Choice of harmonic number with the consideration of ion beam formation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Overview of MEIC Ion Complex and Ion Collider Ring
Advertisements

Ion Accelerator Complex for MEIC January 28, 2010.
Paul Derwent 30 Nov 00 1 The Fermilab Accelerator Complex o Series of presentations  Overview of FNAL Accelerator Complex  Antiprotons: Stochastic Cooling.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.
Expectations and Directions of MEIC Ion Injector Design Optimization Yuhong Zhang MEIC Collaboration Meeting Spring 2015 March 30 and 31, 2015.
MEIC Electron Cooling Simulation He Zhang 03/18/2014, EIC 14 Newport News, VA.
Proton Driver at Fermilab Keith Gollwitzer Accelerator Division Fermilab IDS-NF 7 th Plenary Meeting Oct 17-19,2011.
Synchronization Andrew Hutton Slava Derbenev Yuhong Zhang.
Proton Beam for PRISM Keith Gollwitzer Accelerator Division Fermilab 5 th Workshop Project X Physics – Muons November 8, 2010.
Proton Source & Site Layout Keith Gollwitzer Accelerator Division Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Muon Accelerator Program Review Fermilab, August.
MEIC Electron Ring Injection from CEBAF
DTL Option for MEIC Ion Injection Jiquan Guo, Haipeng Wang Jlab 3/30/
Preliminary MEIC Ion Beam Formation Scheme Jiquan Guo for the MEIC design study team Oct. 5,
4 MW, 50 Hz, 10 GeV, 1 ns (rms), FFAG Proton Driver Study G H Rees, RAL.
Synchronization Issues in MEIC Andrew Hutton, Slava Derbenev and Yuhong Zhang MEIC Ion Complex Design Mini-Workshop Jan. 27 & 28, 2011.
Proton Driver Design Keith Gollwitzer Fermilab February 19, 2014.
Beam time structures 1 At any particular instance of time there will be only one kind of beam in the MI. It will be either protons or anti-protons. The.
NuFACT06 Muon Source at Fermilab David Neuffer Fermilab.
Proton Driver Keith Gollwitzer Accelerator Division Fermilab MAP Collaboration Meeting June 20, 2013.
ELENA RF Manipulations S. Hancock. Apart from debunching before and rebunching after cooling, the principal role of the rf is to decelerate the beam and.
HP-PS beam acceleration and machine circumference A.LachaizeLAGUNA-LBNO General meeting Paris 18/09/13 On behalf of HP-PS design team.
Oct MEIC Ion Bunch Splitting (T. Satogata and R. Gamage)p. 1 MEIC Ion Bunch Splitting Defining the Problem –Beam definition and bunch structure –Operability.
Neutrino Factory by Zunbeltz, Davide, Margarita, Wolfgang IDS proposal.
FCC-ee injector complex including Booster Yannis Papaphilippou, CERN Thanks to: M.Aiba (PSI), Ö.Etisken (Ankara Un.), K.Oide (KEK), L.Rinolfi (ESI-JUAS),
Alexei Fedotov, December 7, Beam parameters and collective effects for pEDM ring (December 7, 2009)
Beam Manufacture in PS2 M. Benedikt, S. Hancock. LHC Beams in the PS by 2015 Typeh injε l inj [evs] h ejN bunch ej RF ej [MHz] ε l ej [evs] τ ej [ns]
JLEIC Ion Integration Update
BEAM TRANSFER CHANNELS, INJECTION AND EXTRACTION SYSTEMS
JLEIC ion source: specifications, design, and R&D prospects
Alternative/complementary Possibilities
Considerations on RF systems of SPPC collider and its injector chain
Space Charge Effect Simulation Using DA Based FMM and Electron Cooling Simulation for JLab’s MEIC Project.
PEPPo Based Polarized Positron Beam Formation for JLEIC
JLEIC ELECTRON COOLING SIMULATION
Polarized Positrons in JLEIC
Injection design of CEPC
JLEIC Reaching 140 GeV CM Energy: Concept and Luminosity Estimate
General Issues for a Multi-MW driver
DTL for MEIC Ion Injection
JLEIC ion fullsize booster (2256m) space charge limit (Δν=0
MEIC New Baseline: Part 9
MEIC New Baseline: Part 10
JLEIC Ion Integration Goals
Ion bunch formation options for 400GeV JLEIC
JLEIC 200 GeV Ion Injector Chain and Bunch Formation
Update on MEIC Activities at ANL
MEIC New Baseline: Luminosity Performance and Upgrade Path
Synchronization in MEIC
JLEIC 200 GeV ion beam formation options
Technical challenges for forming the double intensity section of JLEIC ion beam Jiquan Guo.
Non-pairwise Collision
JLEIC CCR Path Length and Gap Formation
Comments to the Report of the Community Review of EIC Accelerator R&D for the Office of Nuclear Physics, February 13, 2017 (60 pages) By Haipeng Wang,
MEIC low rep-rate operation and path length
Jiquan Guo, Haipeng Wang
MEIC New Baseline: Performance and Accelerator R&D
Pulsed electron beam cooling experiments: data & preliminary results
More on MEIC Beam Synchronization
HE-JLEIC: Do We Have a Baseline?
Cooling of C6+ ion beam with pulsed electron beam
Some Thoughts on the JLEIC Ion Injector
MEIC beam path change with e-ring bypass lines
SC Magnets with Small Apertures for JLEIC*
RF system for MEIC Ion Linac: SRF and Warm Options
Optimization of JLEIC Integrated Luminosity Without On-Energy Cooling*
200GeV JLEIC circumferences
Updated MEIC Ion Beam Formation Scheme
An Alternative Ion Complex Agenda /some preliminary estimations/
Beam Synchronization in MEIC: The Problem, Scale and Prospect
JLEIC Ion Beam Formation options for 200 GeV
Presentation transcript:

Choice of harmonic number with the consideration of ion beam formation Jiquan Guo 9/17/2015

Ion beam formation cycles: Multi-turn strip-injection of up polarized ion from linac to booster (non-polarized for heavy ions) Capture beam into a bucket (~0.7× booster ring circumference) Ramp energy (to 7.9GeV proton equivalent) and perform DC cooling in the booster Compress the bunch length to ~0.7/Nh0× of the collider ring circumference Bucket-to-bucket transfer beam into collider ring Repeat step 1-5 for (Nh0/2-1) times Switch to down polarized ions and repeat step 1-5 for another (Nh0/2-1) times Ramp collider ring to collision energy, perform bunch splitting to Nh If needed, manipulate the beam to create extra empty buckets in the gap, as required by beam synchronization. (w/o barrier bucket, bunch splitting needs to be done in steps, and the final harmonic number Nh must be multiple of Nh0, but beam sync requires varying Nh by increment of 1, so sometimes Nh is impossible to be multiple of Nh0) BB cooler 14 up polarized long bunches 2 empty buckets for gap 14 down polarized long bunches Desired Nh0 depends on linac energy and target collider ring current (0.5A in baseline) Nh0=36-40 for ~42MeV/u Pb Nh0=30-32 for ~130MeV proton or ~55MeV/u Pb Nh0=16-18 for ~210MeV proton or ~100MeV/u Pb

Possible choices of Nh Nh 3600 3584 2266 2256 16 30 40 28 32 Circumference (m) 2266 2256 Nh0 16 30 40 28 32 Occupied long bunches 14 36 26 Gap length (ns, ×2) 472 252 378 470 269 235 Linac Energy (MeV/u) Pb 100 55 42 57 50 Proton 215 125 130 115 Occupied short bunches 3150 3360 3240 3136 3328 Split scheme ×3×3×5×5 ×5×4×3×2 ×5×3×3×2 ×7×25 ×27 ×7×24 Plenty of options to reduce bunch reprate Binary split, might be the easiest Factor of 7 split, might be beneficial for e-ring injection with reduced reprate ~110m longer than 2154m, just enough for the bypass lines