Ch 15: Social Psych in Court

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Steps in a Jury Trial. STEPS IN A JURY TRIAL Selection of the Jury The Trial The Judge's Charge Deliberation The Verdict.

Advertisements

Professor of Forensic Psychology Institute of Psychiatry

Confessions and Convictions How Varying Types of Confessional Evidence Affect Conviction Rates James Gentry and Jared Smith Hanover College.

Unit 6 Miranda, Interviews & Interrogations. Interviewing The essential elements of an interview. Who What Where When Why How.

Social Psychology & Law. Social Psychology and the Law Psychology in the Courtroom  Pre-trial  Courtroom Drama  Jury Deliberation  Post-conviction.

Standard 11: Criminal Trial Procedures I can identify and describe the standard procedures in a criminal jury trial.

Reaching a Verdict Persuading a Jury. Answer as many of the following statements as you can…. In Britain we have an adversarial court system, this is.

Rule 104: Preliminary Questions & Conditional Relevance.

Persuading a Jury: Optional H/W from last lesson: What effect does the order in which testimony is presented have on persuading a jury? (10) JUN 11.

Social Psychology in the Court Copyright © 2005 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Social Psychology by David G. Myers 8 th Edition Social Psychology in.

Ch 12: Social Psych & Law Part 1: Nov. 29, Juries Use of intuition vs. scientific jury selection Death Qualified Juries – How are these juries used?

Ch 13: Social Psych and Business Part 1: Dec. 3, 2010.

Ch 12: Social Psych and Law Part 2: Dec. 1, 2010.

CJ202: Problems of the Criminal Judiciary The Institution of the Jury Valerie P. Hans.

What are our duties under the law? I n Canada, law and justice is not only the business of Members of Parliament, judges, lawyers and police services!

Introduction to the Criminal Trial

TRIAL INFORMATION Steps, vocabulary.

Civil litigation begins with pleadings: formal papers filed with the court by the plaintiff and defendant. Plaintiff - the person bringing the lawsuit.

Expert Witnesses Texas Rules of Evidence Article VII. Opinions and Expert Testimony Judge Sharen Wilson.

Trial Procedures II CLN4U. The Judge, The Crown, The Defence Judge: Judge: Impartial and unbiased Impartial and unbiased Applies law to case, instructs.

A play by Reginald Rose. Be ready to share the following questions with the class. Are you one who is quick to jump to conclusions or do you like to hear.

CJ233: Introduction to Forensic Psychology

Trial Courts (pages 46 to 50). Trial Courts Courts that listen to testimony, consider evidence, and decide the facts.

February 25, A judge can be removed from office only through the process of ______________. Impeachment.

UNIT 5 AMERICAN GOVERNMENT. LESSON How do the 5 th, 6 th, and 8 th Amendments protect the rights within the judicial system. Objective: Explain.

CHAPTER 13: The Trial Note: Project Management skills are very important to maintain a continual movement forward for all facets of trial preparation.

Criminal Psychology Chapter 12 Trial Consultation Talbot Kellogg Community College.

Evidence in Court Holy Trinity Law Audrius Stonkus.

What is Evidence? Learning Target: Classify different types of evidence.

The Case of the Missing Millionaire Writing Options.

1. True 1. True 2. True 2. True 3. True 3. True 4. False 4. False 5. True 5. True 6. True 6. True 7. False 7. False 8. True 8. True 9. True 9. True 10.

Eye Witness Memory Affected by False Memory

Ch 15: Social Psych in Court Part 2: Apr. 8, 2015.

 1) Jury Selection  2) Opening STATEMENTS  3) Presentation of the Prosecution Case  4) Presentation of the Defense Case  5) Closing ARGUMENT  6)

Courtroom Diagram. TRUE or FALSE? An attorney is called a lawyer and a counselor.

Order In The Court Business Law Mock Trial Project.

Intro to Law. 1. The plaintiff in a civil or a prosecutor in criminal case has their lawyer make an opening statement. This explains the case to the judge.

Helping: 3) Situational Theories (cont.) - Other situational influences on helping: – Rural/Urban areas: – Culture: – Role modeling: – Attractiveness:

Arraignment The reading of the charge to the accused. This must be the charge contained in the indictment or an acquittal may result. “Order in the Court”

Research 1 Mini Research Presentation: Police Interrogations and False Confessions Brandy Williams PSY610: Applied Social Psychology Instructor: Patricia.

Jane D. July 22, 2010 CJS 220.  Discovery  Negotiations  Pre-trial Motions  Jurors Summoned  Jury Selection  References.

Final By: annelisa marzan.

Mystery Vocabulary Alibi: A story by an accused person of not having been at the scene of the crime. Clue: Something that appears to give information.

©2013 McGraw-Hill Companies

Laying the Foundation: Expert Witnesses

Steps in a Jury Trial.

Chapter 5 Law and Civics Mr. Newman

Judges and Juries The Courtroom Players.

مراجعة عامة.

Ch 15: Social Psych in Court

المدخل إلى تكنولوجيا التعليم في ضوء الاتجاهات الحديثة

Ch 12: Social Psych & Law Part 1: Apr. 19, 2012.

Chapter 5: The Court System

Ch 13: Social Psych and Business

Ch 12: Social Psych & Law Part 1: Nov. 29, 2010.

Ch 15: Social Psych in Court

Types of Evidence CLU 3MR Lesson 71.

Ch 15: Social Psych in Court

Vocabulary Activity Interrogate Self Incrimination

Criminal Law Criminal Trials.

It’s a murder trial. Get ready.

Ch 15: Social Psych in Court

Ch 12: Social Psych and Law

Judges and Juries The Courtroom Players.

Miranda v. Arizona Matthew & Noah.

Chapter 5: The Court System

Trial skills simulation program

Presentation transcript:

Ch 15: Social Psych in Court Part 3: Dec. 3, 2012

Interrogations & Confessions Impact of social influence Motivations for false confessions? Compliance – Internalization -

Juries in Action How do they process info? Story order Witness order What is more influential?

Other Juror Issues “Death-Qualified” Jurors Inadmissible Evidence Who are they? What types of attitudes? Inadmissible Evidence Are jurors able to follow judges’ instructions?

Criticisms of Jury Research How is most social psych research on juries conducted? Criticisms? Researchers’ responses?