House Environmental Committee Testimony

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Management of Spent Nuclear Fuel By: Matthew R. MacDougall Nuclear Engineer of Oregon State University Sponsored by American Nuclear Society August 1 st,
Advertisements

SECURITY REQUIREMENTS FOR INDUSTRIAL RADIOGRAPHIC OPERATIONS IN THE UNITED STATES.
Interim Storage of Used Nuclear Fuel February 2008.
Long Term Storage, The Failure of the Federal Government, and NIMBY.
Yucca Mountain Emily Craver Wiliam Fairweather Emily Macieiski Mike Naleid Gelver Vergeldedios Danny Webb.
1 GAO Study on Radioactive Waste Management Scenarios Ric Cheston US Government Accountability Office (GAO)
School for drafting regulations Nuclear Safety Decommissioning Vienna, 2-7 December 2012 Tea Bilic Zabric.
NUCLEAR ENERGY What is it? David J. Diamond Energy Sciences & Technology Department February 2009.
MODULE “STRATEGY DEVELOPMENT”
NRC Decommissioning Activities for the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Bruce A. Watson, CHP Chief, Reactor Decommissioning Branch Division of Decommissioning,
Nuclear Power Isar Plant - Germany Diablo Canyon - California.
Setting the Stage: Review of 2013 IEPR Nuclear Recommendations Danielle Osborn Mills Former Senior Nuclear Policy Advisor to the California Energy Commission.
Spent Nuclear Fuel Timothy Pairitz. Nuclear Power 101 Uranium-235 is enriched from 0.7% to 3-5%. Enriched fuel is converted to a uranium oxide powder.
Federal Energy and Environmental Regulation Agencies and Laws
California Energy Commission James Madigan April 27, 2015.
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Existing and Proposed Units American Society of Civil Engineers Dallas Chapter November 1, 2010.
VERMONT YANKEE Transitioning into SAFSTOR ​SEPTEMBER 2, 2015 Paul Paradis Director Decommissioning.
Transportation of Radioactive Material in the United States Earl P. Easton.
August 4,  Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station (VYNPS) ceased power operations on December 29, 2014 after 633 days of continuous power operation.
Status of Low-Level Radioactive Waste (LLRW) Compacts and update on Commercial LLRW Disposal Facilities Tom Wolf, Governor John Quigley, Secretary.
PENNSYLVANIA’S ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM AROUND NUCLEAR FACILITIES Tonda Lewis.
Eric M. Davied American Nuclear Society Texas A&M University
1 LICENSING A U.S. GEOLOGICAL REPOSITORY WILLIAM BORCHARDT Executive Director for Operations U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
MODULE “PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL” SAFETY ASSESSMENT DURING DECOMMISSIONING SAFE DECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS Project BG/04/B/F/PP ,
Nuclear Waste. What is Nuclear Waste? Waste that results from the use of radioactive materials -Nuclear energy -Nuclear weapons -Hospitals, Universities,
Integrated Used Nuclear Fuel Management Regulatory Information Conference U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission March 11, 2009 Steven P. Kraft Senior Director.
1 ESTABLISHMENT OF REQUIREMENTS Module “DECOMMISSIONING PROCESS” Project BG/04/B/F/PP , Program “Leonardo da Vinci”
Clear thinking on Nuclear: Waste disposal 1.One site for high-level radioactive waste is easier to monitor, regulate, and secure 2.A repository will provide.
1 Convention Center Authority Republican Policy Group Presentation March 23 rd 2015.
November 4,  Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station (VYNPS) ceased power operations on December 29, 2014 after 633 days of continuous power operation.
STRENGTHENING NATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURES FOR THE CONTROL OF RADIATION SOURCES RER/9/096 REGIONAL PLANNING MEETING ARMENIA ASHOT MNATSAKANYAN Head of Radiation.
 Before a company decides to close it’s power reactors the facility must be put in to a state that no longer has a residual radioactive level, clean.
East Tennessee Technology Park Emergency Management Program (Vision 2020) Darryl Bonner UCOR Emergency Management October 15, 2015.
DECOMMISSIONING FROM THE FRONT LINES HISTORY, EXPERIENCE, AND THE PATH FORWARD Deb Katz Executive Director Citizens Awareness Network Contact: (413)
DEVELOPMENT OF THE NATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE FOR NUCLEAR POWER IN VIETNAM DEVELOPMENT OF THE NATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE FOR NUCLEAR POWER IN VIETNAM Vuong Huu.
Short how nuclear plant works how nuclear power works.
Careers In Nuclear Science & Technology ANS Teacher Workshop Anaheim, CA November 2014.
FY 2012 Budget Press Briefing February 14, NRC FY 2012 Budget NRC Mission: License and regulate the Nation’s civilian use of byproduct, source,
Generations of Opportunity By Rick Perley. If selected for construction of a repository, benefits include:  Between $16 - $24 billion in direct investment.
Decommissioning San Onofre
“Status of the ReACTOR Decommissioning Program” October 7, 2016 LLW Forum Ted Smith, Project Manager Reactor Decommissioning Branch Division of Decommissioning,
Decommissioning Issues
3 Yankee Companies and National Spent Nuclear Fuel Issue Update
Status of national system for control of radioactive sources: Libya
The Hazardous Materials Transportation Act (HMTA)
Sustaining Cradle-to-Grave Control of Radioactive Sources (INT-9182) Workshop on implementation of a national cradle-to-grave control system for radioactive.
Transportation of Radioactive Material in the United States
Proposed Revisions to 10 CFR Part 61
Vermont Yankee Decommissioning Update
The Path Forward for WIPP: A State and Local Perspective
Janet R. Schlueter Senior Director, Radiation and Materials Safety
Spent Nuclear Fuel and Waste Disposition Program Update
Joseph D. Anderson, Chief
3 Yankee Companies and National Spent Nuclear Fuel Issue Update
CR3 and Crystal River Energy Complex
Nuclear Power Public safety concerns and the costs of addressing them have constrained the development and spread of nuclear power in the United States,
Nuclear Waste Storage Current Status and Plans
NRC Cyber Security Regulatory Overview
Nuclear Power in Jordan
SONGS Past, Current, and Future State May 4, 2016
Possible Transition from Operating to Decommissioning
Decommissioning Rulemaking
Spent Fuel Storage and Transport for Shutdown and Decommissioning Nuclear Plants Rod McCullum November 28, 2018.
Overview on the Regulations and Technical Requirements for E-Waste Management in Rwanda. RURA.
Emergency Preparedness
Anni Podimata, Vice President ITRE
November , 2018 State Roundtable Reports Pennsylvania
Preparing for a Terrorist Attack Indian Point Energy Center
Nuclear Decommissioning Citizens Advisory Panel (NDCAP) Certificate of Public Good (CPG) – Second ISFSI Pad & New 200 kW DG May 28, 2015.
NUCLEAR ENERGY What is it?
Presentation transcript:

House Environmental Committee Testimony Eric Epstein Three Mile Island Alert

There is nothing clean or green about nuclear waste High-level radioactive waste continues to accumulate at reactor sites where it is made. There is no plan to permanently isolate it and safety issues with the current options

How much nuclear waste do we have? As of 2018 there were 80,000 metric tons of uranium of commercial irradiated fuel in the US 2,000 metric tons of nuclear waste is generated every year There is approximately 7,560 metric tons of high-level radioactive waste fuel stored at Pennsylvania’s nuclear power plants.

Dry Cask Storage Beaver Valley, Limerick, Peach Bottom and Susquehanna have transitioned to dry cask storage because their on- site spent fuel pools are completely full and can’t accommodate any more fuel assemblies. Dry cask is better than spent fuel pools, but dry casks are vulnerable to failure and difficult to inspect. TMI is the only plant not using dry cask storage, they are only using spent fuel pools and those pools have been re-racked three times. They are out of room in their pools and yet have failed to transition to dry cask storage and won’t do so until 2022 at the earliest.

Reducing the amount of radioactive waste in fuel pools is a top priority! Spent fuel pools, according to independent engineers, are the least safe way to store high level radioactive waste, especially when they are racked to high density. ALL of the reactors in PA still have their fuel pools racked to high density. Dry storage has risks, but it is a lot safer than spent fuel pools. Again, TMI is currently only storing their waste in spent fuel pools which are currently racked to high density.

Hardened on-site storage (HOSS) Hardened On-Site Storage (HOSS) is a better, safer way to store high level radioactive waste than spent fuel pools and dry cask storage. HOSS provides better security at reactor sites with robust dry storage and community oversight, including real time monitoring of heat and radiation.

Are consolidated/centralized “interim” storage areas (CIS) the solution? Current federal law, Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 and 1987 Amendments, state that CIS areas are only allowed if a permanent repository is operating. Moreover, the provision of the law allowing for a “temporary” site has expired, making any CIS facility ILLEGAL. Consolidated Interim Storage (CIS) nuclear waste dumps would be sites to which high level nuclear power waste would be moved before being shipped to a CURRENTLY NONEXISTENT permanent repository.

ILLEGAL CONSOLIDATED INTERIM STORAGE SITES (CIS) are being planned now Despite the illegality of CIS areas, two private corporations applied to open such sites and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is proceeding with their applications. One is in Texas and the other is in New Mexico. CIS areas are not designed to store irradiated nuclear fuel for the millions of years it remains radioactively dangerous Failure to improve existing vulnerability of nuclear waste storage technology It is likely that an “interim” site could become a de-facto permanent storage site if a morally and scientifically sound permanent system to isolate the waste is not developed

These corporations want to: Legalize consolidated “interim” storage before there is a permanent repository Shift liability for high level waste from nuclear power companies to the US Dept. of Energy aka US taxpayers Raid Nuclear Waste Fund money collected for permanent isolation to be redirected for the so called “interim” storage. These corporations want to change the law to allow them to make money while all liability is borne by the public

Safety risks of Transporting nuclear waste Nuclear waste is transported throughout Pennsylvania via major highways and railways. While transportation maps show that it passes through densely populated cities such as Philadelphia, Pittsburgh and Harrisburg, the waste is also transported through small towns, past elementary schools and down main streets.

Transportation of nuclear waste For detailed explanations of the safety risks I just explained, please see the TMIA Vimeo page for short, detailed videos. (No video is longer than two and a half minutes) https://vimeo.com/293053900 – eyewitness to rule breaking during transport (1:56 long) https://vimeo.com/293052668 - travel routes through Central PA for high level radioactive waste (2:24 long) https://vimeo.com/293054956 - transportation of nuclear waste is not safe (1:12 long)

Recommendations for Pennsylvania Recommendation 1: Reporting Pennsylvania Licensees shall send the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PUC) any report provided to the NRC within 10 days of the date upon which it was provided to the NRC.

Recommendations for Pennsylvania Recommendation 2: Department of Energy All spent fuel management costs recovered from DOE must be put into the Decommissioning Trust Fund and used only to pay decommissioning costs.

Recommendations for Pennsylvania Recommendation 3: Parent Company Guarantee The Licensee’s parent Company (not a LLC subsidiary) must provide a Parent Company Guarantee of not less than $500 million, after the payment of all taxes.

Recommendations for Pennsylvania Recommendation 4: Spent Fuel Monitoring Until all spent nuclear fuel has been moved into dry casks in the ISFSI, the licensee shall make annual payments to the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) and to the Pennsylvania Emergency Management Agency (PEMA) to defray the costs incurred by the Departments’ radiation control program for offsite and onsite radiological monitoring and testing.

Recommendations for Pennsylvania Recommendation 5: Emergency Planning Until the calendar year after all spent fuel has been moved into dry casks, the licensee shall make annual payments to DEP and PEMA and to each county within 10 miles of the nuclear site to defray costs incurred for providing emergency radiological planning. Licensees will continue to make annual payments to DEP, PEMA, the Commonwealth and each county within 10 miles of the reactor at a reduced level until all spent nuclear fuel has been removed from the site.

Recommendations for Pennsylvania Recommendation 6: Monitoring fees and responsibilities Consistent with Act 31, initial payment shall be $650,000. With respect to each subsequent calendar year, the payment shall be in an amount equal to the costs incurred in the prior calendar year by the department’s radiation control program. No decommissioning trust funds shall be used to make any of these payments. Commonwealth personnel will accompany NRC personnel visiting the site in connection with any license termination plan, and to take and test samples.

Recommendations for Pennsylvania Recommendation 7: Site Restoration All activities conducted at this site shall comply with applicable federal, state and local environmental and human-health based laws, standards and regulations to the extent such laws, standards and regulations do not conflict with the standards identified in a MOU and should include the DRBC or SRBC as signatories. All subsurface voids shall be filled and the land shall be regraded and reseeded. All fill material must comply with the approved radiological and non-radiological remediation standards. All hazardous waste shall be removed from the site to whatever level is required by federal, state and local laws or regulations for unrestricted use of the site.

Recommendations for Pennsylvania Recommendation 8: Radiation Monitoring The BRP must continue offsite and onsite radiological monitoring until all spent nuclear fuel has been removed from the site. Licensees shall work cooperatively with DEP and PEMA to develop appropriate protocols related to non- radiological remediation and site restoration for information sharing, obtaining samples from onsite environmental media, conducting site visits and inspections, site characterization, remediation, site restoration and notifications. The licensee shall pay the costs as set forth above.

Recommendations for Pennsylvania Recommendation 9: Offsite Emergency Planning State and local (i.e., communities within 10 miles of the site) off-site radiological emergency planning must continue at its current level until all spent fuel is removed from the pool and placed in hardened dry casks, except that potassium iodide provisions may be eliminated 90 days after the reactor is de-fueled. Thereafter, it must continue at a reduced level until all spent nuclear fuel has been removed from the site. Licensees shall pay the cost of such monitoring as set forth above.

Recommendations for Pennsylvania Recommendation 10: Spent Fuel Dry Cask and Pad Monitoring Licensees agrees to monitor in real-time each cask for heat, helium and radiation, and provide real-time monitoring data to the Bureau of Radiation Protection The canisters and concrete outer packs are prone to cracking, exacerbated by  corrosion. The Commonwealth shall have the ability to inspect the pad and casks and shall receive a copy of any report relating to any inspection of the pad or casks by  the licensee  or the NRC within ten days after the date of any such report.

Recommendations for Pennsylvania Recommendation 11: ISFSI Security To reduce the potential of a line-of-site attack, either the casks shall be stored in a building for additional security and environmental protection, or, at a minimum, a barrier not less than 5 feet higher than the height of any cask in the ISFSI shall be constructed around the ISFSI. While fuel remains onsite, security shall include: a protected area around the ISFSI, concrete vehicle barriers, lighting, cameras and intrusion detection equipment and cyber security measures.

we owe it to our children to find a solution to nuclear waste The accident at TMI was in 1979, 40 years ago, and it has never been cleaned up. It is past time to clean up TMI and to solve the problem of nuclear waste. We cannot continue to kick this can down the road, leaving it to the next generation to solve.