Surface Reflectance Validation [CV-17]

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Brian Killough NASA NASA Future Missions Summary CGMS-38 Meeting Delhi, India November 8-12, 2010.
Advertisements

Tuz Gölü – Site Characteristics Larry Leigh 1, Dennis Helder 1, David Aaron 1 I. Behnert 2, A.Deadman 2, N.Fox 2 U. M. Leloğlu 3, H. Özen 3, Derek Griffith.
2010 CEOS Field Reflectance Intercomparisons Lessons Learned K. Thome 1, N. Fox 2 1 NASA/GSFC, 2 National Physical Laboratory.
Session 10: Space Data Support to GFOI R&D DLR Contributing Data Stream Report SDCG-7 Sydney, Australia March 4 th – 6 th 2015 Helmut Staudenrausch, DLR.
WLE Operations Team Planning Meeting 2 nd February 2015, Water’s Edge.
HS Thread at Work Thread: sequence of activities from acquisition, through base processing, interpretation and finally to product presentation Working.
RSG Vicarious Calibration Results and Automated Approach Jeffrey Czapla-Myers Remote Sensing Group ~ Optical Sciences Center University of Arizona Presented.
Korea Aerospace Research Institute (KARI)
Jan 2016 Solar Lunar Data.
Future directions of CEOS WGCV: Incoming chair perspective
SPF MAG Quarterly Report – Feb 2015
Moderate Resolution Sensor Interoperability (MRI) Initiative
IT Strategy Roadmap Template
Ocean Report Australia – Ocean Colour & SST
Analysis Ready Data July 18, 2016 John Dwyer Leo Lymburner
DSC Assurance Team Reporting
Analyzing patterns in the phenomena
Q1 Jan Feb Mar ENTER TEXT HERE Notes
Moderate Resolution Sensor Interoperability: Framework
Towards achieving continental scale field validation and multi-sensor interoperability of satellite derived surface reflectance in Australia Medhavy Thankappan1,
Level 2 Surface Reflectance Product Validation Thoughts
WGCV Work Plan Actions K. . Thome NASA WGCV Plenary # 43
Average Monthly Temperature and Rainfall
Status of Carbon Action Items
2018 Safety Group 1 – 5 Year Program Timeline Guide
WGCV Overview K. Thome WGISS#45 / WGCV#43
Agency Report Geoscience Australia
Presented by Ron Morfitt, U.S. Geological Survey (USGS)
WGCV Chair’s Report K. Thome NASA WGCV Plenary # 44
Medhavy Thankappan and Lan-Wei Wang

2017 Safety Group 1 – 5 Year Program Timeline Guide

Geoscience Australia Report on Cal/Val Activities
Geoscience Australia Report
CSIRO CSIRO Agency Report
RadCalNet Status Marc Bouvet ESA & RadCalNet task team
Mammoth Caves National Park, Kentucky
2017 Jan Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

Gantt Chart Enter Year Here Activities Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 PRODUCT ROADMAP TITLE Roadmap Tagline MILESTONE MILESTONE

Jan Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
2019 Safety Group 1 – 5 Year Program Timeline Guide
2018 Advantage Program Timeline Guide
Electricity Cost and Use – FY 2016 and FY 2017

2014 Advantage Program Timeline Guide *** Progress Visits ***

Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Ctclink executive leadership committee May 31, 2018
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 PRODUCT ROADMAP TITLE Roadmap Tagline MILESTONE MILESTONE

2017 Advantage Program Timeline Guide
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
2016 Safety Group 1 – 5 Year Program Timeline Guide
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
SR Self Assessment for CARD4L - Geoscience Australia
2012 Safety Group 1 – 5 Year Program Timeline Guide
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 PRODUCT ROADMAP TITLE Roadmap Tagline MILESTONE MILESTONE
Pilot of revised survey
2016 Advantage Program Timeline Guide
Presentation transcript:

Surface Reflectance Validation [CV-17] Medhavy Thankappan Team: Guy Byrne, Andrew Walsh, Mark Broomhall, Tim Malthus, Cindy Ong, Ian Lau, Peter Fearns + many others

Team members and reviewers Janet Anstee Hannalie Botha Anjea Byrne Mike Caccetta Alicia Caruso Laurie Chisholm Ken Clarke Claire Fisk Erin Kenna Fuqin Li Stefan Maier Glenn Newnham Simon Oliver Peter Scarth Neil Sims Kylie Smith Liam Stephen Lola Suarez Dan Tindall Lan-Wei Wang Dennis Helder Chris Maclellan Kurt Thome Stuart Phinn Andreas Hueni David Jupp

Project Background Field data collection for continental scale validation of surface reflectance Coordinated by CSIRO under a Project Agreement, funded through Digital Earth Australia (DEA) Field data acquisition, near-coincident with satellite overpass (L8, S2a, S2b), from March 2018 to June 2019 – Phase 1 Phase 2 to cover more complex sites Field based validation using best practice protocols seen as critical to ensure generation of consistent multi-sensor SR products Reliability, consistency of downstream products, user confidence and uptake

Phase 1 Surface Reflectance Validation Sites Surface types ‘mostly’ flat bare or low vegetation homogeneous spectrally diverse

Field Sampling Protocols All instruments / panels were characterised by CSIRO 100x100m sites 6 transects in each site oriented on the solar azimuth Atmospheric readings coincident with overpass using either MicroTops or ASD Transects bookended by panel readings SR field validation protocols documented

Phase 1 Field Data Collection Status 55 individual overpasses, multiple dual overpasses, and trial UAS acquisition. Weather, site proximity, trafficability, equipment and staffing impacted on number of actual opportunities to deploy. Work on characterising measurement uncertainty in progress, final report ready Total field data acquisitions at all sites

Coincident measurements with two ASDs Coincident measurements with two instruments at Pinnacles site Landsat 8 overpass on 20 May 2018 Sentinel-2A overpass on 22 May 2018 GA ASD CSIRO ASD GA ASD CSIRO ASD

Validation for L8 and S2 Tandem Overpasses Pinnacles 2 April 2018 L. Lefroy 25 June 2018 Dookie 2 June 2018 Dookie 2 June 2018 Longreach 23 June 2018 Mullion 10 April 2019

Temporal measurements for Landsat 8 Dookie 14 Mar 18 Longreach 29 May 18 Lake George 12 Feb 18 Mullion 29 Dec 18 Pinnacles 2 Apr 18 Winton 21 Jun 18 Dookie 2 Jun 18 Longreach 23 Jun 18 Lake George 3 May18 Mullion 10 Apr 19 Pinnacles 20 May 18 Winton 20 Oct 18

Temporal measurements for Sentinel-2 Dookie 14 Mar 18 Fowlers Gap 21 Jun 18 Longreach 9 May 18 Lake George 5 Apr 18 Mullion 29 Dec 18 Pinnacles 2 Apr 18 Winton27 May 18 Dookie 18 Apr 18 Fowlers Gap 18 Dec 18 Longreach 23 Jun 18 Lake George 4 Jul 18 Mullion 8 Apr 19 Pinnacles 22 May 18 Winton21 Jun 18 Dookie 2 Jun 18 Longreach 9 May 18 Lake George 17 Sep 18 Mullion 10 Apr 19 Pinnacles 28 Nov 18 Winton 19 Oct 18

Drone Based Validation at Litchfield Drone based spectral data collection trial over Litchfield site, synchronous with a Sentinel-2A overpass Miniature Spectrometer Site overview (Litchfield, NT) Pre-flight reference panel measurement Measuring direct irradiance

Field Validation Summary Results Landsat-8 Sentinel-2A Sentinel-2B

Sensitivity Analyses for SR Parameters Low Medium High Aerosol optical depth 0.05 0.25 0.50 Water vapor (g/cm2) 0.5 1.5 3.5 Solar angle 25 45 70 BRDF low medium high Mean surface reflectance at different aerosol values Mean surface reflectance at different values of solar angle normalisation Mean surface reflectance at different water vapour values Mean surface reflectance at different BRDF levels

Phase 2 Validation of SR Scoping for Phase 2 has begun, use of instrumented sites and automation for data over complex sites; will explore cross-over with new LPV, IVOS initiatives Staff training to fly UAS completed; UAS platform and payload acquired Validation sites being determined

Summary Ongoing field based validation is critical to ensure consistency in generation of SR products from multiple sensors Protocols developed for continental-scale field validation of SR in Phase 1, could be adapted for developing global protocols Sensitivity analyses highlight the relative importance of parameters used for generating SR, and their impacts Planning for Phase 2 SR validation is underway, synergies with new LPV, IVOS initiatives will be explored for collaboration