Roadway Data Governance

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
HFST Council Meeting FHWA Update Frank Julian Federal Highway Administration Resource Center - Safety and Design Team August, ATSSA Mid Year.
Advertisements

Statewide Traffic Engineers Meeting Rumble Strip(e) June 16, 2011 Simone Ardoin Assistant Road Design Engineer Administrator.
Safety Conversation: NLTAPA Conference Michael S. Griffith Director Office of Safety Technologies Federal Highway Administration.
A Comprehensive Study on Pavement Edge Line Implementation Presented by: Mark J. Morvant, P.E. Associate Director, Research Louisiana Transportation Research.
OPEN HOUSE PUBLIC MEETING FOR LA 86 & LA 320: ROUNDABOUT IBERIA PARISH State Project No. H Federal Aid Project No. H
May 2014 Operations Planning Construction Design VISION Process 1.Receive design files from Projectwise -Create Maps to determine ownership and maintenance.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. Mission Statement Plan, Design, Construct, Operate and Maintain the roadway system under the jurisdiction of Lee County.
Office of Highway Safety Highway Factors David Rayburn.
WVDOT GTI SECTION Status Update for Districts. AGENDA Introduction. Introduction. Status Update. Status Update. How to Spatially Enable Database. How.
WVDOT GTI SECTION Status Update for Miss Utility.
North Carolina’s New Statewide Road Centerline Data Sarah Wray, GISP, CGCIOTim Sheldon, GISP Spatial Data ManagerBusiness Analyst Engineering Transportation.
V ehicle I nfrastructure I ntegration Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator for Operations and Acting Program Manager for ITS Joint Program Office.
Working Together to Save Lives An Introduction to the FHWA Safety Program for FHWA’s Safety Partners.
1 Some Findings on Public Outreach for Work Zones.
Module Funding Sources, Requirements, and Opportunities Identify, access, and share funding to support road safety initiatives.
Jason Chapman Data Collection & Management Systems.
HSM: Another Tool for Safety Management in Wyoming 1 Excellence in Transportation.
3000 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 208 Washington, DC
Orange County Traffic Signal System Consolidation of Services Study Commission Meeting September 8, 2005.
Assessing the Marginal Cost of Congestion for Vehicle Fleets Using Passive GPS Data Nick Wood, TTI Randall Guensler, Georgia Tech Presented at the 13 th.
The Safety Problem Is Global The Safety Solution Is Local and Personal Business of Saving Lives.
The Fargo/Moorhead Area Interstate Operations Study Opportunities and Planned Activities Presentation for the Mn/DOT Travel Demand Modeling Coordinating.
Putting Together a Safety Program Kevin J. Haas, P.E.—Traffic Investigations Engineer Oregon Department of Transportation Traffic—Roadway Section (Salem,
Utah Research Benefits Value of Research Taskforce July 29, 2015 Cameron Kergaye Utah Department of Transportation.
Abstract Background Methodology Methods While the project is in the data-collection and background research phase, there are several studies that utilize.
VBMP RCL Workshop: Using VDOT Data November 4, 2015.
The Metropolitan Houston Traffic Safety Program Houston-Galveston Area Council Houston, TX.
INCORPORATING INCOME INTO TRAVEL DEMAND MODELING Brent Spence Bridge Case Study October 13, 2015.
AASHTO Strategic Highway Safety Plan Development & Implementation Status 2004 Traffic Records Forum David M. Smith Senior Transportation Specialist, Office.
Roadway Data Extraction Technical Assistance Program (RDETAP) Robert Pollack October 25,
Comparative Crash Data Analysis Pasco County, FL US 19 Corridor.
Geometric Design: General Concept CE331 Transportation Engineering.
1 THE HIGHWAY SAFETY MANUAL Michael S. Griffith Federal Highway Administration July 26 th, 2004.
Integration of PASER & GIS WLIA March 4, 2004 Presentation Outline Road Centerlines –Overview –Creating –Attribute –Uses –Paser Geocoding Process –Overview.
SUCCESSFUL APPLICATION FOR HIGHWAY SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (HSIP) GRANTS Presented By: Patrick V. DeChellis Deputy Director Los Angeles County Department.
1 Element 1: The Systemic Safety Project Selection Process Element 1: 4-Step Project Selection Process.
Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program Module 1: How to Determine Which Resources Should be Considered in a SCEA How to identify what.
Federal Highway Administration University Course on Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Publication No. FHWA-HRT Bicycle and Pedestrian Planning.
AASHTO Overview. WHAT IS AASHTO?  American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials  A nonprofit association founded in 1914  Members.
Statewide Pedestrian/Bicycle Data Collection Study Federal Certification of Statewide Planning Process Florida Department of TRANSPORTATION July 13, 2016.
Integrating State and Local Safety Data Rhode Island Experience Traffic Records Forum 08/09/2016 Baltimore, MD.
Crash rate per hundred-million Vehicle Kilometers
Adjusting Speed Limits
2017 Traffic Records Forum August 7, 2017 New Orleans, LA Andrea Bill
Comparing Systemic Approaches: A Kentucky Example
Data and Resources Available for Safety Analysis
Overview of FHWA CMAQ & System Performance Measures
Project Management Team Meeting #3
Advancing Local Road Safety Data Analysis
HSR Crossing Safety Update Elliot A
Developing an Active Transportation Database for Southern California
Statewide Lane Reconfiguration Screening
Data-Driven Safety Analysis
Improving Crash Data Location
Highway Safety Team Staff Meeting SMART Portal HSIP Application Demonstration Systemic Safety Improvement (SSI) November 21,2017.
ITTS FEAT Tool Methodology Review ITTS Member States Paula Dowell, PhD
Intersection Safety Improvement Toolbox
County State Aid Needs.
Ventura County Traffic Model (VCTM) VCTC Update
Instructor: Dr. Francisco Olivera CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Traffic Study Presented by Keith Wenners, pe, ptoe
Geometric Design: General Concept CE331 Transportation Engineering.
Systematic Identification of High Crash Locations
MPO Board Presentation
Developing Tools for MIRE-FDE Data Collection on Non-State Roadways
MIRE FDEs The Clock is Ticking
Second U.S. Roadway Safety Data Capabilities Assessment
Reduced Datasets from Roadway Information Database (RID)
Contributing Factors for Focus Crash Types and Facility Types Raghavan Srinivasan University of North Carolina Highway Safety Research Center (UNC HSRC)
Executive Sponsor: Tom Church, Cabinet Secretary
Presentation transcript:

Roadway Data Governance Acadiana Planning Commission Lafayette, Louisiana Roadway Data Governance

History LA Department of Transportation and Development performed a significant data collection on all of the roadways in Louisiana Data that needs to be maintained Gaps remaining Technical assistance from FHWA to develop a plan for managing and updating data About 3 Fugro elements – Right and Left Turn Lanes, Toll, Terrain, Pavement Type, Number of Lanes, Intersection Control, Grades, Vertical/Horizontal Curve, HOV Lanes, Rail crossings, Sidewalks, ect how the data was collected – Video – ran van along all roads Data gaps – traffic count data, other MIRE elements on local roads

Framework for Maintaining Local Data Acadiana Planning Commission – regional 7 county planning commission Planning Commission Staff - state and local councils for GIS data development Regional Aerial Data Collection and Coordination Effort Framework for Maintaining Local Data Also have 8 parish/county regional safety coalition – have included the parish from that region State GIS council – developing schema for local and state roads – intend to integrate that Aerial data is orthos and obliques – high level imagery

Data Governance Group LA-DOTD is also a significant partner Stakeholders from all levels of local government: Public Works Sheriff’s Office 911 Commission Tax Assessors LA-DOTD is also a significant partner By having a group, it provides legitimacy to the work that we are doing. Most local agencies work in silos and not regionally, so by working together we could demonstrate the benefit of sharing the information. The local agencies would receive a data collection that was better than what they could develop on their own. Sheriff’s offices might seem like outliers, but they have a clear need for public safety and have much of the best information on roadway locations, addressing, and even traffic count data. Several of the Sheriff’s offices in the region have speed trailers that also collect a significant amount of ADT information since they will leave them at the location for a week or two. The State DOT has been an invaluable resource in working with the local agencies and providing them with much needed data

Duties of the Data Governance Group Guidance on local data collection Guidance on data conflation Provide a framework for implementation For instance, we had to rely on several relationships between group members to receive the data collection. We had to have one assessor call another assessor to show legitimacy to provide the data. However, we did run into one agency that refused to provide any information, saying that the data was proprietary.

Project Outline Maintain primacy of state data and edit it as the base map with state schema Develop a methodology for updating the data Obtain Data

Range of Local Roadway Data GIS Full set of roadway information State DOT data Access Database Focused on segment condition and some characteristic data Public Works Department in Mid Sized County GIS and Access Database Location and addresses Aerial imagery Assessor and 911 Commissions Characteristic data – lane widths Planning Commission also has aerial data

Local Count Data ID Road Name Average Daily Count Speed Limit Percent Vehicles Exceeding Limit by 10 Miles or More Speeding Time 1 Austin 327 40 77% Day and night 2 Beck Miller 874 20 47% 3 Cheramie 665 48% Morning and afternoon to evening 4 Cosay 243 45 1% Morning to midafternoon 5 Flagstation 434 35 59% Morning 6 Lawyer 734 4% Morning and afternoon 7 Longwood 297 14% Afternoon into evening 8 Meche 516 15% 9 Nonc Lol 250 Afternoon 11 Oscar Rivette 557 12% 12 Rainbow 195 Late night 13 River Birch 176 3% Morning and afternoon into evening 14 Soileau 2201 15 Sugar Mill 43 Mid day 16 Gulino 336 Day and all night

Data Integration 3 Levels of Data: Roadway Locations Aerial Imagery Databases

Missing Segment Missing Segment

Process for Maintaining and Distributing Data

Maintenance Methodology Utilizing ESRI crowdsource programming for low tech workers to provide information Working with local agencies to provide information on an annual basis

https://arcg.is/0juzri

Implementation of Data Collection Utilize roadway locations, new volumes, and characteristic data for Local Road Safety Plan update and safety project development Roadway locations key for spatial analysis – frequently have a spike in crashes on new roadway segments and widenings

Contact Information Ashley Moran, Planner II amoran@planacadiana.org Phillip Breaux, GIS Analyst pbreaux@planacadiana.org