Randomized Controlled Trial of Family Centered Treatment in North Carolina Treatment and Study Overview for NC County Departments of Social Services September.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Successfully Implementing Evidence-Based Programs for Children and Families in North Carolina A Presentation for the Family Impact Seminar Michelle Hughes,
Advertisements

1 Department of Medical Assistance Services DD Waiver Provider Training Department of Medical Assistance Services Division.
JUVENILE JUSTICE TREATMENT CONTINUUM Joining with Youth and Families in Equality, Respect, and Belief in the Potential to Change.
Center for Innovative the Begun Center for Violence Prevention Research and Education 1.
Educational Access Project for DCFS An Overview of a Partnership Between Northern Illinois University and the Illinois Department of Children and Family.
Child Welfare Services Family centered services to achieve well- being through ensuring self-sufficiency, support, safety, and permanence. Dual tracks-
Building a System of Care in Child Welfare: North Carolina
Wraparound Milwaukee was created in 1994 to provide coordinated community-based services and supports to families of youth with complex emotional, behavioral.
Tania Hanford MS LPC PROMISE Counselor Fox Valley Area.
Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Health and Human Services Improving the Commonwealth’s Services for Children and Families A Framework.
Collaborative Mental Health Care Pilot Program Bidder’s Conference October 27, 2014.
LINKAGES IN STANISLAUS COUNTY VOICES OF FAMILIES AT TEAM MEETINGS.
Institutional Review Board (IRB) for Human Subject Protections: Working with the IRB Erin McClure, PhD Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences.
ACO Mapping Group Recommendations 1. Are the subclass members being identified? 2. Are the subclass members being assessed? 3. Are the subclass members.
Josette Dorius, Service Director Autism Council of Utah April 6, 2011.
Youth Mental Health and Addiction Needs: One Community’s Answer Terry Johnson, MSW Senior Director of Services Senior Director of Services Deborah Ellison,
Connecticut Department of Children and Families Agency Overview.
Coordinating Council on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Quarterly Meeting – October 21, 2011 Bryan Samuels, Commissioner Administration on.
The Alliance For Children's Rights Overview of Services.
Background Wraparound Milwaukee was created in 1994 to provide a coordinated and comprehensive array of community-based services and supports to families.
Managing Organizational Change A Framework to Implement and Sustain Initiatives in a Public Agency Lisa Molinar M.A.
Families Achieving Independence Through Recovery Detroit Department of Health and Wellness Promotion/Bureau of Substance Abuse Prevention Treatment & Recovery.
Stemming the Tides Minnesota’s Child Maltreatment Prevention Programs Seventh Annual Citizen Review Panel Conference May 22, 2008 Brenda Lockwood, MN Dept.
NC Health Choice for Children 2009 Revised 6/1/10.
Rhode Island Health Home Initiative NASHP 24 th Annual State Health Policy Conference, October 4, 2011 Deborah J. Florio, Administrator Medicaid Division.
March 12,  May 2010 Governor Bob McDonnell signed Executive Order 10 calling for a Housing Policy Framework  The Homeless Outcomes Policy Report.
LINKAGES FUNDING YOUR PROGRAM DESIGN CalWORKs/Child Welfare Partnership Project.
1 Executive Summary of the Strategic Plan and Proposed Action Steps January 2013 Healthy, Safe, Smart and Strong 1.
Institutional Review Board (IRB) for Human Subject Protections: Working with the IRB Erin A McClure, PhD Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences.
Purpose Of Training: To guide Clinicians in the completion of screens and development of Alternative Community Service Plans.
Foster Care After 18 AB12 signed into law September 30, 2010 Designed to align with the Federal Fostering Connections to Success Act Extends foster care.
Coalition for Educational Equity for Foster Youth
Children’s System of Care
Care Coordination for Children, Young Adults, and Their Families
Family-Agency Collaborative Training Team
Thank You for Joining Us We Will Begin Shortly
CT’s DCF-Head Start Partnership Working Together to Serve Vulnerable Families & Support the Development of At-Risk Children Presenters: Rudy Brooks Former.
Building Our Medical Neighborhood
Los Angeles Unified School District
Kinship care for the safety, permanency, and well-being of children removed from the home for maltreatment: A Summary of a Systematic Review Erin Geary.
NC CSS Solving the Mystery.
Module 5 HAIL Research This module provides an overview of how researchers will collect data with both Independent Living Specialist(ILS) and consumers.
No Place Like HOME Texas Kick Off Meeting
Maryland Healthy Transition Initiative
Tuolumne County Adult Child and Family Services
Home Visiting Collaboration
Remarks from the South Carolina Department of Social Services
MORES Mobile Outreach Response Engagement Stabilization Service
Grants Academy Session Three
Overview of Data from the Statewide FGDM Evaluation
4 Domains Child Welfare, Juvenile Education and Mental/Health
Fostering Connections To Success Act And What It Means For Texas Partners In CPS Reform Meeting, Jan. 14, 2009 Liz Kromrei, Department of Family and Protective.
TBI Waiver Services Information
Building Our Medical Neighborhood
Open Adoption Agreements
The context Child welfare New World order
Chelcie Oseni, MBA, BSN, RN Clinical Nursing Supervisor – Delta Grant
Effectively Training Parents in Behavior Analytic Interventions
IV-E Prevention Family First Implementation & Policy Work Group
Department of Social Services Home Visiting Program
Psychotropic Medication Use by Children in Texas Foster Care:
Permanency Planning Modified Manual
eDirectory: Connecting Families to Support & Success
Foster Care to 21 Carl E. Ayers, MSW
eDirectory: Connecting Families to Support & Success
Human Trafficking and Child Welfare Services
Blue Ridge Behavioral Healthcare
Toronto Child & Youth Advocacy Centre (CYAC)
Children Services Committee Meeting
Presentation transcript:

Randomized Controlled Trial of Family Centered Treatment in North Carolina Treatment and Study Overview for NC County Departments of Social Services September 2019

Focus: Parameters of the randomized controlled trial (RCT) of Family Centered Treatment in North Carolina. Target population: Youths who meet medical necessity for both FCT and Residential Level III out-of-home treatment (OHT) Goal: Provide an overview of the study Outline the potential roles/responsibilities for County DSS’ for youth in care participating in the RCT Answer any questions Introduction

Collaborative Project Partners Include: The Duke Endowment (Funder) The Family Centered Treatment Foundation Cardinal Innovations Healthcare Partners Behavioral Health Management Trillium (tentative) North Carolina FCT Providers Residential Level III OHT Providers Duke University’s Center for Child and Family Policy Duke University’s Margolis Center for Health Policy Collaborative Project

Why is Additional Research on FCT Needed? Existing Evidence is Promising: Quasi-experimental studies have found positive outcomes with juvenile justice and child welfare specialty populations (i.e., domestic violence related). FCT has practice-based evidence: more than 15 years of data with the child mental health population. No RCT studies to date with the child mental health population. Why is Additional Research on FCT Needed?

The Current Study First FCT RCT Study: Focus on Youth within the Behavioral Health System

Study Design Study Goals: Target population: Youths (11-17) authorized for a Level III OHT Determine if FCT, relative to “treatment as usual” leads to: Increased safety and permanency Improved wellbeing outcomes for youth and their caregivers, and Improved family functioning The study began in October of 2018 and runs through June of 2023. 375 families/youth in the FCT intervention group 375 families/youth in the control group We expect to approach 1,000 and enroll 750 total. CCFP research staff will track these youth/families for up to 18 months, even after treatment has concluded. Study Design

Study Design Randomization Randomization would occur at the MCO level within the Utilization Management division at each MCO. Birthdays would serve as the method by which youth are randomized Youth born on even numbered days will be randomized into FCT group. Youth born on odd days will be randomized into the OHT group. Study Design

Study Recruitment for Youths in DSS Custody Youth Randomized into FCT Youth Randomized into OHT Study Recruitment for Youths in DSS Custody MCO to coordinate with DSS to see if FCT would be an appropriate fit for the youth. If youth meets study inclusion criteria, MCO and DSS coordinate to get FCT provider out to talk to caregiver. FCT providers would be provided information about youth/families randomized into FCT by the MCOs and approach caregiver about participating in FCT instead of OHT. DSS to obtain consent to contact for youth/carejgiver(s) to participate in Duke study. MCO to contact DSS to let them know youth is eligible for study DSS to obtain consent tp contact for youth/caregiver(s) to participate in Duke study.

Study Recruitment for Youths in DSS Custody Obtaining Consent to Contact for Duke Study Recruitment for Youths in DSS Custody There are no NCDSS policies that would prevent this. (Letter from DHHS included in your handouts) If parental rights for an eligible youth have not been terminated, a county DSS would have to obtain a consent to contact from a biological parent for the child to participate in the Duke study. If a biological parent agreed Duke could interview bio parent, foster parent (if they also agreed), and the youth; compensate all three. Duke would also need a consent to contact for the foster parent. If parental rights have been terminated, a county DSS can sign the consent form for the youth to participate.

FCT Intervention Group Procedures for FCT Providers: Once contact information is received, FCT providers have 48 hours to make contact with family. Clinician, clinical director, or intake specialist/supervisor to make initial contact. If the family responds to contact, FCT providers will present families with information about why they might want to choose FCT over the Level III OHT. FCT Intervention Group

The family/youth may decline to participate in FCT and/or the research study. A youth/family can decline FCT but still be in the study. CCFP research staff will collect all data for both the FCT intervention and control groups for 18 months. No data collection done by DSS, FCT or OHT providers. Study Recruitment

FCT Intervention Group If the family agrees to participate in FCT, rather than the Level III OHT, the FCT providers will: Submit PCP to receive FCT to MCO within two business days. FCT provider will also contact MCO to let them know the PCP has been submitted so that the process can be prioritized. FCT Intervention Group

FCT Intervention Group If the family does NOT agree to participate in FCT, rather than the Level III OHT, the FCT providers will: Let MCO’s know of the family’s choice to decline FCT within 2 business days FCT Intervention Group Talk about intent to treat design

Interviews: Consenting families will be asked to participate in a baseline interview and three follow-up interviews over 18-months (4 interviews total) with CCFP research staff. Incentives: Participants (youth and their caregivers) will receive $60 for participating in the baseline interview ($50 for caregiver; $10 for youth). The stipend will increase at each follow-up interview thereafter: $75 for 6-month ($60 for caregiver; $15 for youth), $100 for 12-month ($80 for caregiver; $20 for youth), and $165 for 18-month interviews ($115 for caregiver; $50 for youth). Study

Summary Responsibilities for County DSS’: Discuss option of FCT for youths with submitted Level III authorization and an even birthday For all children eligible for the study: Obtain consent to contact for Duke study from bio and foster parents for youths for whom parental rights have not been terminated Sign consent form for youths for whom parental rights have been terminated Number of youths/month/county: Likely < 2 Summary

Questions Possible challenges/issues? Other feedback? Questions for us? Questions