Child Abuse and Neglect Institute

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
On The Right Track Multiple Response System (MRS) and System of Care (SOC) North Carolina’s Child Welfare Reform Model 1, 2008.
Advertisements

PORTFOLIO.
SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGISTS Helping children achieve their best. In school. At home. In life. National Association of School Psychologists.
Five Protective Factors
Southern Alberta Child and Family Services
Denver Family Integrated Drug Court
Introduction to Strengthening Families: An Effective Approach to Supporting Families Massachusetts Home Visiting Initiative A Department of Public Health.
STANDARDS FOR SCHOOL LEADERS DR. Robert Buchanan Southeast Missouri State University.
Child Welfare Courts of Future ALL THE PROCESS THAT IS DUE Managing Cases, Managing Change, Managing to Have a Life.
Multiple Response System (MRS) and System of Care (SOC) North Carolina’s Child Welfare Reform Model The North Carolina Foster and Adoptive Parent Association.
1 Agency/Court Collaboration in the CFSR: ENGAGING COURTS AND THE LEGAL SYSTEM The National Child Welfare Resource Center For Organizational Improvement.
JUVENILE COURT: CONTEXT AND OVERVIEW Janet Mason March 8, 2006 Institute of Government UNC at Chapel Hill.
Partnering with Families for MRS/SOC Success!. North Carolina’s Family Support and Child Welfare System Family-centered practice and system of care principles.
Collaborating Across Systems– Working with Education and the Courts Michelle Lustig, MSW, Ed.D Coordinator, Foster Youth and Homeless Education Services.
VISITATION 1. Competencies  SW Ability to complete visitation plans that underscore the importance of arranging and maintaining immediate, frequent,
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Parent Leadership Lisa Brown and Lisa Conlan Family Resource Specialists Technical Assistance Partnership.
KidsVoice Multidisciplinary Approach to Dependency Advocacy Scott Hollander, Executive Director.
MODULE V LEADERSHIP ROLE OF THE JUDGE AND ICWA: ON AND OFF THE BENCH IN MEANINGFUL ENGAGEMENT AND COLLABORATION MODEL ICWA JUDICIAL CURRICULUM.
1 Adopting and Implementing a Shared Core Practice Framework A Briefing/Discussion Objectives: Provide a brief overview and context for: Practice Models.
1 Moving Children to Timely Permanence Training for Legal Representation for Children and Parents A Report to the State Roundtable of Pennsylvania.
Bringing Protective Factors to Life in the Child Welfare System New Hampshire.
Lisa Pion-Berlin, PhD President and Chief Executive Officer Parents Anonymous ® Inc. Leah Davis, California State Parent Team Achieving Shared Leadership®
Partnership Plan Agreement Together – Making a Difference Respected Partners Nurturing Children Supporting Families Strengthening Communities Respected.
Judge Mark Pouley Commissioner Michelle Ressa October 9, 2012 ICW Summit.
Connecticut Department of Children and Families Agency Overview.
Collaborating with Courts to Reduce and Eliminate Disparities Nancy B. Miller, Director, Permanency Planning for Children Department, National Council.
533: Building a Trauma-Informed Culture in Child Welfare.
Positive Outcomes for All: The Institutional Analysis in Fresno County’s DSS Catherine Huerta 1.
Mountains and Plains Child Welfare Implementation Center Maria Scannapieco, Ph.D. Professor & Director Center for Child Welfare UTA SSW National Resource.
Child and Family Service Review CFSR 101. Child and Family Service Review CFSR stands for the Child and Family Service Review. It is the federal government’s.
MODULE I: WELCOME, INTRODUCTIONS & LEARNING OBJECTIVES MODEL ICWA JUDICIAL CURRICULUM.
Mountains and Plains Child Welfare Implementation Center Maria Scannapieco, Ph.D. Professor & Director Center for Child Welfare UTA SSW Steven Preister,
IOWA PARTNERSHIPS Kara Hudson,CFSR State Coordinator (515) Michelle Muir, Executive Officer (515)
Developed by: July 15,  Mission: To connect family strengthening networks across California to promote quality practice, peer learning and mutual.
Strategic Planning  Hire staff  Build a collaborative decision- making body  Discuss vision, mission, goals, objectives, actions and outcomes  Create.
Standards and Competences for Social work Education for working with children and youth Prof dr Nevenka Zegarac Ass MA Anita Burgund.
In FY10, there were 66,897 confirmed cases of child abuse and neglect. 26,074 cases (39%) were children three years and younger. In Fort Bend County,
LOS ANGELES COUNTY. To learn about the Katie A. Settlement Agreement and its impact on the Child Welfare and Mental Health systems To appreciate the Shared.
CHAPTER 7 DELIVERY OF YOUR COMPREHENSIVE SCHOOL COUNSELING PROGRAM
Social and Emotional Learning
Introduction to the Florida Department of Juvenile Justice (DJJ)
CT’s DCF-Head Start Partnership Working Together to Serve Vulnerable Families & Support the Development of At-Risk Children Presenters: Rudy Brooks Former.
Resolving Foster Parent Concerns
Chautauqua Tapestry Family driven ~ Youth guided ~ Culturally sensitive Community based ~ Evidence-based.
ENSURING ACCESS TO JUSTICE IN A NEUTRAL COURT
OACCA Residential Transformation Conference
Educational Advocacy And The CASA Volunteer.
HEALTHY WORK environments
Maryland Healthy Transition Initiative
Family Preservation in Georgia
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
This briefing is intended to give you an understanding of:
School Counselors as Advocates
Including protective factors in assessment
Tuolumne County Adult Child and Family Services
The Child Welfare System
Human Resources Competency Framework
NAEYC Early Childhood Standards
Stakeholder Webinar September 20, 2018
Improving Outcomes for Children and Youth: Foster Care Redesign
Strategies to increase family engagement
Stakeholder Webinar September 20, 2018
Texas Department of Family and Protective Services December 19, 2014
Children’s Law Center of Minnesota
Marie Crosson, Executive Director
School Counselors as Advocates
Building Stronger Families Protective Factors framework
What does prevention services act mean for Iowa juvenile court judges?
Improving Outcomes for Children and Youth: Foster Care Redesign
Presentation transcript:

Child Abuse and Neglect Institute Improving Outcomes for Children and Families MODULE: Introduction to the Leadership Role of the Judge National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges

IMPROVING OUTCOMES FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES Establishing the Foundation …. The Leadership Role of the Judge

Learning Objectives Over the course of the next few days … Understand the purpose and importance of the juvenile court Understand the unique role and responsibilities of juvenile court judges Understand the importance of the judicial leadership role (both on-the-bench and off- the-bench) in child welfare Understand your own leadership style and the components of effective judicial leadership

Juvenile Courts Developmental History Emergence of a philosophical belief that the state owes children protection from harm, behavioral support and the chance at rehabilitation Give some historical perspective. Expand on the slides The First Juvenile Court -Cook County, Illinois (established 1899; photos 1912 & 1944)

Juvenile Court Today Juvenile court is a unique institution that combines social and legal attributes to serve public interests relating to children and families

Purpose of Juvenile Court Ensure children are raised to become productive citizens Protect children from abuse and neglect Preserve and strengthen families so they can raise their children without state interference The Judge or the court having an obligation to protect children was then and is now a concept that “ traditional judges” have a difficult time grasping.

Role of the Juvenile Court Explain and provide due process Transfer of responsibility for the child to a non-parent Protect the child’s rights, even when a ward of the state Articulate, establish, or reinforce community norms governing the care and protection of children Children had no rights so protecting them was not something the court did.

The Role of the Juvenile Court Judge Doesn’t the judge just decide cases? Not in juvenile court! The juvenile court judge must do much more than decide cases. The juvenile court is the original problem solving court. The role of the juvenile court judge involves leadership functions. The judge must connect with system stakeholders and the community to address the needs of the children and families before the court. Emphasize the collaboration role bringing everyone together to identify and solve problems to improve outcomes.

Responsibilities of the Judge in child abuse and neglect cases Parens patriae surrogate Gatekeeper Jurist of law and fact Administrator of due process Inquiring magistrate of well-being, safety and plan for children in care Applier of therapeutic/restorative justice principles Judges job to focus on well being and safety of children.

Responsibilities of the Judge in Child Abuse and Neglect Cases Permanent Plan for the child Monitor services provided Set standards which the juvenile system will be governed Provide leadership to community and ALL participants in the juvenile court system Setting standards and expectations for the court and the community. Important policy role of the judge. You do not have to be the presiding judge to engage the community in the well being and safety of its children.

UNIQUE ROLE OF THE JUDGE IN CHILD ABUSE AND NEGLECT CASES Includes many non-traditional functions judicial, administrative, collaborative and advocacy components Decisions set standards w/in community and systems connected to the court Ensure systems work efficiently and fairly Judicial leadership both on and off- the-bench

LEADERSHIP ROLE OF THE JUDGE Juvenile and family court judges lead from the bench in cases when they: Fully exercise their oversight role Hold all stakeholders accountable for substantive hearing process and timely case processing Juvenile and family court judges lead from the bench in cases when they exhibit exemplary judicial practice, fully exercise their oversight role, and insist on holding all stakeholders in the child abuse and neglect case process (including themselves), accountable for a substantive hearing process and timely case processing. Juvenile and family court judges have the authority by statute or court rule to order, enforce and review delivery of services and treatment for children and families. The court must insist that the proposed plan or disposition is complete and, when it is not, direct the agency to respond. The court’s leadership responsibilities when exercising its oversight role include the application of sanctions against parties who fail to appropriately respond to court orders. Judges face many challenges when hearing child abuse and neglect cases –poor data, busy dockets, insufficiently trained staff, insufficient or ineffective services, and not enough qualified attorneys for parents and children. To address these challenges, judges must also exercise leadership off-the-bench in collaboration with the child welfare agency and other system partners. This includes encouraging multi-disciplinary training, promoting collaboration by bringing stakeholders to the table to discuss improvements, sharing data and encouraging evidence-based and outcome informed practice, and advocating for improvements in the administration of justice. Judges should encourage the continuing education of all who serve in the juvenile and family court system, including themselves, with professional training topics encompassing the latest knowledge of child abuse and neglect issues, the prevailing laws and effective court practices, cultural competence, gender and identity fairness, as well as encouraging interdisciplinary education that includes training of all stakeholders on the same topics.

Reasons for Judicial Oversight Court/agency involvement is simultaneous Multiple person/agency involvement creates potential for delay, error and conflict Court sets and adjusts direction and plan Court approves placement, visits and services Court enforces participants’ involvement Court ensures all steps that can be taken are being taken Court cannot abdicate responsibility / rubber stamp agency activity.

Judicial Oversight – the Big Picture To ensure that every child that should be in care is in care, but not a single child more To ensure that every child that is in care is in a safe, nurturing placement that is supportive of the permanency plan A Home Would be Heaven – Silvia, Age 13, foster youth From Foster Youth Art Initiative, Texas Department of Family and Protective Services

LEADERSHIP ROLE OF THE JUDGE “Judges who embark on a path of excellence in handling of child abuse and neglect cases recognize the importance of achieving timely permanency through active judicial case oversight demonstrated by effective and timely case scheduling, by thorough hearings with informed and prepared participation by all parties, and by regular review hearings. A self- disciplined court can discipline the whole system.” From: NCJFCJ (1999), Judge’s Guidebook on Adoption and Other Permanent Homes for Children.

LEADERSHIP ROLE OF THE JUDGE Juvenile and family court judges lead off the bench when they: Address court and system challenges by encouraging/supporting/participating in Multidisciplinary Training Court Improvement Collaborative Teams Efforts to Share Data Juvenile and family court judges lead from the bench in cases when they exhibit exemplary judicial practice, fully exercise their oversight role, and insist on holding all stakeholders in the child abuse and neglect case process (including themselves), accountable for a substantive hearing process and timely case processing. Juvenile and family court judges have the authority by statute or court rule to order, enforce and review delivery of services and treatment for children and families. The court must insist that the proposed plan or disposition is complete and, when it is not, direct the agency to respond. The court’s leadership responsibilities when exercising its oversight role include the application of sanctions against parties who fail to appropriately respond to court orders. Judges face many challenges when hearing child abuse and neglect cases –poor data, busy dockets, insufficiently trained staff, insufficient or ineffective services, and not enough qualified attorneys for parents and children. To address these challenges, judges must also exercise leadership off-the-bench in collaboration with the child welfare agency and other system partners. This includes encouraging multi-disciplinary training, promoting collaboration by bringing stakeholders to the table to discuss improvements, sharing data and encouraging evidence-based and outcome informed practice, and advocating for improvements in the administration of justice. Judges should encourage the continuing education of all who serve in the juvenile and family court system, including themselves, with professional training topics encompassing the latest knowledge of child abuse and neglect issues, the prevailing laws and effective court practices, cultural competence, gender and identity fairness, as well as encouraging interdisciplinary education that includes training of all stakeholders on the same topics.

LEADERSHIP ROLE OF THE JUDGE “Judges must convene and engage the community in meaningful partnerships to promote safety, permanency, and well-being of children to improve system responses. The juvenile court must model and promote collaboration, mutual respect, and accountability among all participants in the child welfare system and the community at large” Key Principles of Permanency Planning, NCJFCJ

LEADERSHIP ROLE OF THE JUDGE Judicial responsibility for impartiality does not preclude judicial leadership.

NCJFCJ LEADERSHIP RESOLUTION

Summary –Judicial Responsibility in CHILD ABUSE AND NEGLECT Cases Judges must exercise strong judicial oversight of cases Court must hold system accountable Judges can be active in policy, rules and procedures development Judges must act as convener and advocate to ensure accountability Judges must hold participants accountable– including themselves Judges should exercise leadership both on and off- the- bench