Ron Hancock, PE NCDOT State Construction Engineer

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Independent Advisory Panel Presentation to the MWAA Board of Directors March 16, 2011 Brenda Bohlke Adrian Ciolko Walt Mergelsberg Rich Redmond Piet Van.
Advertisements

Executive Summary Introduction In 1988, by virtue of State Statute , the Nebraska State Legislature first assigned the Nebraska Department.
Innovative Contracting Techniques that Consider Driver Impacts Use of A+B Bidding Presented by: David L. Kent P.E. New York State Department of Transportation.
Oklahoma Department of Transportation Susan McClune Regulatory Services.
City of Omak Central Avenue Bridge Replacement Project Prepared by Highlands Associates Photos by FlyBy Photos.
10 miles on I-80 from Robb Dr. to Vista Blvd. Reconstruction through congested downtown Installation of new 10-mile ITS system Preserved Operational Capacity.
State Aid Design-Build Project Delivery for Minnesota Cities and Counties.
Alternative Project Delivery
SCDOT’s Strategic Direction Janet Oakley Secretary of Transportation South Carolina Alliance to Fix Our Roads September 22, 2014 Janet Oakley Secretary.
Legal Perspective on NDOT Alternative Procurements Geoffrey S. Petrov, Nossaman LLP.
Cabinet Meeting February 22, 2012 Governor Andrew M. Cuomo.
ESTIMATING By Laith Jacob.
Prof. J.J Lew, P.E. Principal Investigator – Purdue Univ. James H. Anspach, P.G. Technical Advisor – So-Deep, Inc. C. Paul Scott, P.E. FHWA Advisor Kevin.
4 TH STREET BRIDGE Pueblo, Colorado December 2006 Project Overview.
Determining Innovative Contracting Methods to Reduce User Costs Stuart Thompson Utah Technology Transfer Center.
Louisiana Safe Routes to School Program Department of Transportation and Development Louisiana Safe Routes to School Program The Application.
Capital Improvement Program. During the Annual Strategic Action Plan (SAP) evaluation, long-term needs and priorities are identified by City Council Capital.
TEA, Portland, Maine Travis Koestner Missouri Department of Transportation October 20, 2006 Alternate Paving Update $$ Cost Control at MoDOT $$
PROJECT SCOPING FOR LOCAL AGENCY FEDERAL AID PROJECTS.
Local Government Section Welcome Marty Andersen ODOT Local Government Section 355 Capitol Street NE, Rm. 326 Salem, Oregon Ph:
Interstate 95 Corridor Improvement Program June 20, 2012.
WELCOME! July 31, 2012 ODOT District July 31, 2012 PURPOSE OF TONIGHT’S MEETING Introduce the project –Reconstruct I-75.
HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT Tim G. Schulte, P.E. Richland County Engineer.
Alternate Technical Concepts AASHTO Subcommittee on Design July 28, 2010 Columbia, S.C. KATHY HARVEY State Design Engineer Missouri Department of Transportation.
AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF CALIFORNIA OAKS ROAD AT I-15 INTERCHANGE CIP NO City Council Meeting January 18, 2011.
Presented By: Jeffrey T. Folden, P.E. Assistant Chief, Innovative Contracting Division.
DBIA MID-ATLANTIC MEETING October 16, 2015 Shailendra Patel, PE, DBIA Director, Alternate Project Delivery Office.
Safe & Sound Bridge Improvement Program. Purpose of Meeting Introduction of Team Today’s discussion  History of Safe & Sound  DBFM to MDBB/DB split.
Contractor Alternate Design Serving the Public’s Best Interest.
1 MnDOT Metro District Proposed Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Amendment Metropolitan Council January 17, 2007.
D.d. delivers district department of transportation d.d. delivers FAISAL HAMEED RONALDO T. NICHOLSON. P.E. Innovative Project Delivery Processes Innovative.
ARRA Design-Build in Minnesota Jay Hietpas - Mn/DOT.
LACCD Building the Future THOMAS HALL Director Facilities Planning and Development.
HOOSIER HEARTLAND HIGHWAY SR25 Segment Four Cass County Public Information Meeting December 10, 2009 Design Consultant – United Consulting Engineers.
New Jersey Turnpike Authority November 19, 2009 New Jersey Turnpike Interchange 6 to 9 Widening Program Presented by Lisa M. Kenney, P.E. 1.
Ohio Department of Transportation John R. Kasich, Governor Jerry Wray, Director Office of Estimating 2015 OCA Leadership Forum.
Metric to English Conversion California Bridge Construction Forum March 8, 2006 Mark Leja, Chief, Division of Design California Department of Transportation.
Design-Build in Minnesota Minnesota Department of Transportation.
Project Delivery Performance Improvement Report to the Oregon Transportation Commission Hal Gard, Technical Services, Geo-Environmental Dee Jones, Technical.
Texas Department of Transportation Corpus Christi District U.S. 181 Harbor Bridge Project Environmental Documentation and Schematic Development Public.
Regina Bypass Project Information Session. Saskatchewan.ca Outline Background –The need for a bypass –Selecting the route –P3 delivery and procurement.
AASHTO 2016 NTPEP Annual Meeting May 9, 2016
The I-465 West Leg Reconstruction Project
Presented By: Sean Campion P.E. Assistant Division Chief,
Sully District Council of Citizens Associations January 25, 2017 Susan Shaw, P.E., Megaprojects Director Virginia Department of Transportation.
The Alabama Transportation Rehabilitation and Improvement Program
Overview May 24, 2017.
Project Purpose and Objective
21st Century Transportation Committee Finance Subcommittee
FOR LOCAL AGENCY FEDERAL AID PROJECTS
Highway 14 – Owatonna to Dodge Center District 6 Update
Public Information Meeting NW 100th Street Reconstruction Project
IA 122 RECONSTRUCTION PRE-BID MEETING
Data Impacts of Transportation Reauthorization: Data Community’s Plans and Strategies Pat Hu Chair, TRB National Transportation Data Requirements and Programs.
Mobility Fund High Impact/Low Cost Projects: Cape Fear RPO
Mr. Greg Slater, Administrator
I-85 Widening Project MM Cherokee County Public Hearing March 14, 2017.
Upcoming Major Projects Nevada Transportation Conference April 9, 2013
AX7665D82 Areawide Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Design-Build
FOR LOCAL AGENCY FEDERAL AID PROJECTS
PROJECT DELIVERY METHODS
I-85 Widening Project MM Cherokee County Public Hearing March 14, 2017.
Paris & DALLAS DISTRICT corridor PROJECTs update
Geometric Design: General Concept CE331 Transportation Engineering.
State of SCDOT Feb 2019 Introduce Commission and Direct Reports.
Parks Highway Reconstruction: Lucas Road to Big Lake Road
Right of Way Certification
Q2 Updates on 2019 Board Priorities
Q2 Updates on 2019 Board Priorities
National Organization of Minority Engineers Leadership Summit
Presentation transcript:

Ron Hancock, PE NCDOT State Construction Engineer NCDOT Design-Build Ron Hancock, PE NCDOT State Construction Engineer

North Carolina Legislative History 1998 - Legislature Granted the Department the Authority to Proceed With Three Design-Build Transportation Contracts 2001 - Authority to Let a Maximum of Twenty-five (25) Design-build Contracts Per Fiscal Year Through State Fiscal Year 2009 2009 Legislative Session removed the sunset 2011 Legislative Session removed the quantity limit In the mid-1800’s, many States adopted “low bid” requirements to protect taxpayers from extravagance, corruption and other improper practices by public officials. Social and economic pressures forced many States to adopt standard requiring construction contracts to be awarded to the lowest bidder. The theory was that taxpayers would be provided with a safe efficient transportation facility at the lowest price that a responsible, competitive bidder could offer. On the Federal side, FHWA’s laws for competitive bidding developed over an extended period of time, however, they reflected the political and social concerns of Congress. The 1938 Federal Highway Act required competitive bidding in all FHWA contracts. The 1968 Federal Highway Act revised Title 23 USC to award construction contracts “ . . . only on the basis of the lowest responsive bid” . FHWA’s statutes for “Letting of Contracts” have had very few changes over the past 40 years.

Design-Build Program

NCDOT Design-Build Major Statistics 50 Projects with Bids Opened to Date 16 Interstate Widening / Rehab 11 Bridge 13 New Location 3 Urban Widening 4 Rural Widening 3 Other $3.2 Billion Total of Bids Opened Roughly 12% of Projects Were Not Awarded to Monetary Low Bidder 50% of winning bidders also had highest technical score UPDATE PROJECT NUMBERS In the mid-1800’s, many States adopted “low bid” requirements to protect taxpayers from extravagance, corruption and other improper practices by public officials. Social and economic pressures forced many States to adopt standard requiring construction contracts to be awarded to the lowest bidder. The theory was that taxpayers would be provided with a safe efficient transportation facility at the lowest price that a responsible, competitive bidder could offer. On the Federal side, FHWA’s laws for competitive bidding developed over an extended period of time, however, they reflected the political and social concerns of Congress. The 1938 Federal Highway Act required competitive bidding in all FHWA contracts. The 1968 Federal Highway Act revised Title 23 USC to award construction contracts “ . . . only on the basis of the lowest responsive bid” . FHWA’s statutes for “Letting of Contracts” have had very few changes over the past 40 years.

Major Statistics Cost Overruns 2 – 3% Inflationary cost savings estimated at $350M - $400M since inception 1,000 design submittals in 2010 - 95% reviewed within 10 business days NEED TO UPDATE In the mid-1800’s, many States adopted “low bid” requirements to protect taxpayers from extravagance, corruption and other improper practices by public officials. Social and economic pressures forced many States to adopt standard requiring construction contracts to be awarded to the lowest bidder. The theory was that taxpayers would be provided with a safe efficient transportation facility at the lowest price that a responsible, competitive bidder could offer. On the Federal side, FHWA’s laws for competitive bidding developed over an extended period of time, however, they reflected the political and social concerns of Congress. The 1938 Federal Highway Act required competitive bidding in all FHWA contracts. The 1968 Federal Highway Act revised Title 23 USC to award construction contracts “ . . . only on the basis of the lowest responsive bid” . FHWA’s statutes for “Letting of Contracts” have had very few changes over the past 40 years.

3 Year Numbers

3 Year Numbers

3 Year Numbers

Types of Projects Fully designed and permitted Fully designed (except traffic control) Preliminary design with no permit Large bridges Package of small bridges

Scopes of Work Roadway / Structures / Pavement Traffic Management Geotechnical / GeoEnvironmental Erosion and Sedimentation Control Environmental Permits Right of Way Railroad Coordination Utilities Coordination Public Information

Quality Credit Management 15 Responsiveness 30 Schedule 20 Innovation 10 MOT & Safety 10 Long Term Maintenance 10 Oral Interview 5 Warranty (extra credit) 5 For $100 M Project 1 point = $800,000 advantage

What Works Best? Long Bridges – with access issues New Location – with heavy grading and multiple interchanges Complex Traffic Control Small Bridge Package – gets several projects on the street fast

Lessons Learned- Control vs Trust Share risk Carefully scope project ATC – for innovation Develop design manuals to reference Resist the urge to standardize Administration Staff stay engaged CEI – Separate from DB Contract

I-85 - Yadkin River Project Example of Project Complexity

Project Description Highway Improvements Reconstruct & Widen I-85 for 3.5 miles 3000’ Bridge over Yadkin River Straighten sharp curve Remove dangerous left hand exit Construct a new interchange Replace aging PCCP 100,000 ADT 25% trucks

Project Details I-85 Bridge Existing Bridge: 4 lane, with 2 foot shoulders, 1500 feet long, built in 1955 New Bridge: 8 lane, 10 foot shoulders, 3000 feet long

Project Details Other Bridges Bridges over Railroad tracks

Project Details Wilcox Bridge Historic Concrete Arch Bridge Carrying US29/70 Southbound Built in 1922 Bridge strengthened and converted to a pedestrian facility overlooking historic district

Design-Build Proposal Lowest Quality Bid = $136 M Self-imposed late penalties for early removal of traffic from existing bridges Provided a five year warranty on project Finishing 8 months earlier than NCDOT projected

Washington Bypass – Example of Innovation R-2510B

Washington Bypass Design-Build Total project 6 miles, Bridge (2.8 miles) Geoenvironmental (EPA Superfund site) Permit Application ROW Acquisition Utility Relocation Railroad Coordination

Washington Bypass Design-Build Innovations Top Down – Gantry System Bulb T girders with zero overhang formwork Roadway grade set to reduce off site borrow material by 2 million CY

I-485/ I-85 Interchange Recent Estimate Based on NCDOT Preliminary Design … $145 Million Actual Bid …$92 Million Based on Turbine Interchange

I-485 and I-85 Interchange (Design-Build Team Design)