© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Hospital Live Delivery Captured Maternal Death
Advertisements

and Statistics, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1-8. doi: /ajams-4-1-1
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Intermediate-level learner
Hospital live Deliveries
Research, 2015, Vol. 3, No. 6, doi: /education
Figure 3. Comparison of class performance
Table 3. Quran memorization students survey responses about App
Table 1. Sample Size No Category Sample Size (F) Percentage (%) 1
SON Nurse Practitioner Blackboard Community
Total Energy Consumed (%)
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Source Sum of Squares (SS) df Mean Square (MS) F p-value
Table 3. Student’s Mathematical Critical Thinking Ability Description
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Teachers Response (N= 11)
Instructional materials
Table 8. Drawing result before game
Table 2. Showing mean and SD along with t- critical ratio
student achievement scores
Table 11. Chi-Square Analysis Based on Grade Shift for Study Group
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
in the last evaluation of the software
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Test Mean Std. Dev. Mathematics English Language
Table 1. Student’s attitude towards technology (%)
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Significant (2- tailed)
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 2. Showing mean and SD along with t- critical ratio
Number of categories that are mentioned (0% < categories < 5%)
Table 1. The comparison of government model and STWG model training
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Entrapment Efficiency (%) ± S.D.
Table 2. Test of Normality
Table 1. LLC Academics Outcome Report ( )
Number of questionnaires sent out
Table 1. Descriptive Statistics
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Behavioral strategies
Table 4. Summary of Multi ways ANOVA results
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
t-test for Equality of Means
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
chemistry that are involved in peer group
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 3. (d) Summary of two way ANOVA for overall adjustment
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 2. Sample items for measuring attitude towards e-learning
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Category Quantity Secondary school 3 Student participant
Table 1. Sampled Size by Status and Qualification of Academic Staff
MASTERS DEGREE HOLDERS
Table 1. Illiteracy distribution by Gender and Place (No. in million)
Geometry and Mensuration
Table 7. The Result of T Test After Treatment
Table 2. Pre and Post Test Scores for the Plaid Condition(N=16)
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 6. Range Comparisons amongst Subgroups and grade levels
Power per unit land or water area
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Gender N Mean S.D Df t-cal P
Presentation transcript:

© The Author(s) 2015. Published by Science and Education Publishing. Table 2. Operational factors influencing quality education delivery in private secondary schools Items SA (%) A (%) FA (%) D (%) SD (%) All the parents pay their children school fees promptly (0) 11 (22.4) 13 (26.5) 18 (36.7) 7 (14.3) 2.57 All the students have the required textbooks/ learning materials 8 (16.3) 3 (6.1) 22 (44.9) 12 (24.5) 4 (8.2) 2.98 All the students take their academic work very seriously 10 (20.4) 2 (4.1) 3.39 The school has adequate instructional materials in all subjects 15 (30.6) 1 (2.0) 3.88 The school has adequate number of qualified teachers in all subjects on the curriculum 29 (59.2) 9 (18.4) 4.29 The teacher usually complain of excess workload 19 (38.8) 14 (28.6) 2.27 The teacher are effectively managed, monitored and supervised in their various subjects (8.4) 4.39 The teacher gives prompt and regular performance feedback in their respective subjects 16 (32.7) 24 (49.0) 4.12 The school has adequate and well equipped offices for teachers 3.86 The school has adequate classrooms 28 (57.1) 4.33 All the classroom are well equipped with modern facilities 3.31 The school has well equipped laboratory 20 (40.8) 4.00 The school has a well stocked standard library 3.55 The school has a well equipped technical/vocational workshop 5 (10.4) (18.8) (27.1) (25.0) 2.77 The school enjoys regular electricity supply to power its machines/equipment 6 (12.2) The school enjoys good road network for accessibility 17 (34.7) 3.78 Cumulative Mean 3.53 Adeolu Joshua AYENI et al. Private Sector Involvement in Education Enterprise and Quality Learning Outcome in Secondary Schools in Ondo State, Nigeria. American Journal of Educational Research, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 8, 578-587. doi:10.12691/education-4-8-1 © The Author(s) 2015. Published by Science and Education Publishing.