Prescribing Safety Assessment Training Workshop

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Quality and Outcomes Framework Assessor Training Skills in note-making, summarising and report writing Module S5.
Advertisements

E-Portfolio July2014 Managing Multi-source Feedback.
Comprehensive Continuous Improvement Plan(CCIP) Training Module 3 Planning Tool, Part 2.
University of Ottawa Medical Journal Workshop Feb 11, 2014 Diane Kelsall MD MEd Deputy Editor, CMAJ and Editor, CMAJ Open.
Workplace-based Assessment. Overview Types of assessment Assessment for learning Assessment of learning Purpose of WBA Benefits of WBA Miller’s Pyramid.
Writing Workshop Constructing your College Essay
ENGLISH PRIMARY BENCHMARK COMPONENTS AND WEIGHTINGS SPEAKING – carrying 20% of the global mark (prepared by the Benchmark board and administered.
Using Turnitin® and ETS e-rater® with myWriteSmart
Revising. What is Revising? Introduction Writing doesn't end with your first draft. Next you need to revise. When you revise, you do the following: Check.
Being an Effective Peer Reviewer Barbara Gastel, MD, MPH Texas A&M University
Blogging - assessment & feedback Dr Jessie Paterson, School of Divinity, University of Edinburgh
Grading and Analysis Report For Clinical Portfolio 1.
Assessment. Workshop Outline Testing and assessment Why assess? Types of tests Types of assessment Some assessment task types Backwash Qualities of a.
High Quality Items for High Stake Tests Delhi, 20 November, 2015.
Focus on Writing How to Identify a Good Writing The Writing Process:Pre-Writing The Writing Process:Drafting and Editing Designing Controlled and Guided.
Agenda BupaPrivate and Confidential Implementing a training and accreditation scheme for TTA pre-pack dispensing R Betmouni, N Gillani Pharmacy Department,
Ongoing Achievement Record & Grading BSc (Hons) Nursing: Adult, Mental Health and Child Health You will need to turn up the volume on your PC and Please.
Peer Review Overview Meeting [Date] [Product name]
DEVELOPING NATIONAL FORMULARIES BASED ON THE WHO MODEL FORMULARY Tisocki K, Laing RL, Hogerzeil H, Mehta DK, Ryan RSM.
In-Service Teacher Training Assessment in IGCSE Biology 0610 Session 2: Question papers and mark schemes.
OFFICE OF FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT 0 Office of Financial Management Office of Financial Management TALS Draft Conceptual Solution February 24, 2004.
The Quality Gateway Chapter 11. The Quality Gateway.
Publishing research in a peer review journal: Strategies for success
Administrators and System Administrators
Thinking Web > CONTENT DEVELOPMENT
Understanding Standards
Creating and Changing Curriculum
Feedback for Formative and Summative Assessment
PeerWise Student Instructions
In Concert: An Integrated Reading and Writing Approach by Kathleen T
Software Configuration Management
QV Training August 2017: Report-writing
Understanding Standards: Nominee Training Event
Writer’s Workshop (for a written poem, short story, etc.)
Approval of Assessments
MRCGP The Clinical Skills Assessment January 2013.
Template for Science Fair Presentations
In-Service Teacher Training
for Teaching and Learning (Version 2)
GCE Applied ICT G040: Lesson 08 Planning and Drafting Communications
Challenges and options in assessment
Adding and editing students and student test settings
Test Information Distribution Engine (TIDE)
WHO Model Formulary (WMF)
Writing and Feedback.
Writing and Feedback.
Selecting appropriate sources
Kasee Hildenbrand and Darcy Miller
Peer Reviews Tips for the Reviewer.
Employee Performance Management System
ServiceLink Training Video Adding Client Work Experience
Dept. of Community Medicine, PDU Government Medical College,
Peer editing day Take out your IRR rough draft. I will be coming around to check that it meets the requirements for today’s activity. In the meantime.
Barbara Gastel INASP Associate
This presentation document has been prepared by Vault Intelligence Limited (“Vault") and is intended for off line demonstration, presentation and educational.
F.S.A. Computer-Based Item Types
Template for Science Fair Presentations
Approval of Assessments
Membership of the Royal Colleges of Physicians of the United Kingdom Part 2 Clinical Examination (PACES) Chair’s Briefing to Examiners.
Designing and Using Normalization Rules
Inside a PMI Online Course
Recruitment & Selection Process For Talent Acquisition
Managing Multi-source Feedback
Peer and Self Assessment: A Guide
Hands-On: FSA Assessments For Foreign Schools
In-Service Teacher Training
Lecture 3: Communicate in Writing
Megan Smoot 4th Quarter Project 5/1/19
Role of the Internal Verifier
Prescribing Safety Assessment Training Workshop
Presentation transcript:

Prescribing Safety Assessment Training Workshop Introduction to PSA item authoring PWS, REV & CAL items Dr Lynne Bollington

Agenda PSA item development process Creating new items

Item development is a multi-stage process New, V0 (returned VR) Submit, V1 Edit, V2 PRM, V3 AB & SSG, V4 Use 5 stages of version control (V0–V4) Only items at V0 & VR can be edited by authors Items may be returned to VR for revision and resubmission at any stage

Copy editors ensure the items are in house style New, V0 Submit, V1 Edit, V2 PRM, V3 AB & SSG, V4 Use information is in the correct order spelling is corrected superfluous information is deleted all abbreviations are from the approved list reference ranges are consistent with house style metadata are complete and correct

Clinical reviewer checks item content: New, V0 Submit, V1 Edit, V2 PRM, V3 AB & SSG, V4 Use items on correct template PMH matches DH indications and doses match BNF keyed answer matches BNF (if appropriate) Identify potential problems in item construct issues are fixed, or flagged for further consideration

Peer review for clinical appropriateness: New, V0 Submit, V1 Edit, V2 PRM, V3 AB & SSG, V4 Use reviewers come from various backgrounds and have differing expertise check face validity match contemporary practice unambiguous and clear appropriate difficulty relevant to FY1

Assessment Board approves paper(s); Standard Setting Group set pass mark: New, V0 Submit, V1 Edit, V2 PRM, V3 AB & SSG, V4 Use Assessment Board: approves paper build, including item anchoring, re-use etc checks against assessment blueprint confirms coverage of therapeutic domains and topics checks item content elaborates on mark schemes reviews item usage post-hoc SSG: considers difficulty of items sets pass mark/item

Item progress can be viewed by the author in the Dashboard Feedback is visible at all stages VR V1 V2 V3 V4 V0 DD

Agenda PSA item development process Creating new items

Adding new item Side menu expands to show text

Prescribing items (PWS) PWS items present a scenario where a prescription is required Reasoning and judgement Deciding on the most appropriate prescription to write, based on the clinical circumstances Measurable action Writing a safe, effective prescription for a single medicine to tackle a specific indication or syndrome.

Starting a new item

Select a prescription chart

Write a case presentation

Edit the prescribing request as appropriate

Suggest a marking scheme

Or select a drug set (if available)

Use the British National Formulary, to which the candidates will have access throughout, as the ultimate arbiter of dose ranges, routes, indications, contra-indications, etc.

Include justifications for optimal and suboptimal answers Remember to save the mark scheme after adding each drug.

For IV fluids, indicate which volumes and which rates are acceptable

System navigation help tools In viewing mode: In edit mode: edit delete copy

Item usage and performance data

This item was insufficiently focused Fac: 98.6% Dis: 0.084 New, V0 Submit, V1 Edit, V2 PRM, V3 AB & SSG, V4 Use This item was insufficiently focused

. . there were too many correct answers Fac 98.6% Dis: 0.084 New, V0 Submit, V1 Edit, V2 PRM, V3 AB & SSG, V4 Use . . there were too many correct answers

Prescription Review items (REV) REV items present a prescription for review, that was written by someone else Reasoning and judgement Deciding which components of the prescription are inappropriate, unsafe or ineffective

Identifying ADRs, interactions, contraindications and dose errors Only ONE dose error permitted - more than one is very unlikely in practice

Two questions, with 1-3 marks each (max 4 marks in total) If one of the questions is an interaction, include ONE of the interacting drugs in the case presentation and lead-in so candidates don’t have to pick both drugs from the list of medicines.

House style is important here List between 6–10 medicines lower case, generic name, no strength Select from drop-down lists that appear when you begin to type

Calculation skill items (CAL) Competencies Reasoning and judgement Making an accurate drug calculation based on numerical information Measurable action Recording the answer accurately with appropriate units of measurement

All facts required to do the calculation must be included

This item was too easy and did not discriminate Fac: 98.0% Dis: 0.055 New, V0 Submit, V1 Edit, V2 PRM, V3 AB & SSG, V4 Use This item was too easy and did not discriminate Complex, multi-step calculations tend to work best