Causes (“Drivers”) of Climate Change?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Well-being of Nations Chapter 1 Emerging Social and Economic Concerns.
Advertisements

Energy. oil and natural gas  supply 62% all energy consumed worldwide  how to transition to new sources?  use until mc of further use exceeds mc of.
Will CO2 Change What We Do?
Said Chehab ALMEE Ramses Amman Workshop June 2010 Enhancement of Energy Efficiency Policies and Renewable Energy Sources in the Mediterranean region, a.
Sociology and Climate Change Psychology is how individual things make a difference Sociology is how social things make a difference.
Human Population Growth
Towards a Low Carbon Future: China’s Green Development Policy and Practice Ye QI Climate and Carbon Policy Institute (CPI) Tsinghua University & China.
Predicting our Climate Future
U.S. Energy Information Administration Independent Statistics & Analysis Net energy analysis: a policy analysis perspective Net Energy Analysis.
Energy Energy supply & demand as a “social project” What energy does Why we want & need energy Forms & uses of energy, & energy quality Explaining energy.
1 POLS 384 Lec. 12 Energy, Environment & Security.
Energy Management and Policy 09/10/2004The Energy System – Current Situation and Market Trends (Part II) M.Sc. in Engineering Policy and Management of.
Energy Development in China - From a View Point of Sustainable Development Yang Hongwei, Zhou Dadi Energy Research Institute, P. R. China
Trade and Climate Change: International Perspective Mac Callaway, Ph.D UNEP-RISØ Center Technical University of Denmark CPA International.
© OECD/IEA – 2011 Key Insights from IEA Indicator Analysis ENERGY INDICATORS Efficient Power Generation 2011 Roundtable 4: Efficient use of energy in the.
The Science and Economics of Energy: Learning about Solar Energy.
Objective: Analyze several trends that will impact upon the use of technology in the home and family.
1 Macroeconomic Impacts of EU Climate Policy in AIECE November 5, 2008 Olavi Rantala - Paavo Suni The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.
THINKING LONG TERM: Confronting Global Climate Change Written by James J. MacKenzie Senior Associate World Resources Institute (WRI)
Chapter 7 The Human Population. China’s Population Human population size, affluence, and resource consumption all have interrelated impacts on the environment.
Earth’s Changing Environment Lecture 15 Energy Conservation.
Complete Climate Impacts Lecture. Vulnerability Multidimensional vulnerability AR5, WGII, Chapter 13 Tschakert.
© OECD/IEA INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY Worldwide Trends in Energy Use and Efficiency Key Insights from IEA Indicator Analysis ENERGY INDICATORS.
Sustainable Energy Systems The EU “WETO” World Energy, Technology and climate policy Outlook 2030 Domenico Rossetti di Valdalbero European Commission,
The Post Carbon Society Klausegger Nina Kulmer Ulrike Nemiri Sabrina-Sigrid.
Part II 1. Determinants of Population Growth Discussion What are the determinants? Why is it so hard to change?
Factors Influencing the Automobile Industry. Factors that affect Automobile Industry  Anti pollution issues  Alternatives cars such as electric cars.
WHAT IS NEW : PERCEPTION & POLITICS NATIONAL ACTION PROGRAMMES SHIFTS IN GROWTH PATHWAYS WOULD RESULT IN AVOIDANCE OF EMISSIONS, NOT THE OTHER WAY ROUND.
Ecological Economics of Energy: The Potential for a Transition to Renewables CANUSSEE Conference 2015, Vancouver, Canada Jonathan M. Harris
NS4054 Fall Term 2015 Climate Change and Energy Security.
Electric Cars By :Chrismene Dorcenat. Electric Cars ELECTRIC CARS ARE POWERED BY AN ELECTRIC MOTOR INSTEAD OF A GASOLINE ENGINE. THE ELECTRIC MOTOR GETS.
with Area Proportional to Population
Chapter 7 The Human Population. 1. Scientists Disagree on Earth ’ s Carrying Capacity Every 5 days, the human population grows by 1 million people – 1.8.
How Carbon Intensity Effects Kaya. Population 2014 Population Growth Rates USA:.77 Definition: The average annual percent change in the population, resulting.
Economics & the environment. Issues with the environment are global: 1.Need SUSTAINABLE development: Developing countries have a growing population, they.
© OECD/IEA Do we have the technology to secure energy supply and CO 2 neutrality? Insights from Energy Technology Perspectives 2010 Copenhagen,
Introduction to Supply-side Policies Demand-side policies have one major weakness: they are not effective at promoting long-run economic growth. PL SRAS.
Brant Liddle ESI, Singapore Perry Sadorsky York University, Canada
Chapter 7 The Human Population.
World Energy and Environmental Outlook to 2030
Price System Total Revenue Demand Supply Elasticity.
Being Part of the Solution
Econ Ch 2.2 The Free Market.
“A remarkable set of contemplations…”
Section 4 Lecture November 2016 Mr. Gammie
Supply, demand, and the market
SE Reliance on and depletion of fossil fuels
Energy Efficiency Of Cars
Prof. Dr. Claudia Kemfert Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung
The End of the Age of Oil Akito Matsumoto
Sociology and Climate Change
Environmental and Natural Resource Economics
Was the Kyoto Protocol Effective?
Key features of Key features of 2015 Growth in GDP and energy.
Thursday’s Assignment
Causes (“Drivers”) of Climate Change?
Energy Technology Policy Progress and Way Forward
[ 7.3 ] Economic Growth Learning Objectives
Fuel Economy in Macedonia Transfer of know-how
Unit One: Supply and Demand.
Growth Policy: Why Economic Growth Rates Differ
Chapter 7 The Human Population.
Think of 3 things in your life that you have either bought or were given to you that you wanted more then anything. (this could be recent or from back.
Supply!.
Chapter 18 Growth and Sustainability in the Twenty-First Century
Chapter 2 Section 1.
Relationship Between Demand, Supply and Price.
Environmental and Natural Resource Economics
Assignment 2: Due Thurs, next week Drivers of climate change
Presentation transcript:

Causes (“Drivers”) of Climate Change? Part II

Summary: Annualized Growth Rates Global Oregon CO2 Trends doubles CO2 by: 2.4% 2041 1.6% 2055 Population 1.3% 1.7% Affluence 1.8% 4.3% Population*Affluence 3.1% 6.0% Technology -0.7% -4.2%

Creating a Model of Climate Drivers What factors lead to P, A, and T? Personal factors, as identified above Structural factors Understand processes that lead to emissions to identify points for “policy intervention”

Creating a Model of Climate Drivers ??? Population (people) ??? ??? ??? Affluence ($GDP/person) Impact (CO2 Emissions) ??? ??? Technology (CO2/$GDP) ??? ??? ???

Creating a Model of Climate Drivers Structural factors Values related to “what’s a good life” Kids Stuff Freedom Infrastructure: US: 20 tons/yr; EU 10 tons/yr What factors influence the rate of population growth?

Creating a Model of Climate Drivers ??? Population (people) ??? ??? ??? Affluence ($GDP/person) Impact (CO2 Emissions) ??? ??? Technology (CO2/$GDP) ??? ??? ???

Determinants of Affluence Growth Discussion What are the determinants? Why is it so hard to change? How does it relate to CO2 emissions?

Environmental Kuznets Curve The Graph Graph of the relationship between increasing affluence (income: GDP per capita) and pollution levels What do you expect it to be?

Environmental Kuznets Curve The Graph

Environmental Kuznets Curve The Logic As people get richer, three competing things happen: People have more money and so buy more stuff and so pollution/emissions increase But, after a certain point, this is more than offset by the fact that as people have more money, they start caring more about the environment and demand government protection of it And, more money correlates with service economy which “displaces” or “offshores” the pollution

Changing Affluence Growth Some policies do influence consumption patterns Buddhist monks Jewish observance of Shabbat Mormon tithing Voluntary simplicity: “frugality of consumption” So do social norms “More, More, More said the baby.” “I want a better life for my kids.” “I need a raise.” “I need a vacation.” Yet affluence also appears “off limits” politically (though see “Confronting Consumption”) Source: http://www.simpleliving.net/voluntary_simplicity_part_1.asp

Creating a Model of Climate Drivers ??? Population (people) ??? ??? ??? Affluence ($GDP/person) Impact (CO2 Emissions) ??? ??? Technology (CO2/$GDP) ??? ??? ???

Determinants of Technology Growth Discussion What are the determinants? Why is it so hard to change? How does it relate to CO2 emissions?

The Jevons Paradox Jevons Paradox: technological progress that increases efficiency of a resource being used leads to MORE of that resource being used. “Technological improvements that increased the efficiency of coal-use led to the increased consumption of coal [and therefore] could not be relied upon to reduce fuel consumption” (Wikipedia) York (UO Sociology Prof) showed in most countries for past 50 years, each unit of nonfossil-fuel energy displaced less than ¼ unit of fossil-fuel energy and each unit of nonfossil-fuel electricity displaced less than 1/10th” (York 2013).

Jevons Paradox The Logic As technology becomes more efficient, the price of that technology declines and two competing things happen. Pollution per unit goes down Number of units used goes up, because they are cheaper York’s point is that We might expect people to shift to renewables but actually, it lowers the overall prices of energy and we end

Changing Behavior: How Hard Can It Be? If I told you I had a new technology that could increase your car’s fuel efficiency by 20% and reduce your CO2 emissions by 20%, would you use it? How much would you pay for it?

Changing Behavior: How Hard Can It Be? It’s the gas pedal Most people drive 75 mph on freeways Slowing to 65 mph decreases emissions by ~10% Slowing to 55 mph decreases emissions by ~20% No law is required! Source: http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/driveHabits.shtml

Which of these drivers are we addressing?

We are not addressing two of the drivers Population - No Affluence - No Technology – Yes I don’t think improving technology alone can get us there Can we invent new technology? If we do, can we get people to use it?

Population and affluence: the role of government Population and affluence reflect deep-seated values Democracies usually see values as inputs to government policy not targets of government policy Democracies tend NOT to see “shaping values” as an appropriate role for government

Population and affluence: alternatives to government Many people DO see “shaping values” as an appropriate role for other institutions Religions Families Corporations Social movements Conscious communities