Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages (February 2008)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 129, Issue 4, Pages (October 2005)
Advertisements

Copyright © 2008 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
An RNA Molecule Derived From Sendai Virus DI Particles Induces Antitumor Immunity and Cancer Cell-selective Apoptosis  Li-Wen Liu, Tomoyuki Nishikawa,
Molecular Therapy - Methods & Clinical Development
Volume 17, Issue 9, Pages (September 2009)
Volume 77, Issue 10, Pages (May 2010)
Volume 145, Issue 2, Pages (August 2013)
Volume 128, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
A Single Domain–Based Anti-Her2 Antibody Has Potent Antitumor Activities  Xiaoqiong Wu, Siqi Chen, Limin Lin, Jiayu Liu, Yanlan Wang, Yumei Li, Qing Li,
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages (February 2007)
Volume 54, Issue 4, Pages (October 2008)
Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Regulates Pancreatic IL-22 Production and Protects Mice From Acute Pancreatitis  Jing Xue, David T.C. Nguyen, Aida Habtezion 
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
by Bindu Varghese, Adam Widman, James Do, Behnaz Taidi, Debra K
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages (May 2010)
Enhanced Factor VIII Heavy Chain for Gene Therapy of Hemophilia A
Combining the Multitargeted Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Vandetanib with the Antiestrogen Fulvestrant Enhances Its Antitumor Effect in Non-small Cell Lung.
Volume 15, Issue 12, Pages (December 2007)
Hepatocyte Growth Factor Induces Resistance to Anti-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Antibody in Lung Cancer  Tadaaki Yamada, MD, PhD, Shinji Takeuchi,
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
Volume 17, Issue 12, Pages (December 2009)
Alice C.L. Len, Shimona Starling, Maitreyi Shivkumar, Clare Jolly 
Volume 64, Issue 2, Pages (August 2003)
Volume 145, Issue 2, Pages (August 2013)
Development of Peptide-targeted Lipoplexes to CXCR4-expressing Rat Glioma Cells and Rat Proliferating Endothelial Cells  Wouter HP Driessen, Nobutaka.
Increased Neutrophil Adherence in Psoriasis: Role of the Human Endothelial Cell Receptor Thy-1 (CD90)  Anne Wetzel, Tino Wetzig, Uwe F. Haustein, Michael.
Volume 20, Issue 12, Pages (December 2012)
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages (January 2017)
Molecular Therapy - Oncolytics
Volume 15, Issue 9, Pages (September 2007)
1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 inhibits renal interstitial myofibroblast activation by inducing hepatocyte growth factor expression  Yingjian Li, Bradley C.
Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages (May 2013)
Volume 15, Issue 5, Pages (May 2007)
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages (September 2010)
Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids
Suppression of Murine Colitis and its Associated Cancer by Carcinoembryonic Antigen- Specific Regulatory T Cells  Dan Blat, Ehud Zigmond, Zoya Alteber,
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
Incorporation of the B18R Gene of Vaccinia Virus Into an Oncolytic Herpes Simplex Virus Improves Antitumor Activity  Xinping Fu, Armando Rivera, Lihua.
Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages (September 2003)
Volume 21, Issue 11, Pages (November 2013)
Volume 15, Issue 9, Pages (September 2007)
Thomas S. Griffith, Elizabeth L. Broghammer  Molecular Therapy 
Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
Shrimp miR-34 from Shrimp Stress Response to Virus Infection Suppresses Tumorigenesis of Breast Cancer  Yalei Cui, Xiaoyuan Yang, Xiaobo Zhang  Molecular.
Nerve Growth Factor Receptor-Mediated Gene Transfer
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Lukxmi Balathasan, Vera A
Volume 15, Issue 11, Pages (November 2007)
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Interferon-γ-Mediated Growth Regulation of Melanoma Cells: Involvement of STAT1- Dependent and STAT1-Independent Signals  Anja Bosserhoff  Journal of Investigative.
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages (March 2010)
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (January 2018)
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 15, Issue 11, Pages (November 2007)
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages (March 2010)
Sindbis Viral Vectors Transiently Deliver Tumor-associated Antigens to Lymph Nodes and Elicit Diversified Antitumor CD8+ T-cell Immunity  Tomer Granot,
Genetic Immunization With In Vivo Dendritic Cell-targeting Liposomal DNA Vaccine Carrier Induces Long-lasting Antitumor Immune Response  Arup Garu, Gopikrishna.
Volume 20, Issue 6, Pages (June 2012)
Volume 21, Issue 11, Pages (November 2013)
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages (April 2008)
Volume 16, Issue 12, Pages (December 2008)
DARPins: An Efficient Targeting Domain for Lentiviral Vectors
Protein Transduction Domain-mediated Delivery of QBP1 Suppresses Polyglutamine- induced Neurodegeneration In Vivo  H Akiko Popiel, Yoshitaka Nagai, Nobuhiro.
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages (April 2008)
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (January 2009)
Volume 18, Issue 10, Pages (October 2010)
Volume 24, Issue 6, Pages (June 2016)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages 244-251 (February 2008) Virotherapy of Ovarian Cancer With Polymer-cloaked Adenovirus Retargeted to the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor  Joanne Morrison, Simon S Briggs, Nicola Green, Kerry Fisher, Vladimir Subr, Karel Ulbrich, Sean Kehoe, Leonard W Seymour  Molecular Therapy  Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages 244-251 (February 2008) DOI: 10.1038/sj.mt.6300363 Copyright © 2007 The American Society of Gene Therapy Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Poly-(2-hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide (pHPMA) production and physical properties of pHPMA-adenovirus. (a) Diagrammatic representation of mEGF-pHPMA synthesis. For further details see methods. (b) Photon correlation spectroscopy measurement of virus particle size, before and following pHPMA or mEGF-pPHMA coating. Mean unmodified adenovirus = 118 nm; pHPMA-adenovirus and mEGF-pHPMA-adenovirus coated at 10 mg/ml = ∼135 nm. Ad, unmodified adenovirus; p-Ad, pHPMA-adenovirus; mEGF-p-Ad, mEGF-pHPMA-adenovirus; mEGF, murine epidermal growth factor. Molecular Therapy 2008 16, 244-251DOI: (10.1038/sj.mt.6300363) Copyright © 2007 The American Society of Gene Therapy Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Biological activity of epidermal growth factor (EGF) following conjugation with poly-(2-hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide (pHPMA). (a) EGF receptor (EGFR) negative (K562) and positive (A431) cells were incubated with biotinylated mEGF-pPHMA (solid histogram) and a biotinylated pHPMA control (broken line, open histogram) followed by labeling with extravidin phycoerythrin (PE) and analysis by flow cytometry (cells plus extravidin-PE shown with solid line, open histogram). Percentage of positive cells following incubation with mEGF-pHPMA and extravidin-PE are indicated. (b) Western blot of mEGF-pHPMA and murine EGF (mEGF) stimulation of EGFR autophosphorylation (Y1092). A431 cells were serum starved and stimulated for 30 minutes with mEGF or mEGF-pHPMA. Cell lysates were run on a 7.5% sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, blotted onto nitrocellulose paper, and developed with antibodies against phosphorylated EGFR. Concentrations of mEGF-pHPMA relate to the mEGF content only. (c) mEGF (top row) and mEGF-pHPMA (bottom row) were added to serum-starved A431 cells and EGFR labeled (green) in cells incubated for 0, 20, and 60 minutes to demonstrate the effect of mEGF and mEGF-pHPMA on EGFR internalization. Labeling of mEGF-pHPMA with Texas red (red) in the right hand panels demonstrates co-localization of EGFR and mEGF-pHPMA following internalization (yellow). Scale bars represent 10 μm. These data are representative of at least three independent experiments. Molecular Therapy 2008 16, 244-251DOI: (10.1038/sj.mt.6300363) Copyright © 2007 The American Society of Gene Therapy Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) status of cell lines used. Murine A9 fibroblast cells were stably transfected with a human EGFR containing plasmid, clones isolated and screened for EGFR expression. (a) Flow cytometry for EGFR status of murine A9 fibroblast cells transfected with human EGFR: A549 cells (positive control); parental A9 cells (negative control) and A9-EGFR clone. Broken line histograms represent isotype control antibody labeling and solid line histograms represent anti-EGFR antibody labeling. Percentage of positive cells following incubation with anti-EGFR antibody indicated for each cell line. Data are representative of repeated measurements over a 12-month period. (b) poly-(2-hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide (pHPMA) and mEGF-pHPMA (10 mg/ml) were used to coat AdCMV-LucΔE1 and transduction efficiency measured by a luciferase assay in the EGFR-positive, coxsackie-adenovirus receptor (CAR)-negative A9 cell line (right panel) (P = 0.0018), and EGFR-negative, CAR-negative parental A9 cells (left panel). (c) murine EGF (mEGF) binding to EGFR was blocked in A9-EGFR cells by preincubating cells for 30 minutes with an anti-EGFR antibody (GR01L). No anti-EGFR blockage (unfilled bars); preincubation with anti-EGFR antibody (black bars); (***P < 0.001). Data in b and c are representative of three independent experiments performed in triplicate. Bars represent mean + SD. Ad, unmodified adenovirus; p-Ad, pHPMA-adenovirus; mEGF-p-Ad, mEGF-pHPMA-adenovirus. Molecular Therapy 2008 16, 244-251DOI: (10.1038/sj.mt.6300363) Copyright © 2007 The American Society of Gene Therapy Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 In vitro transduction efficiency of mEGF-pHPMA modified adenovirus (a) mEGF-pHPMA-adenovirus transduction of a range of epidermal growth factor (EGFR)-positive cell lines. Unmodified AdCMV-LucΔE1 (unfilled bars); poly-(2-hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide (pHPMA)-adenovirus (hashed bars); mEGF-pHPMA-adenovirus (black bars).For all cell lines the level of transgene expression following transduction with pHPMA-adenovirus was compared to mEGF-pHPMA-adenovirus (***P < 0.001). (b) Coxsackie-adenovirus receptor (CAR) and EGFR status of each cell line was assessed by flow cytometry (data not shown) and EGFR levels were formally quantified using a commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, which gave a similar pattern of results. (c) Levels of luciferase gene expression following transduction with unmodified AdCMV-Luc ΔE1 and mEGF-pHPMA-adenovirus were compared with cellular EGFR levels. (d) Specific activity of mEGF-pHPMA-adenovirus in EGFR-positive cells (luciferase activity per virus particle, as measured by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (QPCR)) was assessed by transduction of A431 cells with AdCMV-LucΔE1. After 24 hours, cell lysate was analyzed for luciferase activity and DNA extracted for viral particle estimation by QPCR. Data are representative of at least two independent experiments performed in at least triplicate. Bars represent + SD. Ad, unmodified adenovirus; p-Ad, pHPMA-adenovirus; mEGF-p-Ad, mEGF-pHPMA-adenovirus. (e, f) Cytotoxicity analysis of mEGF-pHPMA-Ad5WT. pHPMA and mEGF-pHPMA (10 mg/ml) were used to coat Ad5WT. Known concentrations of adenovirus in plaque forming units (pfu) were incubated with A2780 cells (e) and SKOV-3 cells (f). After 6 days an MTS assay was performed to assess cell survival. Bars represent + SD. Dashed line with open squares, unmodified Ad5WT; dotted line with crosses, pHPMA-Ad5WT; solid line with filled diamonds, mEGF-pHPMA-Ad5WT. mEGF, murine EGF; RLU, relative light units. Molecular Therapy 2008 16, 244-251DOI: (10.1038/sj.mt.6300363) Copyright © 2007 The American Society of Gene Therapy Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 In vivo efficacy of mEGF-pHPMA retargeted wild-type Ad5. Female nude mice implanted with SKOV-luc cells intraperitoneally and treated with 3 doses of Ad5WT (5 × 1010 virus particles of unmodified Ad5WT [solid line, open inverted triangles); pHPMA-Ad5WT (dashed line, pink triangles); or mEGF-pHPMA-Ad5WT (dashed line, blue diamonds)] or a phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) control (solid line, closed squares). (a) Kaplan–Meier survival curves. (b) Bioluminescence measurements of tumor load 16 days after tumor inoculation. Representative merged luminescence images for each group are shown. Bars represent median group values and points are individual mouse luminescence. (**P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ns, not significant (P > 0.05)) (c) Adhesion scores for each group; mEGF-pHPMA-adenovirus treated mice had significantly fewer adhesions than mice treated with unmodified adenovirus by Chi-squared analysis (P = 0.00039). Bars represent the percentage of each group: no adhesions (open bars); mild adhesions (hashed bars); moderate adhesions (dotted bars); severe adhesions (black bars). (**P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001) (d) Representative images of mice from each group are shown. Ad, unmodified Ad5WT; p-Ad, pHPMA-Ad5WT; mEGF-p-Ad, mEGF-pHPMA-Ad5WT. Data are consistent with data from a randomized and blinded tumor load pilot study (data not shown), which were used in an a priori power calculation for this survival experiment. mEGF, murine epidermal growth factor; ns, not significant; pHPMA, N-(2-hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide. Molecular Therapy 2008 16, 244-251DOI: (10.1038/sj.mt.6300363) Copyright © 2007 The American Society of Gene Therapy Terms and Conditions