© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

1 K-2 Smarter Balanced Assessment Update English Language Arts February 2012.

Advertisements

performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC

Big Ideas and Problem Solving in Junior Math Instruction

Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)

Document Review STANDARDEVIDENCE Standard 1 - Professional KnowledgeDocumentation and Observation Standard 2 - Instructional PlanningDocumentation and.

Math Boxes Math/Science Facilitator Meeting April 18, 2007

TPAC - Task 2 By Dora L. Bailey, An analysis of the effects of teaching on students’ learning (the “so what”) Video Tape should : 2.

ationmenu/nets/forteachers/2008s tandards/nets_for_teachers_2008.h tm Click on the above circles to see each standard.

Curriculum Report Card Implementation Presentations

Science: Learning Experience 4

How People Learn – Brain, Mind, Experience, and School (Bransford, Brown, & Cocking, 1999) Three core principles 1: If their (students) initial understanding.

Christine Yang March 17, As a teacher it is critical for me to demonstrate mastery of technology teacher standards. ISTE-NETS Teacher Standards.

Introduction to Presenting. What Does Presenting Involve? Providing information in verbal, written, and multimedia forms Ensuring listeners understand.

Introduction to Life Science. Science is a way of learning about the natural world Scientific inquiry – all the diverse ways in which scientist study.

Creative Curriculum and GOLD Assessment: Early Childhood Competency Based Evaluation System By Carol Bottom.

What Happened? Each box of “what happened” represents a different response from a student or group of students. Teachers are encouraged to staple more.

Appendix 1. Mean and standard deviation of the study sample grades on a scale of Developmentally Appropriate Teaching Practices Eman Gheith et al. Correlation.

Table 1. Alignment of Assessment Domains with CEC and ACEI Standards Sheilah M. Paul et al. From Conceptualization to Reflection: Ensuring Robust Clinical.

ESE 697 Week 1 Reflective Journal Check this A+ tutorial guideline at The.

Table 2. Result of Actual Technical Writing Needs

Research, 2015, Vol. 3, No. 6, doi: /education

Figure 3. Comparison of class performance

Table 3. Quran memorization students survey responses about App

Web-Based, Inquiry-Based Lesson Planning Tool

NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice

Table 2. Result of intention to use

Table 1. Sample Size No Category Sample Size (F) Percentage (%) 1

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Overview of the Teacher Work Sample (TWS)

Table 3. Student’s Mathematical Critical Thinking Ability Description

Model Types Instructional Decisions Associated Lesson Plans

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Teachers Response (N= 11)

Table 8. Drawing result before game

Table 2. Showing mean and SD along with t- critical ratio

student achievement scores

Table 11. Chi-Square Analysis Based on Grade Shift for Study Group

No. 8, doi: /education Table 9. t-Test Analysis Based on Average Quiz Scores from Last Six Quizzes t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Unequal.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Test Mean Std. Dev. Mathematics English Language

K-2 Smarter Balanced Assessment Update

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Significant (2- tailed)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Number of categories that are mentioned (0% < categories < 5%)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Overall Average Female Overall Average Male/Female

Table 1. LLC Academics Outcome Report ( )

Table 1. Conceptual Framework Learning Outcomes

Table 3. Standardized Factor Loadings of EFA

Number of questionnaires sent out

Table 1. Descriptive Statistics

Behavioral strategies

95% Confidence Interval for Mean

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 3. (d) Summary of two way ANOVA for overall adjustment

Figure 2. MDS-T configuration for the thirteen (13) criteria (and their Place) in DPESS in Athens (NKUA) Chris P. Lamprou et al. Evaluating the effectiveness.

Category Quantity Secondary school 3 Student participant

Geometry and Mensuration

Table 7. The Result of T Test After Treatment

Table 3. The Structure of the Basic Science and Technology Curriculum

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 4. Independent Samples Test Application of ICT by Gender

Table 6. Range Comparisons amongst Subgroups and grade levels

Presentation transcript:

© The Author(s) 2015. Published by Science and Education Publishing. Table 2. Examples from teacher candidate evaluation tool with Project Approach adaptations Systematic and Organized Instruction/Intervention Scale: 3=Target, 2=AccepTable 1=Unacceptable 1 Observed activities are a part of a larger unit/project/goal and contribute to deepening children's conceptual understanding, increasing skill, and/or developing independence 1 2 3 2 Activities use a variety of formats (e.g., play, routines, small group activities, inquiry approaches, and systematic instruction) appropriate to their objectives. 3 Candidate builds upon prior knowledge and young children's experiences when introducing, leading, or expanding upon new concepts and activities. 4 Candidate assumes roles that range from instructor, facilitator, and coach to audience in relation to context and children's needs. 5 Instruction responds to the varied cultures and languages of the classroom to enhance development/learning. 6 Candidate explains how an observed instructional activity addresses IFSP/IEP goals for children with special needs Overall Rating of Coherence: Choose the mode of the ratings above. Exception: three or more ratings of '1' earn an overall rating of '1'. Comments (Note examples/evidence of ratings, as well as explanation for any rating of 1 or 3): Adam S. Kennedy et al. The Project Approach Meta-Project: Inquiry-Based Learning in Undergraduate Early Childhood Teacher Education. American Journal of Educational Research, 2015, Vol. 3, No. 7, 907-917. doi:10.12691/education-3-7-15 © The Author(s) 2015. Published by Science and Education Publishing.