Skin-like soft driving system for wirelessly activated fully soft robots. Skin-like soft driving system for wirelessly activated fully soft robots. (A)

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Soft robotic device applied to the RV in a pressure overload model of RHF. Soft robotic device applied to the RV in a pressure overload model of RHF. (A.

Advertisements

Degradation of MSP samples in 37°C DPBS solution.

Basic design concept of human mimetic humanoid.

TPAD controller performance for three force components.

Soft robotic VAD concept.

Cable-driven system diagram for structure matrix.

Three different types of transfer functions with a codomain of [0,1].

TPAD training protocol.

Self-sensing of actuator position.

The RTK and examples of its usage.

Workspace comparison of Delta robots.

T2-weighted cross-sectional MR imaging of MSP swarms inside SD rats.

Ex vivo testing of the soft robotic devices.

Soft robotic device applied to the left side in a coronary ligation HF model. Soft robotic device applied to the left side in a coronary ligation HF model.

Group data during free walking between sessions 1 and 16.

Visual explanation of the interaction terms.

Soft robotic VAD implementations, control schemes, and HF models.

Visual explanation of the interaction terms.

The foldable robotic arm with seven modules assembled in series.

AEGIS intelligent targeting compared with blind targeting.

Prosthesis grasping and control.

A novice user executing various subtasks from study 1.

A shared-control method for effective bimanual robot manipulation.

Tukey boxplots overlaid on data points from objective and subjective measures, displaying results from study 1. Tukey boxplots overlaid on data points.

Soft robotic VAD implementations, control schemes, and HF models.

Tactile features for prosthesis perception.

Quasi-static and dynamic trajectories.

Online verification using reachable occupancies.

Illustration of the addressable wireless folding concept.

Cell viability tests. Cell viability tests. SEM images of (A) MC3T3-E1 cells and (B) MSCs on days 1, 3, and 5 of culture. (C) Survival rates of MC3T3-E1.

Rolling soft robot driven by integrated ring oscillator.

Overview of the key stages (sensing, perception, and interaction) during robot-assisted autism therapy. Overview of the key stages (sensing, perception,

T2-weighted cross-sectional MR imaging of MSP swarms inside SD rats.

Effect of slenderness on optimal shapes.

Soft robotic device applied to the left side in a coronary ligation HF model. Soft robotic device applied to the left side in a coronary ligation HF model.

Translation of a spherical object.

Self-sensing of actuator position.

Brain-computer interfaces.

Details of an implementation of a mechanism within the control chambers for selective lengthening of the sides of the soft robot. Details of an implementation.

Untethered kirigami-skinned soft crawlers.

Degradation of MSP samples in 37°C DPBS solution.

Soft robotic device applied to the RV in a pressure overload model of RHF. Soft robotic device applied to the RV in a pressure overload model of RHF. (A.

Steady-state performance of the soft robotic device in LHF models.

Fluorescence response of actuator.

Coadaptive movements of fully soft robotic design.

Collision resilience and foldability of the origami drone.

Simulation results of magnetic driving ability in hepatic artery, portal vein, and hepatic vein. Simulation results of magnetic driving ability in hepatic.

Folding unit based on the plane symmetric Bricard linkage.

Universal soft robotic activation based on reversible assembly.

AEGIS autonomous targeting process.

Examples of organic sensing in robotics.

Growth enables a soft robot to move its tip through constrained environments and to form 3D structures defined by the path of its tip. Growth enables a.

The RTK and examples of its usage.

Fragmented SHE design of e-skins for fine conformability.

Characterization of kirigami-skinned soft crawlers.

Laboratory tests. Laboratory tests. (A) Time lapse of the landing process, refilling process, and subsequent launch. (B) Comparison of position and velocity.

Kinematic and mechanical advantage trade-off study.

Characterization and optimization of the device.

The biomimetic pressure sensing ability.

Iron line orientation inside the PDMS matrix.

Floating microrobots with different preferred magnetization directions: Fabrication and control principles. Floating microrobots with different preferred.

Breakdown of incorrect participant responses.

Force and angular speed profiles at a contact angle of 30° and initial speed 1.2 m/s for fixed and rotary configurations on rough and smooth surfaces.

Onboard sensors enable state feedback and closed-loop control of robotic skins. Onboard sensors enable state feedback and closed-loop control of robotic.

Robot-assisted intervention system.

Robot-initiated joint attention.

Fig. 2 Daily TNC pickups and drop-offs for an average Wednesday in fall 2016 (1). Daily TNC pickups and drop-offs for an average Wednesday in fall 2016.

Recorded spatial distribution of swift parrots.

Comparison of children’s behavior between the three conditions.

Setup used in the study. Setup used in the study. A child interacts with the robot tutor with a large touchscreen sitting between them, displaying the.

Presentation transcript:

Skin-like soft driving system for wirelessly activated fully soft robots. Skin-like soft driving system for wirelessly activated fully soft robots. (A) Conceptual illustration of e-skin–mediated soft robotic assembly and wireless activation. The e-skin pair can be softly, compactly, and reversibly assembled into separate soft body frames (robot and human); wirelessly interact with each other; and then activate and control the robot, realizing fully soft robots. (B) Activating and operating behavior of the integrated soft robot visualized by thermographic mapping. In this design, dynamic actuation profiles can be shared with every robot part. (C) The embedded controlling e-skin that interacts with human for user-interactive pressure sensing. Junghwan Byun et al. Sci. Robotics 2018;3:eaas9020 Copyright © 2018 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works