -23, 2018