Committee on Earth Observation Satellites

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ACC-VC Status and Issues – Continuity of Limb Sounding Richard Eckman NASA CEOS SIT-29 Meeting CNES, Toulouse, France 9 th -10 th April 2014.
Advertisements

WGClimate Work Plan for John Bates, Chair WGClimate 4th Working Group on Climate Meeting.
ACC-VC Status and Issues Richard Eckman, NASA SIT-30 Agenda Item #8 CEOS Action / Work Plan Reference 30 th CEOS SIT Meeting CNES Headquarters, Paris,
CEOS Working Group on Calibration and Validation (WGCV) Report Agenda item: 17 Presented by: Pascal Lecomte.
The CEOS Carbon Task Force Report SIT th – 28 th March 2012, La Jolla Takashi Moriyama (JAXA) & Diane Wickland (NASA) Carbon Task Force Co-Chairs.
Slide: 1 CEOS SIT Technical Workshop |Caltech, Pasadena, California, USA| September 2013 CEOS Work Plan Section 6.1 G Dyke CEOS ad hoc Working Group.
Status of ACC Activities Claus Zehner ESA VC/WG Day EUMETSAT, Darmstadt, Germany 16 th September 2015.
CGMS-42-WP-21, 28 April 2014 Coordination Group for Meteorological Satellites - CGMS Slide: 1 Main outcomes of the Ad-hoc Meeting on Space Weather CGMS-42,
Incoming Themes for 2017 Frank Kelly, USGS
CEOS Response to GEOSS Water Strategy
Committee on Earth Observation Satellites
CEOS Carbon Strategy – WGClimate Actions
Broader Coordination on Carbon Observations
Albrecht von Bargen, Chair CEOS WGCV DLR Agenda Item # 6 GSICS-EP 17
Title Goes Here Name (s), Organization, CEOS Affiliation CEOS SIT-33
CEOS Status/Overview Steven Hosford WGCapD-7 Agenda Item #6
UNFCCC/IPCC Engagement Efforts
Committee on Earth Observation Satellites
CEOS Plenary 2018 Astrid – Christina Koch, European Commission
German Aerospace Center – Space Administration
WGCV Work Plan Actions K. . Thome NASA WGCV Plenary # 43
CEOS Chair 2018 priorities Mauro Facchini European Commission
WGCV Overview K. Thome WGISS#45 / WGCV#43
CEOS Status/Overview Steven Hosford WGCV-43/WGISS-45 10th April 2018
Title Goes Here Name (s), Organization, CEOS Affiliation CEOS SIT-33
Return to First Principles
WGCV Chair’s Report K. Thome NASA WGCV Plenary # 44
Site classifications, definitions, and updates to Landnet
Synthesis of Carbon Observations Discussions in CGMS
Precipitation Virtual Constellation (P-VC)
International Financing Institutions (IFI) Engagement
Linkage with recent AC-VC activities
CEOS SIT Chair Priorities
Proposed 2019 CEOS chair initiative
Atmospheric Composition VC Report
WGISS Working Group for Information Systems & Services
Atmospheric Composition SG report
Committee on Earth Observation Satellites
CEOS Status/Overview Steven Hosford WGCV-43/WGISS-45 10th April 2018
Review of Chair Priorities
Recent activities of OCR-VC
LSI-VC Work Plan Updates
IPCC Guidelines and Way Forward
Committee on Earth Observation Satellites
SIT Chair Priorities and SIT-33 Objectives
WGCV Work Plan Actions K. Thome NASA WGCV Plenary # 44
WGCapD Perspectives of Work Plan –
Discussion Virtual Constellations
Plenary Decision Items
SIT Chair Introduction
CEOS-CGMS WGClimate Jörg Schulz, EUMETSAT, WGClimate Chair
Proposed Way Forward for CEOS on GHG Observations
Committee on Earth Observation Satellites
Observations for Forests
CEOS Organizational Matters
IPCC Guidelines and Way Forward
VC Title Goes Here Name (s), Organization, CEOS Affiliation
WG Title Goes Here Name (s), Organization, CEOS Affiliation
CEOS SIT Chair Priorities
Stephen Briggs European Space Agency SIT Workshop Agenda Item #13
CEOS Chair GHG Initiative Report and Workshop Outcomes
WG Calibration and Validation
Precipitation Virtual Constellation
Atmospheric Composition Virtual Constellation (AC-VC)
Atmospheric Composition Virtual Constellation (AC-VC)
VC/WG/AHT Working Day Outcomes
Recent Activities of the OST-VC
Ad hoc Team (AHT) Lifecycles
WGCV Chair’s Report C. Ong CSIRO WGCV Plenary # 45
CEOS Analysis Ready Data Strategy
Presentation transcript:

Committee on Earth Observation Satellites AC-VC Air Quality Constellation Validation Needs and Recommendations for Implementation Ben Veihelmann (ESA), Jay Al-Saadi (NASA), AC-VC co-chairs Dave Crisp (CalTech/NASA JPL), AC-VC GHG lead CEOS Plenary 2019 Agenda Item 5.6 Ha Noi, Viet Nam 14 – 16 October 2019

Overview Background Geo-AQ constellation Purpose of the whitepaper ‘Geo-AQ Validation Needs’ Contributors to the whitepaper Structure / table of content Recommendations Implementation strategy Endorsement and way forward

Background Several countries and space agencies are currently preparing geostationary satellites with a strong focus on Air Quality (AQ). The ‘Geo-AQ Constellation’ consists of the Korean Geostationary Environment Spectrometer (GEMS), launch early 2020; the Copernicus mission ‘Sentinel-4’, launch 2023; the Tropospheric Emissions: Monitoring of Pollution (TEMPO), launch early 2022; complemented by LEO missions with strong AQ capabilities (eg OMPS,S5P) serving as travelling standard for inter-calibration of the geostationary mission products. Responding to the CEOS Work Plan Action VC-3, AC-VC prepared a whitepaper ‘Geostationary Satellite Constellation for Observing Global Air Quality: Geophysical Validation Needs’. Status: Final review during AC-VC-15, June 2019, Tokyo, Japan Version 1.0 presented at CEOS 2019 SIT Technical Workshop, September 2019, Fairbanks, Alaska Version 1.1 addresses comments by EC: multi-view multispectral polarimeter observations added to auxiliary data for validating Geo-AQ products (Introduction, Section 4.2.1); multi-mission coordination of validation efforts recommended (Introduction, Section 4.2.1). Missing author added to the list of contributors. Ready for endorsement by CEOS

Geostationary Air Quality (Geo-AQ) Constellation TEMPO + Sentinel-4 + GEMS launch 2023 bb launch early 2022 launch 2020 Complemented by LEO missions with strong AQ capabilities:

Purpose of the ‘Geo-AQ Validation Needs’ Whitepaper Elaborate the validation needs of the Geo-AQ Constellation: focus on new challenges for geostationary atmospheric composition missions (new with respect to LEO heritage) enhancing the success of missions when seen as elements of a constellation Identify ‘Constellation Products’ common to the Geo-AQ missions enhanced value by establishing and monitoring inter-mission consistency Set quantitative inter-mission consistency targets for the Constellation Products taking into account individual product performances and the accuracy of validation methods Identify activities needed to assess and establish this consistency Activities to be performed consistently for each mission Activities addressing new Geo-AQ challenges and inter-mission consistency Coordination and continuity Make specific and actionable recommendations

Contributors to the Whitepaper The Whitepaper has been written by the science teams of the GEMS, Sentinel-4, and TEMPO missions and validation experts including Al-Saadi, Jay (NASA, USA; AC-VC) Cede, Alexander (Luftblick, Austria; AC-VC) Chance, Kelly (SAO, USA; AC-VC) Flynn, Lawrence E. (NOAA, USA, AC-VC; GSICS) Kim, Jhoon (Yonsei University, Republic of Korea; AC-VC) Kim, Sang-Woo (Seoul National University, Republic of Korea; AC-VC) Koopman, Rob (ESA, EU) Lambert, Jean-Christopher (IASB-BIRA, Belgium; AC-VC; WGCV) Lindstrot, Rasmus (EUMETSAT, EU) Loyola Diego (DLR, Germany; AC-VC) Munro, Rose (EUMETSAT, EU; AC-VC; GSICS) Van Roozendael, Michel (IASB-BIRA, Belgium; AC-VC; WGCV) Veihelmann, Ben (ESA, EU; AC-VC) Wang, Jun (University of Iowa, USA; AC-VC) Yoon, Jongmin (NIER, Republic of Korea; AC-VC)

Structure / Table of Content of the Whitepaper Executive Summary (1/2 page) Summary of all Recommendations (1 page) Geo-AQ Missions and Related LEO Missions Product Consistency Across the Constellation Validation Needs Activities That Need to be Performed Consistently for Each Mission Recommendations for Activities Addressing New Geo-AQ Challenges and Inter- mission Consistency Coordination and Continuity Reference Documents, List of Acronyms, Contributors, Annex: Geophysical Validation Infrastructure 40 pages without Annexes

Recommendations formulated in the Whitepaper Consistently perform intensive campaigns dedicated to the validation of the capability of the Geo-AQ missions to observe the diurnal cycle of the target species. Conduct joint validation campaigns with exchange of reference airborne and ground-based instruments. Further develop and apply approaches to the radiometric inter-calibration of the Geo-AQ missions. Further develop and apply approaches to the inter-calibration of the Level-2 products of the Geo-AQ missions. Systematically process the Level-2 Constellation Products of the Geo-AQ missions, using one selected common algorithm per Constellation Product. Further pursue the harmonization of the reference data used for validation and inter- mission consistency verification of Level-2 products. Implement a data centre for storage and exchange of all validation data collected for the Geo-AQ missions, accessible to the entire community involved in the validation. Implement a coordinating unit for ensuring the consistency of the approach and the metrics used for validating the Geo-AQ mission products and their inter-mission consistency.

Implementation Strategy for Recommendations Formulated in the Whitepaper Recommendation 1 expresses best practices for consistent validation of the individual missions. Remaining recommendations aim at an integrated constellation and continuity. The strategy is cost efficient by building on core validation activities of each individual mission needed anyway, irrespectively of the constellation. identifying and leveraging existing activities when possible, exploiting existing assets (LEO sensors as travelling standards, networks of inter- calibrated ground based sensors). Possible mechanisms are identified for those activities not yet in progress. Implementation should begin immediately, given the planned launch of the GEMS mission in early 2020.

Ongoing Activities Relevant to Implementation of the Recommendations NASA and ESA investments in Pandonia Global Network Consistently calibrated Pandora UV-Vis spectrometers and standard data protocols Provides Fiducial Reference Measurements for Geo-AQ Constellation Products ESA, NASA, and NIER deploy instruments, co-located with recommended ancillary measurements, at an increasing number of ground sites within the three GEO domains Supports Recommendations 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, 8. ESA and partner investments in inter-comparison of Fiducial Reference Measurements (CINDI, CINDI-2) Enhance traceability, accuracy, and harmonization, Development of airborne mapping spectrometers and operations demonstrating cost-effective satellite validation capability Validation-quality measurements have been demonstrated with two NASA instruments in several air quality campaigns (DISCOVER-AQ, KORUS-AQ, LMOS, LISTOS) conducted with international (NIER), national (US EPA, NOAA), and regional (LADCO, NESCAUM, universities) partners Four European instruments (VITO, BIRA-IASB, IUP-Bremen, TNO, TU-Delft, KNMI) have been intercompared in the AROMAPEX campaign Bilateral discussions underway for instrument exchanges between mission organizations Supports Recommendations 1, 2, 4, 6 WMO GSICS initiative expanded to include reflective solar backscatter measurements UV-Vis-NIR-SWIR Supports Recommendation 3

Cost efficient: travelling LEO std Planned Activities Relevant to Implementation of the Recommendations Announcements of Opportunity for validation activities are being planned by the Geo-AQ mission agencies Korea’s NIER is preparing an AO for GEMS Phase E1 geophysical validation for draft release late 2019 ESA AO for Sentinel-4 Phase E1 geophysical validation envisaged about 1.5 years before launch following the S5P approach. In addition EUMETSAT will initiate the required preparation for operational calibration and validation activities which will start in Phase E1 and continue throughout Phase E2 NASA AO for an expanded TEMPO science team, including additional validation activities, will be issued after successful TEMPO launch These opportunities can potentially support all Recommendations Preliminary discussions are underway for joint, companion, or harmonized science field campaign activities, including ground and airborne measurements, in 2022-23 timeframe In addition to the science objectives, satellite product validation would be a primary focus NASA, NIER, and other partners now beginning to plan a broader follow-on to KORUS-AQ after launches of GEMS and TEMPO Preliminary discussions underway among NASA, DLR, and other organizations within IGAC to also include European activities after launch of Sentinel-4 Supports Recommendations 1, 2, 4, 6 Cost efficient: travelling LEO std

As-Yet Unplanned Activities Relevant to Implementation of the Recommendations Support Recommendation 5: Systematically process the Level-2 Constellation Products of the Geo-AQ missions, using one selected common algorithm per Constellation Product. One option could be to express this as a priority within the Announcements of Opportunity planned by each organization Support Recommendation 7: Implement a data centre for storage and exchange of all validation data collected for the Geo-AQ missions, accessible to the entire community involved in the validation of the Geo-AQ mission products, very soon after acquisition. Demonstrated capability exists, e.g., the NASA Aura Validation Data Center (AVDC), ESA Validation Data Centre (EVDC), and NASA Airborne Science Data for Atmospheric Composition repository It may be most practical to implement consistent centres in each geographic region, given the intended inclusion of local regulatory monitoring measurements It would be up to one or more agencies to volunteer to host this activity Support Recommendation 8: Implement a coordinating unit for ensuring the consistency of the approach and the metrics used for validating the Geo-AQ mission products and their inter-mission consistency. Activity should leverage existing mechanisms, e.g. CEOS WG-VC, WMO GSICS, QA4EO framework Prioritize continuity of the Ongoing and Planned Activities summarized on previous slides

Endorsement and Way Forward Action VC-03 ‘Air Quality (AQ) Constellation Coordination’ addressed: Whitepaper ‘Geostationary Satellite Constellation for Observing Global Air Quality: Geophysical Validation Needs’ prepared by AC-VC Delivered to CEOS Plenary invited to Endorse the VC-03 white paper SIT and Executive leadership and next Work Plan Evolve VC-03 Deliverable to implementation